Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Neil
Posts: 731
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 263 times
Has Liked: 28 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Neil » Sun May 15, 2022 12:55 pm

Spent a good 8 seconds reviewing it

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12966
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5501 times
Has Liked: 961 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sun May 15, 2022 12:55 pm

Barnes is a clown. If you try and make yourself bigger to block the ball and it hits your outstretched arm then by todays rules its a penalty.

Cant believe we're stuck with Barnes up front for the key run in games.
This user liked this post: Steddyman

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 6605
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2751 times
Has Liked: 1612 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by gandhisflipflop » Sun May 15, 2022 12:56 pm

These referees and VAR are ruining the game

jedi_master
Posts: 8276
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4139 times
Has Liked: 1144 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by jedi_master » Sun May 15, 2022 12:56 pm

Tall Paul wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:55 pm
There is no conspiracy.

It's a penalty and it would have been given at either end.
It was hit at his arm from about 45 cm away.

FCBurnley
Posts: 11618
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2291 times
Has Liked: 1379 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by FCBurnley » Sun May 15, 2022 12:56 pm

If Barnes can get his arm to a shot from 3 feet he needs to play in goal. Insane rule

IanMcL
Posts: 34804
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6949 times
Has Liked: 10367 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by IanMcL » Sun May 15, 2022 12:56 pm

S c u m. No other word for the prem and their desire to promote the interests of the few and cleanse themselves of honest, small clubs.
Last edited by IanMcL on Sun May 15, 2022 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 2 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland longsidepies

jojomk1
Posts: 5669
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 978 times
Has Liked: 654 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by jojomk1 » Sun May 15, 2022 12:56 pm

Harsh

But why does he have his arm so far away from his body

Not much of an effort from Pope !
This user liked this post: AwayClaret

Tread Warily
Posts: 304
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:02 pm
Been Liked: 24 times
Has Liked: 123 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Tread Warily » Sun May 15, 2022 12:57 pm

It did'nt touch his arm

SussexDon1inIreland
Posts: 6217
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:23 pm
Been Liked: 1277 times
Has Liked: 8528 times
Location: Greystones Ireland

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by SussexDon1inIreland » Sun May 15, 2022 12:57 pm

I have no problem whatsoever with losing this game but only IF it is fair and square not like this
It touched his arm but didn’t change its direction and it didn’t adversely affect Spurs
All that hard work thanks Friend
This user liked this post: Boss Hogg

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6831
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2126 times
Has Liked: 1061 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by BurnleyFC » Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm

And they wonder why fans dislike referees so much.

Step forward Mr Piggy Kevin Friend. You utter ****.

Wadesawinger
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:06 am
Been Liked: 21 times
Has Liked: 71 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Wadesawinger » Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm

NEVER touched his arm 😳

RVclaret
Posts: 16503
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3056 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by RVclaret » Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm

Its an absolute farcical rule to lose a goal for that but is the ‘letter of the law’ to award a pen.

IanMcL
Posts: 34804
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6949 times
Has Liked: 10367 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by IanMcL » Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm

jojomk1 wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:56 pm
Harsh

But why does he have his arm so far away from his body

Not much of an effort from Pope !
Pope had no chance with a pen like that. Had Kane banged it down the middle, he would have got it. More go down the middle.

jojomk1
Posts: 5669
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 978 times
Has Liked: 654 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by jojomk1 » Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm

Neil wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:55 pm
Spent a good 8 seconds reviewing it
Showing he thought it was a pen and didn't need more than 8 seconds to make up his mind

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by SalisburyClaret » Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm

jojomk1 wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:56 pm
Harsh

But why does he have his arm so far away from his body

Not much of an effort from Pope !
The defender was wrestling with him and that’s where his arm ended up.

Elbarad
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:46 pm
Been Liked: 161 times
Has Liked: 55 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Elbarad » Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm

Pope never moves. But to be fair wouldn’t have mattered. Right at the post.

Tall Paul
Posts: 7440
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2651 times
Has Liked: 735 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Tall Paul » Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:56 pm
It was hit at his arm from about 45 cm away.
It's still a penalty. Barnes' arm shouldn't have been outstretched like that, it's the definition of an unnatural position.

It's a sucker blow after all the hard work in that half, but talks of conspiracy are batshit mental.
This user liked this post: tiger76

FCBurnley
Posts: 11618
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2291 times
Has Liked: 1379 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by FCBurnley » Sun May 15, 2022 12:59 pm

We have been superb and do not deserve to be behind. Spurs were totally frustrated and would never have scored. You just knew the refs would find a way

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3942
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 1016 times
Has Liked: 1205 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Boss Hogg » Sun May 15, 2022 12:59 pm

Tread Warily wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:57 pm
It did'nt touch his arm
That’s what I thought.

jedi_master
Posts: 8276
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4139 times
Has Liked: 1144 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by jedi_master » Sun May 15, 2022 12:59 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm
Its an absolute farcical rule to lose a goal for that but is the ‘letter of the law’ to award a pen.
What about distance from ball being hit to hitting arm? That so often discounts ‘penalties’ like that. It was no more than 40/50cm at best from his arm when the player hits the ball.

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 735 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Sun May 15, 2022 12:59 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:55 pm
Barnes is a clown. If you try and make yourself bigger to block the ball and it hits your outstretched arm then by todays rules its a penalty.

Cant believe we're stuck with Barnes up front for the key run in games.
Not now DA.
This user liked this post: longsidepies

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by tiger76 » Sun May 15, 2022 12:59 pm

Terrible time to concede after really frustrating them for much of the half, might consider the pen harsh, but in this era if you have your arm outstretched you always run the risk of a spot kick being awarded I'm afraid.

Plenty to take from that half, and if we can stick in until the last 15-20 mins then Spurs will get nervous as they need the 3 points.

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 735 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Sun May 15, 2022 1:00 pm

The integrity of the game has gone.
This user liked this post: longsidepies

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4955
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1231 times
Has Liked: 1907 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by tarkys_ears » Sun May 15, 2022 1:00 pm

Anything to appease the "top 4"

Honestly, I wish they'd have all ****** off to this so-called Super League.

See how much money they make from soft penalties and rolling around like fairies.

FCBurnley
Posts: 11618
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2291 times
Has Liked: 1379 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by FCBurnley » Sun May 15, 2022 1:00 pm

Tall Paul wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm
It's still a penalty. Barnes' arm shouldn't have been outstretched like that, it's the definition of an unnatural position.

It's a sucker blow after all the hard work in that half, but talks of conspiracy are batshit mental.
Arm outstretched for balance is not an unnatural Position
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace

burnleymik
Posts: 5743
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1300 times
Has Liked: 3162 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by burnleymik » Sun May 15, 2022 1:00 pm

I think it feels more unjust because of how well the lads did in that first half. They really didn't deserve that.
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace

SydneyClaret
Posts: 214
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:19 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by SydneyClaret » Sun May 15, 2022 1:00 pm

What an absolute joke. From half a metre away. Who is on the VAR. Friend was scared to say no once he’d been sent to the monitor. Some **** wants Spurs in the champions league.

jedi_master
Posts: 8276
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4139 times
Has Liked: 1144 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by jedi_master » Sun May 15, 2022 1:00 pm

Tall Paul wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm
It's still a penalty. Barnes' arm shouldn't have been outstretched like that, it's the definition of an unnatural position.

It's a sucker blow after all the hard work in that half, but talks of conspiracy are batshit mental.
It’s outstretched in the context of the slow mo replay point of contact, watch the full passage of play and see why it’s there. It’s not in any way imaginable from it that Barnes is sticking his arm out to block the ball/gain an advantage.

elwaclaret
Posts: 9617
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2223 times
Has Liked: 3120 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by elwaclaret » Sun May 15, 2022 1:01 pm

Absolute nonsense penalty, only given by officials who have no idea about playing the game.

Cleveleys_claret
Posts: 3133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
Been Liked: 973 times
Has Liked: 593 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Cleveleys_claret » Sun May 15, 2022 1:01 pm

He was pulled back a little and tried to position himself, he used his arm as leverage to try to not fall back and get himself back up, causing his arm to be outstretched, yes it shouldnt have been there but the contact against him leading to him shouldnt have happened

FCBurnley
Posts: 11618
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2291 times
Has Liked: 1379 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by FCBurnley » Sun May 15, 2022 1:01 pm

Where did the 4 mins come from. Was Cornet down for that long ??

NewClaret
Posts: 17684
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3979 times
Has Liked: 4932 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by NewClaret » Sun May 15, 2022 1:01 pm

I agree, how can an outstretched arm when jumping for a header be an unnatural position?

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3301
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 746 times
Has Liked: 664 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by BabylonClaret » Sun May 15, 2022 1:02 pm

That's way harsh. Shocker

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20610
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4540 times
Has Liked: 2047 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by ElectroClaret » Sun May 15, 2022 1:03 pm

Replay shows it definitely connected with his arm.

Brisliam
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 13 times
Has Liked: 39 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Brisliam » Sun May 15, 2022 1:03 pm

Watching on TV. Kevin Friend absolutely loved the fact he got to give that. He stepped away from the monitor, intentionally paused and then smugly smiled as he pointed for penalty.
This user liked this post: AwayClaret

Fretters
Posts: 3062
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:56 am
Been Liked: 1215 times
Has Liked: 658 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Fretters » Sun May 15, 2022 1:04 pm

It did touch his arm and it was a penalty with the modern rules. Hopefully this will fire us up to get back into it.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20610
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4540 times
Has Liked: 2047 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by ElectroClaret » Sun May 15, 2022 1:04 pm

Kicked off in the tunnel at HT.

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3301
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 746 times
Has Liked: 664 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by BabylonClaret » Sun May 15, 2022 1:04 pm

Tall Paul wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:55 pm
There is no conspiracy.

It's a penalty and it would have been given at either end.
We've had claims that not given for us

jedi_master
Posts: 8276
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4139 times
Has Liked: 1144 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by jedi_master » Sun May 15, 2022 1:05 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 1:03 pm
Replay shows it definitely connected with his arm.
If I walk up to you and belt a football at your arm from 40cm away from you it will connect with your arm.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Milltown1882
Posts: 3573
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
Been Liked: 1266 times
Has Liked: 911 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Milltown1882 » Sun May 15, 2022 1:05 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 1:04 pm
Kicked off in the tunnel at HT.
Bardsley straight in there.

taio
Posts: 12828
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by taio » Sun May 15, 2022 1:05 pm

Brisliam wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 1:03 pm
Watching on TV. Kevin Friend absolutely loved the fact he got to give that. He stepped away from the monitor, intentionally paused and then smugly smiled as he pointed for penalty.
Probably the right decision albeit hard to take but I thought exactly the same about his smug pause... the t**t

Vino blanco
Posts: 5714
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 2038 times
Has Liked: 2068 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Vino blanco » Sun May 15, 2022 1:06 pm

Very harsh penalty but under current interpretations thats what is given. I would bring Weghorst on and take Barnes off, we need to hold the ball going forward.

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4402
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1621 times
Has Liked: 697 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by LoveCurryPies » Sun May 15, 2022 1:06 pm

Time for a substitution? Weghurst on?

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 6605
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2751 times
Has Liked: 1612 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by gandhisflipflop » Sun May 15, 2022 1:06 pm

The ref has given Jackson’s team talk at half time for him. Those lads have done great in that first half and if there’s any justice, they will come out all fired up and we will get something from today.

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4955
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1231 times
Has Liked: 1907 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by tarkys_ears » Sun May 15, 2022 1:06 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 1:04 pm
Kicked off in the tunnel at HT.
Good

DCWat
Posts: 9974
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4500 times
Has Liked: 3921 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by DCWat » Sun May 15, 2022 1:07 pm

Whether it was a penalty or not (far too soft for my liking, whatever the modern rules say) huge credit to the players, they’d done a great job, defended really well as a team and even created the odd moment.

Got to not let that decision impact us in the second half, keep going as we were and keep it tight.
This user liked this post: Tall Paul

FCBurnley
Posts: 11618
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2291 times
Has Liked: 1379 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by FCBurnley » Sun May 15, 2022 1:07 pm

Refs are deciding who stays up and who goes into CL etc. corruption at the highest level. Spurs needed a helping hand and got 1 from the ref not from Barnes. And yes I saw the smirk. Not once but twice. Once before saying he was going to look at monitor and one after

Stayingup
Posts: 5951
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 985 times
Has Liked: 2987 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Stayingup » Sun May 15, 2022 1:08 pm

A bloke on the BBC comments on the match says Burnley are a joke and he hopes they go down. I dont have an account on the BBC or I would say and what a laugh we all had when they beat Spurs earlier in tge seaon at Turf Moor. These guys.

Marty Dobson
Posts: 502
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 92 times
Has Liked: 261 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Marty Dobson » Sun May 15, 2022 1:08 pm

quote=KefkaClaret post_id=1811627 time=1652615518 user_id=2478]
Why does he have his arm there
[/quote]
Because it's connected to his body and he was pushed in the chest. Shoulda been a free out.

Neil
Posts: 731
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 263 times
Has Liked: 28 times

Re: Match Thread; Spurs v Clarets

Post by Neil » Sun May 15, 2022 1:08 pm

jojomk1 wrote:
Sun May 15, 2022 12:58 pm
Showing he thought it was a pen and didn't need more than 8 seconds to make up his mind
They spent two to three minutes reviewing it before asking the ref to check it on screen. Surely he should be looking at all the angles before making such a massive decision. Probably was a pen with the new rules but think he jumped on it too quickly. Definitely a tough one to take.

Post Reply