Savid Javid

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Pstotto
Posts: 6224
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:11 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Savid Javid

Post by Pstotto » Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:56 pm

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... lancashire" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Did you know that they want to undermine Lancashire so it will cave in for big profits by the multinationals? It's called 'fracking.'

The good folk of Lancashire said NO. The democratically elected councils of Lancashire said NO.

That authority has been completely screwed by one man: Savid Javid.

So WE have our county screwed undemocratically by... Savid Javid.

I'M LIVID.

Awayfromburnley
Posts: 814
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 8:08 am
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 71 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Awayfromburnley » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:02 pm

Iam Javid

I am not. But it's a tough one this.

We need energy but no one wants turbines imby.

I prefer turbines to fracking.

Pstotto
Posts: 6224
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:11 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Pstotto » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:04 pm

Hashtag FRACK LONDON

FRACK' EM!!!!!!
Last edited by Pstotto on Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Savid Javid

Post by tiger76 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:04 pm

What i don't believe in the fracking debate, is the claim that household energy bills will reduce this is a red herring,what this also shows is how little power local authorities actually have in reality.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 4078
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1288 times
Has Liked: 2354 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:05 pm

So that's what's happened to Ray Wilkins

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by thatdberight » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:07 pm

Pstotto wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... lancashire

Did you know that they want to undermine Lancashire so it will cave in for big profits by the multinationals? It's called 'fracking.'

The good folk of Lancashire said NO. The democratically elected councils of Lancashire said NO.

That authority has been completely screwed by one man: Savid Javid.

So WE have our county screwed undemocratically by... Savid Javid.

I'M LIVID.
I think you're probably lijid.

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by thatdberight » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:08 pm

Awayfromburnley wrote:Iam Javid

I am not. But it's a tough one this.

We need energy but no one wants turbines imby.

I prefer turbines to fracking.
I'll have both thanks and I'll take energy production as a national issue that national government is entitled to decide on.

Pstotto
Posts: 6224
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:11 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Pstotto » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:10 pm

Legit in my anger at this. IT'S YOUR COUNTY matey, no joke and it's being screwed by folk from elsewhere in an undemocratic fashion.

WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:11 pm

We are an windy, wet island, surrounded by some of the strongest tides in the world.

Lets dig into the ground for energy
These 4 users liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70 Pstotto SonofPog longsidepies

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Savid Javid

Post by tiger76 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:12 pm

Is this what George Osbourne meant by a Northern Powerhouse :lol:

Pstotto
Posts: 6224
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:11 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Pstotto » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:17 pm

Probably... Javid comes from Rochdale, how about fracking Rochdale?

ONE MAN.... destroying our democracy AND his near neighbours.

I hope his house is over a sink hole.

BleedingClaret
Posts: 4026
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 1187 times
Has Liked: 1926 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Savid Javid

Post by BleedingClaret » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:18 pm

Always thought that all George Osbourne meant by The Northern Powerhouse was a reference to Fracking.
Also as mentioned above there will be no benefit to normal people.

ExistentialWanderer
Posts: 1117
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:24 am
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by ExistentialWanderer » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:21 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:We are an windy, wet island, surrounded by some of the strongest tides in the world.

Lets dig into the ground for energy
Not being funny but we do dig into the ground for energy. Gas and Oil for example. Is this a case of 'not on my doorstep' but it's ok elsewhere? Quite intrigued how those who are against 'Fracking' are ok with consuming gas and oil and all the hazards to our environment.
Apologies if you're all free spirits and power your cars and laptops on cow shite and the wind that makes you free. :roll:

John Johnson 1605
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 9:49 am
Been Liked: 255 times
Has Liked: 49 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by John Johnson 1605 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:28 pm

Can he obtain a work permit and does he possess pace ?

Pstotto
Posts: 6224
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:11 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Pstotto » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:29 pm

Just because horrible things might happen elsewhere, that does not validate such activities pan-world and especially when voted against. I've not heard of earthquakes in Saudi Arabia or the North Sea, as a result of oil and gas extraction, but this seems to be pushing it one step beyond and the folk have said NO.

SonofPog
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:52 am
Been Liked: 169 times
Has Liked: 82 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by SonofPog » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:33 pm

ExistentialWanderer wrote:Not being funny but we do dig into the ground for energy. Gas and Oil for example. Is this a case of 'not on my doorstep' but it's ok elsewhere? Quite intrigued how those who are against 'Fracking' are ok with consuming gas and oil and all the hazards to our environment.
Apologies if you're all free spirits and power your cars and laptops on cow shite and the wind that makes you free. :roll:
Add.... ground under our homes then for more accuracy. Also, we know far more about the dangers and literal limitations of fossil fuels now, than we did when North Sea was being exploited.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:30 pm

Good lad is our Sajid.
This user liked this post: KateR

Pstotto
Posts: 6224
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:11 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Pstotto » Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:33 pm

Got shares in Deutsche Bank?

dpinsussex
Posts: 3554
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1047 times
Has Liked: 1187 times
Location: Reading

Re: Savid Javid

Post by dpinsussex » Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:33 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:We are an windy, wet island, surrounded by some of the strongest tides in the world.

Lets dig into the ground for energy
Problem is if wind speed gets up too high c30 mph i believe the turbines shut down.

Pstotto
Posts: 6224
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:11 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Pstotto » Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:35 pm

The Rio Ave in Portugal has (had?) tidal windmills along the banks of the river. Rather than some grand tidal (Cardiff?) plan, this seems like a nice low-tech idea.

geopancake
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:07 am
Been Liked: 137 times
Has Liked: 37 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by geopancake » Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:49 pm

It is truly awful this fracking experiment has been allowed, I can't wait until the earthquakes hit downtown Padiham and the powers that shouldn't be attempt to convince us it's a well established fault line. The San Thickneck Fault.

DCWat
Posts: 9974
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4500 times
Has Liked: 3921 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by DCWat » Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:58 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:We are an windy, wet island, surrounded by some of the strongest tides in the world.

Lets dig into the ground for energy
There isn't a solution for wave based power, from what I've seen. In an ideal world that would seem to be the best option, if a viable solution could be found.

Pstotto
Posts: 6224
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:11 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Pstotto » Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:10 pm

A Scottish firm pioneered wave power technology but the Chinese stole the idea and put them out of business.

piston broke
Posts: 5548
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1448 times
Has Liked: 1229 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: Savid Javid

Post by piston broke » Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:14 pm

Watched a programme on Portugal where they pay next to nowt for electric because they use solar, wind and wave.

Whatever they come up with a combination of nimbys and professional objectors will stand outside with their banners.

I've nothing against fracking but would rather it was left in the ground until it becomes essential. Progress is being made with all other forms of electricity generation and we could reach a point where it's not needed

South West Claret.
Posts: 5904
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 788 times
Has Liked: 511 times
Location: Devon

Re: Savid Javid

Post by South West Claret. » Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:25 pm

Yes Javid just comes across as an absolutely slimy, oily, greasy and all round typical Tory right wing reprehensible low life git...don't you think? :)

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4296 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by nil_desperandum » Tue Aug 29, 2017 11:34 pm

thatdberight wrote:I'll have both thanks and I'll take energy production as a national issue that national government is entitled to decide on.
So it's only right then that the National government pays the policing costs ?
Why should we in Lancashire pick up the tab for policing something that our County Council turned down?

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by thatdberight » Tue Aug 29, 2017 11:44 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:So it's only right then that the National government pays the policing costs ?
Why should we in Lancashire pick up the tab for policing something that our County Council turned down?
So presumably because the laws on, say, burglary are set nationally the apprehension of local miscreants should be paid for by central government? That's a ridiculous argument, as if you didn't know it already.

SmudgetheClaret
Posts: 820
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 181 times
Has Liked: 100 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by SmudgetheClaret » Wed Aug 30, 2017 2:39 am

Re-open the coal mines technology surely can filter emissions safer than in the past...

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3951
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 3231 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Burnley Ace » Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:00 am

To be fair (or perhaps correct) the County Council shouldn't have refused the application as they didn't have the evidence to support that decision. It was quite obvious that they were intimidated by the vocal protesters and the nimby voters, that's why it was granted on appeal and the Judicial Review was overturned.
This user liked this post: KateR

lucs86
Posts: 657
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 177 times
Has Liked: 631 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by lucs86 » Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:17 am

ExistentialWanderer wrote:Not being funny but we do dig into the ground for energy. Gas and Oil for example. Is this a case of 'not on my doorstep' but it's ok elsewhere? Quite intrigued how those who are against 'Fracking' are ok with consuming gas and oil and all the hazards to our environment.
Apologies if you're all free spirits and power your cars and laptops on cow shite and the wind that makes you free. :roll:
The people of Lancashire or the UK have no choice on whether we use gas or oil resources, the whole economy is built and fuelled on the use of oil and gas and it's just not possible as a country to stop that use because we don't like it any more. But it was possible to stop fracking at the county level and to reject the direction of travel that fracking represents. At least it was until Savid Javid disagreed and then it wasn't possible. You don't have to live on an allotment to know that's bullshit.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4296 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by nil_desperandum » Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:27 am

thatdberight wrote:So presumably because the laws on, say, burglary are set nationally the apprehension of local miscreants should be paid for by central government? That's a ridiculous argument, as if you didn't know it already.
How is it a ridiculous argument?
It's comparing the costs of a national policing operation in Lancashire to that of apprehending a burglar in Padiham that's ridiculous.

You've already said that it's a national issue that has been laid at our door. It's rather similar to Lancashire Council tax payers having to foot the police bill for Party Conferences if they happen to be at Blackpool.
You may consider it to be a ridiculous argument, but Lancashire Police wouldn't agree.
Lancashire Police are facing unprecedented cuts to their budget. The force has suffered huge cuts in recent years with 850 officers and 450 police staff losing their jobs since austerity began. It has so far made £78.7m of annual savings – with another £40m to be saved by 2020, but policing the fracking sites is costing them an estimated £450,000 each month.
In the circumstances the police have asked the Home Office to foot the bill. The HO have refused to intervene. However, the "good" news for Council tax payers is that once the cost exceeds £2.6 million - fast approaching - the Home Office have to pick up the bill.
So perhaps my point isn't so ridiculous after all?

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by thatdberight » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:40 am

nil_desperandum wrote:How is it a ridiculous argument?
It's comparing the costs of a national policing operation in Lancashire to that of apprehending a burglar in Padiham that's ridiculous.

You've already said that it's a national issue that has been laid at our door. It's rather similar to Lancashire Council tax payers having to foot the police bill for Party Conferences if they happen to be at Blackpool.
You may consider it to be a ridiculous argument, but Lancashire Police wouldn't agree.
Lancashire Police are facing unprecedented cuts to their budget. The force has suffered huge cuts in recent years with 850 officers and 450 police staff losing their jobs since austerity began. It has so far made £78.7m of annual savings – with another £40m to be saved by 2020, but policing the fracking sites is costing them an estimated £450,000 each month.
In the circumstances the police have asked the Home Office to foot the bill. The HO have refused to intervene. However, the "good" news for Council tax payers is that once the cost exceeds £2.6 million - fast approaching - the Home Office have to pick up the bill.
So perhaps my point isn't so ridiculous after all?
Yes, it is. If the folk of Lancashire want to p1ss away their own money on this, let them.

UpTheBeehole
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 496 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by UpTheBeehole » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:54 am

He's called Sajid Javid.

mybloodisclaret
Posts: 2983
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:04 pm
Been Liked: 945 times
Has Liked: 5871 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by mybloodisclaret » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:13 pm

thatdberight wrote:Yes, it is. If the folk of Lancashire want to p1ss away their own money on this, let them.
Where are you even from? Brighton?

It's clearly not an issue that even slightly effects you, whether it be environmental impact, tremors or funding a security operation.
Or are you employed by the exploration company?

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4296 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by nil_desperandum » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:16 pm

thatdberight wrote:Yes, it is. If the folk of Lancashire want to p1ss away their own money on this, let them.
I don't understand where you are coming from. How are we p***ing away our money?
Scenario:
Fracking was given the green light in Lancashire by the Nat Govt. contrary to County Council decision,
Fracking can't go ahead in Lancashire unless Cuadrilla can build a "plant", service it etc.
Cuadrilla can't go ahead if their progress is continuously obstructed by protesters who have descended on the site from all over the country.
Police, have a legal responsibility, and are called in to restrict the activities of protesters, and ensure that cuadrilla can go ahead.
Police have to bring in resources from all over the County and beyond.
Lancashire Police have to fund this.
Lancashire Council tax payers foot the bill (until it reaches £2.6 billion)
Winners: Cuadrilla and govt.
Losers: Those who are paying the police bill (i.e. the good folk of Lancashire inc pensioners, the disabled, and other low income families)
So in what sense are we p***ing our own money away?

AlargeClaret
Posts: 5018
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1251 times
Has Liked: 217 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by AlargeClaret » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:18 pm

As a (genuine) matter of interest when did Lancashire vote No to fracking?

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Lancasterclaret » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:20 pm

Its about as unpopular as its possible to be.

Even theresa May is more popular

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4296 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by nil_desperandum » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:26 pm

AlargeClaret wrote:As a (genuine) matter of interest when did Lancashire vote No to fracking?
Lancashire County Council decision in June 2015 following a 2 year review /consultation.

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by thatdberight » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:07 pm

mybloodisclaret wrote:Where are you even from? Brighton?

It's clearly not an issue that even slightly effects you, whether it be environmental impact, tremors or funding a security operation.
Or are you employed by the exploration company?
affects*

Yes. Everybody who has a view contrary to yours is some sort of plant operating on behalf of the American miltary-industrial complex. You've rumbled me so I'm out of this.
This user liked this post: CJW

mybloodisclaret
Posts: 2983
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:04 pm
Been Liked: 945 times
Has Liked: 5871 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by mybloodisclaret » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:13 pm

I've only questioned you, and I've not stated my view. So climb down off your grammar correcting high horse.

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by thatdberight » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:36 pm

mybloodisclaret wrote:I've only questioned you, and I've not stated my view. So climb down off your grammar correcting high horse.
spelling*

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3951
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 3231 times

Re: Savid Javid

Post by Burnley Ace » Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:21 pm

The audacity of the PNRAG spokesperson is staggering talking about the stress and disruption caused as though it's down to Cudrllla not the protestors!

Post Reply