boyyanno wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:49 am
Been in the team of the year when gaining promotion at this level previously.
Started and captained his team in the PL (they stayed up)
Played and featured regularly in the top two decisions of English football.
Was signed and immediately came in to the team in a higher squad position than Ekdal.
Ekdal has played less than 20 games at a decent standard, been quickly replaced and punted out on loan to a team below our standard. I'll ask again, what suggests he's anywhere near as good as Worrall?
You're aware Ekdal has been injured for the majority of his time here. There in lies the problem, you can't rely on a centre back who doesn't stay fit for prolonged periods.
If he'd been fit for pre season it might have been a different story but again he was injured and missed his chance. His injury along with Worrall's has actually been the making of Egan-Rileys career.
If Egan Riley hadn't got that chance he might have been down in league one or back in Scotland, sat on the bench waiting for a chance there. A lot of it is about opportunity and Ekdal hasn't had much of that where as Worrall had it easier in the sense he didn't need to move.
Your use of arbitrary evidence like 'he was in team of the season' Is laughable along with his PL record. He never made it at that level, hence him being shipped out for a pretty low fee. If hed have been much use to them i'd have thought theyd want to keep someone who by sll accounts has an excellent character and has come through their own system.
My own eyes tell me he is as good as Worrall (better actually imo) and that's all that really matters, it's subjective. We also don't know what toll the injuries have taken on his body.