my mate who has got things right in the past tells me the club are playing 3 triallists, one of whom is of interest to other clubs. Any ideas CT?

dougcollins wrote: ↑

Sun Aug 09, 2020 10:07 pm

Once upon a time we used to manufacture everything.

I wonder what happened?

We weren't very good at it?

I think his weaknesses would be exposed if he went to another club. Not a great kicker of the dead ball, not comfortable with the ball at his feet, goes for too many shots with his feet and not vocal enough. He is well protected here with our style of defending and I would think any capable keeper c...

So we should sign a player that can't get in the Fulham side, and which EPL team plays with just 2 midfielders?

FactualFrank wrote: ↑

Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:18 am

I coud only read a bit of that. Whoever wrote it needs sacking.

But how do you know the journo needs sacking if you haven't read the article?

Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑

Wed Jul 15, 2020 3:56 pm

A lot of people don't want to pay it, don't watch it or think it's value for money.

Maybe you should pay double and them not at all?

Why? I made a factual statement and you are being very silly.

Too much pressure on young shoulders. None of them will make it, and when they start getting released from next year they will pack in football. Ridiculous!

Every edition of match of the day still exists.

The BBC is the best value for money organisation in the entertainments and streaming services by far.

Radio, podcasts, streams, catch up, world service, world class documentaries, not to mention the TV programmes and the news. I don't begrudge paying the licence fee at all.

We don't really need posts like this that will make over 70's even more concerned than they already are.
Even if it is brought in, they can go out for walks etc. They will just be asked to avoid shops and not to get too close to others.