Matt Lowton

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Fretters
Posts: 3025
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:56 am
Been Liked: 1200 times
Has Liked: 649 times

Matt Lowton

Post by Fretters » Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:56 pm

According to this, he's created the 6th highest amount of chances out of all full backs in the PL. He's definitely grown on me lately. He seems to be settling into the league nicely and growing in confidence.

http://talksport.com/football/revealed- ... 223114?p=3" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11136
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 823 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:59 pm

Change his name to Kieran Trippier and we'd all have damp pants.
These 7 users liked this post: Sidney1st Steve1956 BFCmaj Holtyclaret Bertiebeehead HendricksHair JohnMac

Goobs
Posts: 4581
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1540 times
Has Liked: 1059 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Goobs » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:04 pm

I don't have a problem particularly with Lowton, he's not flashy and will probably never be in the running for player of the year, but he is capable of playing well enough at this level.

At the moment he is the type of player that we can afford to have as he probably won't cost us too many goals / games, however we would need to improve on him if we want to progress as he probably wouldn't get in too many (if any) other PL teams.

dibraidio
Posts: 1683
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 3:34 pm
Been Liked: 555 times
Has Liked: 147 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by dibraidio » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:04 pm

Isn't he in the top list of tacklers as well?

Seems to be a real marmite player.

Fretters
Posts: 3025
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:56 am
Been Liked: 1200 times
Has Liked: 649 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Fretters » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:06 pm

Goobs wrote:I don't have a problem particularly with Lowton, he's not flashy and will probably never be in the running for player of the year, but he is capable of playing well enough at this level.

At the moment he is the type of player that we can afford to have as he probably won't cost us too many goals / games, however we would need to improve on him if we want to progress as he probably wouldn't get in too many (if any) other PL teams.
If he doesn't cost us goals, creates chances and puts in a tackle, why is he somebody we'd need to improve on? Maybe we could just let him get better and better?

Rileybobs
Posts: 18550
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7611 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:11 pm

He's been better since he came back into the side for Flanagan since serving his suspension.
These 2 users liked this post: clerkenwell.claret Jambo

claretspice
Posts: 6382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3160 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by claretspice » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:14 pm

Underrated, is Lowton. He's sometimes a little flaky defensively, but he's grown in stature recently in that department (inevitably - players get used to the league, get confident in their own ability and begin to assert themselves more), and his attacking play has been excellent since he first arrived. His crossing isn't quite of Trippier's quality, but it isn't half bad (two lovely wickedly curling crosses against Sunderland attest to that) and leaving aside the eye-catching ball for Hendrick's goal v Bournemouth, his passing is consistently reliable and assured.

As with most of our full backs, plays best when paired with George Boyd on that flank.

NottsClaret
Posts: 4235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2900 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by NottsClaret » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:19 pm

I'd agree with all of that spice, he's definitely improving all the time. Seems very confident now, as he should.
This user liked this post: clerkenwell.claret

Goobs
Posts: 4581
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1540 times
Has Liked: 1059 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Goobs » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:26 pm

Fretters wrote:If he doesn't cost us goals, creates chances and puts in a tackle, why is he somebody we'd need to improve on? Maybe we could just let him get better and better?
I personally don't feel he will ever improve to be that much better than he currently is, however he is currently sufficient for what we require / can afford.

There are other areas that definitely require new additions before we look at replacing Lowton, however in the long run if we have loftier ambitions that yo-yo club / scraping survival he will IMO require an upgrade at some point.

Like I said, I have no issues with him, I just don't ever see him being a "great" player.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank

ClaretTony
Posts: 76640
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37346 times
Has Liked: 5703 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:27 pm

He's the best we have by some considerable distance as all those who went to Sunderland were reminded
This user liked this post: The Enclosure

claretspice
Posts: 6382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3160 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by claretspice » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:28 pm

Goobs wrote:I personally don't feel he will ever improve to be that much better than he currently is, however he is currently sufficient for what we require / can afford.

There are other areas that definitely require new additions before we look at replacing Lowton, however in the long run if we have loftier ambitions that yo-yo club / scraping survival he will IMO require an upgrade at some point.

Like I said, I have no issues with him, I just don't ever see him being a "great" player.
He won't be great, but then neither will all but about 3 or 4 of our current team, and one or two of them are more likely to move on than fulfil greatness with us.

The likes of Lowton, Ward, Mee and Arfield are very important to us. They create the culture which means that the unit is greater than the sum of its parts.
This user liked this post: Fretters

Ric_C
Posts: 2769
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 1012 times
Has Liked: 174 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Ric_C » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:31 pm

The problem Lowton has is that he has had to follow Tripper, and we are always comparing the two.
These 4 users liked this post: Fretters JohnMac k90bfc Shore claret

Goobs
Posts: 4581
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1540 times
Has Liked: 1059 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Goobs » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:37 pm

I'm not trying to have a go at Lowton and I agree with what both Tony and yourself are saying. I just think that Lowton (and possibly Ben Mee) are quite limited in their potential and whilst they are good players they should EVENTUALLY be replaced with better quality if we are to progress. For now though Lowton would still be one of the first names on my team sheet his position is pretty secure considering the alternatives.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by FactualFrank » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:37 pm

Goobs sums it up very well.

Spijed
Posts: 17932
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3028 times
Has Liked: 1324 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Spijed » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:44 pm

I think he offers us more defensively than Trippier did.

claretspice
Posts: 6382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3160 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by claretspice » Tue Jan 10, 2017 2:07 pm

FactualFrank wrote:Goobs sums it up very well.
Yeah, i think it is a fair assessment. I suppose the point of difference is whether we as a club can ever move beyond the stalwarts who currently underpin what we are. We are seeing this season at Swansea what happens when you begin to replace them and begin to lose your identity and i think you can draw a similar trend from what happened to the likes of Rovers, Bolton etc before. We are always going to be an underdog at this level and players who have that mentality are therefore always going to be vital to us, even if they aremt top of the range players (much like Glenn Whelan, Shawcross and Jon Walters are still key cogs at Stoke).

In any event, i don't think we're at the point of outgrowing or potentially outgrowing Lowton any time soon.
These 2 users liked this post: CleggHall Goobs

Spijed
Posts: 17932
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3028 times
Has Liked: 1324 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Spijed » Tue Jan 10, 2017 2:15 pm

That's a good point about Jon Walters. He's never been a player you'd think was good enough for the Premier league, but never seems to let Stoke down at this level.

Inchy
Posts: 3096
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:32 pm
Been Liked: 1518 times
Has Liked: 106 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Inchy » Tue Jan 10, 2017 2:16 pm

He is clearly the best we have in that position but IMO that's because we are weak in that position. Stats don't paint the pull picture. I would like to see us sign someone better in the summer

claretspice
Posts: 6382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3160 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by claretspice » Tue Jan 10, 2017 2:16 pm

Ditto Gareth Macauley at WBA.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76640
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37346 times
Has Liked: 5703 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jan 10, 2017 2:36 pm

Ric_C wrote:The problem Lowton has is that he has had to follow Tripper, and we are always comparing the two.
That hits the nail right on the head for me
This user liked this post: k90bfc

No Ney Never
Posts: 2752
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
Been Liked: 913 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by No Ney Never » Tue Jan 10, 2017 3:25 pm

Tripps hardly got out of his own half for the first 10 or so games the last time we were in the prem, let alone put any decent crosses in. There were also numerous times that when he did manage to venture forward, Jones had to cover the gap right midfield and stop potential counter attacks. Don't get me wrong, I thought Tripps eventually became a great player for us, but he was by no means perfect. I don't believe that there is that big of a gap between Tripps and Lowts ability wise. By the time Tripps left us he'd plenty of time to get used to our system, Lowts continues to improve each time I've seen him, I'm happy with his progress and contribution.
This user liked this post: Bashclaret

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by aggi » Tue Jan 10, 2017 3:41 pm

Players always get better when they're not actually playing for us though.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1917 times
Has Liked: 4254 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Jan 10, 2017 3:54 pm

Ric_C wrote:The problem Lowton has is that he has had to follow Tripper, and we are always comparing the two.
Agreed.
I have been reflecting on my 50+ years of watching Burnley, and bearing in mind the division in which we are playing, we haven't had many better.
Top of my RB list would still be the first I saw - the legendary John Angus, then it would be Keith Newton and Trippier, followed by Lowton.
(I hope I haven't forgotten someone really obvious).

HuncoatClaret
Posts: 657
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 252 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by HuncoatClaret » Tue Jan 10, 2017 3:58 pm

Agreed.
I have been reflecting on my 50+ years of watching Burnley, and bearing in mind the division in which we are playing, we haven't had many better.
Top of my RB list would still be the first I saw - the legendary John Angus, then it would be Keith Newton and Trippier, followed by Lowton.
(I hope I haven't forgotten someone really obvious).

Brian Laws

Holtyclaret
Posts: 1551
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
Been Liked: 453 times
Has Liked: 2275 times
Location: Wantage

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Holtyclaret » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:03 pm

I think Lowton has benefited by the 'Trippier Effect'.

Spurs got in Tripps as back up to Walker and Walker has improved amazingly (beyond recognition).

Flannagan gave Lowton a scare and now hes having to fight for his place in every game, hence showing consistent improvement.

UTC

boatshed bill
Posts: 17187
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3526 times
Has Liked: 7717 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by boatshed bill » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:03 pm

HuncoatClaret wrote:Agreed.
I have been reflecting on my 50+ years of watching Burnley, and bearing in mind the division in which we are playing, we haven't had many better.
Top of my RB list would still be the first I saw - the legendary John Angus, then it would be Keith Newton and Trippier, followed by Lowton.
(I hope I haven't forgotten someone really obvious).

Brian Laws
What about the amazing Dean West?

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1917 times
Has Liked: 4254 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:04 pm

HuncoatClaret wrote:Agreed.
I have been reflecting on my 50+ years of watching Burnley, and bearing in mind the division in which we are playing, we haven't had many better.
Top of my RB list would still be the first I saw - the legendary John Angus, then it would be Keith Newton and Trippier, followed by Lowton.
(I hope I haven't forgotten someone really obvious).

Brian Laws
You're right!. I wasn't being "revisionist" and trying to eradicate Laws from my memory, I genuinely forgot about him, although it is probably fair to say that he was not as good here as he was later to become, and, of course he never played in the top tier for Burnley. Nonetheless he would definitely be in the top 2 or 3.
Last edited by nil_desperandum on Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1917 times
Has Liked: 4254 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:06 pm

boatshed bill wrote:What about the amazing Dean West?
I think that that statement goes some way to support my point. :lol:
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

Fez
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:06 am
Been Liked: 64 times
Has Liked: 142 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Fez » Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:33 pm

He's 20th in the most tackles completed as well.

roamingclaret
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:01 pm
Been Liked: 37 times
Has Liked: 277 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by roamingclaret » Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:33 pm

ClaretTony wrote:He's the best we have by some considerable distance as all those who went to Sunderland were reminded
Not sure I agree with knocking one of our own players in public...especially one playing virtually his first game for over a year. Dyche did say he was 'delighted' with Darikwas' performance though. Thankfully the manager knows best.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76640
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37346 times
Has Liked: 5703 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:37 pm

roamingclaret wrote:Not sure I agree with knocking one of our own players in public...especially one playing virtually his first game for over a year. Dyche did say he was 'delighted' with Darikwas' performance though. Thankfully the manager knows best.
I wasn't knocking anyone, I was pointing out that, in my opinion, Lowton is the better option by some distance which is probably been first choice since he got into the side in December 2015.

roamingclaret
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:01 pm
Been Liked: 37 times
Has Liked: 277 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by roamingclaret » Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:42 pm

Sorry, but they weren't reminded by a performance from Matt Lowton were they, so I.m not sure I can swallow that.

TsarBomba
Posts: 2258
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1452 times
Has Liked: 412 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by TsarBomba » Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:53 pm

Most games I find myself saying 'what a tackle', and invariably it is Lowton.

He has also made some crucial interceptions and last ditch tackles, usually when coming across to cover for Keane.

Lowton has easily saved us more points than he has cost us so far.

holdyourfire
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:23 pm
Been Liked: 98 times
Has Liked: 220 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by holdyourfire » Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:10 pm

Bond got rid of a fullback,that became a regular for arsenal and england.

k90bfc
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:15 pm
Been Liked: 129 times
Has Liked: 7257 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by k90bfc » Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:15 pm

Dont forget,they are not John Angus,you know!

Duffer_
Posts: 2353
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 805 times
Has Liked: 1387 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Duffer_ » Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:23 pm

Lowton is good on the ball but just a smidge short of pace at PL level. I like Lowton but Ward is better in every department. That is more a testament to how very good Ward has been this season rather than a criticism of Lowton.

UTC!
This user liked this post: Jambo

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1917 times
Has Liked: 4254 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:36 pm

holdyourfire wrote:Bond got rid of a fullback,that became a regular for arsenal and england.
I certainly hadn't forgotten about him, and he was probably the best of the lot, but with only 4 Burnley appearances as a teenager, he can't realistically be considered to be in our top 5 full-backs, or indeed ahead of Lowton.

Spijed
Posts: 17932
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3028 times
Has Liked: 1324 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Spijed » Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:50 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:I certainly hadn't forgotten about him, and he was probably the best of the lot, but with only 4 Burnley appearances as a teenager, he can't realistically be considered to be in our top 5 full-backs, or indeed ahead of Lowton.
In fairness though he played for Chester, Bury & Stoke before playing for Arsenal so it wasn't as though he was playing that well after he left us.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3489
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 915 times
Has Liked: 580 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:27 am

Derek Scott?

Jambo
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:48 am
Been Liked: 211 times
Has Liked: 240 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by Jambo » Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:41 pm

Lowton is ok and he's definitely improved since the game he was dropped, but right-back would still be a position I'd look to improve either in this window or in the summer - he's the weak link in the defence and possibly the team for me. I also assume we felt Flanagan would be first choice by now but he hasn't been as good as we were expecting. With Ward 32 in August we need to be thinking about full-backs on both sides unless there's anyone particularly promising in the kids.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76640
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37346 times
Has Liked: 5703 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by ClaretTony » Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:03 pm

holdyourfire wrote:Bond got rid of a fullback,that became a regular for arsenal and england.
Yes, he went to Chester and they released him in no time, then to Bury. Lee Dixon himself said he had the wrong attitude at the time and it was no surprise.
This user liked this post: Spijed

ecc
Posts: 6104
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 2090 times
Has Liked: 1709 times

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by ecc » Wed Jan 11, 2017 6:19 pm

I think he's doing a decent job. I believe we paid circa £1m for him (plus add-ons). I'm not sure what people were expecting for that sort of money.

bobinho
Posts: 10577
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4612 times
Has Liked: 7256 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Matt Lowton

Post by bobinho » Wed Jan 11, 2017 6:29 pm

Certainly got better these last few weeks.

Out of the two full back slots, id suggest if one was being replaced, it'd be Lowton. Ward has been absolutely superb since he broke into the team.

Having said that tho, i'd be happy if Lowton continues in his current form.

Post Reply