Not only Burnleys number one fanClaretTony wrote:Close to going to Ipswich on loan on Thursday but in the end Ipswich considered him too big an injury risk for the wages they would have had to pay.
Now he's in the loop at Ipswich

Not only Burnleys number one fanClaretTony wrote:Close to going to Ipswich on loan on Thursday but in the end Ipswich considered him too big an injury risk for the wages they would have had to pay.
ClaretTony wrote:Quite happy for you to laugh at yourself - but your comment was absolutely wrong
ClaretTony wrote:No you can't and that is 100% fact
I can very much guarantee Man Utd were interested in Keane it was Keanes choice to go to Everton it was because of his early days experience at Utd that he preferred Everton he didn't want to re join a club that had already off loaded him previously.100% fact.ClaretTony wrote:It was only Everton
Not entirely true,I think you'll find they work side by side both parties agreed on new regulations set out a couple of years ago.ClaretTony wrote:The FA have nothing to do with work permits - it's the Home Office.
Braindead wrote:Absolutely 100%.
They have one job, to predict the weather. If they can't get it right 24 hours beforehand then yes, in my humble opinion that makes them extremely useless.
Egg on your face come 11pm tomorrowClaretTony wrote:The thing is, the manager doesn't agree with you.
Relavance??ClaretTony wrote:I can certainly confirm the agent info being the same as Ings & Austin.
Your feeble jibe at suggesting a local Journalist who because didn't tweet yesterday that this signing was happening knows nothing is just pathetic..Braindead wrote:What part of my question are you struggling with?
Would you like me to type it slower for you?
School holidays can't finish soon enough.Braindead wrote:Care to explain how YESTERDAY, Boden tweeted that there was nothing in this then?
Not so wrong after allClaretTony wrote:Nixon has been spot on this summer with us.
He said we were signing Robertson - we signed Taylor
He said we were signing Whelan - we signed Cork
He said we were signing Shawcross - Hughes said it was baloney
Plattdougcollins wrote:Gayle who?
Someone's interpretation or version of events is different to yours so it automatically becomes bullsh!tClaretTony wrote:Yes, because you were talking ******** and I'm afraid you still are. What a shame people with an agenda here are posting such nonsense.
Matterson'sVegas Claret wrote:3 posts............hmmm
IanMcL wrote:Ings watch commences.