Substitutions

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
dermotdermot
Posts: 3737
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 696 times
Has Liked: 207 times

Substitutions

Post by dermotdermot » Sun Dec 29, 2024 9:58 pm

Possibly amongst the worst I have ever seen. Completely killed the game off. Took off the two best players to begin with and then opted for Rodriguez over Foster. I'm lost for words.

Burnleyareback2
Posts: 3000
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:07 pm
Been Liked: 891 times
Has Liked: 1683 times
Location: Mostly Europe

Re: Substitutions

Post by Burnleyareback2 » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:08 pm

Point away from home, clean sheet against a top 6 side over a busy Christmas.

Bank it and move on.
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat Holtyclaret

alboclaret
Posts: 922
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 188 times
Has Liked: 116 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by alboclaret » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:09 pm

Just said same coming off.
On the flip side there was probably a little eye on another 2 games this week. Need to use the squad a bit.

Midfield looked a little leggy tonight.

Luppy
Posts: 398
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 107 times
Has Liked: 25 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by Luppy » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:11 pm

Squad rotation with an eye on 2 huge games in next 6 days
This user liked this post: Bosscat

TsarBomba
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1474 times
Has Liked: 418 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by TsarBomba » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:12 pm

Huge fan of Parker, but he got the starting 11 wrong tonight, and subs too.

There hasn’t been much rotation, despite having the squad, and our decision making across the pitch tonight reflected that.

hoosier-daddy
Posts: 971
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 5:13 pm
Been Liked: 173 times
Has Liked: 282 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by hoosier-daddy » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:12 pm

Need to give the guy a break. Anthony ran all game and looked shattered. Subs don't always work, that's just the way it goes.
These 3 users liked this post: boatshed bill louieollie AfloatinClaret

RVclaret
Posts: 16505
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3056 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by RVclaret » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:13 pm

I was pleased Sarmiento was brought on as it felt like a bit of magic was needed at the time. I’m sure there would be moans by people if he hadn’t come on, along the lines of ‘he’s got Sarmiento on the bench, a match winner, why not bring him on????’ Anthony was playing well, you don’t take Brownhill off so Hannibal was probably the best option to sub.

Flemming was a bit off it tonight I felt so subbing him off also felt right. Jay had done fine in the team lately. The question is, would Foster have been ready for 20 minutes of action or are they bringing him back slowly, given a relatively lengthy absence?

boyyanno
Posts: 2233
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 762 times
Has Liked: 168 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by boyyanno » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:15 pm

Subs didn't work tonight but they weren't negative as I've seen some people say- Parker clearly wanted to go on and win the game.

hoosier-daddy
Posts: 971
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 5:13 pm
Been Liked: 173 times
Has Liked: 282 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by hoosier-daddy » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:15 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:13 pm
I was pleased Sarmiento was brought on as it felt like a bit of magic was needed at the time. I’m sure there would be moans by people if he hadn’t come on, along the lines of ‘he’s got Sarmiento on the bench, a match winner, why not bring him on????’ Anthony was playing well, you don’t take Brownhill off so Hannibal was probably the best option to sub.

Flemming was a bit off it tonight I felt so subbing him off also felt right. Jay had done fine in the team lately. The question is, would Foster have been ready for 20 minutes of action or are they bringing him back slowly, given a relatively lengthy absence?
I'd have brought Foster on earlier, but those subs could have easily made the difference on another night. We can't be complaining after the fact, because Anthony ran all night and was out of juice.

taio
Posts: 12828
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by taio » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:16 pm

dermotdermot wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 9:58 pm
Possibly amongst the worst I have ever seen. Completely killed the game off. Took off the two best players to begin with and then opted for Rodriguez over Foster. I'm lost for words.
Hannibal wasn't one of our two best players

ksrclaret
Posts: 8071
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 3059 times
Has Liked: 867 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:18 pm

The worst substitutions you've ever seen?
These 3 users liked this post: AmbleClaret Burnleyareback2 Poulton-le-Claret

alboclaret
Posts: 922
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 188 times
Has Liked: 116 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by alboclaret » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:25 pm

Nothing wrong with the subs but they didn't work. Like people have said that's the way it goes.
Boro forward caused us a few problem closing down quick when he came one.
This user liked this post: longsidepies

claretspice
Posts: 6442
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3179 times
Has Liked: 151 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by claretspice » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:30 pm

Worst subs ever? Not even close.

Personally I thought there was a good case for Koleosho coming on for Hannibal or Laurent to give us an option for a ball in behind or wide left to beat Boro's aggressive press - they were pushing high and contesting the space at times and we were a bit narrow and comgested at times. Equally Foster might have offered that sort of threat. But Sarmiento has been good recently so it wasn't that outlandish to bring him on to play a similar role to Hannibal with perhaps a bit more creativity, and of course Foster is only just returning from a long lay off and needs careful management.

I'd be surprised if we don't see changes on Wednesday.

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 3243
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 297 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by Jakubs Tash » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:33 pm

The problem with the majority of the subs tonight was that, Sarmiento apart (because I could see the logic in this change), you are bringing on inferior players and they had no impact.
These 2 users liked this post: JohnDearyMe Silkyskills1

dermotdermot
Posts: 3737
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 696 times
Has Liked: 207 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by dermotdermot » Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:48 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:18 pm
The worst substitutions you've ever seen?
I said “amongst” the worst.

Maybe, on reflection, that was a slight overreaction but I’ve seen Scott Parker do that before. Hannibal wasn’t playing as well as he did the other day but he was just starting to grow into the game and take control. Sarmiento wasn’t bad but the other two offered nothing.

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4928
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1252 times
Has Liked: 1487 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:11 pm

We were getting a bit leggy, not surprised with the substitutions really.

NewClaret
Posts: 17686
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3980 times
Has Liked: 4932 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by NewClaret » Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:27 pm

I think the subs were fine.

They were positive, added pace and trickery plus experience with time to make an impact. Definitely not even close to the worst I’ve ever seen or amongst the worst I’ve ever seen.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 12244
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 6027 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:31 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:18 pm
The worst substitutions you've ever seen?
He clearly didn't see Frédéric Nimani.

Silkyskills1
Posts: 6640
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1947 times
Has Liked: 2895 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Substitutions

Post by Silkyskills1 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:06 am

The subs, quality wise, are on the whole not good enough to change a game. Defensively, yes but offensively no. Koleosho is having a difficult time; not in the starting line up and then coming on in place of Hannibal without his defensive capabilities almost becomes a liability. There was a game there to be won tonight but I thought that as the second half went on it became a game to be saved.
This user liked this post: Darnhill Claret

jojomk1
Posts: 5669
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 978 times
Has Liked: 654 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by jojomk1 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 6:21 am

We played well last night
Anthony, for me, was having his best game of the season
Brownhill, whilst he missed the best chances, looked like our main chance for a goal
Taking those two off killed any chance of winning the match
The players coming on had nowhere near the same effect

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8716
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1877 times
Has Liked: 2238 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by Woodleyclaret » Mon Dec 30, 2024 6:50 am

Wrong subs wrong time disappointing to loose points to a very average team but 6 points beckon so 10 points over Xmas New Year not a bad haul UTC

CaptJohn
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
Been Liked: 559 times
Has Liked: 412 times
Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
Contact:

Re: Substitutions

Post by CaptJohn » Mon Dec 30, 2024 8:19 am

I thought he got it wrong as well but I also felt he should have used his squad more from the start. Some of the team looked tired in the 2nd half, no wonder with the games coming thick and fast, and he should have done at least three changes on the 60 minute mark to freshen things up. His eventual substitutions actually handed the initiative to Boro.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

Clive 1960
Posts: 2056
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
Been Liked: 299 times
Has Liked: 568 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by Clive 1960 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 11:25 am

sometimes they come off and sometimes they don't ..

GetIntoEm
Posts: 3090
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 840 times
Has Liked: 241 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by GetIntoEm » Mon Dec 30, 2024 11:28 am

Can someone tell me what subs they would have preferred to have seen?

Koleosho was needed at that point, unfortunately they swapped their left back out straight away to deal with it. Good management there from wilder.

Flemming was hardly in the game, arguably I'd have swapped for foster rather than Jay, but the plan was obviously to go for it and get 2 up top late on.

Wise subs, just didn't come off.

warksclaret
Posts: 8765
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2330 times
Has Liked: 1293 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by warksclaret » Mon Dec 30, 2024 11:49 am

GetIntoEm wrote:
Mon Dec 30, 2024 11:28 am
Can someone tell me what subs they would have preferred to have seen?

Koleosho was needed at that point, unfortunately they swapped their left back out straight away to deal with it. Good management there from wilder.

Flemming was hardly in the game, arguably I'd have swapped for foster rather than Jay, but the plan was obviously to go for it and get 2 up top late on.

Wise subs, just didn't come off.
Wilder gets about :lol:

Happy with subs but had I been Foster I might have felt a bit demotivated seeing Jay go on instead of him. Foster needs to be featuring more now hes fit, and in fairness Flemming was a little out of it last night. We move on
This user liked this post: Lakeland Claret

NL Claret
Posts: 2813
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 343 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by NL Claret » Mon Dec 30, 2024 11:53 am

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:31 pm
He clearly didn't see Frédéric Nimani.
Or Dane Richards

FCBurnley
Posts: 11620
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2291 times
Has Liked: 1379 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by FCBurnley » Mon Dec 30, 2024 12:08 pm

What is the point of having Foster on the bench. If he was not considered good enough to come on for last 30 mins last night then he never will be. Josh B and Flemming were both knackered at half time along with one or two others. Perfect chance for Foster.

AmbleClaret
Posts: 769
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 319 times
Has Liked: 192 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by AmbleClaret » Mon Dec 30, 2024 4:47 pm

NL Claret wrote:
Mon Dec 30, 2024 11:53 am
Or Dane Richards
Was he the sub who got subbed after about 10 minutes,not due to injury?

Lakeland Claret
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2024 9:02 am
Been Liked: 20 times
Has Liked: 30 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by Lakeland Claret » Mon Dec 30, 2024 4:50 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Mon Dec 30, 2024 11:49 am
Wilder gets about :lol:

Happy with subs but had I been Foster I might have felt a bit demotivated seeing Jay go on instead of him. Foster needs to be featuring more now hes fit, and in fairness Flemming was a little out of it last night. We move on
Wasn't Wilder Boro manager before Carrick ? Had a spell at Watford too I think

Elizabeth
Posts: 5310
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1520 times
Has Liked: 1503 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by Elizabeth » Mon Dec 30, 2024 4:54 pm

I think we'll see more of Foster over the next 2 games. I would not like to predict he'll be on the field come March but we'll see

NL Claret
Posts: 2813
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 343 times

Re: Substitutions

Post by NL Claret » Mon Dec 30, 2024 4:55 pm

AmbleClaret wrote:
Mon Dec 30, 2024 4:47 pm
Was he the sub who got subbed after about 10 minutes,not due to injury?
I think he might have lasted more than 10 minutes. Think he came on in first half and was taken off in the 2nd. it was in 1 of them really drab home games in Dyche first season

Post Reply