Colburn_Claret wrote:I've never heard of Tommy Robinson, or Britain's First. I have a life.
I suspect that far more people read this shite in order to wind themselves up with indignation, than do to agree with it.
He wants an audience, if you want him to go away then ignore him. The authorities have enough staff to monitor anyone considered a threat.
I have a life too, but that involves in people in my social circle sharing the posts about this, both in disgust at it and also some in support of it. Ignoring him and his type will not make the problem go away, but merely leave you ill-informed about what he is doing and saying. Perhaps I was being a little unkind to you by picking up on your description of a terrorists MO, I am merely highlighting that your description can apply to many diverse groups across the political spectrum.
Colburn_Claret wrote:As I said, if you blow it up to more than it is, then the danger is you create exactly what you are worried about.
I would tend to agree with this, by it's very nature to terrorise someone you need to make them worry about it in the first place. To remove their power would be to have a media blackout on all issues such as this, but that would not be possible at all in reality due to many different reasons.
Colburn_Claret wrote:Not a terrorist an arsehole
IMO his actions, by attacking a specific section of a community, make his actions terrorist in nature so he may well fit the description of a terrorist. I do concur though that he is definitely an arsehole.