This is also my current thoughts. The only niggle I have, is the Fulham and Bournemouth fans both warned us this is what we would get.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 5:52 pmTotally agree that it’s not good to watch but I think he’s been dealt a bad hand and he needs some time. I recall people calling for Dyche’s head early in his time at Burnley.
I think it would be absolutely crazy to even consider changing manager.
Parker - In or Out
Re: Parker - In or Out
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 947 times
- Has Liked: 288 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Parker - In or Out
Out for me. Never going to work for him here.
-
- Posts: 3383
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 960 times
- Has Liked: 1330 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
It’s a bit dull isn’t it?
-
- Posts: 4235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2900 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Parker - In or Out
I said when we gave him the job it was this generation’s Brian Laws moment. Which it is.
There were plenty at the time of his miserable tenure who defended him, largely because he wasn’t a disliked predecessor. Sounds familiar.
Also equally obvious early on it was a mistake, and things would continue to get worse. Despite the pleas to give him a chance - as if positive posts on an online fans forum would suddenly make them a good manager - there wasn’t a single person disappointed when the trigger was belatedly pulled.
It’s just history repeating, same people in the same camps and we’ll stay there until this draws to its inevitable conclusion.
There were plenty at the time of his miserable tenure who defended him, largely because he wasn’t a disliked predecessor. Sounds familiar.
Also equally obvious early on it was a mistake, and things would continue to get worse. Despite the pleas to give him a chance - as if positive posts on an online fans forum would suddenly make them a good manager - there wasn’t a single person disappointed when the trigger was belatedly pulled.
It’s just history repeating, same people in the same camps and we’ll stay there until this draws to its inevitable conclusion.
These 5 users liked this post: quoonbeatz Guller Bull ksrclaret KefkaClaret alf_resco
-
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
My issue is that this is playing out exactly how Fulham and Bournemouth fans predicted it would. I'm therefore not expecting it to change. Given we've only scored 8 in our last 12 games (and i dont really think weve deserved even that many), I just can't see how it gets better from here
Re: Parker - In or Out
Out its getting worse every game
-
- Posts: 6746
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1973 times
- Has Liked: 504 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Silly thread and a bit insulting but I am now concerned and really the club need to be instructing him (not a choice) to explain to the fans his desires regarding attacking play and entertainment because I cannot remember a single question on this. Then we could and should give him time. As it stands the club give out these vacuous interviews with in-house "nothing questions" that although affable and open aren't very revealing because the questions are non-entities, e.g. "so tell me Scott, have you had a nice week with the squad?".
Human nature is that a vacuum must be filled by something, and these "Parker Out" threads fill it in the club's absence, and don't do the club any favours. This is where "fan engagement" really should come into its own.
Human nature is that a vacuum must be filled by something, and these "Parker Out" threads fill it in the club's absence, and don't do the club any favours. This is where "fan engagement" really should come into its own.
-
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 952 times
- Has Liked: 786 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Hmmm.
Tricky one.
Parker came with such a high pedigree from Bournemouth, Fulham and most notably Brugge, but for some reason it doesn't seem to have worked.
No idea why.
Tricky one.
Parker came with such a high pedigree from Bournemouth, Fulham and most notably Brugge, but for some reason it doesn't seem to have worked.
No idea why.
Re: Parker - In or Out
burnley007 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 6:00 pmHmmm.
Tricky one.
Parker came with such a high pedigree from Bournemouth, Fulham and most notably Brugge, but for some reason it doesn't seem to have worked.
No idea why.
You're really getting boring now!
Last edited by Leisure on Sun Nov 03, 2024 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 2 users liked this post: longsidepies Holtyclaret
Re: Parker - In or Out
Spot on.NottsClaret wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 5:57 pmI said when we gave him the job it was this generation’s Brian Laws moment. Which it is.
There were plenty at the time of his miserable tenure who defended him, largely because he wasn’t a disliked predecessor. Sounds familiar.
Also equally obvious early on it was a mistake, and things would continue to get worse. Despite the pleas to give him a chance - as if positive posts on an online fans forum would suddenly make them a good manager - there wasn’t a single person disappointed when the trigger was belatedly pulled.
It’s just history repeating, same people in the same camps and we’ll stay there until this draws to its inevitable conclusion.
Most of those saying in are, even in so many words in some cases, only doing so because they don't feel comfortable saying out after 13 league games. There is very little to no hope that Parker will suddenly become a manager who will coach us to attack games and score some goals.
-
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1433 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Parker - In or Out
Patience is a virtue and generally that applies to football managers as much as anything else. It's just that 1) this is what we were told to expect and 2) it's getting worse as time goes on.
VK earned patience from day one because while performances were up and down at this point, it was clear what direction we were going in. It seems clear what direction we're going now, and it's not positive.
VK earned patience from day one because while performances were up and down at this point, it was clear what direction we were going in. It seems clear what direction we're going now, and it's not positive.
Re: Parker - In or Out
Out. No excuses,it's not like today was a one off. I posted earlier we should have gone with attack minded Bellamy.
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 438 times
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 811 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Except despite being dealt a bad hand he’s also spent an absolute fortune in Championship terms.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 5:52 pmTotally agree that it’s not good to watch but I think he’s been dealt a bad hand and he needs some time. I recall people calling for Dyche’s head early in his time at Burnley.
I think it would be absolutely crazy to even consider changing manager.
He should be getting far more of a tune out of the players he has at his disposal.
These aren’t one off performances. It’s like watching the same game every single week - and against bang average teams (who have spent a pittance compared to us/Parker).
It’s dreadful.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 1150 times
- Has Liked: 279 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Parker - In or Out
In some ways he's been dealt a bad hand but in others he hasn't, he has better quality players than the majority of other managers.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 5:52 pmTotally agree that it’s not good to watch but I think he’s been dealt a bad hand and he needs some time. I recall people calling for Dyche’s head early in his time at Burnley.
I think it would be absolutely crazy to even consider changing manager.
The real concern is the lack of improvement, we aren't expecting to be the finished article but to see us moving towards it would be a comfort.
Teams were frightened of us two years ago, even early on in the season, they certainly aren't now.
This is where he has to show what he is made of, he's under pressure and in my opinion, quite rightly so.
Last edited by Goody1975 on Sun Nov 03, 2024 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 3 users liked this post: Vegas Claret Jakubs Tash longsidepies
-
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
- Been Liked: 337 times
- Has Liked: 255 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
100 percent in
-
- Posts: 76623
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37343 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Parker - In or Out
Do you know, I’m not bothered what they have to say, I’ll judge him on what happens with us. It’s not a good watch just now but I don’t think he’s got a good enough squad right now. Whether that changes when some of the injured players finally get fit we’ll have to see. But I’m not judging a manager on thirteen games. As I posted last week, that’s all that’s wrong in the game.
-
- Posts: 34426
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Parker - In or Out
Staggering if correct
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2024-11-03 10.09.00 AM.png (57.49 KiB) Viewed 2644 times
These 2 users liked this post: KefkaClaret Rowls
Re: Parker - In or Out
Its not been attractive or entertaining that's for sure.
But given that we started well, then had match winning players sold in the window, we've lost twice in 13.
We're fourth.
We've a team of players out injured.
Back the guy he's trying his best. Give him a break.
But given that we started well, then had match winning players sold in the window, we've lost twice in 13.
We're fourth.
We've a team of players out injured.
Back the guy he's trying his best. Give him a break.
-
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 489 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
If we had atleast a playstyle it would be easier to justify. It just seems to be keep it tight and rely on individual brilliance to score.
Re: Parker - In or Out
It's a bit unfair on the guy. He probably finds managing a toothless team as frustrating as the fans.
As has been said, the rug was pulled from under him as he walked in through the door. Alan Pace had a fire sale of major assets, leaving only a fortnight to assess team and bring in fresh players. Absolutely crazy situation.
If Pace was banking on a quick return to the PL without having to scrape the bottom of the parachute payments, that was the wrong way to go about it.
'Parker in'....but i fear we will end the season some way outside the play offs.
As has been said, the rug was pulled from under him as he walked in through the door. Alan Pace had a fire sale of major assets, leaving only a fortnight to assess team and bring in fresh players. Absolutely crazy situation.
If Pace was banking on a quick return to the PL without having to scrape the bottom of the parachute payments, that was the wrong way to go about it.
'Parker in'....but i fear we will end the season some way outside the play offs.
This user liked this post: jos
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5499 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
I've been really disappointed with the lack of idenity this team has and the cautious tactics Parker has taken however we've got a good squad and Parkers succeeded before so I think we should give him more time and I wouldn't advocate for making such a quick change
The one thing I do object to is this idea that Parker has been dealt a bad hand as despite the sales he's inherited the best squad any Bunley manager has for at least 40 years.
Teams always have to sell following relegation and when you take away the players both Kompany and Parker lost after taking over then I know which one I think had the harder task
Kompany starting squad 22/23
GK: Peacock-Farrell
Def: Lowton. Taylor, Roberts
Mid: Cork, JBG, Brownhill, Costello
Att: Rodriguez , Barnes
Parker starting squad 24/25
GK: Trafford
Def: Esteve, Beyer, Ekdal, Egan-Riley, Roberts,
Mid: Cullen, Brownhill, Benson, Massengo, Koleosho
Att: Foster, Rodriguez
The one thing I do object to is this idea that Parker has been dealt a bad hand as despite the sales he's inherited the best squad any Bunley manager has for at least 40 years.
Teams always have to sell following relegation and when you take away the players both Kompany and Parker lost after taking over then I know which one I think had the harder task
Kompany starting squad 22/23
GK: Peacock-Farrell
Def: Lowton. Taylor, Roberts
Mid: Cork, JBG, Brownhill, Costello
Att: Rodriguez , Barnes
Parker starting squad 24/25
GK: Trafford
Def: Esteve, Beyer, Ekdal, Egan-Riley, Roberts,
Mid: Cullen, Brownhill, Benson, Massengo, Koleosho
Att: Foster, Rodriguez
-
- Posts: 11193
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3611 times
- Has Liked: 2229 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Yeah that’s the problem.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 6:09 pmDo you know, I’m not bothered what they have to say, I’ll judge him on what happens with us.
-
- Posts: 6585
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1929 times
- Has Liked: 2869 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Parker - In or Out
I've usually been one for erring on the cautious side. However, the sort of performance we have seen today has now become the norm. I'm convinced that SP has lost his way in management somehow since his 'heady days'. It's only summise on my behalf but his football could not have been as uninspiring and soul- destroying as this. So, in answer to the question I will say 'yes'. The 'diehards' will continue to attend but the younger generation will be lost to the club if this continues. There are two attend with us but I wouldn't be surprised if they chose not to bother sooner than later.
-
- Posts: 3383
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 960 times
- Has Liked: 1330 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
So for you guys that are saying “ in” , what is it that you are seeing that makes you say that?
-
- Posts: 8256
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2482 times
- Has Liked: 2222 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
IN
Not his fault.
As for Pace, that's a different question
Not his fault.
As for Pace, that's a different question
This user liked this post: Stayingup
-
- Posts: 3284
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 737 times
- Has Liked: 64 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Those saying it’s not his fault, you do realise that he can set the side up to attack more despite who may have been sold etc?
His tactics are setting us up to fail at the moment .
His tactics are setting us up to fail at the moment .
-
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:38 am
- Been Liked: 134 times
- Has Liked: 372 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
In. Pace and the transfer window is to answer for a fairly substantial element of what we are seeing. However, the squad definitely is underperforming as well. It is horrible to watch. I can understand the Laws comparison that people are making above. It also comes off the back of the disgrace we had to tolerate last season so I'm not exactly surprised that some want this sorted quickly. It is becoming apparent that we have terrible owners.
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 438 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
As expensive as the squad was to assemble, I don’t think the forwards are good enough. Bring in a new manager all you want, but who’s going to get a tune out of Anthony, Koleosho, Foster, Jayrod or Hountonji?
The jury is still out on Fleming as we have no idea what his best position is yet for us, but it’s clear he’s not an out and out striker.
The jury is still out on Fleming as we have no idea what his best position is yet for us, but it’s clear he’s not an out and out striker.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 1150 times
- Has Liked: 279 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Parker - In or Out
Surely Anthony was a Parker signing though.helmclaret wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 6:27 pmAs expensive as the squad was to assemble, I don’t think the forwards are good enough. Bring in a new manager all you want, but who’s going to get a tune out of Anthony, Koleosho, Foster, Jayrod or Hountonji?
The jury is still out on Fleming as we have no idea what his best position is yet for us, but it’s clear he’s not an out and out striker.
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 438 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Yes, probably a last minute desperation one.
Anthony has shown glimpses of what he can do but he’s been far too timid for me overall.
Anthony has shown glimpses of what he can do but he’s been far too timid for me overall.
Re: Parker - In or Out
Why?
Why give him a chance but we can ask for Kompany out after 13 PL games? Kompany had achieved something Parker could only dream of for this club yet that wasn’t even enough credit in the bank.
-
- Posts: 6585
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1929 times
- Has Liked: 2869 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Parker - In or Out
My 'yes' earlier was for out. Not clear in the post.
Re: Parker - In or Out
I like Parker when he speaks, think he’s a nice fella and I want him to succeed but I just don’t see him as the long term man.
I don’t see us getting promotion like this but I think it’s probably too early and harsh to sack him now.
So do we just tread water for the sake of giving him time? Probably
I don’t see us getting promotion like this but I think it’s probably too early and harsh to sack him now.
So do we just tread water for the sake of giving him time? Probably
Re: Parker - In or Out
In terms of a core squad he has got a lot to work with and there's absolutely no doubt the football should be better with what he has.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 6:11 pmI've been really disappointed with the lack of idenity this team has and the cautious tactics Parker has taken however we've got a good squad and Parkers succeeded before so I think we should give him more time and I wouldn't advocate for making such a quick change
The one thing I do object to is this idea that Parker has been dealt a bad hand as despite the sales he's inherited the best squad any Bunley manager has for at least 40 years.
Teams always have to sell following relegation and when you take away the players both Kompany and Parker lost after taking over then I know which one I think had the harder task
Kompany starting squad 22/23
GK: Peacock-Farrell
Def: Lowton. Taylor, Roberts
Mid: Cork, JBG, Brownhill, Costello
Att: Rodriguez , Barnes
Parker starting squad 24/25
GK: Trafford
Def: Esteve, Beyer, Ekdal, Egan-Riley, Roberts,
Mid: Cullen, Brownhill, Benson, Massengo, Koleosho
Att: Foster, Rodriguez
In terms of the bad hand. In my view it's not about comparing what's gone before and who would do a better job. Parker has had to contend with pre-season being of little value given how the end of the window went.
Yes we had to sell but the way we went about it is clearly an ongoing challenge. It's his job to solve this obviously, but a very unsettling period when he's new to role isn't ideal.
Despite that I do expect much better, but I believe he deserves cutting slack under the circumstances.
These 2 users liked this post: Devils_Advocate ClaretMat
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 811 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Those forwards aren’t good enough. But Parker had enough time (and money) to recruit who he wanted.helmclaret wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 6:27 pmAs expensive as the squad was to assemble, I don’t think the forwards are good enough. Bring in a new manager all you want, but who’s going to get a tune out of Anthony, Koleosho, Foster, Jayrod or Hountonji?
The jury is still out on Fleming as we have no idea what his best position is yet for us, but it’s clear he’s not an out and out striker.
Also, it’s the manager who keeps on picking the same players in the same positions every week when it’s clearly not working. He never even switched his wingers over for 20 minutes.
It’s stale and it’s only heading in one direction to an inevitable end when it’s too late for this season.
Re: Parker - In or Out
How did Kompany screw us over with his signings when we’ve made profit on most of them?Shaggy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 5:31 pmParker ball is a serious downgrade in Dycheball both in entertainment and effectiveness.
Got to give him the chance but I don’t think he is the man to turn us around. Kompany has screwed us over with Al his stupid signings, and that is the real issue
If we don’t go up in the next 2 years then we are going to be bang in trouble.
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Frankly we have been on the whole worse rather than better unde our new owners. We've often relied on moments of brilliant e and since we flogged all the brilliant moment creators we've struggled.
I dont neccesarily think it's Parker's fault here - in the first 2 games we scored 9 in the first two but since then we've not averaged 1 per game.
We are too solid to be in danger but sides who don't score at least 1 per game don't get promoted. And that is our necessary outcome.
I don't think changing the manager will change that. We have not got enough going forward.
I dont neccesarily think it's Parker's fault here - in the first 2 games we scored 9 in the first two but since then we've not averaged 1 per game.
We are too solid to be in danger but sides who don't score at least 1 per game don't get promoted. And that is our necessary outcome.
I don't think changing the manager will change that. We have not got enough going forward.
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Because games aren't won and lost ona balance sheet. We bought too many who werebl investments and either didn't give a **** about the club or felt the club didn't give a **** about them.
We are ******
Re: Parker - In or Out
In
Although we are in a very good position from a resource point of view, being asked to pretty much rebuild the team in a couple of weeks would be challenging for anybody. He's also not had the chance to have both Foster and Flemming in the same squad, nevermind the same 11 and I think that could make a big difference. The midfield setup at the moment clearly isn't quite working without a number 10 (Hannibal clearly isn't, Sarmiento maybe could be).
We do however need to see a difference in the intent of the team. Currently it seems like we are playing to keep the ball and keep the opposition at arms length, rather than looking to hurt the opposition and win games.
Although we are in a very good position from a resource point of view, being asked to pretty much rebuild the team in a couple of weeks would be challenging for anybody. He's also not had the chance to have both Foster and Flemming in the same squad, nevermind the same 11 and I think that could make a big difference. The midfield setup at the moment clearly isn't quite working without a number 10 (Hannibal clearly isn't, Sarmiento maybe could be).
We do however need to see a difference in the intent of the team. Currently it seems like we are playing to keep the ball and keep the opposition at arms length, rather than looking to hurt the opposition and win games.
Re: Parker - In or Out
I think the chaotic transfer window, and complete mismanagement of this squad over the past 12 months, means I’m still in the ‘in’ camp.
The sad thing is that I could’ve gone today, but decided to stay at home with the kids. I predicted 0-0, and like most of us, probably expected a turgid game, but that showing was truly turgid.
If and when fans start voting with their feet, which they will if this continues, then the pressure will really start to mount. And I don’t think that time is too far off, unfortunately.
The sad thing is that I could’ve gone today, but decided to stay at home with the kids. I predicted 0-0, and like most of us, probably expected a turgid game, but that showing was truly turgid.
If and when fans start voting with their feet, which they will if this continues, then the pressure will really start to mount. And I don’t think that time is too far off, unfortunately.
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret
-
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 952 times
- Has Liked: 786 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Parker is doing a cracking job
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1841 times
- Has Liked: 2186 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
In we are not Watford give the guy a break
-
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1741 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
This is the issue - when the home fans stop turning up. Winter kicking in and a glut of games coming up. Keep serving this up and Pace will be seeing a lot more empty seats.TsarBomba wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 7:12 pmI think the chaotic transfer window, and complete mismanagement of this squad over the past 12 months, means I’m still in the ‘in’ camp.
The sad thing is that I could’ve gone today, but decided to stay at home with the kids. I predicted 0-0, and like most of us, probably expected a turgid game, but that showing was truly turgid.
If and when fans start voting with their feet, which they will if this continues, then the pressure will really start to mount. And I don’t think that time is too far off, unfortunately.
-
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 952 times
- Has Liked: 786 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
Parker will be the next Real Madrid manager
-
- Posts: 3264
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1086 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
It comes down to what kind of club we want to be. Do we want to change managers every time its not going well? Retrospectively does Dyche get the chance to take us up if we have that kind of model? Changing managers all the time is expensive, and often the grass is always greener.
Parker isn't stupid, knowing what needs fixing and fixing it are two different things. Parker wasn't my choice personally, but he's here now. And for me he at least gets the season to show progress.
Parker isn't stupid, knowing what needs fixing and fixing it are two different things. Parker wasn't my choice personally, but he's here now. And for me he at least gets the season to show progress.
-
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 523 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
In, but I won't be buying many more tickets unless the football starts serving to entertain.
-
- Posts: 3156
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 187 times
Re: Parker - In or Out
7 of VKs starting squad were established PL players. Only Brownhill of the current squad has more than one PL season under his belt other than Jay Rod who is 35.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 6:11 pmI've been really disappointed with the lack of idenity this team has and the cautious tactics Parker has taken however we've got a good squad and Parkers succeeded before so I think we should give him more time and I wouldn't advocate for making such a quick change
The one thing I do object to is this idea that Parker has been dealt a bad hand as despite the sales he's inherited the best squad any Bunley manager has for at least 40 years.
Teams always have to sell following relegation and when you take away the players both Kompany and Parker lost after taking over then I know which one I think had the harder task
Kompany starting squad 22/23
GK: Peacock-Farrell
Def: Lowton. Taylor, Roberts
Mid: Cork, JBG, Brownhill, Costello
Att: Rodriguez , Barnes
Parker starting squad 24/25
GK: Trafford
Def: Esteve, Beyer, Ekdal, Egan-Riley, Roberts,
Mid: Cullen, Brownhill, Benson, Massengo, Koleosho
Att: Foster, Rodriguez
In VKs squad, the club added to the 7 PL players a player who was good enough to play for a team that won the Bundesliga last season and one who played in the Champions league final.
There is absolutely no comparison between the two squads. None whatsoever.
Re: Parker - In or Out
Tella and Maatsen in the Championship was cheating.