4-4-2. Bin it.

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
minnieclaret
Posts: 6842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2012 times
Has Liked: 2287 times
Location: lismore co. waterford

4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by minnieclaret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:07 pm

SD has shown his loyalty to players too often but even worse is his insistence on 4-4-2.
Our 2 CMs get swamped every match. It’s time to come into this century. If any two on our books were good enough they would struggle against the quality MFs they face in the PL.
We need to go 3-5-2. Bringing Collins into the CBs would create that space for a third CM. The widemen could be Lowton/Taylor or JBG/McNeil, dependant on quality of opposition but the difference maker would be in the middle. Where we could play a sitter and two flexible but one must have license to get behind the two strikers. We get no goals from MF because they are virtually permanently 20yds behind them and never get on to any poor clearances.
Loyalty is great attribute but enough is enough.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34894
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12710 times
Has Liked: 6319 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:17 pm

I'd play Roberts long before JBG, but yes, 3-5-2 is worth a try at this point

ksrclaret
Posts: 8071
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 3059 times
Has Liked: 867 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by ksrclaret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:20 pm

Definitely needs binning with the way we play it. It can still be an effective formation as it allows you to keep a good shape behind the ball and then break very directly. The problem is it requires pace in the forward areas so that the "long balls" are played into space behind the defence, rather than right in front of them up to a big target man as we do it now.

We clearly don't have that so we need to move away from it. I'd like to see us revert to the 451 we used to effectively in 2017/18, but if we were to try a 352 variant, I'd be getting Roberts on the right hand side.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by tiger76 » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:21 pm

If you don't buy a ticket you don't win the raffle. so definitely worth trying something different, as the same old tactics are not working.

Collins has to come in, and possibly Roberts too, if nothing else just to add some athleticism to our side.

And we somehow need to get Dwight involved in games as he was when he first burst onto the scene.

taio
Posts: 12828
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by taio » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:23 pm

Yes it's time to try something different although it was weeks ago.

KRBFC
Posts: 19183
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 4003 times
Has Liked: 1079 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:27 pm

How are people still suggesting JBG to start? Have we not been watching football for 3 years?
These 2 users liked this post: winsomeyen Top Claret

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3477 times
Has Liked: 5721 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by Colburn_Claret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:29 pm

442 has worked for us.
There is a right way to play 442, and a wrong way. Unfortunately we've been playing the wrong way lately. Early doors it was fine, but we didn't get the results we deserved. Now it's our negativity on the ball that is costing us, not the formation.
I wish we mixed it up more, especially during the game, whether holding on, or chasing a result, but ultimately its the players that are the problem, and their present mentality.
I would like to see Collins especially infront of the back 4, I believe we wouldn't co cede as many chances with him there, and it would free Taylor and Lowts to be more assertive in attack.

davetheclaret
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 10:48 pm
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by davetheclaret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:35 pm

minnieclaret wrote:
Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:07 pm
SD has shown his loyalty to players too often but even worse is his insistence on 4-4-2.
Our 2 CMs get swamped every match. It’s time to come into this century. If any two on our books were good enough they would struggle against the quality MFs they face in the PL.
We need to go 3-5-2. Bringing Collins into the CBs would create that space for a third CM. The widemen could be Lowton/Taylor or JBG/McNeil, dependant on quality of opposition but the difference maker would be in the middle. Where we could play a sitter and two flexible but one must have license to get behind the two strikers. We get no goals from MF because they are virtually permanently 20yds behind them and never get on to any poor clearances.
Loyalty is great attribute but enough is enough.
Im not for getting rid of our 442 but i do think against certain sides we need to change the formation, to keep the opposition guessing a lot more, by playing the same system i think it helps the opposition in their set up against us, we would currently be better with 5 in midfield, but he wont do it.

Woonderbah
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:03 am
Been Liked: 362 times
Has Liked: 416 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by Woonderbah » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:40 pm

This Saturday is as good a time as any.. we all know the result is largely irrelevant to SD but would be good to see some intent to try something positive instead of beating the same fairly worn drum.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8716
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1877 times
Has Liked: 2238 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by Woodleyclaret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:42 pm

442
Pope
Lowton Collins Mee Taylor
Roberts Westwood Brownhill Mc Neil
Wood/Barnes/Vyds/ Jay

RVclaret
Posts: 16504
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3056 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:47 pm

I want to see Dwight in the 10 role behind Wood. Give the midfielders an extra man that’s closer to pass to, as well as help them defensively against the 3’s they are often up against.

It’s a shame Cornet is now off for a month. I would have had him on the left, Lennon right, then possibly Stephens and Brownhill as a midfield two following that rubbish the other two served up yesterday.

Collins in for Tarkowski and potentially Roberts for Lowton (yes he’s been a better performer but at the end of the day something needs to change).

Pope
Roberts Collins Mee Taylor
Lennon Stephens Brownhill Cornet
McNeil
Wood

Same formation that we played in the successful 2017/18 season without the quality of Defour (a new signing this month should be a ball playing midfielder who can play those line breaking passes and be comfortable in possession).

Of course Cornet is away for a bit so we really ought to bring in another winger asap, as JBG isn’t good enough I’m afraid and can’t keep starting if we are going to start winning games.

MT03ALG
Posts: 2312
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
Been Liked: 462 times
Has Liked: 5023 times
Location: COTTON TREE

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by MT03ALG » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:50 pm

Assuming Mee and Tarkowski stay at the club, the back 3 should be Tarkowski - Collines - Mee
Build the rest of the team from the back 3.
3 central midfielders
2 wingbacks (either full backs or wingers)
2 forwards
Certainly worth a try, the wingback positions are very flexible with a 3-5-2

NewClaret
Posts: 17686
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3979 times
Has Liked: 4932 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:50 pm

4-4-2 works when your strikers are in form and scoring. Less so when they’re not. Not helpful that we have such a weak midfield because it’s hard to think of players you’d play over selecting two strikers.

Here’s hoping we strengthen there in January and it gives us more options.

welsbyswife
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Been Liked: 554 times
Has Liked: 301 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by welsbyswife » Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:54 pm

It worked when the midfield were physically in their prime. Unfortunately Cork's best days are behind him. A two with him and Westwood just can't get any foothold in the game. Brownhill gets stick but at least he has an engine. I think we have missed him.

davetheclaret
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 10:48 pm
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by davetheclaret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 7:57 pm

welsbyswife wrote:
Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:54 pm
It worked when the midfield were physically in their prime. Unfortunately Cork's best days are behind him. A two with him and Westwood just can't get any foothold in the game. Brownhill gets stick but at least he has an engine. I think we have missed him.
We have missed him, he gets stick from people who don't understand the game, the same ones who want to drop McNeil.

warksclaret
Posts: 8764
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2330 times
Has Liked: 1293 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jan 03, 2022 9:17 pm

Its also time for SD to grow a pair and bring Collins into defence.His choice as to who he replaces, but my choice would be to pair him with Tarkowski . You cant go one win in 20, let stupid goals in, and not make changes .He is the most promising player we have, and keeping him out in a team on a losing run is highly demotivating. In midfield we need someone yesterday who can go straight in to replace Cork. In attack decide who the front two are and give them a run. Again grow a pair and drop Wood. He has been more than loyal to a group of players contributing sweet fa
This user liked this post: Superjohnnyfrancis

Johma
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2021 9:32 am
Been Liked: 33 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by Johma » Mon Jan 03, 2022 9:35 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:27 pm
How are people still suggesting JBG to start? Have we not been watching football for 3 years?
JBG has never brought anything to the table to improve us
Hes simply a teamsheet filler

IanMcL
Posts: 34805
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6949 times
Has Liked: 10368 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by IanMcL » Mon Jan 03, 2022 11:30 pm

I will leave it to Mr Dyche.

FCBurnley
Posts: 11619
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2291 times
Has Liked: 1379 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by FCBurnley » Mon Jan 03, 2022 11:52 pm

Here is a list of who I believe are our 11 best players ( in no particular order)

Pope
Lowton
Tarks
Mee
Taylor
Collins
Cornet
Westwood
Brownhill
McNeil
Wood

Now mold them into team that gets the best out of all of them. It’s not that difficult

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3544
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 944 times
Has Liked: 582 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:33 am

We have so many options, but we never try the options. People moan about players not being effective or losing value or pace as they age, but we can accommodate that. Cork played center half at Southampton when he was 27. We could go 3 at the back , one of them a ball player, and seeing everything in front of him. Pieters, im sure, would be a calm foil in front of 2 centre halves at the back of a 5.
Jay Rod has lost that pace to chase around with. But has that tricky clever brain that would make him a prompting 10.

But we never do this because? We just go 442.

superdimitri
Posts: 5120
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1046 times
Has Liked: 739 times

Re: 4-4-2. Bin it.

Post by superdimitri » Wed Jan 05, 2022 7:54 am

I'm a believer of sticking to what you know and not changing things round so much when you're doing badly.
Making big changes is more something to do gradually and you slowly adjust the squad too as some players move on and new ones come in.

The obvious issue with changing the system is the players in our squad. To start playing with 3 central midfielders we'd need to get another. One spare just isn't enough. McNeil can certainly play there too but they also means we would be one winger down.

5 at the back? 433? Similar story. We'd only have one backup.

And then you have to think playing with one striker when we have 4 on the books doesn't add up either.

The premise of our play this season has been to sit deep like we have before, but we've also worked a lot on pressing our opponents more aggressively than we have done before. Unfortunately the more aggressive press means we're caught out more often. The 442 system suits the players we have and the way they play. They can't keep the ball well so knocking it forward fast and trying to make space behind our opponent's has always been the way.

In other words, direct, counter attacking football a bit like Leicester played when they won the league.

But the problem with this system is that we lack pace. We knock the ball for Wood to try and run on to but he's not fast and he is often caught out for trying to make the runs onside. If we had pace it would work a lot better.. but playing long balls and trying out physique our opponents is what Dyche believes is our best strength.

In the long term if we can't get pace then we really should look at changing the system and the squad but right now it should be back to basics and hope we have enough grit to get over the line.

Post Reply