Oystons lose court case
-
- Posts: 19788
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4201 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Oystons lose court case
Latvian businessman valeri belokon has won his court case against the owners of Blackpool fc, the Oyston family.
£31m they have to pay him.
£31m they have to pay him.
These 4 users liked this post: Rick_Muller TVC15 tim_noone MrTopTier
-
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 3108 times
- Has Liked: 4870 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
Blackpool forums making for interesting reading atm !!
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Oystons lose court case
Apparently there were some Blackpool fans in the court who cheered when the verdict was announced.
These 3 users liked this post: Bin Ont Turf conyoviejo evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1288 times
- Has Liked: 2354 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
It couldn't have happened to nicer people
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
- Been Liked: 393 times
- Has Liked: 166 times
- Location: York
Re: Oystons lose court case
But does that mean they'll be taking the 31m out of the club (somehow) which can't be good news for the fans.
Re: Oystons lose court case
I think the Blackpool fans are hoping they’ll have to sell the club to help fund the £31m.Sutton-Claret wrote:But does that mean they'll be taking the 31m out of the club (somehow) which can't be good news for the fans.
Re: Oystons lose court case
Prick list
-
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:24 pm
- Been Liked: 189 times
- Has Liked: 130 times
- Location: York
Re: Oystons lose court case
You can buy Bolton Wonderers for £25m
Who'll buy the Tangerines for £31m
Who'll buy the Tangerines for £31m
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2493 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
Re: Oystons lose court case
IT couldn't have happened to a nicer family .. What comes round goes round..
These 2 users liked this post: randomclaret2 tim_noone
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:26 pm
- Been Liked: 168 times
- Has Liked: 103 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
No problem with the Seasiders,always had a soft spot for them. This is fantastic news for the long suffering Pool fans in their prolonged battle with the odious Oyston clan.
These 2 users liked this post: tim_noone ClaretTony
-
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
- Been Liked: 654 times
- Has Liked: 155 times
- Location: the ghost in the atom
Re: Oystons lose court case
even better the judge has said they have no access to appeal
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 5253
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2129 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Oystons lose court case
The disheartening thing is looking at the B'pool forums.
A lot of fans saying that since the Oystens ripped heart outa the club and they have been boycotting - they have found other passtimes now and will not likely be supporting the club as they once did.
Even with the Oystens gone from B'pool it seems the damage has already been done.
A lot of fans saying that since the Oystens ripped heart outa the club and they have been boycotting - they have found other passtimes now and will not likely be supporting the club as they once did.
Even with the Oystens gone from B'pool it seems the damage has already been done.
-
- Posts: 12245
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 6027 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
Expect the bastards fans to trot that excuse out as and when the Venky's leave.bfccrazy wrote:
A lot of fans saying that since the Oystens ripped heart outa the club and they have been boycotting - they have found other passtimes now and will not likely be supporting the club as they once did.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 5253
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2129 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Oystons lose court case
Quite an interesting thread on their forum where someone posed the question.TheFamilyCat wrote:Expect the bastards fans to trot that excuse out as and when the Venky's leave.
They won't get near the attendances of a few years ago with the loss of fair weather fans anyway you'd think. They had around 4k on in their past lower league days and it'll probably be around that amount again now I'm guessing - they have around 2k now with the boycott.
Re: Oystons lose court case
The slimy and odious Oystons will be wriggling like netted fish to worm their way out of paying.
Let us hope this is the start of their demise.
Let us hope this is the start of their demise.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Oystons lose court case
They had 3k on for their fa cup first round game on Saturday.bfccrazy wrote:Quite an interesting thread on their forum where someone posed the question.
They won't get near the attendances of a few years ago with the loss of fair weather fans anyway you'd think. They had around 4k on in their past lower league days and it'll probably be around that amount again now I'm guessing - they have around 2k now with the boycott.
Re: Oystons lose court case
Blackpool fc is a name with a training ground I understand that the Oystons own Bloomfield road lock stock and barrel. If they want they can turn it into a shopping complex to sell or just sell it now as it is with pp for a shopping complex. An investor might buy it and rent it to Blackpool fc but how much would the rent be ? No winners.
-
- Posts: 4929
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1252 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
Be a good place raise sick and maltreated donkeys. Maybe they already do.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4386 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
They own a lot of land in Blackpool.
This user liked this post: Steve-Harpers-perm
-
- Posts: 2544
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 898 times
- Has Liked: 11184 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
Be careful what you say people, you know what the wealthy arsewipes are like for bullying lesser lights who speak out of turn. 

-
- Posts: 5510
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1478 times
- Has Liked: 3255 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: Oystons lose court case
Could they transfer the £31 million debt to the club?
Borrow against the club's assets?
Borrow against the club's assets?
Re: Oystons lose court case
Doesn't one of the Oystons work for the FA?
Re: Oystons lose court case
Not quite one of the Oystons does FA work as in sweet FA.(allegedly)KRBFC wrote:Doesn't one of the Oystons work for the FA?
-
- Posts: 3237
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 940 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100
Re: Oystons lose court case
Is there even £31m in the club?
Re: Oystons lose court case
That Reddit thread is very funnyMrTopTier wrote:Excellent result for the fans.
https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comment ... igh_court/
Re: Oystons lose court case
Good to see the Oystons on the receiving end. Hope the fans get their club back. Diabolical what's gone on over the past decade there.
-
- Posts: 77782
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38060 times
- Has Liked: 5775 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Oystons lose court case
It's dreadful what's gone at Blackpool and a number of other clubs in recent years with the owners. Interestingly, the mess at clubs with owners is usually down to foreign owners and not ones who have been in charge of their club for nigh on 20 years.
What the Blackpool fans have had to deal with is absolutely disgraceful and if they get something positive out of this then we should all be really pleased for them.
What the Blackpool fans have had to deal with is absolutely disgraceful and if they get something positive out of this then we should all be really pleased for them.
-
- Posts: 8717
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1877 times
- Has Liked: 2238 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
Unfortunately a lot of clubs are run by people of dubious reputation .The football league checks about fair and proper owners are a complete joke with a variety of foreign businessman looking to "invest" in football clubs and then sell on for profit.
In Blackpools case it was local owners who caused problems and alienated the fans.
I doubt the ground and it's environs especially in a dump like Blackpool South shore is worth anything like £31m.
It begs the perennial question though.What did the Oystons do with the large amounts earned by Ollie and his promotion winning team.
That's a point that Karl Oyston and his family have not fully answered .
The Lashers deserve better than these chancers running their club but I doubt they'll shift the Oystons.
Who need offshore tax havens when you've got a moneytree growing in Blackpool?
In Blackpools case it was local owners who caused problems and alienated the fans.
I doubt the ground and it's environs especially in a dump like Blackpool South shore is worth anything like £31m.
It begs the perennial question though.What did the Oystons do with the large amounts earned by Ollie and his promotion winning team.
That's a point that Karl Oyston and his family have not fully answered .
The Lashers deserve better than these chancers running their club but I doubt they'll shift the Oystons.
Who need offshore tax havens when you've got a moneytree growing in Blackpool?
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:07 am
- Been Liked: 15 times
- Has Liked: 2 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
An interesting read in the Blackpool gazette -
After further discussion in court the judge ruled that a “financial buy-out” was the appropriate course following his findings. The judge ordered the buy-out jointly against Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Ltd, a company with Oyston family links formerly known as Segesta, and Owen Oyston and Karl Oyston, but not against the football club itself. How the Oyston family intend to pay the huge bill remains to be seen. The judge refused the Oystons’ right to appeal but they are likely to take their case to the Court of Appeal instead. Justice Smith ordered the Oystons to pay £10m to Belokon within 28 days; their assets to be frozen while a timetable for the full amount was decided. The Oystons’ £26.77m payments to their own companies was described by the judge as “illegitimate stripping of Blackpool FC”.
Read more at: http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/ ... -1-8844084" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Even more interesting is the judges summing up of the Oystons.
http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/ ... -1-8844096" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
After further discussion in court the judge ruled that a “financial buy-out” was the appropriate course following his findings. The judge ordered the buy-out jointly against Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Ltd, a company with Oyston family links formerly known as Segesta, and Owen Oyston and Karl Oyston, but not against the football club itself. How the Oyston family intend to pay the huge bill remains to be seen. The judge refused the Oystons’ right to appeal but they are likely to take their case to the Court of Appeal instead. Justice Smith ordered the Oystons to pay £10m to Belokon within 28 days; their assets to be frozen while a timetable for the full amount was decided. The Oystons’ £26.77m payments to their own companies was described by the judge as “illegitimate stripping of Blackpool FC”.
Read more at: http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/ ... -1-8844084" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Even more interesting is the judges summing up of the Oystons.
http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/ ... -1-8844096" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 8266
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2483 times
- Has Liked: 2223 times
Re: Oystons lose court case
Good news for Lashers fans but, what was interesting was Belokon's inability to be associated with the Club now, because of his Money Laundering exploits !
What a Nest of Vipers Bloomfield Road really is !
Who vets these people? BFS and 'Appy 'Arry ?!

What a Nest of Vipers Bloomfield Road really is !
Who vets these people? BFS and 'Appy 'Arry ?!



Re: Oystons lose court case
Nowadays, you cannot just develop on a sports ground/ pitch. A replacement equivalent has to be provided.bfcjg wrote:Blackpool fc is a name with a training ground I understand that the Oystons own Bloomfield road lock stock and barrel. If they want they can turn it into a shopping complex to sell or just sell it now as it is with pp for a shopping complex. An investor might buy it and rent it to Blackpool fc but how much would the rent be ? No winners.
-
- Posts: 77782
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38060 times
- Has Liked: 5775 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Oystons lose court case
Doesn't that company 'Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Ltd' actually own the football club?Overthehill wrote:An interesting read in the Blackpool gazette -
After further discussion in court the judge ruled that a “financial buy-out” was the appropriate course following his findings. The judge ordered the buy-out jointly against Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Ltd, a company with Oyston family links formerly known as Segesta, and Owen Oyston and Karl Oyston, but not against the football club itself.
-
- Posts: 77782
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38060 times
- Has Liked: 5775 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Oystons lose court case
David Conn in the Guardian and the ineffective fit and proper persons test
https://www.theguardian.com/football/bl ... all-league" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
One line reads: "The second key provision which disqualifies an owner or director is to have been involved in the insolvency of two clubs. Again, any insolvency before 2004 is not taken into account."
If the 2004 wasn't included, it would disqualify Shaun Harvey the chief exec of the league who was involved in insolvency at both Bradford City and Leeds.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/bl ... all-league" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
One line reads: "The second key provision which disqualifies an owner or director is to have been involved in the insolvency of two clubs. Again, any insolvency before 2004 is not taken into account."
If the 2004 wasn't included, it would disqualify Shaun Harvey the chief exec of the league who was involved in insolvency at both Bradford City and Leeds.