Academy

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
warksclaret
Posts: 8517
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2259 times
Has Liked: 1241 times

Academy

Post by warksclaret » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:24 am

Being reported in Training Ground Guru that we and WBA have lost our Cat 1 status. Dont know if its true or a very old story, so dont shoot me down

RVclaret
Posts: 16200
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3007 times

Re: Academy

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:28 am

Yeah I’ve seen this.

‘Situation slightly unclear with Burnley as they submitted a detailed letter of mitigation to Professional Game Board, who have asked for further information.

But as things stand they've lost Cat 1 status/ looks like legal action would be only remaining option’

ClaretTony
Posts: 76611
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37336 times
Has Liked: 5701 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Academy

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:31 am

Looked as though we had a chance last week but if this is the case then what a shocking state of affairs

aggi
Posts: 9648
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Academy

Post by aggi » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 am

Latest seems to be that they have lost it but the article is a bit unclear on whether that is being further appealed.

The PGB agreed with PGAAC's decision to withdraw Burnley's Category One licence, which had been granted on a provisional two-year basis in July 2020 (it had been provisional because Covid meant full on-site audits were not possible in 2020).

Burnley did submit a detailed ‘letter of mitigation’, along with supporting documents, arguing that the failings identified by auditors at the start of this year had been down to Covid.

The PGB have asked for further information and Burnley believe the process is still ongoing. But, as things stand, the Clarets will lose their Category One status from the start of next season. As the PGB is English football’s final arbiter, Burnley would need to mount a legal challenge through the courts in order to try and overturn their demotion.


https://trainingground.guru/articles/bu ... emy-status

agreenwood
Posts: 4458
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2461 times
Has Liked: 352 times

Re: Academy

Post by agreenwood » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:38 am

What isn’t clear is whether these are recent failings or if we’d have never got it in the first place in 2020 if Covid had allowed a full inspection.

Other clubs have been placed in “special measures”, but we’ve just been downgraded. So either that’s a pretty rapid and significant deterioration or we were lucky to get Cat 1 in 2020.
Last edited by agreenwood on Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76611
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37336 times
Has Liked: 5701 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Academy

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:39 am

agreenwood wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:38 am
What isn’t clear is whether these are recent failings or if we’d have never got it in the first place in 2020 if Covid had allowed a full inspection.
I have been led to believe it is the staffing levels now as much as anything else. Like every other department in the club, it appears there has been a massive turnover of staff in the last 12-18 months.

RVclaret
Posts: 16200
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3007 times

Re: Academy

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:47 am

How long do you need to wait until you can lodge for a promotion back to Cat 1?

Longsidelenny1882
Posts: 908
Joined: Sun May 31, 2020 5:26 pm
Been Liked: 211 times

Re: Academy

Post by Longsidelenny1882 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:09 am

It all went down hill when Dr Pepper left very sad news utc
This user liked this post: Spike

The Enclosure
Posts: 4486
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
Been Liked: 990 times
Has Liked: 3266 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Academy

Post by The Enclosure » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:18 am

No one likes us,we don't care.

spt_claret
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 815 times
Has Liked: 484 times

Re: Academy

Post by spt_claret » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:26 am

So much for the reports we were confident of retaining Cat 1.
Crushingly disappointing this. Massive massive blow to any development plans.
Hopefully we can sort the staffing issus and reapply soon.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76611
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37336 times
Has Liked: 5701 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Academy

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:29 am

spt_claret wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:26 am
So much for the reports we were confident of retaining Cat 1.
Crushingly disappointing this. Massive massive blow to any development plans.
Hopefully we can sort the staffing issus and reapply soon.
It is crushingly disappointing.

I've no involvement now but it was so good this year to see us competing against the big clubs at academy levels, and we did compete well, particularly with some really good results for the under-18s. It will affect recruitment too, we are now a cat below five other north west clubs again.
These 2 users liked this post: Dark Cloud tiger76

Dark Cloud
Posts: 7535
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2279 times
Has Liked: 4043 times

Re: Academy

Post by Dark Cloud » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:36 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:29 am
It is crushingly disappointing.

I've no involvement now but it was so good this year to see us competing against the big clubs at academy levels, and we did compete well, particularly with some really good results for the under-18s. It will affect recruitment too, we are now a cat below five other north west clubs again.
Crushing blow is a huge understatement. The message it sends out to potential signings at any level is that maybe things are not at all good behind the scenes and they should possibly look elsewhere. Awful when we're busy trying to sign top quality replacement first team players and hold on to our really promising U23s and U18s of which we have more than a few right now.
These 2 users liked this post: ClaretTony k90bfc

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Academy

Post by tiger76 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:53 am

If confirmed this is not good, especially when our model appears to be developing youngsters and hopefully selling on a few for profit, plus maybe hoping a couple do make it to the 1st team ranks.

Spike
Posts: 3235
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 687 times
Has Liked: 1582 times

Re: Academy

Post by Spike » Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:23 am

Such shocking news! Pace needs to give his a wobble

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9064
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3429 times
Has Liked: 5646 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Academy

Post by Colburn_Claret » Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:32 am

Relegation is just a part of sport, it can affect anyone, but this is just down to our, or the boards, incompetence.
No excuses, it's a bloody shambles that we lose Cat 1 because of staffing levels. What the hell were they thinking.
These 2 users liked this post: k90bfc Spike

Falcon
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:40 pm
Been Liked: 931 times
Has Liked: 1267 times
Location: Proudsville

Re: Academy

Post by Falcon » Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:36 am

At least if it is due to something like staffing levels, it should be relatively easy to re-attain cat 1 status though?

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6708
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2100 times
Has Liked: 1047 times

Re: Academy

Post by BurnleyFC » Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:00 pm

Surely, in today’s mad world, we can just ‘identify’ as a Category 1 academy?
These 4 users liked this post: Raggus Dark Cloud RVclaret Cleveleys_claret

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Academy

Post by tiger76 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:36 pm

Falcon wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:36 am
At least if it is due to something like staffing levels, it should be relatively easy to re-attain cat 1 status though?
No idea how it works, but I guess you can only apply on an annual basis, so even if they do eventually sort it out, it'll hit us hard in the short term anyway.

What's bizarre is AP has been at pains to point out his strategy of plucking young players from other clubs, or developing our existing talent pool, then selling on a a profit, now in theory I totally agree with this plan, but if they aren't prepared to fund the staff to implement it it will be a dead duck.

Chester Perry
Posts: 20120
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3296 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Academy

Post by Chester Perry » Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:45 pm

This is what the accounts had to say about staff turnover, there has been a very distinct change in focus - remember this was just the first 7 months there have been plenty of changes since the end of last July - Under Pepper our Academy staffing had risen to almost 100 to facilitate the rise to Cat 1 (i.e. just to get there not stay there)

- Football staff reduced by 23 to 133
- Permanent sales, administration and ancillary staff increased by 39 (split 19:20 between full and part time) to 134 (split 85:49).

elwaclaret
Posts: 9568
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2203 times
Has Liked: 3102 times

Re: Academy

Post by elwaclaret » Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:51 pm

aggi wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 am

The PGB have asked for further information and Burnley believe the process is still ongoing. But, as things stand, the Clarets will lose their Category One status from the start of next season. As the PGB is English football’s final arbiter, Burnley would need to mount a legal challenge through the courts in order to try and overturn their demotion. [/i]

https://trainingground.guru/articles/bu ... emy-status
Not getting over excited by this. Close reading tells us ‘as thing stand’ i.e. it is not known if this will ultimately be the case.

If Burnley believe the process is still ongoing… would Burnley not know?
AS THINGS STAND - itself suggests things may yet change.

AS someone trained to ‘close read’ historical documentation… i see absolutely nothing here, we didn’t know. We could lose our status… but Burnley are confident they can put it right.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Academy

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:57 pm

This is a massive step back for the club
This user liked this post: Spike

elwaclaret
Posts: 9568
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2203 times
Has Liked: 3102 times

Re: Academy

Post by elwaclaret » Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:00 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:57 pm
This is a massive step back for the club
IF it continues to be the case.

If….Biggest little word in the world.

taio
Posts: 12715
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3563 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Academy

Post by taio » Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:05 pm

It's been a big concern from many on here. The concern has now intensified by the statement about it can only be overturned through the courts.

RVclaret
Posts: 16200
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3007 times

Re: Academy

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:18 pm

Pace out!

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Academy

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:30 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:18 pm
Pace out!
Best thing you have said on here 😂

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1776 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Academy

Post by arise_sir_charge » Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:40 pm

Have I read something different to everybody but Elwa, it doesn’t sound to me like it’s a certainty that it’s lost.

Also the other point which is well made above, I wonder whether we’d have secured CAT 1 in the first place if it wasn’t for Covid ie we’ve been operating a model we believed to be sufficient but close inspection, when finally allowed, suggests it isn’t?

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11585
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4723 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Academy

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:43 pm

arise_sir_charge wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:40 pm
Have I read something different to everybody but Elwa, it doesn’t sound to me like it’s a certainty that it’s lost.

Also the other point which is well made above, I wonder whether we’d have secured CAT 1 in the first place if it wasn’t for Covid ie we’ve been operating a model we believed to be sufficient but close inspection, when finally allowed, suggests it isn’t?

If it was per Pace we would have been CAT 1 due to everything being spot on until he walked through the door.

Strange how when a report came out about the club retaining its status as CAT 1 it seemed to drop down the first page very quickly, but the hint of something negative and the bulb has been switched on to attract the moths.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Academy

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:54 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:43 pm
If it was per Pace we would have been CAT 1 due to everything being spot on until he walked through the door.

Strange how when a report came out about the club retaining its status as CAT 1 it seemed to drop down the first page very quickly, but the hint of something negative and the bulb has been switched on to attract the moths.
Why would it be a hot topic talking about something we already have? And should retain bar poor management.

Off course losing a critical aspect of the club is going to gain more attention

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11585
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4723 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Academy

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:56 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:54 pm
Why would it be a hot topic talking about something we already have? And should retain bar poor management.

Off course losing a critical aspect of the club is going to gain more attention

Remember when you were told you don't have to have an opinion on everything
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

ClaretTony
Posts: 76611
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37336 times
Has Liked: 5701 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Academy

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:01 pm

arise_sir_charge wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 2:40 pm
Have I read something different to everybody but Elwa, it doesn’t sound to me like it’s a certainty that it’s lost.

Also the other point which is well made above, I wonder whether we’d have secured CAT 1 in the first place if it wasn’t for Covid ie we’ve been operating a model we believed to be sufficient but close inspection, when finally allowed, suggests it isn’t?
Yes it is lost and yes we would have got it.

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Academy

Post by Billy Balfour » Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:01 pm

I'm mighty pead off about this. Even more so if all we get is the usual 'silent treatment' from the club. If I was doing comms, I'd be engaging with fans about how the club is going to put things right.
These 3 users liked this post: ClaretTony k90bfc Spike

RVclaret
Posts: 16200
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4468 times
Has Liked: 3007 times

Re: Academy

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:03 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:01 pm
Yes it is lost and yes we would have got it.
‘Yes we would have got it’

I mean that’s a statement which is more or less impossible to make. Maybe there is ‘belief’ we would have got it, but there appears to be a strong ‘belief’ right now that we shouldn’t be losing it.

The Enclosure
Posts: 4486
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
Been Liked: 990 times
Has Liked: 3266 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Academy

Post by The Enclosure » Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:05 pm

Its a pretty serious thing for the club losing Cat 1 status.
Someone needs to be tasked with ensuring we try and meet the necessary standards to win it back and whats more ensure we retain it.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Academy

Post by tiger76 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:11 pm

The Enclosure wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:05 pm
Its a pretty serious thing for the club losing Cat 1 status.
Someone needs to be tasked with ensuring we try and meet the necessary standards to win it back and whats more ensure we retain it.
Indeed it'll make recruiting, and more importantly retaining youngsters an awful lot tougher.

Shame if this does come to pass, as there's been tentative signs of progress at all age levels recently.

Spijed
Posts: 17931
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3028 times
Has Liked: 1324 times

Re: Academy

Post by Spijed » Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:49 pm

If we do get the required staff in how long do we have to wait before we can reapply for Cat 1 status?

DCWat
Posts: 9934
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4471 times
Has Liked: 3882 times

Re: Academy

Post by DCWat » Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:28 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:01 pm
Yes it is lost and yes we would have got it.
So we’ve definitely dropped a level, unless a further appeal proves to be successful?
This user liked this post: Spike

Elbarad
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:46 pm
Been Liked: 160 times
Has Liked: 55 times

Re: Academy

Post by Elbarad » Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:34 pm

Seems a lot like a restatement of the last info we had. We're down but it's under appeal.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76611
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37336 times
Has Liked: 5701 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Academy

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:55 pm

DCWat wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:28 pm
So we’ve definitely dropped a level, unless a further appeal proves to be successful?
There isn’t an appeal I don’t think, that was the final verdict.

barracuda
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:28 pm
Been Liked: 20 times
Has Liked: 21 times

Re: Academy

Post by barracuda » Tue Jun 21, 2022 7:20 pm

What a fiasco
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud

boatshed bill
Posts: 17182
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3525 times
Has Liked: 7714 times

Re: Academy

Post by boatshed bill » Tue Jun 21, 2022 7:24 pm

very, very careless.
One would think, given their apparent interest in a worldwide scouting system, that they would prioritise getting this right.

DCWat
Posts: 9934
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4471 times
Has Liked: 3882 times

Re: Academy

Post by DCWat » Tue Jun 21, 2022 8:35 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:55 pm
There isn’t an appeal I don’t think, that was the final verdict.
Brilliant!

It sounds like an entirely avoidable issue to fail on, which is all the more ridiculous. Hardly a ringing endorsement of what’s going on under Pace’s watch.

aggi
Posts: 9648
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Academy

Post by aggi » Tue Jun 21, 2022 8:42 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:55 pm
There isn’t an appeal I don’t think, that was the final verdict.
It doesn't sound entirely clear cut from the article. There are suggestions the decision isn't quite made but no one seems to know exactly why.

k90bfc
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:15 pm
Been Liked: 129 times
Has Liked: 7257 times

Re: Academy

Post by k90bfc » Tue Jun 21, 2022 8:48 pm

It seems like all our fancy flashing lights are more important,In the meantime,please put back all of Our Heroes Portraits on the walls outside Turf Moor,where to all us fans they belong,and sorely missed,Please Mr Pace ! Also sort the Academy !UTC.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76611
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37336 times
Has Liked: 5701 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Academy

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:45 pm

aggi wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 8:42 pm
It doesn't sound entirely clear cut from the article. There are suggestions the decision isn't quite made but no one seems to know exactly why.
It’s as clear as the Professional Game Board having backed the decision to withdraw our Cat 1 licence, suggesting that our only option is to take legal action.

I am very confident that everything was in place when we dumped Jon Pepper a year ago.

Dark Cloud
Posts: 7535
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2279 times
Has Liked: 4043 times

Re: Academy

Post by Dark Cloud » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:55 pm

barracuda wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 7:20 pm
What a fiasco
Absolutely! There are clearly going to be published criteria which have to be met and have to be monitored by the PGB to ensure they continue to be met. Basically hoops to be jumped through. Anybody with an ounce of wit or common sense simply jumps through them and bingo, passes with flying colours! On the surface our failure here looks acutely embarrassing and the repercussions won't be good.

Steddyman
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:45 pm
Been Liked: 792 times
Has Liked: 737 times

Re: Academy

Post by Steddyman » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:01 pm

Such a shame if true and a setback to the business model.

If I remember though when we got it awarded it was much sooner than when we had planned to obtain it. Pretty sure when we went from 3 to 2, we expected it to be about another 3 years before we got to cat 1. Which gives credence to the doubt we would have got it in the first place had a full audit been done.

aggi
Posts: 9648
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Academy

Post by aggi » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:10 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:45 pm
It’s as clear as the Professional Game Board having backed the decision to withdraw our Cat 1 licence, suggesting that our only option is to take legal action.

I am very confident that everything was in place when we dumped Jon Pepper a year ago.
But then you have this line in the article

The PGB have asked for further information and Burnley believe the process is still ongoing

Which makes you wonder why they have asked for further information if the decision is made.

BillyHamilton9
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:48 pm
Been Liked: 10 times
Has Liked: 6 times

Re: Academy

Post by BillyHamilton9 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm

Dark Cloud wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:55 pm
Absolutely! There are clearly going to be published criteria which have to be met and have to be monitored by the PGB to ensure they continue to be met. Basically hoops to be jumped through. Anybody with an ounce of wit or common sense simply jumps through them and bingo, passes with flying colours! On the surface our failure here looks acutely embarrassing and the repercussions won't be good.
Unfortunately the personnel on the Senior Management Team who's job it was to jump through those hoops in order for the criteria to be met, arrogantly chose to ignore some of it, presumably to save some pennies. The only thing Pace is guilty of is that this person is still in a position to carry on making similar decisions on behalf of the club.

Spike
Posts: 3235
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 687 times
Has Liked: 1582 times

Re: Academy

Post by Spike » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:25 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 6:55 pm
There isn’t an appeal I don’t think, that was the final verdict.
Pace takes ultimate responsibility but it’s not just him he has brought in “helpers” that up to now have been hopeless!

bfcjg
Posts: 14846
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5696 times
Has Liked: 8364 times

Re: Academy

Post by bfcjg » Wed Jun 22, 2022 8:03 am

I wonder if VK took the job and one of the conditions that influenced him was having Cat 1 status?

Post Reply