
No VAR
-
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
- Been Liked: 544 times
- Has Liked: 1332 times
No VAR
How good was it to watch us score a goal tonight and then not have to worry about the purple screen popping up to say they are looking for a reason to cancel the goal 

- Attachments
-
- Screenshot_20240812-233829.png (1.85 MiB) Viewed 1813 times
These 16 users liked this post: beeholeclaret Lord Beamish 4:20 addisclaret dsr Oakworth claret The Hung Juror Beansontoast ArmchairDetective bobinho ClaretGent mkmel bfcjg Pearcey Stayingup northeastclaret
-
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 6:51 pm
- Been Liked: 89 times
- Has Liked: 431 times
Re: No VAR
I refused to set foot on the Turf again,in the premiership ,after the last Luton debacle, due to VAR.
I cant wait to set foot on the Turf again, after last nights thrashing of Luton and no VAR...pure bliss!
Oh and I am a season ticket holder of many years!!!
I cant wait to set foot on the Turf again, after last nights thrashing of Luton and no VAR...pure bliss!
Oh and I am a season ticket holder of many years!!!
These 3 users liked this post: LincsWoldsClaret Stayingup mybloodisclaret
Re: No VAR
I have to admit when the first went in I was waiting for the VAR check lol. Its absolutely a better game without, no matter how poor the Refs are, its just what I call pure football.
This user liked this post: bfcjg
-
- Posts: 8276
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4139 times
- Has Liked: 1144 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: No VAR
Makes a massive difference knowing the second Vitinho smashes that past Kaminski you can just go wild without that slight doubt - and the same goes for the players.
These 3 users liked this post: ArmchairDetective Beansontoast Oakworth claret
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
- Been Liked: 537 times
- Has Liked: 216 times
Re: No VAR
I agree had var been in place the Oshea goal would have been ruled out after push by Oderbert on defender as the new rules state a foul committed when not looking in the direction of the ball is an offence, rock on with out VAR
-
- Posts: 4338
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 999 times
- Has Liked: 809 times
Re: No VAR
The ref was poor last night, but he is human. I can accept the ref making mistakes, but I bloody hate VAR, it is part of the death of football in the Premier League.
Championship football is massively better to watch, I was watching it much more last season than the dirty Prem.
Championship football is massively better to watch, I was watching it much more last season than the dirty Prem.
Re: No VAR
Not a chance that VAR rules that out.pureclaret wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2024 9:33 amI agree had var been in place the Oshea goal would have been ruled out after push by Oderbert on defender as the new rules state a foul committed when not looking in the direction of the ball is an offence, rock on with out VAR
The only mistake the ref made that lead to a goal was the pull by Brownhill on their player on the build up to us winning the corner which we scored from. But of course VAR would never have checked that anyway.
-
- Posts: 4304
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2929 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: No VAR
Same with me.
Re: No VAR
I'm another one that jumped up and cheered then sat back and said brownhill could be offside.
Re: No VAR
I posted on the match thread exactly the same thing ,almost post traumatic stress
Re: No VAR
There were a few decisions were VAR would have intervened and interrupted the flow of the game last night.
It's awful and not been implemented the way it should have been (clear and obvious errors.)
It's awful and not been implemented the way it should have been (clear and obvious errors.)