The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
jdrobbo
Posts: 10663
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 5429 times
Has Liked: 1038 times
Location: Leeds

The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by jdrobbo » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:23 am

I’ve not seen this posted anywhere else and I wanted to keep it away from the Hannibal thread, because it’s more to do with refereeing.

I could completely be misinterpreting the situation but when Hannibal‘s number was put up, Brownhill, who was stood very close to the referee, went straight to him and started pointing towards the Burnley bench.

Hannibal was nearer to the far touchline and the referee was asking him to leave at the nearest point, which of course was the far side. Brownhill was insistent, I think, that Hannibal should be allowed to leave through the pitch, probably highlighting his safety as a result.

Whilst we can now laugh at the Hannibal heroics, as he went around the perimeter, giving it back to the frothing Leeds fans, Is it fair to say that a potentially nasty situation could have arisen there, easily preventable by the referee?

All of this, bearing in mind, that our goalkeeper had been hit by something thrown from the crowd as well, just previous?

I know that the referee was exercising the rules to the letter, but for me, just go to Hannibal and say jog off the pitch in this direction… No wasting time because you are already on a yellow card… Something like that.
These 4 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin bfcjg NewClaret Rick_Muller

Bosscat
Posts: 28912
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9660 times
Has Liked: 20808 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Bosscat » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:25 am

Spot on John 👍

Cleveleys_claret
Posts: 3133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
Been Liked: 973 times
Has Liked: 593 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Cleveleys_claret » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:29 am

If you watch the beginning of his walk off the pitch he was taking it in jest but someone must have said something as he turned round and did a step back to the crowd, couldn't see any more as the camera than went back onto the pitch. As with all rules, we as a footballing community need to be able to allow refs to ref with common sense. Problem is that there will always be the .01% which disagree with a refs decision and make it more difficult for them

ecc
Posts: 6322
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 2156 times
Has Liked: 1772 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by ecc » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:31 am

You're right, John. It wasn't the best of ideas. Whilst part of me, I must admit, enjoyed seeing him "communicating" with the locals it's surprising nobody chucked something at him. We'd all be complaining if he'd copped a bottle or a coin.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5287
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2964 times
Has Liked: 836 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:31 am

Absolutely could have been avoided, especially seeing as that ‘leave by the nearest exit’ rule is hardly ever enforced.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20608
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4539 times
Has Liked: 2047 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by ElectroClaret » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:34 am

My main concern would be him picking up a second yellow with his antics and thus a suspension, as someone posted on the Hannibal thread.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18749
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7697 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:42 am

I suspect Hannibal was more than happy to leave the pitch where he did and enjoy his lap of abuse. But yes, referees could use their common sense.

claretburns
Posts: 5487
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
Been Liked: 1009 times
Has Liked: 358 times
Location: Halifax

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by claretburns » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:49 am

jdrobbo wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:23 am
I’ve not seen this posted anywhere else and I wanted to keep it away from the Hannibal thread, because it’s more to do with refereeing.

I could completely be misinterpreting the situation but when Hannibal‘s number was put up, Brownhill, who was stood very close to the referee, went straight to him and started pointing towards the Burnley bench.

Hannibal was nearer to the far touchline and the referee was asking him to leave at the nearest point, which of course was the far side. Brownhill was insistent, I think, that Hannibal should be allowed to leave through the pitch, probably highlighting his safety as a result.

Whilst we can now laugh at the Hannibal heroics, as he went around the perimeter, giving it back to the frothing Leeds fans, Is it fair to say that a potentially nasty situation could have arisen there, easily preventable by the referee?

All of this, bearing in mind, that our goalkeeper had been hit by something thrown from the crowd as well, just previous?

I know that the referee was exercising the rules to the letter, but for me, just go to Hannibal and say jog off the pitch in this direction… No wasting time because you are already on a yellow card… Something like that.
Whilst I agree with the sentiment that the ref could have let Hannibal leave across the pitch and straight to the bench, Hannibal himself, whilst us as fans enjoyed it, could have been more restraint with his antics when walking through a situation like that.

mdd2
Posts: 6984
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1842 times
Has Liked: 761 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by mdd2 » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:50 am

I think there is a very simple solution. Players run to their dugout when substituted unless clearly injured. Failure to do so and waste time yellow card and if they continue dragging their feet, a second yellow.
What happened with Hannibal was silly IMO. Mercifully it didnt happen against the Rovers, but the slow walk off the pitch is an irritation, as it never happens when the team is losing. (Unless it is us playing City in a bid to keep the goal difference down)

aggi
Posts: 9707
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2338 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by aggi » Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:58 am

claretburns wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:49 am
Whilst I agree with the sentiment that the ref could have let Hannibal leave across the pitch and straight to the bench, Hannibal himself, whilst us as fans enjoyed it, could have been more restraint with his antics when walking through a situation like that.
They were abusing Koleosho when he went off before Hannibal (the ref did the same thing of sending him off the opposite side to the dugout) too.

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2557
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 436 times
Has Liked: 409 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:04 pm

Excellent pantomime villain gave it to them loads.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3773
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1485 times
Has Liked: 365 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Big Vinny K » Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:07 pm

Watching it back I was surprised one of the Leeds fans did not run on the pitch and go for him.
We are not talking about a normal set of fans here.
The referee used zero common sense as he must have known the Leeds fans reputation and to be fair he should have been more than aware that Hannibal is also no shrinking violet.

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 950 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Hipper » Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:27 pm

Did Trafford actually get hit bon the head? It wasn't shown or mentioned on TV, only Trafford rubbing his head and the ref coming over.

Accrington claret
Posts: 184
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 8:04 pm
Been Liked: 80 times
Has Liked: 188 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Accrington claret » Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:29 pm

aggi wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:58 am
They were abusing Koleosho when he went off before Hannibal (the ref did the same thing of sending him off the opposite side to the dugout) too.
Koleosho also had objects thrown towards him from the Leeds fans, just like Trafford and Hannibal got
When Leeds was last in the Prem this happened at Bellend Road on more than one occasion
They received zero punishment from the powers that be, Nothing will happen about the throwing objects onto the pitch once again by Leeds fans

taio
Posts: 12827
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3588 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by taio » Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:31 pm

Hipper wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:27 pm
Did Trafford actually get hit bon the head? It wasn't shown or mentioned on TV, only Trafford rubbing his head and the ref coming over.
It looked like it. Certainly went down in the second half. Too far away to tell what he might have been hit by. He didn't seem too troubled by it.

Clive 1960
Posts: 2051
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
Been Liked: 299 times
Has Liked: 565 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Clive 1960 » Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:32 pm

Hipper wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:27 pm
Did Trafford actually get hit bon the head? It wasn't shown or mentioned on TV, only Trafford rubbing his head and the ref coming over.
got hit on back of the head with the ball it said on TV i was watching but i didn't see the ball hit him ...

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 950 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Hipper » Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:35 pm

A bit more here:

https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/sport/leed ... r-29938923

...where they also say it was a ball and Trafford made a lot of it, which I can believe.

Burnley1989
Posts: 8585
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2685 times
Has Liked: 2374 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Burnley1989 » Sun Sep 15, 2024 1:15 pm

jdrobbo wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:23 am
I’ve not seen this posted anywhere else and I wanted to keep it away from the Hannibal thread, because it’s more to do with refereeing.

I could completely be misinterpreting the situation but when Hannibal‘s number was put up, Brownhill, who was stood very close to the referee, went straight to him and started pointing towards the Burnley bench.

Hannibal was nearer to the far touchline and the referee was asking him to leave at the nearest point, which of course was the far side. Brownhill was insistent, I think, that Hannibal should be allowed to leave through the pitch, probably highlighting his safety as a result.

Whilst we can now laugh at the Hannibal heroics, as he went around the perimeter, giving it back to the frothing Leeds fans, Is it fair to say that a potentially nasty situation could have arisen there, easily preventable by the referee?

All of this, bearing in mind, that our goalkeeper had been hit by something thrown from the crowd as well, just previous?

I know that the referee was exercising the rules to the letter, but for me, just go to Hannibal and say jog off the pitch in this direction… No wasting time because you are already on a yellow card… Something like that.
You say jog off but I've never understood why players are told to hurry up, nobody would bat an eyelid if it was 5 minutes into the game and a player walked off.
Just stop the watch

mdd2
Posts: 6984
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1842 times
Has Liked: 761 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by mdd2 » Sun Sep 15, 2024 1:31 pm

Taking an age to leave the pitch near the end when perhaps under the cosh stops the momentum of the game. We see this when players go down "injured" near the end of a game too.

Lip
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 2:35 pm
Been Liked: 314 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Lip » Sun Sep 15, 2024 2:00 pm

Just imagine if a dirty Leeds player was made to leave the pitch like Hannibal did at the Turf. I'm sure the Clarets fans would applause him all the way round to the dugout. :D

ClaretTony
Posts: 77665
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37999 times
Has Liked: 5770 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Sep 15, 2024 2:01 pm

Trafford was hit with the ball
This user liked this post: NewClaret

Rileybobs
Posts: 18749
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7697 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Sep 15, 2024 2:03 pm

Hipper wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:27 pm
Did Trafford actually get hit bon the head? It wasn't shown or mentioned on TV, only Trafford rubbing his head and the ref coming over.
Trafford was hit in the back of the head by a ball thrown from the crowd. He didn’t see it coming so it must have come as a bit of a surprise, but he dropped to the ground and milked it for a few seconds before thinking better of it.
This user liked this post: NewClaret

NewClaret
Posts: 17674
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3977 times
Has Liked: 4931 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by NewClaret » Sun Sep 15, 2024 2:18 pm

Re: the OP, completely agree with John and was considering posting something myself after we’d all enjoyed Hannibal’s ****housery to the maximum.

Sending an ex Man United player around the touch line at Elland Road is just brainless refereeing and definitely a player welfare issue.

I’m glad Hannibal gave it to them - a lesser player might not and instead had to unnecessarily suffer a load of abuse or got hurt - and hopefully the authorities reflect on it and avoid it in future.

Regarding Trafford, I agree it was a shock and he wasn’t to know it was a ball, but he got up pretty quickly thereafter.

IanMcL
Posts: 34790
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6944 times
Has Liked: 10361 times

Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)

Post by IanMcL » Sun Sep 15, 2024 7:31 pm

quoonbeatz wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:31 am
Absolutely could have been avoided, especially seeing as that ‘leave by the nearest exit’ rule is hardly ever enforced.
And yet when teams want to make a swift change, because they are chasing the game, players just step off on the far side.

Post Reply