It’s going to cost us.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:54 am
- Been Liked: 7 times
- Has Liked: 4 times
It’s going to cost us.
Don’t like Jack backing into the keeper on corners
can just see us getting pulled for it if we score
please just don’t do it.
-
- Posts: 5682
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 2027 times
- Has Liked: 2063 times
Re: It’s going to cost us.
I thought this myself on Thursday night.
This user liked this post: newchurchbfc
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: It’s going to cost us.
Agree, it has been a tactic employed by several clubs in the past, but officials now differentiate between a player who is just standing in the way and one who actively prevents the goalkeeper from attempting to play the ball. Jack often falls wrong side of that distinction.newchurchbfc wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 6:55 pmDon’t like Jack backing into the keeper on cornerscan just see us getting pulled for it if we score
please just don’t do it.
This user liked this post: newchurchbfc
Re: It’s going to cost
Just as the ball was being crossed for our second goal Forster shoved Cork out of the way . Think a penalty would have given before the offside that was appealed for.
In the second half it happened again but instead of awarding a penalty the ref had a word with Forster. He didn’t shove Cork again. Nothing wrong with standing your ground
In the second half it happened again but instead of awarding a penalty the ref had a word with Forster. He didn’t shove Cork again. Nothing wrong with standing your ground
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: It’s going to cost
See above - and no standing ground is different than active ‘obstruction’. Watching the game back against Southampton I noticed the ‘expert’ (former Wolves striker, name fails me) commentator, when a Southampton player deliberately led on the ball when he lost control, “that’s not a foul” - DEAD WRONG, not only was it a foul, deliberate obstruction of the ball has ALWAYS been a foul.Joe Buck wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 7:24 pmJust as the ball was being crossed for our second goal Forster shoved Cork out of the way . Think a penalty would have given before the offside that was appealed for.
In the second half it happened again but instead of awarding a penalty the ref had a word with Forster. He didn’t shove Cork again. Nothing wrong with standing your ground
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
Re: It’s going to cost us.
I wouldn't trust most co-commentators (ie [ex]players) to know the actual rules. They just know what they could get away with
-
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1862 times
- Has Liked: 2716 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: It’s going to cost
However, they were awarded the free kick! I can only think that it was because our lads tried to extricate the ball and, in these modern times, would have been deemed to be 'endangering their opponent' or using 'excessive force' ---the game has gone soft!elwaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 7:32 pmSee above - and no standing ground is different than active ‘obstruction’. Watching the game back against Southampton I noticed the ‘expert’ (former Wolves striker, name fails me) commentator, when a Southampton player deliberately led on the ball when he lost control, “that’s not a foul” - DEAD WRONG, not only was it a foul, deliberate obstruction of the ball has ALWAYS been a foul.
-
- Posts: 9569
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2203 times
- Has Liked: 3102 times
Re: It’s going to cost
Where they, could not remember which way it was given… I think I was in shock an ex-pro could be so ignorant of a age old BASIC rule of the game.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 7:55 pmHowever, they were awarded the free kick! I can only think that it was because our lads tried to extricate the ball and, in these modern times, would have been deemed to be 'endangering their opponent' or using 'excessive force' ---the game has gone soft!
-
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1862 times
- Has Liked: 2716 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: It’s going to cost
I always have the sound muted when I watch games on TV ----enjoy them much more without the inane mumblings of whoever.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 7:59 pmWhere they, could not remember which way it was given… I think I was in shock an ex-pro could be so ignorant of a age old BASIC rule of the game.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1
-
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2020 4:27 pm
- Been Liked: 37 times
- Has Liked: 313 times
Re: It’s going to cost
Same here, wish they still had the "crowd noise" only optionAshingtonclaret46 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 8:32 pmI always have the sound muted when I watch games on TV ----enjoy them much more without the inane mumblings of whoever.
-
- Posts: 17187
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7717 times
Re: It’s going to cost us.
I love it.
Re: It’s going to cost us.
As a goalkeeper I'm all for being able to push everyone out if the way to get to the ball. If you're in the six yard box expect to get clattered...
Re: It’s going to cost us.
I must be the only 1 who doesn't mind Don Goodman.
-
- Posts: 17187
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7717 times
Re: It’s going to cost us.
I wonder if his absence has been an important factor in our reduced affectiveness at corners?
-
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 823 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: It’s going to cost us.
For backing into the keeper, see standing his ground.
No problem, no foul.
No problem, no foul.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2343 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: It’s going to cost us.
Unless he costs us for offside cos he didn't clear out quick enough.
-
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
- Been Liked: 573 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
-
- Posts: 5114
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Re: It’s going to cost us.
Wardy did it for years for us. Goalkeepers get far too protected nowadays.
-
- Posts: 10447
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3070 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: It’s going to cost us.
I liked the corner we used against Everton a while back. We stood a player behind Pickford then played the corner over the top to the far post. Wood headed it in but because the ball had gone over our other player he had committed no foul by standing his ground.
Sweet, we should use it more often.
Sweet, we should use it more often.
-
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 823 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo