Matt Lowton
Matt Lowton
According to this, he's created the 6th highest amount of chances out of all full backs in the PL. He's definitely grown on me lately. He seems to be settling into the league nicely and growing in confidence.
http://talksport.com/football/revealed- ... 223114?p=3" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://talksport.com/football/revealed- ... 223114?p=3" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 823 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: Matt Lowton
Change his name to Kieran Trippier and we'd all have damp pants.
These 7 users liked this post: Sidney1st Steve1956 BFCmaj Holtyclaret Bertiebeehead HendricksHair JohnMac
-
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1540 times
- Has Liked: 1059 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Matt Lowton
I don't have a problem particularly with Lowton, he's not flashy and will probably never be in the running for player of the year, but he is capable of playing well enough at this level.
At the moment he is the type of player that we can afford to have as he probably won't cost us too many goals / games, however we would need to improve on him if we want to progress as he probably wouldn't get in too many (if any) other PL teams.
At the moment he is the type of player that we can afford to have as he probably won't cost us too many goals / games, however we would need to improve on him if we want to progress as he probably wouldn't get in too many (if any) other PL teams.
Re: Matt Lowton
Isn't he in the top list of tacklers as well?
Seems to be a real marmite player.
Seems to be a real marmite player.
Re: Matt Lowton
If he doesn't cost us goals, creates chances and puts in a tackle, why is he somebody we'd need to improve on? Maybe we could just let him get better and better?Goobs wrote:I don't have a problem particularly with Lowton, he's not flashy and will probably never be in the running for player of the year, but he is capable of playing well enough at this level.
At the moment he is the type of player that we can afford to have as he probably won't cost us too many goals / games, however we would need to improve on him if we want to progress as he probably wouldn't get in too many (if any) other PL teams.
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Matt Lowton
He's been better since he came back into the side for Flanagan since serving his suspension.
These 2 users liked this post: clerkenwell.claret Jambo
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Underrated, is Lowton. He's sometimes a little flaky defensively, but he's grown in stature recently in that department (inevitably - players get used to the league, get confident in their own ability and begin to assert themselves more), and his attacking play has been excellent since he first arrived. His crossing isn't quite of Trippier's quality, but it isn't half bad (two lovely wickedly curling crosses against Sunderland attest to that) and leaving aside the eye-catching ball for Hendrick's goal v Bournemouth, his passing is consistently reliable and assured.
As with most of our full backs, plays best when paired with George Boyd on that flank.
As with most of our full backs, plays best when paired with George Boyd on that flank.
-
- Posts: 4235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2900 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Matt Lowton
I'd agree with all of that spice, he's definitely improving all the time. Seems very confident now, as he should.
This user liked this post: clerkenwell.claret
-
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1540 times
- Has Liked: 1059 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Matt Lowton
I personally don't feel he will ever improve to be that much better than he currently is, however he is currently sufficient for what we require / can afford.Fretters wrote:If he doesn't cost us goals, creates chances and puts in a tackle, why is he somebody we'd need to improve on? Maybe we could just let him get better and better?
There are other areas that definitely require new additions before we look at replacing Lowton, however in the long run if we have loftier ambitions that yo-yo club / scraping survival he will IMO require an upgrade at some point.
Like I said, I have no issues with him, I just don't ever see him being a "great" player.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Matt Lowton
He's the best we have by some considerable distance as all those who went to Sunderland were reminded
This user liked this post: The Enclosure
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Matt Lowton
He won't be great, but then neither will all but about 3 or 4 of our current team, and one or two of them are more likely to move on than fulfil greatness with us.Goobs wrote:I personally don't feel he will ever improve to be that much better than he currently is, however he is currently sufficient for what we require / can afford.
There are other areas that definitely require new additions before we look at replacing Lowton, however in the long run if we have loftier ambitions that yo-yo club / scraping survival he will IMO require an upgrade at some point.
Like I said, I have no issues with him, I just don't ever see him being a "great" player.
The likes of Lowton, Ward, Mee and Arfield are very important to us. They create the culture which means that the unit is greater than the sum of its parts.
This user liked this post: Fretters
Re: Matt Lowton
The problem Lowton has is that he has had to follow Tripper, and we are always comparing the two.
These 4 users liked this post: Fretters JohnMac k90bfc Shore claret
-
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1540 times
- Has Liked: 1059 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Matt Lowton
I'm not trying to have a go at Lowton and I agree with what both Tony and yourself are saying. I just think that Lowton (and possibly Ben Mee) are quite limited in their potential and whilst they are good players they should EVENTUALLY be replaced with better quality if we are to progress. For now though Lowton would still be one of the first names on my team sheet his position is pretty secure considering the alternatives.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Matt Lowton
Goobs sums it up very well.
Re: Matt Lowton
I think he offers us more defensively than Trippier did.
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Yeah, i think it is a fair assessment. I suppose the point of difference is whether we as a club can ever move beyond the stalwarts who currently underpin what we are. We are seeing this season at Swansea what happens when you begin to replace them and begin to lose your identity and i think you can draw a similar trend from what happened to the likes of Rovers, Bolton etc before. We are always going to be an underdog at this level and players who have that mentality are therefore always going to be vital to us, even if they aremt top of the range players (much like Glenn Whelan, Shawcross and Jon Walters are still key cogs at Stoke).FactualFrank wrote:Goobs sums it up very well.
In any event, i don't think we're at the point of outgrowing or potentially outgrowing Lowton any time soon.
These 2 users liked this post: CleggHall Goobs
Re: Matt Lowton
That's a good point about Jon Walters. He's never been a player you'd think was good enough for the Premier league, but never seems to let Stoke down at this level.
Re: Matt Lowton
He is clearly the best we have in that position but IMO that's because we are weak in that position. Stats don't paint the pull picture. I would like to see us sign someone better in the summer
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Ditto Gareth Macauley at WBA.
-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Matt Lowton
That hits the nail right on the head for meRic_C wrote:The problem Lowton has is that he has had to follow Tripper, and we are always comparing the two.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
- Been Liked: 913 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Tripps hardly got out of his own half for the first 10 or so games the last time we were in the prem, let alone put any decent crosses in. There were also numerous times that when he did manage to venture forward, Jones had to cover the gap right midfield and stop potential counter attacks. Don't get me wrong, I thought Tripps eventually became a great player for us, but he was by no means perfect. I don't believe that there is that big of a gap between Tripps and Lowts ability wise. By the time Tripps left us he'd plenty of time to get used to our system, Lowts continues to improve each time I've seen him, I'm happy with his progress and contribution.
This user liked this post: Bashclaret
Re: Matt Lowton
Players always get better when they're not actually playing for us though.
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Agreed.Ric_C wrote:The problem Lowton has is that he has had to follow Tripper, and we are always comparing the two.
I have been reflecting on my 50+ years of watching Burnley, and bearing in mind the division in which we are playing, we haven't had many better.
Top of my RB list would still be the first I saw - the legendary John Angus, then it would be Keith Newton and Trippier, followed by Lowton.
(I hope I haven't forgotten someone really obvious).
-
- Posts: 657
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
- Been Liked: 252 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Agreed.
I have been reflecting on my 50+ years of watching Burnley, and bearing in mind the division in which we are playing, we haven't had many better.
Top of my RB list would still be the first I saw - the legendary John Angus, then it would be Keith Newton and Trippier, followed by Lowton.
(I hope I haven't forgotten someone really obvious).
Brian Laws
I have been reflecting on my 50+ years of watching Burnley, and bearing in mind the division in which we are playing, we haven't had many better.
Top of my RB list would still be the first I saw - the legendary John Angus, then it would be Keith Newton and Trippier, followed by Lowton.
(I hope I haven't forgotten someone really obvious).
Brian Laws
-
- Posts: 1551
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 453 times
- Has Liked: 2275 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Matt Lowton
I think Lowton has benefited by the 'Trippier Effect'.
Spurs got in Tripps as back up to Walker and Walker has improved amazingly (beyond recognition).
Flannagan gave Lowton a scare and now hes having to fight for his place in every game, hence showing consistent improvement.
UTC
Spurs got in Tripps as back up to Walker and Walker has improved amazingly (beyond recognition).
Flannagan gave Lowton a scare and now hes having to fight for his place in every game, hence showing consistent improvement.
UTC
-
- Posts: 17187
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3526 times
- Has Liked: 7717 times
Re: Matt Lowton
What about the amazing Dean West?HuncoatClaret wrote:Agreed.
I have been reflecting on my 50+ years of watching Burnley, and bearing in mind the division in which we are playing, we haven't had many better.
Top of my RB list would still be the first I saw - the legendary John Angus, then it would be Keith Newton and Trippier, followed by Lowton.
(I hope I haven't forgotten someone really obvious).
Brian Laws
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: Matt Lowton
You're right!. I wasn't being "revisionist" and trying to eradicate Laws from my memory, I genuinely forgot about him, although it is probably fair to say that he was not as good here as he was later to become, and, of course he never played in the top tier for Burnley. Nonetheless he would definitely be in the top 2 or 3.HuncoatClaret wrote:Agreed.
I have been reflecting on my 50+ years of watching Burnley, and bearing in mind the division in which we are playing, we haven't had many better.
Top of my RB list would still be the first I saw - the legendary John Angus, then it would be Keith Newton and Trippier, followed by Lowton.
(I hope I haven't forgotten someone really obvious).
Brian Laws
Last edited by nil_desperandum on Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: Matt Lowton
I think that that statement goes some way to support my point.boatshed bill wrote:What about the amazing Dean West?

This user liked this post: boatshed bill
Re: Matt Lowton
He's 20th in the most tackles completed as well.
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:01 pm
- Been Liked: 37 times
- Has Liked: 277 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Not sure I agree with knocking one of our own players in public...especially one playing virtually his first game for over a year. Dyche did say he was 'delighted' with Darikwas' performance though. Thankfully the manager knows best.ClaretTony wrote:He's the best we have by some considerable distance as all those who went to Sunderland were reminded
-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Matt Lowton
I wasn't knocking anyone, I was pointing out that, in my opinion, Lowton is the better option by some distance which is probably been first choice since he got into the side in December 2015.roamingclaret wrote:Not sure I agree with knocking one of our own players in public...especially one playing virtually his first game for over a year. Dyche did say he was 'delighted' with Darikwas' performance though. Thankfully the manager knows best.
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:01 pm
- Been Liked: 37 times
- Has Liked: 277 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Sorry, but they weren't reminded by a performance from Matt Lowton were they, so I.m not sure I can swallow that.
Re: Matt Lowton
Most games I find myself saying 'what a tackle', and invariably it is Lowton.
He has also made some crucial interceptions and last ditch tackles, usually when coming across to cover for Keane.
Lowton has easily saved us more points than he has cost us so far.
He has also made some crucial interceptions and last ditch tackles, usually when coming across to cover for Keane.
Lowton has easily saved us more points than he has cost us so far.
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:23 pm
- Been Liked: 98 times
- Has Liked: 220 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Bond got rid of a fullback,that became a regular for arsenal and england.
Re: Matt Lowton
Dont forget,they are not John Angus,you know!
Re: Matt Lowton
Lowton is good on the ball but just a smidge short of pace at PL level. I like Lowton but Ward is better in every department. That is more a testament to how very good Ward has been this season rather than a criticism of Lowton.
UTC!
UTC!
This user liked this post: Jambo
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: Matt Lowton
I certainly hadn't forgotten about him, and he was probably the best of the lot, but with only 4 Burnley appearances as a teenager, he can't realistically be considered to be in our top 5 full-backs, or indeed ahead of Lowton.holdyourfire wrote:Bond got rid of a fullback,that became a regular for arsenal and england.
Re: Matt Lowton
In fairness though he played for Chester, Bury & Stoke before playing for Arsenal so it wasn't as though he was playing that well after he left us.nil_desperandum wrote:I certainly hadn't forgotten about him, and he was probably the best of the lot, but with only 4 Burnley appearances as a teenager, he can't realistically be considered to be in our top 5 full-backs, or indeed ahead of Lowton.
-
- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 915 times
- Has Liked: 580 times
Re: Matt Lowton
Derek Scott?
Re: Matt Lowton
Lowton is ok and he's definitely improved since the game he was dropped, but right-back would still be a position I'd look to improve either in this window or in the summer - he's the weak link in the defence and possibly the team for me. I also assume we felt Flanagan would be first choice by now but he hasn't been as good as we were expecting. With Ward 32 in August we need to be thinking about full-backs on both sides unless there's anyone particularly promising in the kids.
-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Matt Lowton
Yes, he went to Chester and they released him in no time, then to Bury. Lee Dixon himself said he had the wrong attitude at the time and it was no surprise.holdyourfire wrote:Bond got rid of a fullback,that became a regular for arsenal and england.
This user liked this post: Spijed
Re: Matt Lowton
I think he's doing a decent job. I believe we paid circa £1m for him (plus add-ons). I'm not sure what people were expecting for that sort of money.
-
- Posts: 10577
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4612 times
- Has Liked: 7256 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Matt Lowton
Certainly got better these last few weeks.
Out of the two full back slots, id suggest if one was being replaced, it'd be Lowton. Ward has been absolutely superb since he broke into the team.
Having said that tho, i'd be happy if Lowton continues in his current form.
Out of the two full back slots, id suggest if one was being replaced, it'd be Lowton. Ward has been absolutely superb since he broke into the team.
Having said that tho, i'd be happy if Lowton continues in his current form.