Go now Dyche

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
davetheclaret
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 10:48 pm
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by davetheclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 5:40 pm

agreenwood wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 4:15 pm
There aren’t many managers who have been in charge as long as Dyche had, so the sample size is tiny. However, there’s a distinct feeling of staleness about all we do.

I don’t actively want him gone, but if it was announced tomorrow that he was leaving in the summer, I wouldn’t be concerned.
Stale is very much the word i would use agreenwood,they had 2 big lads in Hanley and Gibson and we keep hoofing balls into their box and some say we don't play hoofball, its all Westwoods done for ages hit hope balls.

bf2k
Posts: 1437
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 1519 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by bf2k » Mon Apr 11, 2022 5:49 pm

davetheclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 5:40 pm
Stale is very much the word i would use agreenwood,they had 2 big lads in Hanley and Gibson and we keep hoofing balls into their box and some say we don't play hoofball, its all Westwoods done for ages hit hope balls.
And that style of football hasn't worked for ages either. We've always played direct football under Dyche but we used to hit the right balls forward for the right players. Now its up high regardless of whether it's a 6'6" forward or a 5'6" forward up top.

Dyche's interview after the Everton game puzzled me. He made reference to the type of balls forward not always being the right ones which tells me the players were the ones playing their own style of play, not a style to his instructions.

warksclaret
Posts: 8765
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2330 times
Has Liked: 1293 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by warksclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 6:10 pm

Murger wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:41 am
We played our best football under Dyche when he had Defour at his disposal. Why didn't he build on that? It's because he's a negative manager who can't help what he is.
Thats very true-hard to beat and an element of creativity and class. The fact we have had about 5 years to find another "Steven Defour" says everything about our club. Lacking in vision and planning. Instead we now have two ageing CM's in Westwood and Cork, and Brownhill who at best is combative but posseses little creativity. We have gone backwards in CM from a period when we had Defour,a young and energetic Hendrick and a Cork (the latter at the top of his game and rewarded with an England cap)
This user liked this post: tiger76

IanMcL
Posts: 34805
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6949 times
Has Liked: 10368 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by IanMcL » Mon Apr 11, 2022 6:19 pm

We saw in our championship season, that our manager is very capable of playing, winning, expansive, football.

Being in anyone else and you lose half a season, while they fanny about. We only have one go at a return, most probably.

Dyche is a very claddy manager, with footballers all praising his management.

As for not replacing Defour, see previous chairman thread.

davetheclaret
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 10:48 pm
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by davetheclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 6:22 pm

If we play the same balls into the box against West Ham Dawson and Zoumar will lap it up. Now i may get shot down for what im about to say next but for me replacing Westwood with McNeil could well be a start to stopping the aimless balls, weather he would just play square or backwards balls to Taylor or Lawton for them to hoof forward i don't know but he would bring some energy into midfield and he can find a pass, i think he'd get forward more as well. Many will say it isn't the right time to make such a change things, and tha'ts a fair point, but if we don't change things we'll continue to have the same outcome.

randomclaret2
Posts: 7844
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 3108 times
Has Liked: 4870 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by randomclaret2 » Mon Apr 11, 2022 6:28 pm

davetheclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 6:22 pm
If we play the same balls into the box against West Ham Dawson and Zoumar will lap it up. Now i may get shot down for what im about to say next but for me replacing Westwood with McNeil could well be a start to stopping the aimless balls, weather he would just play square or backwards balls to Taylor or Lawton for them to hoof forward i don't know but he would bring some energy into midfield and he can find a pass, i think he'd get forward more as well. Many will say it isn't the right time to make such a change things, and tha'ts a fair point, but if we don't change things we'll continue to have the same outcome.
Nothing to lose...we're going down with a whimper as things stand

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6623
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1238 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by Lowbankclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:04 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:34 pm
Can you blame people for wanting a change from watching league Two standard football with 14 wins from the past 68 games?

Times change, there was more a feel good factor around the club the last few times, without mentioning it was over 6 seasons ago.
I humbly suggest we blame Garlick for our midfield that’s not up to the challenge, not SD.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 7837 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by boatshed bill » Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:11 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:04 pm
I humbly suggest we blame Garlick for our midfield that’s not up to the challenge, not SD.
Yes, in the last 18 months he has been conspicuous in his absence ;)

RVclaret
Posts: 16505
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3056 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by RVclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:13 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:04 pm
I humbly suggest we blame Garlick for our midfield that’s not up to the challenge, not SD.
I think that’s pretty harsh. What if Garlick was willing to spend but Dyche reluctant to pull the trigger on certain players? What if player X and Y, who Garlick was prepared to sign, didn’t want to join Burnley because of our style of play? What if the said players didn’t want to join Burnley as they know they have to wait 10 games or an injury / suspension to get a game?

And why not blame Pace and co? They spent close to 40m this season but not a single penny on a midfielder. Why? Or Is it Dyche who doesn’t see that position as a priority? Was he happy to go with Westy, Browny and Corky?
This user liked this post: tiger76

Elizabeth
Posts: 5310
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1520 times
Has Liked: 1503 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by Elizabeth » Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:31 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:13 pm

Was he happy to go with Westy, Browny and Corky?
Were you just miffed he didn't start with McNeill yesterday? A player who has done the square root of nothing this season
You told us all on the match thread yesterday what a genius you are when McNeill put his one good ball in this season . You have too high an opinion of what you think you know I would offer

RVclaret
Posts: 16505
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3056 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by RVclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:10 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:31 pm
Were you just miffed he didn't start with McNeill yesterday? A player who has done the square root of nothing this season
You told us all on the match thread yesterday what a genius you are when McNeill put his one good ball in this season . You have too high an opinion of what you think you know I would offer
Definitely should have started our most creative player / only player capable of delivering quality against a side who were looking to sit deep, that’s for sure. Another poor move from Dyche who is quite inflexible when it comes to adapting to opposition.

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6623
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1238 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by Lowbankclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:12 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:13 pm
I think that’s pretty harsh. What if Garlick was willing to spend but Dyche reluctant to pull the trigger on certain players? What if player X and Y, who Garlick was prepared to sign, didn’t want to join Burnley because of our style of play? What if the said players didn’t want to join Burnley as they know they have to wait 10 games or an injury / suspension to get a game?

And why not blame Pace and co? They spent close to 40m this season but not a single penny on a midfielder. Why? Or Is it Dyche who doesn’t see that position as a priority? Was he happy to go with Westy, Browny and Corky?
Mr Garlick saved 50 million in Burnley’s bank, which went straight into his bank account on the sale of the club. I am sure that would have bought a good midfielder..

RVclaret
Posts: 16505
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3056 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by RVclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:39 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:12 pm
Mr Garlick saved 50 million in Burnley’s bank, which went straight into his bank account on the sale of the club. I am sure that would have bought a good midfielder..
That’s a completely inaccurate statement and if you’d been following any of the finance related threads you might know why

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6623
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1238 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Go now Dyche

Post by Lowbankclaret » Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:47 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 11, 2022 8:39 pm
That’s a completely inaccurate statement and if you’d been following any of the finance related threads you might know why
Perhaps you can link the relevant part. It was kind of how I understood it. Feel free to re-educate me.

Post Reply