Team v QPR
Team v QPR
Trafford
Roberts
Egan-Riley
Esteve
Humphreys
Cullen
Brownhill
Koleosho
Anthony
Flemming
Hountondji
More 4-4-2 / 4-2-3-1 (what we went to after the subs) than the 4-5-1 / 4-3-3 we’ve been playing. Flemming playing just off Hountondji - this is where he’s done his best work for Millwall and immediately last night. Yes I’d like Laurent in there too but with this shape I’d stick with Cullen and Brownhill.
Roberts
Egan-Riley
Esteve
Humphreys
Cullen
Brownhill
Koleosho
Anthony
Flemming
Hountondji
More 4-4-2 / 4-2-3-1 (what we went to after the subs) than the 4-5-1 / 4-3-3 we’ve been playing. Flemming playing just off Hountondji - this is where he’s done his best work for Millwall and immediately last night. Yes I’d like Laurent in there too but with this shape I’d stick with Cullen and Brownhill.
Re: Team v QPR
Trafford
Roberts Egan-Riley Esteve Pires
Cullen Laurent
Koleosho Brownhill Anthony
Flemming
Roberts Egan-Riley Esteve Pires
Cullen Laurent
Koleosho Brownhill Anthony
Flemming
-
- Posts: 4341
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 809 times
Re: Team v QPR
Cullen and Brownhill have been dreadful this season, only one of them should play, probably Brownhill, alongside Laurent.
If we persist with 3 defensive midfielders, this is going to be a long, painful season.
If we persist with 3 defensive midfielders, this is going to be a long, painful season.
-
- Posts: 10143
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3213 times
- Has Liked: 3198 times
Re: Team v QPR
----------Trafford
Roberts-CJ-Esteve-Pires
---------Cullen-Laurent
Sarmiento-Brownhill-Anthony
----------Flemming
If we go 4-4-2 you could even opt for Brownhill at RM (played there under Dyche to decent effect) coming infield with Roberts overlapping him.
Roberts-CJ-Esteve-Pires
---------Cullen-Laurent
Sarmiento-Brownhill-Anthony
----------Flemming
If we go 4-4-2 you could even opt for Brownhill at RM (played there under Dyche to decent effect) coming infield with Roberts overlapping him.
These 4 users liked this post: Tricky Trevor claretfern whiffa Wo Didi
-
- Posts: 10143
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3213 times
- Has Liked: 3198 times
Re: Team v QPR
Tough crowd.
Only scoring 1 in 2 from midfield.
- Attachments
-
- topGoalScorers.png (48.84 KiB) Viewed 3985 times
Re: Team v QPR
Sarmiento didn’t make the squad last night, haven’t seen Parker’s comments but wouldn’t look good for a game in 2 days…CoolClaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 9:55 am----------Trafford
Roberts-CJ-Esteve-Pires
---------Cullen-Laurent
Sarmiento-Brownhill-Anthony
----------Flemming
If we go 4-4-2 you could even opt for Brownhill at RM (played there under Dyche to decent effect) coming infield with Roberts overlapping him.
-
- Posts: 10143
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3213 times
- Has Liked: 3198 times
Re: Team v QPR
Could just be illness, I don't know too much about it tbh...
The RW spot remains a problem (said as much when the window concluded) - I think other than Agyei & Benson, all of our wingers play their best stuff off the left.
Re: Team v QPR
Agree - can understand why we tried for Rak-Sakyi now before he moved to Sheff Utd. And obv been unlucky (again) with Benson’s long term injury.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:03 amCould just be illness, I don't know too much about it tbh...
The RW spot remains a problem (said as much when the window concluded) - I think other than Agyei & Benson, all of our wingers play their best stuff off the left.
-
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1129 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Re: Team v QPR
Cullen and Brownhill have not been awful by any stretch. I don't think we're getting the best out of Cullen in this system, but Brownhill I think is actually improving. He's getting into some really good positions, he brilliantly made the chance at the end for Anthony at the death last night for example. And he's scored some good goals, without which we'd have less points. If we're going to play 3 in midfield, I think Hannibal has to miss out. Brownhill has to be the furthest forward, and Laurent needs to be a box-to-box next to Cullen imo.
However I still think that compromises Flemming, and at home to QPR I'd lean more towards playing 2 of Cullen/Brownhill/Laurent with Flemming in a 10 and Jay up front in the 9. The question is who plays in the midfield pair, which is tricky, all 3 have different qualities. On balance, I'd go:
Trafford
Roberts
CJ
Esteve
Pires
Cullen
Brownhill
Sarmiento
Anthony
Flemming
Jay
I agree with others who say Koleosho needs a break. Awesome sub to bring on if we need a boost, but a watching brief wouldn't harm him I think. Tough on Laurent, who always looks good and gives us energy. But another good sub to have along with Hannibal, who increasingly looks less like an attacking CM to me. His pressing and ability to win the ball back is great, but he doesn't do enough going forward. If he goes anywhere in a 442 I'd say it's the right hand side (more of a dyche wide player)
However I still think that compromises Flemming, and at home to QPR I'd lean more towards playing 2 of Cullen/Brownhill/Laurent with Flemming in a 10 and Jay up front in the 9. The question is who plays in the midfield pair, which is tricky, all 3 have different qualities. On balance, I'd go:
Trafford
Roberts
CJ
Esteve
Pires
Cullen
Brownhill
Sarmiento
Anthony
Flemming
Jay
I agree with others who say Koleosho needs a break. Awesome sub to bring on if we need a boost, but a watching brief wouldn't harm him I think. Tough on Laurent, who always looks good and gives us energy. But another good sub to have along with Hannibal, who increasingly looks less like an attacking CM to me. His pressing and ability to win the ball back is great, but he doesn't do enough going forward. If he goes anywhere in a 442 I'd say it's the right hand side (more of a dyche wide player)
This user liked this post: ecc
-
- Posts: 20614
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4542 times
- Has Liked: 2048 times
Re: Team v QPR
Laurent must start, we look far stronger with him in.
These 4 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin mkmel yosserhughes k90bfc
-
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:16 am
- Been Liked: 694 times
- Has Liked: 668 times
Re: Team v QPR
Brownhill bring dreadful so far must be in with a shout for post of the year.
I agree with Laurent coming into the team but not for Brownhill. Probably Cullen.
Traff
Roberts CJER Esteve Humph
Laurent Brownhill
Anthony Flemming Koleosho
Hountondji
I think we can afford to be more attacking and this lineup is a reflection of that.
I agree with Laurent coming into the team but not for Brownhill. Probably Cullen.
Traff
Roberts CJER Esteve Humph
Laurent Brownhill
Anthony Flemming Koleosho
Hountondji
I think we can afford to be more attacking and this lineup is a reflection of that.
-
- Posts: 8276
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4139 times
- Has Liked: 1144 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Team v QPR
Trafford
Roberts Egan-Riley Esteve Humphreys
Laurent Cullen
Sarmiento Brownhill Anthony
Flemming
(if Sarmiento is not fit, I would go with Koleosho, but I really think he needs a rest)
Roberts Egan-Riley Esteve Humphreys
Laurent Cullen
Sarmiento Brownhill Anthony
Flemming
(if Sarmiento is not fit, I would go with Koleosho, but I really think he needs a rest)
-
- Posts: 11841
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4804 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Team v QPR
This beats QPR
Trafford
Egan Riley Esteve Humphreys
Laurent Cullen
Koleosho Brownhill Anthony
Hountondji Flemming
Easy this management game
Trafford
Egan Riley Esteve Humphreys
Laurent Cullen
Koleosho Brownhill Anthony
Hountondji Flemming
Easy this management game
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 1016 times
- Has Liked: 1205 times
Re: Team v QPR
This team for me.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 9:55 am----------Trafford
Roberts-CJ-Esteve-Pires
---------Cullen-Laurent
Sarmiento-Brownhill-Anthony
----------Flemming
If we go 4-4-2 you could even opt for Brownhill at RM (played there under Dyche to decent effect) coming infield with Roberts overlapping him.
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Team v QPR
-----------Trafford
Roberts Egan Riley Esteve Pires
-------Cullen Laurent/Mejbri
Koleosho Brownhill Anthony
-----------Flemming.
I suspect Hannibal ultimately going to be best as a sitting midfielder who plays simple and tidies up, rather than an attacking midfielder or even a box-to-box midfielder. At present, whilst he is good technically and comfortable receiving the ball, he just doesn't appear to have the subtlety or attacking instinct to play in those roles. He can play alongside Cullen, as a double pivot, but this idea of him playing as a 10, or even the more advanced of two 8s, isn't working and Brownhill needs to assume that role. But because of his greater range of comfort on the ball in tight areas, Cullen is the first name on the team sheet other than possibly Esteve. I think alongside Cullen you therefore have a choice between Hannibal who is a slightly better technically and more comfortable on the half turn, and Laurent who is a bit more purposeful in driving the team forwards. The other option is to play neither, and play Flemming behind an out and out striker, but Jay and Flemming are too similar and it'd be a bit call to play Hountondji from the start and drop one of Hannibal and Laurent.
I'd retain Anthony and Koleosho for now - particularly if Sarmiento is unavailable for any reason - but I'd like to see them both swap wings more. Koleosho looks like hes trying too hard (as is often the way with young players who are suddenly find things more difficult) and given he's produced his best form playing from the left, it might just help him to play from that position more often. Long term, he ought to be the sort of player who is comfortable on either flank, but for now he's clearly not quite there and more fluidity between him and Anthony might help.
Roberts Egan Riley Esteve Pires
-------Cullen Laurent/Mejbri
Koleosho Brownhill Anthony
-----------Flemming.
I suspect Hannibal ultimately going to be best as a sitting midfielder who plays simple and tidies up, rather than an attacking midfielder or even a box-to-box midfielder. At present, whilst he is good technically and comfortable receiving the ball, he just doesn't appear to have the subtlety or attacking instinct to play in those roles. He can play alongside Cullen, as a double pivot, but this idea of him playing as a 10, or even the more advanced of two 8s, isn't working and Brownhill needs to assume that role. But because of his greater range of comfort on the ball in tight areas, Cullen is the first name on the team sheet other than possibly Esteve. I think alongside Cullen you therefore have a choice between Hannibal who is a slightly better technically and more comfortable on the half turn, and Laurent who is a bit more purposeful in driving the team forwards. The other option is to play neither, and play Flemming behind an out and out striker, but Jay and Flemming are too similar and it'd be a bit call to play Hountondji from the start and drop one of Hannibal and Laurent.
I'd retain Anthony and Koleosho for now - particularly if Sarmiento is unavailable for any reason - but I'd like to see them both swap wings more. Koleosho looks like hes trying too hard (as is often the way with young players who are suddenly find things more difficult) and given he's produced his best form playing from the left, it might just help him to play from that position more often. Long term, he ought to be the sort of player who is comfortable on either flank, but for now he's clearly not quite there and more fluidity between him and Anthony might help.
These 2 users liked this post: summitclaret fatboy47
-
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1021 times
- Has Liked: 1612 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Team v QPR
Spot on Spice. Don't understand the reluctance to swop wings in game. Brownhill the more advanced in cm is a total no brainer. No doubt I'll be called a negative moaner by the usual suspects/happy clappers.
-
- Posts: 7593
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2301 times
- Has Liked: 4095 times
Re: Team v QPR
I definitely think if we don't put two up front from the start against strugglers like QPR then we're ridiculously risk averse. But, in order to play Houtondji up top with Flemming as number 10, you'd probably need to drop Koleosho. Tough call.
What isn't (or shouldn't be) a tough call, is dropping Hannibal to play Laurent. No brainer I'd say.
What isn't (or shouldn't be) a tough call, is dropping Hannibal to play Laurent. No brainer I'd say.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Team v QPR
I don't think we need to play 2 up front. We rarely if ever started in with 2 up two seasons ago and we averaged almost two goals a game. More important is that the team as a whole is set up to get men in the box. That involves the wide players getting into more goalscoring positions than is currently the case, and freeing up Brownhill to attack the box.Dark Cloud wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:44 pmI definitely think if we don't put two up front from the start against strugglers like QPR then we're ridiculously risk averse. But, in order to play Houtondji up top with Flemming as number 10, you'd probably need to drop Koleosho. Tough call.
What isn't (or shouldn't be) a tough call, is dropping Hannibal to play Laurent. No brainer I'd say.
That's especially the case with Flemming the lone striker. He can provide a focal point if he can drop deeper in the knowledge the wide players and Brownhill will attack the space behind him (much as Liverpool did for years with Firmino the central striker). But currently (and certainly last night) those runs are a bit sporadic. My understanding is that Brownhill did it effectively from a more liberated position at Sheffield Wednesday.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 947 times
Re: Team v QPR
Trafford
Roberts Egan-Riley Esteve Pires
Laurent Cullen
Anthony Brownhill Koleosho
Flemming
I only saw him play at Wolves but I'd be tempted.to put McDermott on the bench as an option in the 10, he looked to have something about him and can't be any worse than the other options we've had in a 10 this season.
Flemming would be perfect but we just don't have an option good enough up front.
Roberts Egan-Riley Esteve Pires
Laurent Cullen
Anthony Brownhill Koleosho
Flemming
I only saw him play at Wolves but I'd be tempted.to put McDermott on the bench as an option in the 10, he looked to have something about him and can't be any worse than the other options we've had in a 10 this season.
Flemming would be perfect but we just don't have an option good enough up front.
Re: Team v QPR
This isn't quite true. Kompany regularly played with 2 up in reality even if on paper it didn't look like it.claretspice wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 3:21 pmI don't think we need to play 2 up front. We rarely if ever started in with 2 up two seasons ago and we averaged almost two goals a game. More important is that the team as a whole is set up to get men in the box. That involves the wide players getting into more goalscoring positions than is currently the case, and freeing up Brownhill to attack the box.
That's especially the case with Flemming the lone striker. He can provide a focal point if he can drop deeper in the knowledge the wide players and Brownhill will attack the space behind him (much as Liverpool did for years with Firmino the central striker). But currently (and certainly last night) those runs are a bit sporadic. My understanding is that Brownhill did it effectively from a more liberated position at Sheffield Wednesday.
In fact at times he would leave the widen high so it was closer to 4 up.
There's a reason that team scored so many and this team has one of the lowest xg's in the division. One of them is just pure numbers. Then there's a lack of fluidity of movement and individual quality on top of that.
Re: Team v QPR
Trafford
Roberts Egan Riley. Esteve. Humphreys
Cullen. Laurent
Brownhill. Flemming. Anthony
Haountonji
Roberts Egan Riley. Esteve. Humphreys
Cullen. Laurent
Brownhill. Flemming. Anthony
Haountonji
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Team v QPR
Well agreed but that's precisely what I'm saying, isn't it? We don't need to play 2 recognised out and out strikers, but we need the 3 who are nominally behind the striker to get beyond the striker to make a front 4 more frequently. The reason that works and was so effective two years ago is that those same three players can play deeper in the build up phase to help you have complete control in midfield before springing into those forward positions. At the moment we're not doing that "springing" bit often or well enough: too many people are either behind or alongside the ball when we work the ball into dangerous areas (which we broadly did well last night, give or take some sloppy individual moments when we gave possession away in bad areas). I'd rather we focused on doing that, than playing Hountondji as an extra attacker. We have a real strength at present that we can basically control midfield in games at will (ironically given that Cullen's contributions aren't necessarily being appreciated) and to only play 2 of Cullen, Brownhill, Hannibal and Laurent would seem to involve weakening a strength in an attempt to solve a weakness. I don't think we need to do that.Goliath wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 3:53 pmThis isn't quite true. Kompany regularly played with 2 up in reality even if on paper it didn't look like it.
In fact at times he would leave the widen high so it was closer to 4 up.
There's a reason that team scored so many and this team has one of the lowest xg's in the division. One of them is just pure numbers. Then there's a lack of fluidity of movement and individual quality on top of that.
Re: Team v QPR
Fair enough. I think we need to recognise the difference Roberts makes in controlling the midfield as well. He's become a really effective inverted full back so at times he's sat alongside Cullen which like you say should give even more freedom for the other midfielders to get forward, which in turn should bring out the best in both Brownhill and Laurent.claretspice wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 4:46 pmWell agreed but that's precisely what I'm saying, isn't it? We don't need to play 2 recognised out and out strikers, but we need the 3 who are nominally behind the striker to get beyond the striker to make a front 4 more frequently. The reason that works and was so effective two years ago is that those same three players can play deeper in the build up phase to help you have complete control in midfield before springing into those forward positions. At the moment we're not doing that "springing" bit often or well enough: too many people are either behind or alongside the ball when we work the ball into dangerous areas (which we broadly did well last night, give or take some sloppy individual moments when we gave possession away in bad areas). I'd rather we focused on doing that, than playing Hountondji as an extra attacker. We have a real strength at present that we can basically control midfield in games at will (ironically given that Cullen's contributions aren't necessarily being appreciated) and to only play 2 of Cullen, Brownhill, Hannibal and Laurent would seem to involve weakening a strength in an attempt to solve a weakness. I don't think we need to do that.
It's a shame Redmond isn't fit really because we also don't have a winger making those diagonal out to in runs like Tellan Cornet and JBL did which made them big goal threats. Unfortunately Koleosho is a bit clueless in that sense.
-
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
- Been Liked: 421 times
- Has Liked: 429 times
Re: Team v QPR
Not a fan of Brownhill who seems to disappear in games however he’s one of the Championships leading scorers so we need to play him further up the pitch.burnley007 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 9:54 amCullen and Brownhill have been dreadful this season, only one of them should play, probably Brownhill, alongside Laurent.
If we persist with 3 defensive midfielders, this is going to be a long, painful season.
-
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Team v QPR
Trafford
Roberts, Egan, Esteve, Pires
Laurent, Cullen
Koleosho, Flemming, Anthony
Houtondji
Roberts, Egan, Esteve, Pires
Laurent, Cullen
Koleosho, Flemming, Anthony
Houtondji
Re: Team v QPR
Trafford
Roberts CJER Esteve Pires
Laurent Brownhill
Sarmiento Anthony
Flemming Hountondji
Could almost be a front 5 when in possession, with Brownhill making the run from deep, or Laurent who is more than capable as long as Brownhill sits when he does so. Then drop to more of a 4-4-2/4-4-1-1 if we’re up against it.
I don’t imagine QPR will do anything other than park the bus so we have to go for an early goal to open the game up.
As much as I like Cullen in certain games I think he can slow down our build up and we need to be firing on all cylinders from the first minute.
Roberts CJER Esteve Pires
Laurent Brownhill
Sarmiento Anthony
Flemming Hountondji
Could almost be a front 5 when in possession, with Brownhill making the run from deep, or Laurent who is more than capable as long as Brownhill sits when he does so. Then drop to more of a 4-4-2/4-4-1-1 if we’re up against it.
I don’t imagine QPR will do anything other than park the bus so we have to go for an early goal to open the game up.
As much as I like Cullen in certain games I think he can slow down our build up and we need to be firing on all cylinders from the first minute.
-
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2023 9:35 pm
- Been Liked: 33 times
- Has Liked: 32 times
Re: Team v QPR
Numerous calls for Hountondji’s inclusion. I’m going back to bed.
-
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2332 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: Team v QPR
Having got a feel of Parkers team selections I just dont see Hountondji starting v QPR. Laurent was a major surprise by ommission v Hull, but what I saw against Wednesday, and when he came on at Hull, he is very good at making strong runs into the opponents penalty area. So I expect him to support Fleming alongside Brownhill
Trafford
Roberts Esteve ER Humphreys
Cullen
Koleosho Brownhill Laurent Anthony
Fleming
Trafford
Roberts Esteve ER Humphreys
Cullen
Koleosho Brownhill Laurent Anthony
Fleming
Re: Team v QPR
We played our best and most productive football under Kompany in the Championship doing just that so the concept works very well if applied properly... In fact, most fans in here were calling for us to go back to that formation last seasonburnley007 » Thu Oct 24, 2024 9:54 am
If we persist with 3 defensive midfielders, this is going to be a long, painful season.

This user liked this post: warksclaret
-
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2586 times
- Has Liked: 4176 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Team v QPR
As long we get straight onto the front foot and inject some pace into our play we really should be looking to score goals against QPR. Can the ponderous build up stuff and get to it!
Trafford
Roberts
CJ E-R
Esteve
Humphreys
Cullen
Laurent
Brownhill
Anthony
Koleosho
Flemming
Trafford
Roberts
CJ E-R
Esteve
Humphreys
Cullen
Laurent
Brownhill
Anthony
Koleosho
Flemming
This user liked this post: mkmel
Re: Team v QPR
Cullen dreadful?burnley007 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 9:54 amCullen and Brownhill have been dreadful this season, only one of them should play, probably Brownhill, alongside Laurent.
If we persist with 3 defensive midfielders, this is going to be a long, painful season.
-
- Posts: 5315
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1523 times
- Has Liked: 1503 times
Re: Team v QPR
Expecting Laurent back for Hannibal. Will be interested whether Humphreys and Hountondji start for Pires and Koleosho.
-
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1187 times
- Has Liked: 1926 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: Team v QPR
And most of those teams don’t include LaurentAlan Young wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2024 9:02 amNumerous calls for Hountondji’s inclusion. I’m going back to bed.
I don’t think that they’ve been paying attention
This user liked this post: Spike
-
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1187 times
- Has Liked: 1926 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: Team v QPR
We were lacking a forward player with Cork and Cullen both in front of the back four
I think Cork got injured and we became more attacking just because of the players available (No criticism of Cork)
In the Prem we needed to be more defensive minded
-
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1187 times
- Has Liked: 1926 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: Team v QPR
Trafford
Roberts
CJR
Steve
Humphries
Cullen
Brownhill
Anthony
Laurent
Koleosho
Flemming
Roberts
CJR
Steve
Humphries
Cullen
Brownhill
Anthony
Laurent
Koleosho
Flemming
Re: Team v QPR
On course for 92 points , not lost in weeks yet some folk think we are dreadful
We are not the finished article and have a few injuries so hopefully we can better “ than dreadful”
Question is when we “ Free Tella” on New Years Day will he go straight into the team for the trip to Evilwood?
We are not the finished article and have a few injuries so hopefully we can better “ than dreadful”
Question is when we “ Free Tella” on New Years Day will he go straight into the team for the trip to Evilwood?
-
- Posts: 4929
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1252 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
Re: Team v QPR
Interesting how many people have dropped Brownhill from 'their' team or even said he's been 'dreadfull'. Even more interesting is how dropping this dreadfull player, who happens also to be our leading goalscorer, is going to help us score more goals.
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:11 am
- Been Liked: 260 times
- Has Liked: 76 times
Re: Team v QPR
They have to have a whipping boy,it usually fades but for some reason even though he’s our captain and top scorer they’ve stuck at it with Josh.Baffles me.Cirrus_Minor wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2024 10:26 pmInteresting how many people have dropped Brownhill from 'their' team or even said he's been 'dreadfull'. Even more interesting is how dropping this dreadfull player, who happens also to be our leading goalscorer, is going to help us score more goals.
This user liked this post: Cirrus_Minor
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 874 times
- Has Liked: 425 times
Re: Team v QPR
3 "defensive midfielders", in a team that presses so high up the pitch that occasionally all 11 players are in the opposition half, is very different to 3 "defensive midfielders" in a team that rarely gets into the opposition box
Edit:
Having read this back, I think I'm agreeing with you
-
- Posts: 8852
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 3021 times
- Has Liked: 1868 times
Re: Team v QPR
??? brownhill is one of the reasons we are where we are in this division. you are deluded to the point of insanity.burnley007 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 9:54 amCullen and Brownhill have been dreadful this season, only one of them should play, probably Brownhill, alongside Laurent.
If we persist with 3 defensive midfielders, this is going to be a long, painful season.
-
- Posts: 2057
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
- Been Liked: 299 times
- Has Liked: 568 times
Re: Team v QPR
whatever the team Parker puts out just get behind them as i for one didn't think we would be in this position now after pre season but we can only get better and have players to come back from injury. UTC...
These 3 users liked this post: Hbclaret007 warksclaret ArmchairDetective
-
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:42 pm
- Been Liked: 195 times
- Has Liked: 54 times
Re: Team v QPR
How about?
Trafford
Roberts
Humphrys
Esteve
Pires
Hannibal
Laurent
Brownhill
Flemming
Anthony
J'Rod
Cullen hasn't been great.
Can Hannibal play the defensive role?
Push Brownhill alongside Flemming with Anthony and J'Rod up front.
Trafford
Roberts
Humphrys
Esteve
Pires
Hannibal
Laurent
Brownhill
Flemming
Anthony
J'Rod
Cullen hasn't been great.
Can Hannibal play the defensive role?
Push Brownhill alongside Flemming with Anthony and J'Rod up front.
Re: Team v QPR
Trafford
Roberts Egan-Riley Steve Pires (only because QPR as the lad is iffy at the back)
Koleosho Brownhill Laurent Anthony
Flemming
Houdini
Roberts Egan-Riley Steve Pires (only because QPR as the lad is iffy at the back)
Koleosho Brownhill Laurent Anthony
Flemming
Houdini
-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:12 pm
- Been Liked: 556 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Team v QPR
Well said. We can all see where we need to improve but there is a lot to build on. We continue to accumulate points and look a good bet for a top six finish.Clive 1960 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:53 amwhatever the team Parker puts out just get behind them as i for one didn't think we would be in this position now after pre season but we can only get better and have players to come back from injury. UTC...
This user liked this post: Clive 1960
Re: Team v QPR
Winning