Stale is very much the word i would use agreenwood,they had 2 big lads in Hanley and Gibson and we keep hoofing balls into their box and some say we don't play hoofball, its all Westwoods done for ages hit hope balls.agreenwood wrote: ↑Sun Apr 10, 2022 4:15 pmThere aren’t many managers who have been in charge as long as Dyche had, so the sample size is tiny. However, there’s a distinct feeling of staleness about all we do.
I don’t actively want him gone, but if it was announced tomorrow that he was leaving in the summer, I wouldn’t be concerned.
Go now Dyche
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 10:48 pm
- Been Liked: 14 times
Re: Go now Dyche
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 337 times
- Has Liked: 1519 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Go now Dyche
And that style of football hasn't worked for ages either. We've always played direct football under Dyche but we used to hit the right balls forward for the right players. Now its up high regardless of whether it's a 6'6" forward or a 5'6" forward up top.davetheclaret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 5:40 pmStale is very much the word i would use agreenwood,they had 2 big lads in Hanley and Gibson and we keep hoofing balls into their box and some say we don't play hoofball, its all Westwoods done for ages hit hope balls.
Dyche's interview after the Everton game puzzled me. He made reference to the type of balls forward not always being the right ones which tells me the players were the ones playing their own style of play, not a style to his instructions.
-
- Posts: 8765
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2330 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: Go now Dyche
Thats very true-hard to beat and an element of creativity and class. The fact we have had about 5 years to find another "Steven Defour" says everything about our club. Lacking in vision and planning. Instead we now have two ageing CM's in Westwood and Cork, and Brownhill who at best is combative but posseses little creativity. We have gone backwards in CM from a period when we had Defour,a young and energetic Hendrick and a Cork (the latter at the top of his game and rewarded with an England cap)
This user liked this post: tiger76
Re: Go now Dyche
We saw in our championship season, that our manager is very capable of playing, winning, expansive, football.
Being in anyone else and you lose half a season, while they fanny about. We only have one go at a return, most probably.
Dyche is a very claddy manager, with footballers all praising his management.
As for not replacing Defour, see previous chairman thread.
Being in anyone else and you lose half a season, while they fanny about. We only have one go at a return, most probably.
Dyche is a very claddy manager, with footballers all praising his management.
As for not replacing Defour, see previous chairman thread.
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 10:48 pm
- Been Liked: 14 times
Re: Go now Dyche
If we play the same balls into the box against West Ham Dawson and Zoumar will lap it up. Now i may get shot down for what im about to say next but for me replacing Westwood with McNeil could well be a start to stopping the aimless balls, weather he would just play square or backwards balls to Taylor or Lawton for them to hoof forward i don't know but he would bring some energy into midfield and he can find a pass, i think he'd get forward more as well. Many will say it isn't the right time to make such a change things, and tha'ts a fair point, but if we don't change things we'll continue to have the same outcome.
-
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 3108 times
- Has Liked: 4870 times
Re: Go now Dyche
Nothing to lose...we're going down with a whimper as things standdavetheclaret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 6:22 pmIf we play the same balls into the box against West Ham Dawson and Zoumar will lap it up. Now i may get shot down for what im about to say next but for me replacing Westwood with McNeil could well be a start to stopping the aimless balls, weather he would just play square or backwards balls to Taylor or Lawton for them to hoof forward i don't know but he would bring some energy into midfield and he can find a pass, i think he'd get forward more as well. Many will say it isn't the right time to make such a change things, and tha'ts a fair point, but if we don't change things we'll continue to have the same outcome.
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Go now Dyche
I humbly suggest we blame Garlick for our midfield that’s not up to the challenge, not SD.
-
- Posts: 17375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7837 times
Re: Go now Dyche
Yes, in the last 18 months he has been conspicuous in his absenceLowbankclaret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:04 pmI humbly suggest we blame Garlick for our midfield that’s not up to the challenge, not SD.

Re: Go now Dyche
I think that’s pretty harsh. What if Garlick was willing to spend but Dyche reluctant to pull the trigger on certain players? What if player X and Y, who Garlick was prepared to sign, didn’t want to join Burnley because of our style of play? What if the said players didn’t want to join Burnley as they know they have to wait 10 games or an injury / suspension to get a game?Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:04 pmI humbly suggest we blame Garlick for our midfield that’s not up to the challenge, not SD.
And why not blame Pace and co? They spent close to 40m this season but not a single penny on a midfielder. Why? Or Is it Dyche who doesn’t see that position as a priority? Was he happy to go with Westy, Browny and Corky?
This user liked this post: tiger76
-
- Posts: 5310
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1520 times
- Has Liked: 1503 times
Re: Go now Dyche
Were you just miffed he didn't start with McNeill yesterday? A player who has done the square root of nothing this season
You told us all on the match thread yesterday what a genius you are when McNeill put his one good ball in this season . You have too high an opinion of what you think you know I would offer
Re: Go now Dyche
Definitely should have started our most creative player / only player capable of delivering quality against a side who were looking to sit deep, that’s for sure. Another poor move from Dyche who is quite inflexible when it comes to adapting to opposition.Elizabeth wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:31 pmWere you just miffed he didn't start with McNeill yesterday? A player who has done the square root of nothing this season
You told us all on the match thread yesterday what a genius you are when McNeill put his one good ball in this season . You have too high an opinion of what you think you know I would offer
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Go now Dyche
Mr Garlick saved 50 million in Burnley’s bank, which went straight into his bank account on the sale of the club. I am sure that would have bought a good midfielder..RVclaret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:13 pmI think that’s pretty harsh. What if Garlick was willing to spend but Dyche reluctant to pull the trigger on certain players? What if player X and Y, who Garlick was prepared to sign, didn’t want to join Burnley because of our style of play? What if the said players didn’t want to join Burnley as they know they have to wait 10 games or an injury / suspension to get a game?
And why not blame Pace and co? They spent close to 40m this season but not a single penny on a midfielder. Why? Or Is it Dyche who doesn’t see that position as a priority? Was he happy to go with Westy, Browny and Corky?
Re: Go now Dyche
That’s a completely inaccurate statement and if you’d been following any of the finance related threads you might know whyLowbankclaret wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:12 pmMr Garlick saved 50 million in Burnley’s bank, which went straight into his bank account on the sale of the club. I am sure that would have bought a good midfielder..
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times