Fury v AJ
Re: Fury v AJ
Called it bang on, Fury never wanted that fight with AJ.
Re: Fury v AJ
Imagine if AJ would've fought Chisora instead of Usyk
he'd have rightly received pelters

-
- Posts: 3286
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 553 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Fury v AJ
In reality, it made no sense for either of them.
AJ can probably knock over a couple with decent purses and still get a crack at a title fight in a couple of years-time. He is a big draw and would fill a big venue in this country and sell pay per view.
Fury really wants the big one against Usyk but people will pay to watch Fury knock over Derek Chisora.
Fury v AJ will happen in 3 or 4 years-time when both are on the decline and no longer title contenders.
In truth I think Usyk will give Fury quite a contest despite the size difference because both have good chins and can last a fight. It's then about who makes the cleaner shots and boxes for the points.
AJ can probably knock over a couple with decent purses and still get a crack at a title fight in a couple of years-time. He is a big draw and would fill a big venue in this country and sell pay per view.
Fury really wants the big one against Usyk but people will pay to watch Fury knock over Derek Chisora.
Fury v AJ will happen in 3 or 4 years-time when both are on the decline and no longer title contenders.
In truth I think Usyk will give Fury quite a contest despite the size difference because both have good chins and can last a fight. It's then about who makes the cleaner shots and boxes for the points.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 949 times
Re: Fury v AJ
It's happened we Fury and Wilder, Eddie Hearn doesn't want it because AJ loses
Re: Fury v AJ
Fury a giant and a half alongside Usyk. A few upper cuts will do a Foreman on Frazier.ClaretPete001 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:15 pm
In truth I think Usyk will give Fury quite a contest despite the size difference because both have good chins and can last a fight. It's then about who makes the cleaner shots and boxes for the points.
-
- Posts: 3573
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1266 times
- Has Liked: 911 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Have you ever looked at Matchroom’s stable?
Re: Fury v AJ
Why has Fury been linked to fighting Charr, Chisora and Thor then? Eddie Hearn called his bullshit from the start, all publicity, the fight he really wanted was an easy fight against Charr/Chisora, the AJ publicity was all a tactic to take the heat off him choosing an easy fight.
-
- Posts: 3573
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1266 times
- Has Liked: 911 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Chisora isn’t a link at this stage obviously. Think they swerved Charr after the public reaction.KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:03 pmWhy has Fury been linked to fighting Charr, Chisora and Thor then? Eddie Hearn called his bullshit from the start, all publicity, the fight he really wanted was an easy fight against Charr/Chisora, the AJ publicity was all a tactic to take the heat off him choosing an easy fight.
In terms of the Chisora one anyone that wants to go out at 10.30pm in December in England to watch a scrappy fight with an obvious winner already baffles me.
This user liked this post: KRBFC
-
- Posts: 6839
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2133 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: Fury v AJ
I like Tyson Fury and think he’s the best in the division but he doesn’t come out of this looking good and I’ve no interest in watching him punch Chisora to a pulp.
It’d have been more interesting watching him compete for the WWE title.
It’d have been more interesting watching him compete for the WWE title.
-
- Posts: 11841
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4804 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Maybe Joshua should be looking for a new manager, they had weeks to sort the fight but it wasn't long enough. Chisora's camp managed it in a day or 2
Still Eddie's fanboys will believe all he says
Still Eddie's fanboys will believe all he says
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4201 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Chisora is a perfect opponent for a bum fight.
He will stand there and take a lot of punishment to make Fury look good, but won't just get sparked in the first round to leave fans feeling they wasted their money.
He will stand there and take a lot of punishment to make Fury look good, but won't just get sparked in the first round to leave fans feeling they wasted their money.
-
- Posts: 3286
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 553 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Yet the team who didn’t sign the contract were matchroom. Even DAZN wanted it and was going to step aside to allow BT the rights in the UK.KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:03 pmWhy has Fury been linked to fighting Charr, Chisora and Thor then? Eddie Hearn called his bullshit from the start, all publicity, the fight he really wanted was an easy fight against Charr/Chisora, the AJ publicity was all a tactic to take the heat off him choosing an easy fight.
Both fighters wanted it, Hearn doesn’t want another L as 3 in 5 currently and 4 from 6 would be a difficult sell to the casual fans who in the main make up AJs fanbase.
Re: Fury v AJ
I think Fury will just walk into Usyk and deliver.ClaretPete001 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 9:19 amYou think Usyk is going to walk into a Fury uppercut?
I agree Fury will likely win but you would expect it to be a decent fight.
With most, Usyk has a hood chance, however, Fury is another mountain further up!
-
- Posts: 3286
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 553 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Probably, he didn't do that against Pianeta and Wallin albeit he was on the come back trail.
And Wilder / Whyte are not in the same class as Usyk in terms of boxing but you could be right
-
- Posts: 3286
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 553 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Good point and likely true but I can't see why Fury would want AJ when he could have an easy (ish) pay day against Chisora and then a unifying bout against Usyk, which he would be confident of winning.Shaggy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 9:44 amYet the team who didn’t sign the contract were matchroom. Even DAZN wanted it and was going to step aside to allow BT the rights in the UK.
Both fighters wanted it, Hearn doesn’t want another L as 3 in 5 currently and 4 from 6 would be a difficult sell to the casual fans who in the main make up AJs fanbase.
Why risk all that against a boxer/bodybuilder with a knockout punch? Makes no sense.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 949 times
Re: Fury v AJ
When was AJ's last knockout punch?ClaretPete001 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 10:15 amGood point and likely true but I can't see why Fury would want AJ when he could have an easy (ish) pay day against Chisora and then a unifying bout against Usyk, which he would be confident of winning.
Why risk all that against a boxer/bodybuilder with a knockout punch? Makes no sense.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 949 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Because he wanted a tune up fight in December, he's limited who he can fight. Usyk wants March time, Fury wanted AJ and I personally believe at first AJ wanted Fury but Hearn has talked him out of it out of fear of losing his cash cow. Same reason he won't let him fight Wilder, he knows both end in defeats.KRBFC wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:03 pmWhy has Fury been linked to fighting Charr, Chisora and Thor then? Eddie Hearn called his bullshit from the start, all publicity, the fight he really wanted was an easy fight against Charr/Chisora, the AJ publicity was all a tactic to take the heat off him choosing an easy fight.
AJ to me just looks broken when he fights now.
Fury put the links out there to get the AJ contract signed but he couldn't do it in over 2 weeks, why not? Then soon as Fury has enough and moves on Hearn comes out the woodwork, the guys a fraud
These 2 users liked this post: rincon Shaggy
Re: Fury v AJ
Tyson didn't allow them enough time to figure the deal out, putting stupid 24 hour deadlines and lying about when Matchroom received contracts.Shaggy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 9:44 amYet the team who didn’t sign the contract were matchroom. Even DAZN wanted it and was going to step aside to allow BT the rights in the UK.
Both fighters wanted it, Hearn doesn’t want another L as 3 in 5 currently and 4 from 6 would be a difficult sell to the casual fans who in the main make up AJs fanbase.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 949 times
Re: Fury v AJ
2 weeks was more than enough time, Chisora did it in less. Even ex boxers who are friends with AJ couldn't understand the delay and all came to the same conclusion that Hearn didn't want to risk it, he wants a few easier fights so he can carry on milking AJ. Hearns boxing world is slowly crumbling
Re: Fury v AJ
I don't think you're quite aware how deep Hearn's stable of fighters is if you think Hearn's entire income relies heavily on AJ.bumba wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 5:02 pm2 weeks was more than enough time, Chisora did it in less. Even ex boxers who are friends with AJ couldn't understand the delay and all came to the same conclusion that Hearn didn't want to risk it, he wants a few easier fights so he can carry on milking AJ. Hearns boxing world is slowly crumbling
This user liked this post: Milltown1882
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 45 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Really enjoyed reading some of these posts. The comment ‘The guys a fraud’ interests me the most, just out of interest how is he a fraud?bumba wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 2:50 pmBecause he wanted a tune up fight in December, he's limited who he can fight. Usyk wants March time, Fury wanted AJ and I personally believe at first AJ wanted Fury but Hearn has talked him out of it out of fear of losing his cash cow. Same reason he won't let him fight Wilder, he knows both end in defeats.
AJ to me just looks broken when he fights now.
Fury put the links out there to get the AJ contract signed but he couldn't do it in over 2 weeks, why not? Then soon as Fury has enough and moves on Hearn comes out the woodwork, the guys a fraud
FYI I’m a fan of both fighters so I guess I’m a fan boy of both.
-
- Posts: 3573
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1266 times
- Has Liked: 911 times
Re: Fury v AJ
https://www.matchroomboxing.com/boxers-2/
And people think Hearn just relies on AJ haha. The job Hearn has done over the years is phenomenal.
Re: Fury v AJ
Hearn's the best promoter in the game and it's not even close, he's modern and followed the UFC model of stacking the undercards, people want a night of competitive high level boxing, not 1 big name in the main event in a one sided fight and a bunch of filler crap on the undercard.Milltown1882 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 5:55 pmhttps://www.matchroomboxing.com/boxers-2/
And people think Hearn just relies on AJ haha. The job Hearn has done over the years is phenomenal.
Re: Fury v AJ
Fury is very clever at sussing a weakness.ClaretPete001 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 10:07 amProbably, he didn't do that against Pianeta and Wallin albeit he was on the come back trail.
And Wilder / Whyte are not in the same class as Usyk in terms of boxing but you could be right
Fury v Usyk just strikes me as a dead ringer for big George Foreman against the much smaller, tighter Joe Frazier. Foreman just punched right through the guard, where no one else could. Flattened poor old Joe!
This seems the same to me.
Re: Fury v AJ
KRBFC wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 6:19 pmHearn's the best promoter in the game and it's not even close, he's modern and followed the UFC model of stacking the undercards, people want a night of competitive high level boxing, not 1 big name in the main event in a one sided fight and a bunch of filler crap on the undercard.


Hearn is the master of BS and fake hype. AJ being a prime example. Building up an average boxer with overmatched opponents and faded fighters from the past and the fan boys swallow it.
I disagree with your assessment. Hearns cards are very similar to just about any other event. Old Fast car isn’t doing too well now he’s left sky.. Ben Shalom on the other hand.
Re: Fury v AJ
I love this notion that because AJ lost to an incredible generational talent in Usyk that he's suddenly now a fraud and was never any goodShaggy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 22, 2022 12:30 am![]()
![]()
Hearn is the master of BS and fake hype. AJ being a prime example. Building up an average boxer with overmatched opponents and faded fighters from the past and the fan boys swallow it.
I disagree with your assessment. Hearns cards are very similar to just about any other event. Old Fast car isn’t doing too well now he’s left sky.. Ben Shalom on the other hand.

Matchroom's cards are streets ahead of anyone else, not even remotely close. World Champions fighting on undercards. Hrgovic and Callum Smith were two of the fighters who featured on the undercard of Usyk AJ 2. Those two are headline acts for Warren and Shalom, neither have the stable deep enough to compete.
This user liked this post: Milltown1882
-
- Posts: 3286
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 553 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Fury v AJ
Fair points, the only things I would say that George Foremen was a puncher - Tyson Fury is an awkward boxer with a long reach he's not renowned as a puncher.IanMcL wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 11:41 pmFury is very clever at sussing a weakness.
Fury v Usyk just strikes me as a dead ringer for big George Foreman against the much smaller, tighter Joe Frazier. Foreman just punched right through the guard, where no one else could. Flattened poor old Joe!
This seems the same to me.
I would also say that Joe Frazier was more a Mike Tyson - a good infighter and Foreman just pushed him back with a longer reach and put him on the back foot. Like Deontay Wilder once on the back foot he just didn't know what to do.
Usyk has excellent ring craft and is a moving target not sure he's the same kind of fighter as Joe Frazier.
And of course Muhammad Ali knocked out George Foreman and he is the same size as Usyk albeit Foreman was not the size of Fury and Usyk is no ali.
Re: Fury v AJ
Agree it is not clear cut, ClaretPete. Just the size of Fury will make a big uppercut very powerful on a smaller man.
Fury will look to do the simple thing and he certainly thought he could show AJ how to beat Usyk, using his size and greater power.
Fury will look to do the simple thing and he certainly thought he could show AJ how to beat Usyk, using his size and greater power.
-
- Posts: 3286
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 553 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Fury v AJ
I agree with you more than I agree with myself TBH. Fury is probably too big for Usyk and a much better boxer than AJ.
This user liked this post: IanMcL
Re: Fury v AJ
Good debate though!
He will probably just sit on him!
He will probably just sit on him!