More trouble in london

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:56 am

dsr wrote:Just explaining to you why people might think "liberals" first thought wasn't to be sorry it happened. It's quite possible that your first thought when you heard this was to be sorry at yet another senseless tragedy. But your first post wasn't.
And how is that different to my first posts in other threads regarding tragedies?

Question: What do you think is more likely, that at no time and for no tragedy is my first thought to feel sympathy for the victims, or that i simply don't post my worthless sympathies on an internet forum?

Dom
Posts: 801
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:36 pm
Been Liked: 327 times
Has Liked: 218 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Dom » Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:57 am

People did call for mass internment of anyone "suspected" of having some terrorist links, no matter how tenuous that link was, right wingers wanted thousands of people rounded up and locked away for an indefinite amount of time without trial or proper evidence.

In the same way we need to root out the cause of Extremist Islamic terrorism we need to root out the cause of Islamophobic based terrorism. Fighting fire with fire only leads to more ******* fire.
These 2 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie cricketfieldclarets

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:58 am

ClaretMoffitt wrote:The only privilege a person can be born with is wealth and status. That is the only factor that will influence a person's life better than those around them.

No matter how hard you try to push it, race, gender or sexual orientation does not grant you privilege.

If a gay, black woman is born a princess in Nigeria, she will live a life far beyond that of a straight white male born on stoops estate with far less restriction.

So let me guess, you're one of those who doesn't think white privilege exists. Right?

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:58 am

Not in this country CM.

You've got the best start in life if you are white, male and straight in this country.

I agree that there are mitigating factors but

Whose got more chance?

A white, straight male on stoops?

Or a black, gay woman on stoops?

dpinsussex
Posts: 3554
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1047 times
Has Liked: 1187 times
Location: Reading

Re: More trouble in london

Post by dpinsussex » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:01 pm

BleedingClaret wrote:is he to blame more than
The London Bride Killers.
Must have missed this one. Was she a looker ??? :)

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19787
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4200 times
Has Liked: 2246 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Quickenthetempo » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:02 pm

How does this get labelled a terrorist attack?

Only going off the article in the first post so new info might be around but it's no way an attack or message to the government which is why they use the term terrorist. A racist attack maybe? Murder if the victim died of injuries caused by the van but he had already collapsed.

No doubt it's a sh**house thing to do. Questioning how it gets decided as a terrorist attack.

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4402
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1621 times
Has Liked: 697 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by LoveCurryPies » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:11 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote:How does this get labelled a terrorist attack?

Only going off the article in the first post so new info might be around but it's no way an attack or message to the government which is why they use the term terrorist. A racist attack maybe? Murder if the victim died of injuries caused by the van but he had already collapsed.

No doubt it's a sh**house thing to do. Questioning how it gets decided as a terrorist attack.
It is creating fear in the Muslim community. As much a terrorist incident as the London Bridge attacks.

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:11 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote:How does this get labelled a terrorist attack?

Only going off the article in the first post so new info might be around but it's no way an attack or message to the government which is why they use the term terrorist. A racist attack maybe? Murder if the victim died of injuries caused by the van but he had already collapsed.

No doubt it's a sh**house thing to do. Questioning how it gets decided as a terrorist attack.

What message to the government was the Manchester bomber sending?

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 12244
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 6027 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by TheFamilyCat » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:19 pm

claretandy wrote:It's at times like these that I'm reminded of Norman Tebbits cricket test. England vs Pakistan at Lords, you are born and bred in this country, who are you supporting?
If you emigrated to Spain and had a son, who would want him to support when England play Spain at football?

Guich
Posts: 1229
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:35 pm
Been Liked: 472 times
Has Liked: 598 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Guich » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:25 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:Not in this country CM.

You've got the best start in life if you are white, male and straight in this country.

I agree that there are mitigating factors but

Whose got more chance?

A white, straight male on stoops?

Or a black, gay woman on stoops?
I'm not saying you're wrong Lancaster, but how does that explain how white males seem to be lagging behind most groups in terms of education/further education? Are they just genetically thick?

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by claretandy » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:26 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:What message to the government was the Manchester bomber sending?
Last edited by claretandy on Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Tall Paul
Posts: 7440
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2651 times
Has Liked: 735 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Tall Paul » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:26 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote:How does this get labelled a terrorist attack?

Only going off the article in the first post so new info might be around but it's no way an attack or message to the government which is why they use the term terrorist. A racist attack maybe? Murder if the victim died of injuries caused by the van but he had already collapsed.

No doubt it's a sh**house thing to do. Questioning how it gets decided as a terrorist attack.
Image
These 2 users liked this post: Lancasterclaret Greenmile

Tall Paul
Posts: 7440
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2651 times
Has Liked: 735 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Tall Paul » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:28 pm

claretandy wrote:I suggest you look up the definition of terrorism I'm a dictionary.
If you're a dictionary, you could tell us the definition.
This user liked this post: quoonbeatz

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:29 pm

Christ Guich, thats well, a whole shed load of a thread.

Peer pressure maybe? Parents didn't take school seriously so they don't?

Someone will certainly know a hell of a lot more than me about it!

Guich
Posts: 1229
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:35 pm
Been Liked: 472 times
Has Liked: 598 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Guich » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:31 pm

Agreed Lancaster - it's a huge question. Just popped into my head then I went to see if there was any news on us signing Robertson...

WestMidsClaret
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:55 pm
Been Liked: 534 times
Has Liked: 506 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by WestMidsClaret » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:34 pm

claretandy wrote:I suggest you look up the definition of terrorism I'm a dic
Corrected that for you. :D ;)

UpTheBeehole
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 496 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by UpTheBeehole » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:44 pm

claretandy wrote:I suggest you look up the definition of terrorism I'm a dictionary.
Terrorism
NOUN

mass noun
The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Says https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/terrorism

Last night's attack was definitely terrorism

joey13
Posts: 7507
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1772 times
Has Liked: 1231 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by joey13 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:53 pm

Right_winger wrote:Yeah and your just a typical leftie *******. Haven't you got some demonstrations to go to against the white "British" male?

You can use any excuse you like... anti gay, females rights, anti Islam, racism, hell even being a successful person because you don't share it around.

Hypocrites the left is full of them.
Not sure why you are allowed to spout your bigotry on this site or any other , racism must be defeated
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

bfcjg
Posts: 14834
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5696 times
Has Liked: 8365 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by bfcjg » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:02 pm

The grief and pain experienced by the people and relatives/friends last night will be as painful as that experienced in Manchester and London it shows that we all live on this island and share a hope that such acts like this will stop. The **** who did this will be widely condemned and if he attempts to say he did it for Christ, God, Hinduism etc it will be as repulsive to Christians, Jews Hindus etc as the psychos who claim to kill for Allah etc.
I have called for internment and I stick by it, round anybody up who is capable of these atrocities and let us all live in peace.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:05 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:So let me guess, you're one of those who doesn't think white privilege exists. Right?
Not in this country or others like it. If we're talking about Russia, or Serbia then yeah, sure.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:11 pm

Serbia?

the country that just elected its first gay pm?
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7717
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4295 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by nil_desperandum » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:13 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:The only privilege a person can be born with is wealth and status. That is the only factor that will influence a person's life better than those around them.

No matter how hard you try to push it, race, gender or sexual orientation does not grant you privilege.

If a gay, black woman is born a princess in Nigeria, she will live a life far beyond that of a straight white male born on stoops estate with far less restriction.
A rather unfortunate and lazy choice of comparison there.
Presumably you didn't do any research, otherwise you would know that this Princess of yours could be stoned to death for her sexuality, or get up to 14 years in gaol. Gay people are also banned from holding meetings or forming clubs in Nigeria.
Living on Stoops might not be a choice we would make, but it's one hell of a lot better than living in most of Africa.
This user liked this post: Greenmile

JohnMac
Posts: 7740
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2585 times
Has Liked: 4175 times
Location: Padiham

Re: More trouble in london

Post by JohnMac » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:21 pm

TsarBomba wrote:I'm in the Met.

Response teams are running vastly below minimum, as officers are pulled to aid crime scenes, reassurance patrols, operations etc. The officers that have 'shifted out onto the street', as you put it, or already on the streets.

I've worked double shifts, and every shift I finish hours late. I'm not complaining, it's what I joined for. I don't have a break, I go from call to call, and get criticised from MOP why it's taken me so long to get there. My standard response is 'there just isn't enough of us'.

Upstairs in investigative roles, officers are juggling over 30 crimes. The Met as a whole are 800 detectives down.

I work in a London Borough where it's now the norm to parade 11-12 officers for a population of 250k. We aren't proactive anymore, simply because call volume is too high, and not enough of us to deal with 999 calls alone. I would suggest we need double the amount of officers on the street to be effective.

I think ordinary members of the public would be amazed at how little Police there are.

Respect for the job you are doing and like I say, not a dig.

From a staffing perspective I had the same issues for years when I was in the Army, especially telling when you can't physically man all your equipment.

I wanted to join the Police when I left in 1995 but having been successful in everything they simply stopped recruiting, just like that, the budget was cut.

Some of my info was from a mate in the job, I will ignore him from now on!

Keep up the good work and don't let the bastards grind you down.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:23 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:A rather unfortunate and lazy choice of comparison there.
Presumably you didn't do any research, otherwise you would know that this Princess of yours could be stoned to death for her sexuality, or get up to 14 years in gaol. Gay people are also banned from holding meetings or forming clubs in Nigeria.
Living on Stoops might not be a choice we would make, but it's one hell of a lot better than living in most of Africa.
Correction that was supposed to be "from" not "in", I'm very aware of Nigerian views on homosexuality.

Also, I was born on and continue to live on cog Lane to this day. I know what it's like to grow up there, and I'm not comparing it to Africa... Hopefully my correction clears up the comparison.
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum

UpTheBeehole
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 496 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by UpTheBeehole » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:25 pm

The wave that the murderous terrorist gives at the end of this video is sickening.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/vid ... park-video

He deserves everything coming to him in prison.

iw1961
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:25 pm
Been Liked: 15 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by iw1961 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:30 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:I think I'll go all in

All white van drivers should be in camps, or at the very least have to wear some sort of identification device (like a yellow star) so we all know where they are at all times.

Its the only way to be sure.

Whilst I am sure that you thought your sarcasm/irony or wit, call it what you will, would be quite amusing. For some of us with personal reasons that is highly offensive.

claret3561
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:54 pm
Been Liked: 141 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by claret3561 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:31 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:Not in this country CM.

You've got the best start in life if you are white, male and straight in this country.

I agree that there are mitigating factors but

Whose got more chance?

A white, straight male on stoops?

Or a black, gay woman on stoops?
Obviously the latter as she will get every benefit and all the help our namby pamby liberal society can throw at her. As for today's attack, I don't see IT and his cronies coming out and defending the rights of the attacker as he has so often with the muslims.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:33 pm

Ladies and Gentleman, we've just reached peak Daily Mail.
These 3 users liked this post: Falcon Lord Beamish Greenmile

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:35 pm

Fine, iw1961, then make sure you complain about it, but to make sure you are consistent, you have to complain when the "white van men" is replaced by "muslims".

Otherwise you are a hypocrite, or someone who doesn't like the fact that I'm pointing out the blatant issues with what was proposed on here for Muslims

And the use of "yellow star" is too make it abundantly clear, so there is no avoidance of doubt what a policy like that for Muslims means.

Further edit - I don't actually try to be funny, I actually care quite a lot about this kind of thing, but ranting about islamophobia doesn't really help on here, but gently reminding people what all this actually means sometimes works.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by claretandy » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:48 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:If you emigrated to Spain and had a son, who would want him to support when England play Spain at football?
We are talking about 3rd generation born here.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3477 times
Has Liked: 5720 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Colburn_Claret » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:51 pm

Rick_Muller wrote:Have you not seen any Britain's First posts on Facebook...? or the bile spouted by Tommy Robinson on all social media...? Both of these examples fit the description of having networks, campaign agendas, a public voice, even if it only spouts bullshit
No
Why would any reasonable person want to.

I've never heard of Tommy Robinson, or Britain's First. I have a life.
I suspect that far more people read this shite in order to wind themselves up with indignation, than do to agree with it.
He wants an audience, if you want him to go away then ignore him. The authorities have enough staff to monitor anyone considered a threat.

As I said, if you blow it up to more than it is, then the danger is you create exactly what you ate worried about.

Not a terrorist an arsehole
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4402
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1621 times
Has Liked: 697 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by LoveCurryPies » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:55 pm

UpTheBeehole wrote:He deserves everything coming to him in prison.
That will be a room to himself, TV and internet connection, meals 3 times a day, no bills and protection from all the knobheads that liked what he's done.

UpTheBeehole
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 496 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by UpTheBeehole » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:58 pm

LoveCurryPies wrote:That will be a room to himself, TV and internet connection, meals 3 times a day, no bills and protection from all the knobheads that liked what he's done.
If it's that good why don't you give it a go?

aggi
Posts: 9713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by aggi » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:12 pm

Just looking at the pictures, it seems that it didn't actually happen at the mosque. It was at the Muslim Welfare House a few minutes away. From what I've seen of the place it is more of a community centre, it was one of the places that hosted a 'More in Common' event on Saturday for Jo Cox's Great Get-Together. A slightly strange choice of target.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by claretandy » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:15 pm

And so it continues, a muslim shouting "Allah Ackbar" tried to stab police outside a train station in london

https://t.co/rwUJHK1eRi" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Rick_Muller
Posts: 6844
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2875 times
Has Liked: 7065 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Rick_Muller » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:22 pm

Colburn_Claret wrote:I've never heard of Tommy Robinson, or Britain's First. I have a life.
I suspect that far more people read this shite in order to wind themselves up with indignation, than do to agree with it.
He wants an audience, if you want him to go away then ignore him. The authorities have enough staff to monitor anyone considered a threat.
I have a life too, but that involves in people in my social circle sharing the posts about this, both in disgust at it and also some in support of it. Ignoring him and his type will not make the problem go away, but merely leave you ill-informed about what he is doing and saying. Perhaps I was being a little unkind to you by picking up on your description of a terrorists MO, I am merely highlighting that your description can apply to many diverse groups across the political spectrum.
Colburn_Claret wrote:As I said, if you blow it up to more than it is, then the danger is you create exactly what you are worried about.
I would tend to agree with this, by it's very nature to terrorise someone you need to make them worry about it in the first place. To remove their power would be to have a media blackout on all issues such as this, but that would not be possible at all in reality due to many different reasons.
Colburn_Claret wrote:Not a terrorist an arsehole
IMO his actions, by attacking a specific section of a community, make his actions terrorist in nature so he may well fit the description of a terrorist. I do concur though that he is definitely an arsehole.

aggi
Posts: 9713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by aggi » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:28 pm

claretandy wrote:And so it continues, a muslim shouting "Allah Ackbar" tried to stab police outside a train station in london

https://t.co/rwUJHK1eRi" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
From the article. Place of safety is strange phrasing, I assume it's in relation to the mental health issues.
The man is suspected by police to have mental health issues. ...
"The man has been taken to a place of safety.
"The incident is not being treated as terror related."

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:29 pm

Infowars sharing it as a "terrorist incident"

Now there is a shock.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:41 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:Infowars sharing it as a "terrorist incident"

Now there is a shock.
It really isn't.

I dont like info wars but they, nor do any alt right type public speakers I know of condone, accept or encourage this type of behaviour at all, very much the opposite in fact.

They will point out the Liberal and media double standards to how it is dealt with however and in many cases they will have a point.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:44 pm

Sandy Hook?

aggi
Posts: 9713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by aggi » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:55 pm

Infowars must have a pretty high bar for terrorist incident given that Alex Jones believes that the Oklahoma Bombings and 9/11 were both Government conspiracies (the moon landings were also fake if anyone was wondering).

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:56 pm

iw1961 wrote:Whilst I am sure that you thought your sarcasm/irony or wit, call it what you will, would be quite amusing. For some of us with personal reasons that is highly offensive.

Then be highly offended. Nothing happens.

TsarBomba
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1474 times
Has Liked: 418 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by TsarBomba » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:01 pm

aggi wrote:From the article. Place of safety is strange phrasing, I assume it's in relation to the mental health issues.
The man is suspected by police to have mental health issues. ...
"The man has been taken to a place of safety.
"The incident is not being treated as terror related."
A place of safety is usually a 136 suite, which is a secure facility normally within the footprint of a hospital, where a mental health assessment can be undertaken by doctors. This is where the Police take MOP detained under 136 of the Mental Health Act, as they are considered an immediate danger to themselves and/or others.

Edit- 136 powers can only be utilised in a public place.
Last edited by TsarBomba on Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:02 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:It really isn't.

I dont like info wars but they, nor do any alt right type public speakers I know of condone, accept or encourage this type of behaviour at all, very much the opposite in fact.

They will point out the Liberal and media double standards to how it is dealt with however and in many cases they will have a point.
You claim to dislike Info wars yet you're a fan of Paul Joseph Watson, editor-at-large of Infowars.com

aggi
Posts: 9713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by aggi » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:05 pm

TsarBomba wrote:A place of safety is usually a 136 suite, which is a secure facility normally within the footprint of a hospital, where a mental health assessment can be undertaken by doctors. This is where the Police take MOP detained under 136 of the Mental Health Act, as they are considered an immediate danger to themselves and/or others.

Edit- 136 powers can only be utilised in a public place.
Cheers, that makes sense.

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:14 pm

Colburn_Claret wrote:No
Why would any reasonable person want to.

I've never heard of Tommy Robinson, or Britain's First. I have a life.
I suspect that far more people read this shite in order to wind themselves up with indignation, than do to agree with it.
He wants an audience, if you want him to go away then ignore him. The authorities have enough staff to monitor anyone considered a threat.

As I said, if you blow it up to more than it is, then the danger is you create exactly what you ate worried about.

Not a terrorist an arsehole

I'd like to remind you of what you said with regards to people like Anjem Choudrey standing on street corners and hurling abuse at the relatives of the dead.
Colburn_Claret wrote:There are laws in this land about incitement and breach of the peace. If you truly believe these people aren't committing a crime then your clearly of that left wing brigade, OR maybe you just want to court an argument as usual.

So when Muslim extremists are loundly abhorrant it's incitement and a crime for which they should be punished, but then it's a white, British guy doing it you're all oh just ignore him and he'll go away.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by claretandy » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:35 pm

Breaking, another attempted Terror attack in France

https://t.co/WZxAVZJbCr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Claretmatt4
Posts: 3949
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
Been Liked: 1049 times
Has Liked: 724 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Claretmatt4 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:41 pm

claretandy wrote:Breaking, another attempted Terror attack in France

https://t.co/WZxAVZJbCr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Nothing in that article suggests it's a terror attack.
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: More trouble in london

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:42 pm

Claretmatt4 wrote:Nothing in that article suggests it's a terror attack.
He wants to deflect.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: More trouble in london

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:43 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:You claim to dislike Info wars yet you're a fan of Paul Joseph Watson, editor-at-large of Infowars.com
Im 50/50 on him. Sometimes he's bang on, other times he's talking utter turd.

Dont like anyone else on there though, your Alex jones' and the like.

Post Reply