Wouldn't Joe Worrall be next seasons Joe Worrall
Ben Mee
Re: Ben Mee
There's a bit of a Myth that were signing loads of old pro's. As far as I can see we've got two players who are over 30, Laurent and Barnes. Adding Ben Mee to that mix would not exactly tip us over the edge imo.
Steady PL defender, good character and leader coming to the end of his career joins a newly promoted/young side as a squad option. Tale as old as time, uninspiring but needed sometimes. Not one to be upset about or write home about imo.
I'm putting faith in the club this window and I'd be happy if we sign a few experienced heads for little outlay if it allows us to spend on quality to add to the group. I think there's a pre conceived notion that Ben Mee is finished at this level, it was the same when he left us. He's still played games for a decent PL side but he has been hampered by injuries recently. He never relied on pace so I don't believe he's finished to the point that he couldn't offer a steady option if needed- Brentford seemed to think so.
Steady PL defender, good character and leader coming to the end of his career joins a newly promoted/young side as a squad option. Tale as old as time, uninspiring but needed sometimes. Not one to be upset about or write home about imo.
I'm putting faith in the club this window and I'd be happy if we sign a few experienced heads for little outlay if it allows us to spend on quality to add to the group. I think there's a pre conceived notion that Ben Mee is finished at this level, it was the same when he left us. He's still played games for a decent PL side but he has been hampered by injuries recently. He never relied on pace so I don't believe he's finished to the point that he couldn't offer a steady option if needed- Brentford seemed to think so.
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat billyhamilton82
-
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
- Been Liked: 748 times
- Has Liked: 1945 times
Re: Ben Mee
It might save a transfer fee, but it loses us an opportunity to make a profitable player re-sale, takes up one of our twenty five squad places and still costs us a salary; I can't see Ben Mee playing for free and reckon we could buy and pay a promising twenty year old for what we'd need to pay Ben.
-
- Posts: 8627
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2299 times
- Has Liked: 1269 times
Re: Ben Mee
Less games in the PL so an active squad of 22 would allow for 2-3 "old heads". Ben might see this as an opportunity to get into management. means we need to be ruthless in moving a significant number of players on ie Delcroix, Obefemi, Churlinov, Santos, Costelloe and a number more
Re: Ben Mee
If Mee thinks he still has something to offer, he ain’t gonna come here as fifth choice.
He’ll probably end up dropping down a division.
He’ll probably end up dropping down a division.
Re: Ben Mee
The problem is you can't apply the profitable resale to every signing in every window. We can't afford it.AfloatinClaret wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 9:44 pmIt might save a transfer fee, but it loses us an opportunity to make a profitable player re-sale, takes up one of our twenty five squad places and still costs us a salary; I can't see Ben Mee playing for free and reckon we could buy and pay a promising twenty year old for what we'd need to pay Ben.
I already posted on the transfer thread what imo is a list of the required squad, 28 realistically, which needs to be made up of at least 3 under 21's. In what positions that doesn't matter.
Your promising 20 year old isn't going to want to come in as fourth choice centre half. It's swings and roundabouts. With that but you missed the bit at the end I said that the ideal would be to sign a under 21 promising youngster. But again price, playing time all things that realistically a player down the pecking order isn't quite as bothered about at 35.
That's before I even talk about experience, his time at Brentford, his history with our club and his leadership.
No brainer.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 945 times
Re: Ben Mee
If we wrote all our players off that season after a bad 45 mins then we'd have ended up forfeiting the season
-
- Posts: 9440
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2796 times
- Has Liked: 2780 times
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:42 am
- Been Liked: 92 times
- Has Liked: 249 times
Re: Ben Mee
At last, a sensible comment. Totally agree. No doubt he'd be a huge asset in the Prem. People forget our how poorly our inexperienced side did in the Prem last time around. We need experienced heads, and Mee is a great leader.
These 2 users liked this post: BertiesBeehole Steddyman
Re: Ben Mee
The 2 year contract could be because, as there is no transfer fee. Ben Mee could be entitled to ask for higher wages. That may be out of sync with our pay requirements, so the pay he agrees could be for half pay but for 2 years instead of one. Second year, there may be an alternative plan.
-
- Posts: 34667
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12648 times
- Has Liked: 6298 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Ben Mee
Speaking ahead of Brentford’s last home match of the season against Fulham, Mee told the club’s official website: “Sunday will be my last game at the Gtech.
“I’d like to thank the Bees fans for the amazing support you’ve given me during these last three years - it’s really meant a lot. This is a unique club full of fantastic people and I’m really proud and grateful to have had the pleasure to play here.
“I still have a lot more to give on the pitch and I’ll certainly be looking to do that somewhere next season and beyond. For now, let’s hope we can have a strong finish to the season.”
Brentford head coach Thomas Frank added: “Ben has been fantastic for us. His first season was outstanding; he was a big part of us finishing ninth in the Premier League.
“He has not had as many minutes in the two seasons since then, but he has always performed when called upon and been invaluable off the pitch. He has helped us build a strong culture and shared his knowledge with the younger players about how to be a top defender.
“Ben is a top pro and a top person - he will be missed. We wish him all the best for the future.”
“I’d like to thank the Bees fans for the amazing support you’ve given me during these last three years - it’s really meant a lot. This is a unique club full of fantastic people and I’m really proud and grateful to have had the pleasure to play here.
“I still have a lot more to give on the pitch and I’ll certainly be looking to do that somewhere next season and beyond. For now, let’s hope we can have a strong finish to the season.”
Brentford head coach Thomas Frank added: “Ben has been fantastic for us. His first season was outstanding; he was a big part of us finishing ninth in the Premier League.
“He has not had as many minutes in the two seasons since then, but he has always performed when called upon and been invaluable off the pitch. He has helped us build a strong culture and shared his knowledge with the younger players about how to be a top defender.
“Ben is a top pro and a top person - he will be missed. We wish him all the best for the future.”
Re: Ben Mee
Every Burnley fan, I believe, holds Ben Mee in high esteem. He's a model professional and a latter-day Claret icon.Hanoverusaclaret wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 10:07 pmAt last, a sensible comment. Totally agree. No doubt he'd be a huge asset in the Prem. People forget our how poorly our inexperienced side did in the Prem last time around. We need experienced heads, and Mee is a great leader.
But he's 35.
On the other hand, you can be sure he's as fit as possible for his age.
Ben Mee knows the PL. He knows his body. I really would not see him coming back to this club to take us for a ride.
If Scott Parker thought Ben could do a job as back-up then I would be delighted to see him back.
This user liked this post: Goodclaret
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:50 am
- Been Liked: 477 times
- Has Liked: 535 times
Re: Ben Mee
Very astute signing if true.
The mixture of youth and experience is what will keep us up.
He's never had pace, its his reading of the game and tenacity that makes him a top defender.
Just reading the Brentford forum tells you all you need to know.
https://griffinpark.org/forums/threads/ ... 47/page-40
The mixture of youth and experience is what will keep us up.
He's never had pace, its his reading of the game and tenacity that makes him a top defender.
Just reading the Brentford forum tells you all you need to know.
https://griffinpark.org/forums/threads/ ... 47/page-40
These 2 users liked this post: BertiesBeehole LincsWoldsClaret
-
- Posts: 8839
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 3020 times
- Has Liked: 1865 times
Re: Ben Mee
Ben was tremendous, a model pro elsewhere too, but its 2025, we just got promoted to a viciously harsh division. we need the blend of youth and experience that recent recruitment has brought. sadly no room for nostalgia where we are going.
-
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:16 am
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 663 times
-
- Posts: 10959
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1342 times
- Has Liked: 889 times
Re: Ben Mee
Realistically can you see anybody else offering him PL football maybe Sunderland at a push nobody else. So it's 1 year take or leave it or ben decides to drop down or hang his boots up. He left us to pursue extended PL football upon our relegation which he was entitled to do as it was the best for him & his family & by that same token the club are entitled to go the way that's in their best interests. Loyalty is a 2 way street.IanMcL wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 10:19 pmThe 2 year contract could be because, as there is no transfer fee. Ben Mee could be entitled to ask for higher wages. That may be out of sync with our pay requirements, so the pay he agrees could be for half pay but for 2 years instead of one. Second year, there may be an alternative plan.
Re: Ben Mee
I was just pointing out that Al Dakhill did get a chance to play to CH in the PL, he actually started a game over O’Shea. Think VK wrote him off after the Chelsea game.
Re: Ben Mee
If SP thinks that Ben Mee can add something around the place next season, that's good enough for me. Nathan Tella coming back would be pretty major as well.
Let's hope that the spin doctor's son has had someone in his life teach him to tell the truth!
Let's hope that the spin doctor's son has had someone in his life teach him to tell the truth!
-
- Posts: 6784
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1980 times
- Has Liked: 507 times
Re: Ben Mee
I’d be quite happy with Ben returning. For that matter I’d try to get Tripps too. We need experience, but we also need younger players as well. It has to be a blend. Think of their input if we go 6 defeats on the bounce and heads start to drop on the training pitch. Invaluable.
-
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 371 times
- Has Liked: 989 times
Re: Ben Mee
no just no
There is a reason Brentford haven't renewed
There is a reason Brentford haven't renewed
-
- Posts: 5254
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1504 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
Re: Ben Mee
The two clubs are in different positions. Brentford are now an established PL team and their squad planning will be different to ours.Wokingclaret wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 11:09 pmno just no
There is a reason Brentford haven't renewed
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 17289
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3555 times
- Has Liked: 7796 times
Re: Ben Mee
I'm getting a bit bored with the concept that any returning (old) ex players will automatically be good "mentors".
And Burnley FC is a professional Football Club, not some sort of "Boys to Men" establishment.
And Burnley FC is a professional Football Club, not some sort of "Boys to Men" establishment.
-
- Posts: 6765
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2117 times
- Has Liked: 1058 times
Re: Ben Mee
Holy ****.Elizabeth wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 8:36 pmJoe Worrall is only 28 and while his experience will be important he is not there to mentor. I'm not sure what the position is with Barnes contract wise but even if he is there next season there is no correlation between him and Mee.
Why would the club pay wages for cheerleaders which is basically what you are describing Mee and Barnes as being if they were in the squad.
I genuinely thought he was about 33.
-
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 371 times
- Has Liked: 989 times
-
- Posts: 983
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:24 pm
- Been Liked: 231 times
- Has Liked: 11 times
Re: Ben Mee
Please no. As much as I have respect for Ben Mee and how good he was for us, we don't need him back.
-
- Posts: 14708
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5667 times
- Has Liked: 5895 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Ben Mee
No, Ive actually got good sources on this one. Straight from the Gawthorpe’s mouth, so to speak.
Ben Mee will be next season's Joe Worrall.
Worrall will be the next Michael Duff and Stephen Graham is in talks to be our new Joe Worrall.
Pace wants a 2 year contract but Graham needs to get out of an ITV drama before he can commit.
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 945 times
Re: Ben Mee
Well I suppose we could put it down to that!
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 945 times
Re: Ben Mee
Fans wanting Ben Mee to sign a 2 year deal saying it's a good deal because we are in the premier league with less games......what happens in 12 months when we are likely in the championship and left with Ben Mee who couldn't manage a 46 game season and no sell on value?
Re: Ben Mee
Ben Mee hasn't played for this club for 3 years and we (plus football in general) have changed a lot in that time
His knowledge of this club in its current form probably extends to him still knowing where the toilets are
"He still thinks he has a lot to offer" - he's hardly likely to say he is now not up to Premier League standard although Brentford clearly think he isn't
A backward step but "legends" live on with some fans
These 2 users liked this post: MeeActon1 Clarky
Re: Ben Mee
I think it was more a case of not wanted by Mr K.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 10:41 pmRealistically can you see anybody else offering him PL football maybe Sunderland at a push nobody else. So it's 1 year take or leave it or ben decides to drop down or hang his boots up. He left us to pursue extended PL football upon our relegation which he was entitled to do as it was the best for him & his family & by that same token the club are entitled to go the way that's in their best interests. Loyalty is a 2 way street.
-
- Posts: 10959
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1342 times
- Has Liked: 889 times
Re: Ben Mee
Ben needed a fresh challenge & being offered a 2 year deal at a PL club was far more enticing than a championship campaign. Even if kompany wanted him I still think he would have left. Then you had all that humming & harring previously with gibson replacing him & ben changing his mind & the other ben being sidelined which didn't appear professional. A timed retracted offer could have avoided all that instead of people being messed about.
Re: Ben Mee
I actually laughed at this. Clearly Ekdal is a much worse player than Ben Mee.
Re: Ben Mee
Mee is a great professional, he’s also a great person.Hanoverusaclaret wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 10:07 pmAt last, a sensible comment. Totally agree. No doubt he'd be a huge asset in the Prem. People forget our how poorly our inexperienced side did in the Prem last time around. We need experienced heads, and Mee is a great leader.
But.
He’s the player leader of a previous management team. A team that had a very clear vision, plan and design.
We’re not that team anymore. I wouldn’t want him if I was SP. I wouldn’t want to come back if I was BM.
Re: Ben Mee
Exactly
-
- Posts: 8627
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2299 times
- Has Liked: 1269 times
Re: Ben Mee
Its possible Worrall and Parker have had a grown up conversation, with the player saying he is only 28 and wants regular football, with Scott being honest and saying he cannot guarantee it in the PL. Maybe Joe will move on to secure regular football in which case Ben would become the back up CH and defensive mentor to the team, and that would make more financial sense than both in the squad
Re: Ben Mee
You don’t think there’s an ‘apprenticeship’ model in professional sport?boatshed bill wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 11:50 pmI'm getting a bit bored with the concept that any returning (old) ex players will automatically be good "mentors".
And Burnley FC is a professional Football Club, not some sort of "Boys to Men" establishment.
Old teach the young; it’s the way.
Re: Ben Mee
Ekdal is a much worse player than Ben Mee WAS,not IS he's 35,it's the premier league we already have experienced players to support the team off field, especially if Barnes signs,we don't need Mee,FFS give your head a wobble
-
- Posts: 5254
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1504 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
Re: Ben Mee
Mee's strong emotional connection and passion for the club will bridge the gap quickly. He'll probably know more about the club's recent transformation than some people think. So no, you don't necessarily lose all knowledge of a club after being away 3 years.jojomk1 wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 7:20 amBen Mee hasn't played for this club for 3 years and we (plus football in general) have changed a lot in that time
His knowledge of this club in its current form probably extends to him still knowing where the toilets are
"He still thinks he has a lot to offer" - he's hardly likely to say he is now not up to Premier League standard although Brentford clearly think he isn't
A backward step but "legends" live on with some fans
We've been out of the PL two of the last three seasons and the popular belief is that it has outgrown promoted clubs. What better than signing a player who has experienced how the PL has changed during this time.
As for scepticism over Mee's playing ability at the top level. Mee lost his regular place due to injury not form. Brentford have better players and are a much better team than we can hope to be at the present time. I wouldn't be fooled into thinking his release there means he is no longer capable of playing at the top level.
Re: Ben Mee
Father time decides that,and as yet nobody has been able to beat it.The younger faster premier league forwards will be all over him,as we age the reaction time also slows,we simply wouldn't be able to cope.Ots not my decision,it's mother nature unfortunately
This user liked this post: randomclaret2
Re: Ben Mee
In the last 3 years Ben Mee has played double the amount of games as Ekdal at a much higher level.
You'll have to excuse me for wondering on what basis people think Ekdal is anywhere near good enough for the PL.
-
- Posts: 8625
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1860 times
- Has Liked: 2226 times
Re: Ben Mee
Ekdal is an international and imo worth keeping as a squad player but if this situation re Ben is actually real then he will be surplus to requirements and can be sold on
Re: Ben Mee
As the football saying goes "You can't have too many ex players putting out cones for a training session".
This user liked this post: randomclaret2
-
- Posts: 7815
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 3105 times
- Has Liked: 4854 times
Re: Ben Mee
Spot on...what is this constant obsession with re-signing players who did well for us years ago ? There is literally a whole world of players out there available to us nowgtclaret wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 9:12 amFather time decides that,and as yet nobody has been able to beat it.The younger faster premier league forwards will be all over him,as we age the reaction time also slows,we simply wouldn't be able to cope.Ots not my decision,it's mother nature unfortunately
These 2 users liked this post: Tribesmen MeeActon1
Re: Ben Mee
No one is obsessed, someone has suggested we may be offering Mee a contract, some people think he'll be an okay squad option on a free transfer and some people disagree.randomclaret2 wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 9:24 amSpot on...what is this constant obsession with re-signing players who did well for us years ago ? There is literally a whole world of players out there available to us now
I don't see anyone clamouring for him to sign, I don't get why people have to embellish everything.
-
- Posts: 5708
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1302 times
- Has Liked: 700 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: Ben Mee
You really have hit the nail on the head .randomclaret2 wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 9:24 amSpot on...what is this constant obsession with re-signing players who did well for us years ago ? There is literally a whole world of players out there available to us now
-
- Posts: 8287
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2457 times
- Has Liked: 3512 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: Ben Mee
I could see him turning up at Bournemouth or Sunderland. But with us, unless we loan out Ekdal and/or Beyer i'm not sure there is a slot?
-
- Posts: 7699
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1923 times
- Has Liked: 4277 times
Re: Ben Mee
Is there evidence that Beyer will be anywhere near ready for PL football in August? (Genuine question).ŽižkovClaret wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 9:41 amI could see him turning up at Bournemouth or Sunderland. But with us, unless we loan out Ekdal and/or Beyer i'm not sure there is a slot?
I am undecided about Mee coming back, but I'm guessing that for most of next season he is likely to be more PL fit than Beyer, though I hope for Beyer's sake that I am wrong.
-
- Posts: 8287
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2457 times
- Has Liked: 3512 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: Ben Mee
I suspect you're right, and a loan to the Bundesliga until Jan might do him good.....nil_desperandum wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 9:49 amIs there evidence that Beyer will be anywhere near ready for PL football in August? (Genuine question).
I am undecided about Mee coming back, but I'm guessing that for most of next season he is likely to be more PL fit than Beyer, though I hope for Beyer's sake that I am wrong.
-
- Posts: 3747
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1480 times
- Has Liked: 364 times
Re: Ben Mee
I really do not understand this obsession for posters saying there is an obsession on signing ex players.
Posts like this”would you sign such and such if hadn’t worn a claret shirt ?”….are so predictable as soon as this debate starts. It may sound crazy but those people who think that a signing of an ex player may be worthwhile based on their view of him as a footballer rather than he used to play for us.
Personally I wouldn’t sign Ben Mee as think he’s just started picking up too many injuries and it’s difficult to see at his age how this could get any better. But if we are losing any of the current centre backs and SP thinks Mee can give us a better chance of staying up I think most sensible Burnley fans will understand that we are bringing in someone with a lot of quality, great character and experience.
Posts like this”would you sign such and such if hadn’t worn a claret shirt ?”….are so predictable as soon as this debate starts. It may sound crazy but those people who think that a signing of an ex player may be worthwhile based on their view of him as a footballer rather than he used to play for us.
Personally I wouldn’t sign Ben Mee as think he’s just started picking up too many injuries and it’s difficult to see at his age how this could get any better. But if we are losing any of the current centre backs and SP thinks Mee can give us a better chance of staying up I think most sensible Burnley fans will understand that we are bringing in someone with a lot of quality, great character and experience.