Osmajic

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
burnmark
Posts: 3338
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:50 am
Been Liked: 848 times
Has Liked: 643 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by burnmark » Thu Aug 21, 2025 6:42 pm

It’s the Lancashire Post who revealed the news today via their PNE reporter:
Attachments
IMG_1173.jpeg
IMG_1173.jpeg (332.95 KiB) Viewed 1173 times

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8677
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1869 times
Has Liked: 2232 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Woodleyclaret » Thu Aug 21, 2025 7:13 pm

Fao ClaretTony this fiasco has gone on far too long it should have been sorted inside a month after the event.The FA and their stance on racism has been shown to be seriously flawed. Hannibal has been totally let down in this situation.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11006
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 896 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Jakubclaret » Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:13 am

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Thu Aug 21, 2025 7:13 pm
Fao ClaretTony this fiasco has gone on far too long it should have been sorted inside a month after the event.The FA and their stance on racism has been shown to be seriously flawed. Hannibal has been totally let down in this situation.
You could actually argue it's osmajic that's been let down if he's innocent with it hanging over his head. It cannot just be assumed that osmajic is guilty a lot of people seem to be forgetting that's he actually denied the allegation & it's not been proven. Without knowing the truth it's reasonable to conclude the FA is letting 1 of them down for sure just not sure which 1.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77534
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37926 times
Has Liked: 5762 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Osmajic

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:18 am

Woodleyclaret wrote:
Thu Aug 21, 2025 7:13 pm
Fao ClaretTony this fiasco has gone on far too long it should have been sorted inside a month after the event.The FA and their stance on racism has been shown to be seriously flawed. Hannibal has been totally let down in this situation.
Not sure why you started this with an fao for me but have you considered that the FA's stance on racism is so strong that it has forced them into a long investigation? And, as has previously been said, is it not possible that Osmajic is telling the truth and that it is he who would be let down and not Hannibal?
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7710
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1929 times
Has Liked: 4283 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by nil_desperandum » Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:49 am

No matter how you look at it, it has no impact on Burnley whatsoever, but the timing of this could not be worse for PNE.
It's dragged on to the point where the transfer window will be closed, so selling him will be difficult whilst this hangs over him, and if he does get a lengthy ban the window is closed so they can't replace him.
FWIW I'm pretty sure he's guilty, but whether guilty or not this lengthy process, whilst the FA have gone through due process, has not helped PNE or the player very much.

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1446 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Osmajic

Post by daveisaclaret » Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:01 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:
Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:49 am
No matter how you look at it, it has no impact on Burnley whatsoever, but the timing of this could not be worse for PNE.
Preston finished 1 point above relegation last season and Osmajic scored goals in two draws after the incident so this takes some working out

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7710
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1929 times
Has Liked: 4283 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by nil_desperandum » Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:03 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:01 pm
Preston finished 1 point above relegation last season and Osmajic scored goals in two draws after the incident so this takes some working out
I certainly agree with that - and said so at the time, but once the season had ended then the scenario that I described above became active.

GetIntoEm
Posts: 3032
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 822 times
Has Liked: 236 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by GetIntoEm » Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:04 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:
Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:49 am
No matter how you look at it, it has no impact on Burnley whatsoever, but the timing of this could not be worse for PNE.
It's dragged on to the point where the transfer window will be closed, so selling him will be difficult whilst this hangs over him, and if he does get a lengthy ban the window is closed so they can't replace him.
FWIW I'm pretty sure he's guilty, but whether guilty or not this lengthy process, whilst the FA have gone through due process, has not helped PNE or the player very much.
Surely it's not about what's good for which club, it's about justice for Hannibal and the fact that he was racially abused (alleged)

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7710
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1929 times
Has Liked: 4283 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by nil_desperandum » Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:44 pm

GetIntoEm wrote:
Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:04 pm
Surely it's not about what's good for which club, it's about justice for Hannibal and the fact that he was racially abused (alleged)
Exactly, and that’s why due process had to be followed to try to try to establish the truth

FCBurnley
Posts: 11559
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2269 times
Has Liked: 1372 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by FCBurnley » Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:51 pm

No reason why we should benefit but if case is proven then PNE and player should be the ones punished
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum

Papabendi
Posts: 1885
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:29 pm
Been Liked: 438 times
Has Liked: 71 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Papabendi » Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:54 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:18 am
Not sure why you started this with an fao for me but have you considered that the FA's stance on racism is so strong that it has forced them into a long investigation? And, as has previously been said, is it not possible that Osmajic is telling the truth and that it is he who would be let down and not Hannibal?
We're back to the scope of the info at hand which we all agree is very narrow. I think it would be fairer to all parties involved if this could have been resolved sooner rather than a needless overhang.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77534
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37926 times
Has Liked: 5762 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Osmajic

Post by ClaretTony » Fri Aug 22, 2025 1:15 pm

Papabendi wrote:
Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:54 pm
We're back to the scope of the info at hand which we all agree is very narrow. I think it would be fairer to all parties involved if this could have been resolved sooner rather than a needless overhang.
I’m sure it would have been much better had it been resolved earlier. We will never know the reasons for it taking this length of time.

burnley007
Posts: 4304
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 988 times
Has Liked: 808 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by burnley007 » Fri Aug 22, 2025 1:18 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Fri Aug 22, 2025 1:15 pm
I’m sure it would have been much better had it been resolved earlier. We will never know the reasons for it taking this length of time.
Are they potentially putting new processes in place to deal with this kind of incident? Perhaps could be the delay?

I'm guessing this will crop up more and more.

Lu-tze
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:20 pm
Been Liked: 31 times
Has Liked: 6 times

Re: Osmajic

Post by Lu-tze » Fri Aug 22, 2025 5:08 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:13 am
You could actually argue it's osmajic that's been let down if he's innocent with it hanging over his head. It cannot just be assumed that osmajic is guilty a lot of people seem to be forgetting that's he actually denied the allegation & it's not been proven. Without knowing the truth it's reasonable to conclude the FA is letting 1 of them down for sure just not sure which 1.
Precisely- it is not fair on either of them.

If (and it’s a big if being as his defence is that he called Hannibal ‘a bad man’- I mean..come on..) Osmajic is innocent then it’s an awful thing to be tarred with for this length of time.

As for Hannibal apart from the fact that if he’s telling the truth it must be absolutely soul destroying to be racially abused and wait this long for any justice there’s also the issue that he is a divisive/sh!thouse type of player anyway so with this hanging over him it’s likely he will get even more abuse from opposition racist/meathead fans this season on top of what he usually gets if they feel he has made a fraudulent claim of racial abuse.

Just really really hope it can be cleared up soon without any doubt and not turn out like the Jayrod case in which I don’t believe either player was at fault- it was just a case of jay being misheard but because it couldn’t be proven one way or another both players ended up getting stick.

I have to say though the length of time it’s taken that’s looking less and less likely.

Post Reply