Ryanair

Barleywine4me · Post by **Barleywine4me** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:04 pm

EXHAUSTING !!!!!!! Just stop it.............

Chobulous · Post by **Chobulous** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:07 pm

Spijed wrote:That's fairly obvious but the fanciful idea that get's put out by Boris & Co. that things can be better than before is rubbish.

Take flights to the EU for example. How can the situation be better post Brexit?

We'll want a good deal, so will the EU. Therefore it'll remain EXACTLY the same as it was before. How on earth then can we get a BETTER deal that suits ALL parties?

That's simply impossible!

What seems obvious to me is that things will not remain exactly the same. Some deals will be better, some deals will be worse and some may remain the same.
For those deals that are better the Brexiteers will be out in force screaming "See we told you so", For those deals that are worse the Remoaners will be out in force screaming "See we told you so" and for those that remain the same both parties will keep quiet.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:08 pm

Spijed wrote:Of course they will land after Brexit, but Boris and Co. seem to think that we can get a BETTER deal for Britain.

This is one example where it's impossible to get anything other than a status quo, just like it will be in 99.99% of other areas.

The status quo is just fine.

Planes will fly n land after Brexit.

You agree with me!

You disagree with the uppity Remoaner Oleary!

All's well....

UpTheBeehole · Post by **UpTheBeehole** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:11 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:The status quo is just fine.

Planes will fly n land after Brexit.

You agree with me!

You disagree with the uppity Remoaner Oleary!

All's well....

To copy and paste someone else's post from yesterday, which you've completely ignored:

nil_desperandum wrote:Now shall we look at what O'Leary actually said?, which is rather different:
“There is a real prospect, and we need to deal with this, that there are going to be no flights between the UK and Europe for a period of weeks, months beyond March 2019.
“There is not going to be an interim agreement, there is not going to be a legal basis, we will be cancelling flights, we will be cancelling people’s holidays for summer of 2019.”
I'm no fan of O'Leary, but there is factual basis for his statement. In the scenario where we simply walked away from the EU with absolutely no deal of any kind, then we wouldn't have any agreement to fly planes in and out of Europe. This is why - where agreements can't be made before March 2019 transitional arrangements will have to be made in order to maintain current flight schedules. This is basically what he said.

With regards to the current Ryanair fiasco. One benefit we currently enjoy within the EU is that flights within the EU are protected, whereas when you fly outside the EU the same financial protections are not there.

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:11 pm

Chobulous wrote:

Chobulous. You're a perfectly sensible poster normally. If you can't see that he misquoted me - deliberately or by accident, then you need to go to Specsavers.
The clue is in the sentence by Ringo that I have now quoted at least twice.
If you want a second clue, it's that the words "bad" and "good" are total opposites.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:11 pm

UpTheBeehole wrote:We're not playing you, we're just bewildered at how ******* thick you are.

"We're just bewildered!"

Couldn't agree more

UpTheBeehole · Post by **UpTheBeehole** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:12 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:"We're just bewildered!"

Couldn't agree more

At how ******* thick you are

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:13 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:Chobulous. You're a perfectly sensible poster normally. If you can't see that he misquoted me - deliberately or by accident, then you need to go to Specsavers.
The clue is in the sentence by Ringo that I have now quoted at least twice.
If you want a second clue, it's that the words "bad" and "good" are total opposites.

You said " I can't be bothered to search through all your previous posts, but I can pretty much guarantee that at some point you will have written and agreed with the bizarrely unworkable - "No deal is better than a bad deal"

I said there no need to. I wouldn't have said it.

Where is the misquote?

UpTheBeehole · Post by **UpTheBeehole** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:14 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:You said " I can't be bothered to search through all your previous posts, but I can pretty much guarantee that at some point you will have written and agreed with the bizarrely unworkable - "No deal is better than a bad deal"

I said there no need to. I wouldn't have said it.

Where is the misquote?

Quoon has highlighted your misquote, you thick ****

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:15 pm

UpTheBeehole wrote:At how ******* thick you are

You stay bewildered. It suits you!

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:16 pm

UpTheBeehole wrote:Quoon has highlighted your misquote, you thick ****

Indeed.Though I never call anyone thick.
You basically - it would appear - made a mistake, but since then you've dug deeper and deeper. Time to put the spade away now I think.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:31 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:Indeed.Though I never call anyone thick.
You basically - it would appear - made a mistake, but since then you've dug deeper and deeper. Time to put the spade away now I think.

Post 120 nil desp- "I can't be bothered to search through all your previous posts, but I can pretty much guarantee that at some point you will have written and agreed with the bizarrely unworkable - "No deal is better than a bad deal"

Post 121 RingoMcCartney " I can save you the time. I haven't said no deal is better than a good deal."

Post 124 nil desp -" I never suggested that you did. You've deliberately misquoted me"

When nil desp says be can " pretty much guarantee you've said" something And that I say I they haven't.

Then nil desp says "I never suggested that you did"

It's clear that nil desp has short term memory loss or is a lousy troll and wind up merchant that ran out of ideas.

What is the mistake I've made. Just hold my hand and walk me thru it.

Tall Paul · Post by **Tall Paul** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:34 pm

lol

Hint:

RingoMcCartney wrote:Post 120 nil desp- "I can't be bothered to search through all your previous posts, but I can pretty much guarantee that at some point you will have written and agreed with the bizarrely unworkable - "No deal is better than a bad deal"

Post 121 RingoMcCartney " I can save you the time. I haven't said no deal is better than a good deal."

quoonbeatz · Post by **quoonbeatz** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:35 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:Whatever pal. Your ability to comprehend English is not my problem

But you carry on with the childish comments ......

hiya pal, its not me who has difficulty comprehending English; i learned the words 'good' and 'bad' when i was a kid.

appears you're still struggling with them now.

Walton · Post by **Walton** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:46 pm

Hahahahaha, keep up the good work Ringo. Best beyond-parody account going.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:48 pm

Tall Paul wrote:lol

Hint:

Yeah yeah! So there was grammatically error! Fair enough.

Ok so I hold my hand up. I missed it. It's no biggy.

However, It wasn't done intentionally it probably came up as predictive text.

But the main thrust of my original post still remains the same. Remoaner Oleary hysterical nonsense about planes not flying n landing after brexit is just that nonsense. He can't organise his pilots holidays and simultaneously messed up 1000s of his, soon to be, former customers holidays. And he'll be punished financially by his beloved EU!.

I can admit to overlooking a single word that really didn't make a bit of difference to the general point I was making. Which was.

The clown Remoaner Oleary has been hoisted by his own petard!

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:54 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:Yeah yeah! So there was grammatically error! Fair enough.

Ok so I hold my hand up. I missed it. It's no biggy.
!

I'm prepared to accept that it was a genuine error, but:
It's not a grammatical error. It makes perfect sense. And
It's definitely a "biggy" when you type the exact opposite of what you mean't to say. I quite understandably thought that you were distorting what I had written. I wouldn't have reacted to an obvious typo, but I genuinely thought that you were trying to be clever.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:56 pm

Walton wrote:Hahahahaha, keep up the good work Ringo. Best beyond-parody account going.

Not a problem Walton. I guess some people aren't as pedantic and ant-like when reading / writing posts.

It's a pity that comments don't have to be disected and simply understood in the spirit it was genuinely meant to be.

If it's a way a deflecting from losing argument I guess people, who are inclined to do it, will do so.

Nobody's house is on fire is it.

At the end of the day. Half dozen posters have seen me make a grammatical error. The whole of Europe have seen Olearys major league **** up. One of us will sleep well tonight!

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:02 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:I'm prepared to accept that it was a genuine error, but:
It's not a grammatical error. It makes perfect sense. And
It's definitely a "biggy" when you type the exact opposite of what you mean't to say. I quite understandably thought that you were distorting what I had written. I wouldn't have reacted to an obvious typo, but I genuinely thought that you were trying to be clever.

Post 126 " Iwas simply confirming that I don't think that no deal is better than a bad one. No sarcasm,no twisting, simply confirming. But after saying that basically we agree."

You can see from this post I wasn't trying to distort what you'd said. I fact I even used the word "bad". So clearly It was a typo. Funny that. The grammatical forensics team missed that one didn't they.

Tall Paul · Post by **Tall Paul** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:03 pm

How do you know O'Leary didn't mean to say the exact opposite of what he said and merely made a "grammatical error"?

RocketLawnChair · Post by **RocketLawnChair** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:10 pm

Whilst there is a point to what O'Leary is saying about 2019 its a tad hysterical don't you think? This does now seem to be the MO of Remain supporters though (how anybody can be a staunch supporter of either is beyond me, good and terrible in both agendas).

The fact is British people spend billions of £s abroad every year and most of that is in mainland Europe, they will find a way (or a deal) of shipping us in and out don't you worry about that, And if O'Leary doesn't want to do it their will be somebody waiting in the wings (great pun) who does.

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:14 pm

Ringo. I honestly thought that you had quite deliberately typed good rather than bad in your reply to me.
It's hardly a typo when the number of letters are different and only the final letter the same, so I don't really see how you could expect me to read it differently. I do however accept that you may have had something of a brain- fail and typed good rather than bad, so let's leave it there.
And on that note that's me out for today.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:15 pm

Tall Paul wrote:How do you know O'Leary didn't mean to say the exact opposite of what he said and merely made a "grammatical error"?

Fair One! But this is a football message board. With about 30 posters max who are interested in this stuff. When you're busy at work. You're on your phone and as I've said it was a genuine mistake on my part cos I used the phrase "no deal is better than a BAD deal" in my very next post, surely a bit of acceptance that a honest mistake had took place? No? Especially when I was saying that me and nil desp were essentially agreeing!

quoonbeatz · Post by **quoonbeatz** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:25 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:One of us will sleep well tonight!

will it be the one worth around a billion pounds or the one who moans about him on a football messageboard?

both, probably.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:27 pm

RocketLawnChair wrote:Whilst there is a point to what O'Leary is saying about 2019 its a tad hysterical don't you think? This does now seem to be the MO of Remain supporters though (how anybody can be a staunch supporter of either is beyond me, good and terrible in both agendas).

The fact is British people spend billions of £s abroad every year and most of that is in mainland Europe, they will find a way (or a deal) of shipping us in and out don't you worry about that, And if O'Leary doesn't want to do it their will be somebody waiting in the wings (great pun) who does.

Great post!

FulledgeClaret · Post by **FulledgeClaret** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:34 pm

NottsClaret wrote:We used to fly with Ryanair all the time, being on a family budget. But after yet another grubby, late cattle transport trip, I thought it doesn't really make sense saving for a holiday then having a miserable time getting there and back.

Spent a tiny bit more with Monarch this year - still very much a budget airline - but it was loads better. Might have been a one off, but I'll be using them again.

used monarch quite a bit over the years and can say it wasn't a one off I have found them very good every time certainly worth the extra few quid to avoid Ryanair Easyjet.

evensteadiereddie · Post by **evensteadiereddie** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:33 pm

Jet2 are pretty good too.

HatfieldClaret · Post by **HatfieldClaret** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:05 pm

He's obviously brilliant at business.

I think he should be in charge of the Brexit negotiations, for the EU side....

dandeclaret · Post by **dandeclaret** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:31 pm

Appears Ryanair are doing a share buy back....... share price has gone down a bit hasn't it....... hmmmmm

THEWELLERNUT70 · Post by **THEWELLERNUT70** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:01 pm

There was an ex Ryanair pilot on Radio 2 today. He worked for them from 2004-2011 (now working for Norwegian Airlines). He outlined the erosion in t&cs for pilots and cabin crew in that time as Ryanair tried to maximise every last ounce of profit they could. It has lead to on board staff now having to purchase necessary items such as water to take on board with them, if the flight was of such length as to necessitate a stop over no accommodation is provided by Ryanair for staff and any required accommodation has to be paid by staff out of their own pockets. Surely there has to be numerous H&S breaches

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:44 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:Ringo. I honestly thought that you had quite deliberately typed good rather than bad in your reply to me.
It's hardly a typo when the number of letters are different and only the final letter the same, so I don't really see how you could expect me to read it differently. I do however accept that you may have had something of a brain- fail and typed good rather than bad, so let's leave it there.
And on that note that's me out for today.

Do you know what nil desp. You knew exactly what I was saying. Exactly. I was following on from you're post that said,

"I do agree that a deal will be reached whereby flights continue" and,

"I'm one of the 70% who believes that we should just get on with Brexit."

And you knew what I meant when there was no need to go through my posts. You didnt like waht I said in my reply. Which was essentially we agreed. But you werent man enough to agree with me cos you either dont like me or agree with my view point or both. So instead you zoomed in on an utterly utterly irrelevent spelling mistake. In post 126 I even use the phrase "No deal is better than a BAD deal" but you chose to ignore what I said then acted as though the spelling mistake was the main point of my post. It meant that you could avoid admitting that we agreed.

Chobulous came in and he misses the spelling mistake and reads my post in the spirit it was supposed to be read. He uses the phrase "No deal is better than a BAD deal" so he, like you, knew exactly what I was saying. You could easily have said "I know what he was saying and its been funny watching him wriggle" but you chose not to. You just focused on the irrelevant spelling mistake. You then get all sneering and say, "It's hardly a typo when the number of letters are different and only the final letter the same, so I don't really see how you could expect me to read it differently." I do know how to spell.

You say,"I quite understandably thought that you were distorting what I had written." Utter garbage.

When I said theres no need to go though my posts.Becasue I dont agree with it. What part of that was dependent on the word "good" or "bad"? You knew exaclty what I meant nil desp.

Be honest whether Remoaner or Brexiteer. Who the f*** actually uses the phrase "No deal is better than a good deal?" Everybody knows what the phrase is.

Answer-no one.

It was clearly an irrelevant error. An error that was corrected repeatedly later, by me and another poster.

You know it and I know it. And you obsessing on a spelling mistake rather than the point of my post. Meant you avoided having to agree with me. You know it and I know it.

And theres something really insideous and cowardly about that.

Bordeauxclaret · Post by **Bordeauxclaret** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:15 pm

Proper rant.

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:17 pm

Ringo.
Anyone who reads my posts should be able to tell that I'm authentic, genuine and honest - even if they disagree with my posts.
I was very polite to you, and accepted that you made a mistake.
If it makes you feel any better by accusing me of lying and describing me as "insideous" and cowardly then that's fine.
My immediate response was that you had deliberately misquoted me, which I honestly believed. It was you that then did not check back and identify that you had made an error. Had you re-read what you typed (when I said you had misquoted me) then you would have spotted your mistake, and the whole misunderstanding could have been avoided.
If I'd been trying to wind you up then my tone would have been mocking. If you read the thread you will note that I didn't laugh at you or mock you, and indeed it was v early in the thread that I suggested that perhaps you had misquoted me by accident.
You don't know me at all, so it doesn't concern me if you don't believe me, but it does concern me that you would write such a long post in order to try to pass the blame on to me for what was a simple human error by you, and a genuine but understandable literal reading by me of what you wrote.
You can't type the direct opposite of what you mean to say and then expect everyone to assume what you actually mean.
And by the way - it's insidious. If you're going to insult or libel me then at least get the term right.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:19 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:Ringo.
Anyone who reads my posts should be able to tell that I'm authentic, genuine and honest - even if they disagree with my posts.
I was very polite to you, and accepted that you made a mistake.
If it makes you feel any better by accusing me of lying and describing me as "insideous" and cowardly then good for you.
My immediate response was that you had deliberately misquoted me, which I honestly believed. It was you that then did not check back and identify that you had made an error. Had you re-read what you typed (when I said you had misquoted me) then you would have spotted your mistake, and the whole misunderstanding could have been avoided.
If I'd been trying to wind you up then my tone would have been mocking. If you read the thread you will note that I didn't laugh at you or mock you, and indeed it was v early in the thread that I suggested that perhaps you had misquoted me by accident.
You don't know me at all, so it doesn't concern me if you don't believe me, but it does concern me that you would write such a long post in order to try to pass the blame on to me for what was a simple human error by you, and genuine but understandable literal reading by me of what you wrote.
You can't type the direct opposite of what you mean and then expect everyone to assume what you actually mean.
And by the way - it's insidious. If you're going to insult or libel me then at least get the term right.

Pedantic, cowardly and someone for whom I have zero respect.

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:23 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:Pedantic, cowardly and someone for whom I have zero respect.

Therein lies the difference between us, since I respect everyone on this board irrespective of whether I agree with their views or not.
I will continue to read your posts with interest.
Edit: By the way when you (in effect) wrote " a good deal is better than no deal" it made perfect sense and I thought it was your most sensible contibution to the thread.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:53 pm

"a simple human error by you", your words nil desp.

You chose not to admit that earlier didnt you! You absolutely knew it earlier as well. But, preferred to deflect from having to agree with me. By admitting it was an error now, proves I'm right. You knew exactly what I meant. Eaxctly.

Like Oleary.

You've been hoisted by you're own petard....

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:07 pm

RingoMcCartney wrote:"a simple human error by you", your words nil desp.

You chose not to admit that earlier didnt you! You absolutely knew it earlier as well. But, preferred to deflect from having to agree with me. By admitting it was an error now, proves I'm right. You knew exactly what I meant. Eaxctly.
.

I think you'll find that I offered you this explanation at 2.19 this afternoon - post 133 - at a time when other's were laughing at you following your faux pas.
I did say at that point that your quote could have been accidental rather than deliberate, but you failed to acknowledge this.
When I wrote accidental I could just as easily have written "simple human error".
Why not let this rest now.
Good night.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:18 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:I think you'll find that I offered you this explanation at 2.19 this afternoon - post 133 - at a time when other's were laughing at you following your faux pas.
I did say at that point that your quote could have been accidental rather than deliberate, but you failed to acknowledge this.
When I wrote accidental I could just as easily have written "simple human error".
Why not let this rest now.
Good night.

Give em enough rope.........

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 11:17 am

nil_desperandum wrote:I think you'll find that I offered you this explanation at 2.19 this afternoon - post 133 - at a time when other's were laughing at you following your faux pas.
I did say at that point that your quote could have been accidental rather than deliberate, but you failed to acknowledge this.
When I wrote accidental I could just as easily have written "simple human error".
Why not let this rest now.
Good night.

Good morning.

Talking of a "faux pas". Something which you are keen to point out when you feel others are guilty of. You couldnt wait to point out i'd spelt insidious wrong could you! you just could resist the temptation. So I'm sure you wont mind me pointing out your error.

Post 122 RingoMccartney -

I can save you the time. I haven't said no deal is better than a good deal.

But you agree with me that a deal will be done on flights.

You therefore disagree with the silly stuff spouted by Oleary.

You want the British government to just get on with It!

Despite what you think. We agree!

Post 124 nildesp -

I never suggested that you did. You've deliberately misquoted me.

Where in my post are the quotation marks nil desp? WHERE!? Im not QUOTING you i'm making a statement. For me to misquote you, as I'm sure you know as a fully paid up pedant, there would actually have to have been, a quotation in the first place! There were no QUOTATION marks. None

Because you were all giddy at the thought of avoiding having to agree with me, after what you'd said. You seized the opportunity to highlight something you could use, to deflect. You jumped in and claimed I was misquoting you! You were wrong. You were utterly wrong. What you should have said, is that you're trying to misrepresnt me.

No quotation marks means, there was NO quote. Consequently, there could be no misquote!

Not only are you a coward who fakes his own misunderstanding, to weasel out of what should have been a straight forward, but begrudging, agreement. But, you've been shown up for not actually being on top of your game when it comes to forensically, scrutinising other posters words.

You failed in your attempt to claim you didnt realy know what I was meaning. And you failed, miserably, in your attempt of, constant, self aggrandisment by trying to be a big hitter, in the Punctutaion Police!

Remember. You need a pair of these - "" if you want a quotation. And a pair of balls if you want to admit you were wrong. You possessed neither.

Chobulous · Post by **Chobulous** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 11:20 am

Christ on a bike, give it a rest.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 11:23 am

If people can dish it out, they can take it.

Rileybobs · Post by **Rileybobs** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 11:52 am

This is proper funny

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 11:55 am

As other's have been pointing out recently.
I think he's totally lost it.
Strange really since his football related post are usually very sensible.

UpTheBeehole · Post by **UpTheBeehole** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 12:02 pm

You've totally got under his skin here nil_desperandum. Bloke's obsessed.

Chobulous · Post by **Chobulous** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 12:07 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:As other's have been pointing out recently.
I think he's totally lost it.
Strange really since his football related post are usually very sensible.

You usually avoid the ad hominem

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 12:13 pm

Chobulous wrote:You usually avoid the ad hominem

This is very true, but I did compliment him on his contributions to football threads.

quoonbeatz · Post by **quoonbeatz** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 12:21 pm

looks like i was wrong about them both sleeping well. must only have been the rich guy.

aggi · Post by **aggi** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 3:51 pm

Looks like those planes might not be flying after all

And Norman thinks Mrs May's reassertion that "no deal is better than a bad deal" was significant.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-41359581" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

(It's Friday afternoon, I'm bored)

IanMcL · Post by **IanMcL** » Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:59 pm

I've sussed it! This is not an I'm easy error. It is a cunning plan. One of those brainstorm ideas which is then calculated and when it saves money - let's do it.

Pilots fly all summer but some leave. 150 went to Norwegian, we know. The under filled flights are scuppered in the Summer and the co-pilots get in their hours. Poor conditiins meabs pilots leave andwhen winter comes, lot less flights and less pilots needed, so not a problem. New trainees become co-pilots and the co-pilots with their hours become fully fkedged.

There are flights they would lose money on in winter, so they would rather cancel them and merge 2 together. Cover story...we cocked up the annual leave. No they didn't! Just cancellwdparticular loss makers. Cost of flight more than compensation. Clever O'Leary.

RingoMcCartney · Post by **RingoMcCartney** » Fri Sep 29, 2017 12:43 pm

Another 400,000 affected, and cancellations till March.

And he's now been caught lying and breaking the law! Telling disgruntled customers their travel insurance will cover the almighty incompetent balls up.

He's got till 5 o'clock today to sort his s*** out or face fines by the CAA.

And all this by the whining, lying Remoaner who claimed it would be brexit that would lead to planes not flying between Europe and the UK after March 2019.

What an lying, EU law breaking, incompetent clown!