Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:23 am
As said he was mostly sub….I watched the u21s and they were not that good at all. Kolesosho was one of their better players in this tournament though.
If they had been that good in the last few years then Italy wouldn’t be experiencing their worst decade in international football in their history.
I mean, the U19 team he played in won the Euro U19 championship - he played in every game of the tournament including the final. That would suggest Italy U19 were pretty good at that time rather than "weren't even that good at that level" to quote you word for word. Generally what winning the Euro U19 championship means is that they were the best U19 side in Europe at that time - that's not a hard concept hard to grasp. How the senior team is performing is irrelevant to "that level", which is what you were talking about when you were saying "weren't even that good at that level".
Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:23 am
But to get back to the point if Koleosho was as good as you were making out then surely he’d have torn up a poor league like the championship rather than what he did most of the time on the pitch -
give the ball away all the time and sulk.
Just nonsense, Koleosho had more tackles per 90 than Anthony. Hard to achieve that if he just sulked when he gave the ball away.
But the way Parker set up last season didn't suit him, neither did being shunted onto his weaker flank immediately after Anthony was signed. However, I don't see how you could have watched the Spurs game and thought that wouldn't have suited Koleosho given how often we were breaking on a high defensive line - it's similar to why Foster topped the player ratings against Spurs despite getting panned for his performances by fans last season.