I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by ontario claret » Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:06 pm

Yesterday's referee, some 40-something who still calls himself Bobby, not only contributed to the tying goal, he CAUSED it, by body-checking Westwood near the centre dot, and then ignoring an obvious foul on Kevin Long in the penalty area, and allowing the tying goal by Southampton. I'm ready to put on a gorilla suit and appearing on "It's Not the 9 O'Clock News". This goes way beyond coincidence and into active conspiracy theory. I hate playing against 12 men every week. :evil:
These 4 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland Rowls Croydon Claret MT03ALG

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8269
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2936 times
Has Liked: 508 times
Location: Earth

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by ClaretAndJew » Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:13 pm

There is no conspiracy theory, these things are part of the game, can't be helped.

Cornwallclaret
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:28 pm
Been Liked: 127 times
Has Liked: 244 times
Location: Torquay

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Cornwallclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:24 pm

Im more dissapointed our lads weren't more ruthless..would have been better to defend their attack regardless how it started then argue the toss after the final whistle with a 1-0 scruffy win and 3 pts

SussexDon1inIreland
Posts: 6217
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:23 pm
Been Liked: 1277 times
Has Liked: 8528 times
Location: Greystones Ireland

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by SussexDon1inIreland » Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:31 pm

Agree with Ontario
Am tired of always playing 12 - playing against 11 is hard enough.
How many penalties have we won this season?? its none
This user liked this post: ontario claret

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by ontario claret » Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:36 pm

I'm actually surprised that they allowed Barnes's goal. After all, he did brush the keeper after the ball was already in the goal.

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by ontario claret » Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:38 pm

And "can't be helped"? When did you ever see any of the Big 6 undergo these circumstances?

Erasmus
Posts: 761
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 1:46 pm
Been Liked: 574 times
Has Liked: 44 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Erasmus » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:11 pm

It's just another example of the bad luck we seem to experiencing this year.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77740
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38038 times
Has Liked: 5774 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:16 pm

ontario claret wrote:I'm actually surprised that they allowed Barnes's goal. After all, he did brush the keeper after the ball was already in the goal.
ontario claret wrote:And "can't be helped"? When did you ever see any of the Big 6 undergo these circumstances?

He actually put the ball into the net with his hand, albeit not deliberately.

I do Rate the Ref before seeing any footage back, but when I did, the only decision he got wrong was the goalkeeper coming out of the box handling the ball. But he couldn't see it from the angle he had so couldn't give it.

He's a poor referee, in my view, but nothing wrong with his performance at all.

Interestingly, Martin Atkinson did exactly the same today, blocking a player, in the Man U v Chelsea game. It prompted the commentator to mention Madley & Burnley. It's happened for years, it's not anyone's fault.

Walton
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
Been Liked: 866 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Walton » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:22 pm

Some Burnley fans wouldn't look out of place on Arsenal TV or Infowars with their loony conspiracy theories.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro

Dark Cloud
Posts: 7588
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2301 times
Has Liked: 4094 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Dark Cloud » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:25 pm

Westwood should have decked their player and taken the card.
These 2 users liked this post: Godalmingclaret Juan Tanamera

Belial
Posts: 1800
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
Been Liked: 433 times
Has Liked: 377 times
Location: On a crazy train

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Belial » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:27 pm

Can't do anything about the ref getting in the way - it's part of it sometimes and that's one we were unlucky with.

We can say something about the quick free kick we took in the first half though that was called back - because when Man City did that to us, it was allowed to carry on and they directly scored from it

IanMcL
Posts: 34805
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6949 times
Has Liked: 10368 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by IanMcL » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:29 pm

Dark Cloud wrote:Westwood should have decked their player and taken the card.
Should have decked the player and may not have got a card, as it was restoring the balance! Ha!

claret57
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:25 pm
Been Liked: 10 times
Has Liked: 2 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by claret57 » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:32 pm

ClaretTony wrote:He actually put the ball into the net with his hand, albeit not deliberately.

I do Rate the Ref before seeing any footage back, but when I did, the only decision he got wrong was the goalkeeper coming out of the box handling the ball. But he couldn't see it from the angle he had so couldn't give it.

He's a poor referee, in my view, but nothing wrong with his performance at all.

Interestingly, Martin Atkinson did exactly the same today, blocking a player, in the Man U v Chelsea game. It prompted the commentator to mention Madley & Burnley. It's happened for years, it's not anyone's fault.



If you look at the refs position he was on a direct line with the penalty area and had a good view of the goalkeepers hand ball. Also the linesman was on the right side to help him. In my view he bottled it

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by ontario claret » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:35 pm

With all due respect, Tony, isn't the correct call for direct referee interference, inadvertent or not, causing direct change in outcome in a game, a dropped ball? Maybe The_Referee can answer this.

Dark Cloud
Posts: 7588
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2301 times
Has Liked: 4094 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Dark Cloud » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:36 pm

IanMcL wrote:Should have decked the player and may not have got a card, as it was restoring the balance! Ha!
You might be right there! Madley might have felt bad and let him off. And I couldn't help thinking Joey B wouldn't have hesitated!! He'd have taken out Madley AND their player :?
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL MT03ALG

dushanbe
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:20 pm
Been Liked: 427 times
Has Liked: 60 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by dushanbe » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:45 pm

The ref is part of the field of play. It’s just tough luck.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro

Andreshotboots
Posts: 2074
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
Been Liked: 788 times
Has Liked: 126 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Andreshotboots » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:50 pm

As I've said on other threads if we played keep ball from our corner on about 87 mins none of the above would have happened..

ClaretTony
Posts: 77740
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38038 times
Has Liked: 5774 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:53 pm

claret57 wrote:If you look at the refs position he was on a direct line with the penalty area and had a good view of the goalkeepers hand ball. Also the linesman was on the right side to help him. In my view he bottled it
I saw it on the Sky programme. He has a clear view but the ball isn’t visible so he can’t give anything. The lino at that end is on the other side of the pitch.

It’s not even that easy to see from the best camera angle at slow motion.

thatdberight
Posts: 3748
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 716 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by thatdberight » Sun Feb 25, 2018 9:05 pm

Belial wrote:Can't do anything about the ref getting in the way - it's part of it sometimes and that's one we were unlucky with.

We can say something about the quick free kick we took in the first half though that was called back - because when Man City did that to us, it was allowed to carry on and they directly scored from it
Taking it 15 yards from where it was given while it was still moving may have been the problem. Says something about our players sometimes that even second time around when we weren't trying to take it quickly, we still couldn't be arsed to stop the ball first. So we needed a 3rd go. You have to wonder what they have for brains sometimes.

Rowls
Posts: 14750
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5693 times
Has Liked: 5920 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Rowls » Sun Feb 25, 2018 9:59 pm

dushanbe wrote:The ref is part of the field of play. It’s just tough luck.
It's bad refereeing too. The referee's job is to get out of the way and in that he failed.

He failed as badly as a referee can do in this instance as he directly contributed in favour of one side.

It's as poor a refereeing you'll see without witnessing a blatantly wrong decision or deliberate mistake.

Those who say it's just "part of the game" are akin to those saying players who mess up are just "doing their best".

It's a mistake. An error. A f&*k up.

He needs to be marked down for it.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4386 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by tim_noone » Sun Feb 25, 2018 10:37 pm

SussexDon1inIreland wrote:Agree with Ontario
Am tired of always playing 12 - playing against 11 is hard enough.
How many penalties have we won this season?? its none
I admired his honesty of staying on his feet and letting the game flow.makes a Change from all that diving! Pity about the goal though.

scouseclaret
Posts: 2699
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by scouseclaret » Sun Feb 25, 2018 11:18 pm

I don’t think Madley made enough of an attempt to get out of the way.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4386 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by tim_noone » Sun Feb 25, 2018 11:23 pm

scouseclaret wrote:I don’t think Madley made enough of an attempt to get out of the way.
If he'd dived they wouldn't have scored.but your damned if you dive and damned if you don't!

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 4078
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1288 times
Has Liked: 2354 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:01 am

The thing that perhaps Westwood got wrong,Was not the taking one for the team, but he should have carried on into Madley and shoved him over. If he was too knackered or not nimble enough to get his flabby ar5e out of the way that's his look out, and it would have halted play
These 2 users liked this post: tim_noone MT03ALG

beddie
Posts: 6362
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1784 times
Has Liked: 672 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by beddie » Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:23 am

Talking about the hand ball by the keeper, the Lino on the JH side was right up to the half way line and was clearly looking (imo) at the incident. With our players protesting to Madley all he had to do was ask the Lino on the head phones if he saw it. I think we're clutching at straws trying to blame Maley for the collision, he couldn't get out of the way.

aggi
Posts: 9713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by aggi » Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:55 am

Dark Cloud wrote:You might be right there! Madley might have felt bad and let him off. And I couldn't help thinking Joey B wouldn't have hesitated!! He'd have taken out Madley AND their player :?
On the podcast he did with Dyche, Barton made reference to the last game he played for us against Man Utd where he should have taken out their player in the build up to their goal but didn't.

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9825
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3231 times
Has Liked: 10727 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by evensteadiereddie » Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:25 pm

I thought Long's rather feeble, inexperienced attempt at challenging Gabbiadini was the main cause of the goal.
Still, onwards and upwards, eh ?

dermotdermot
Posts: 3737
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 696 times
Has Liked: 207 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by dermotdermot » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:00 pm

I made the suggestion on Saturday that he not only didn’t get out of the way but that it LOOKED as if he was deliberately obstructing him. This drew hoots of derision from Fidel Castrol who saw signs of paranoia creeping in. It was just that the referee seemed determined to stand his ground.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9554
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2810 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:02 pm

dermotdermot wrote:I made the suggestion on Saturday that he not only didn’t get out of the way but that it LOOKED as if he was deliberately obstructing him. This drew hoots of derision from Fidel Castrol who saw signs of paranoia creeping in. It was just that the referee seemed determined to stand his ground.
What did you expect him to do? Dance a jig?

:roll:

Rowls
Posts: 14750
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5693 times
Has Liked: 5920 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Rowls » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm

I expect referees to get out of the way.

Rowls
Posts: 14750
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5693 times
Has Liked: 5920 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Rowls » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm

I've nearly calmed down about this incident.

But not quite.

dermotdermot
Posts: 3737
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 696 times
Has Liked: 207 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by dermotdermot » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:05 pm

My god, you seem to be stalking me. Is it lunch time or something? You really must be part of a “plan”.

Rowls
Posts: 14750
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5693 times
Has Liked: 5920 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Rowls » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:06 pm

Me?

I'm having my lunch, yes.

I promise you're not at all important to me.

dermotdermot
Posts: 3737
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 696 times
Has Liked: 207 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by dermotdermot » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:07 pm

Not you, Rowls. Fidel Castrol.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9554
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2810 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:08 pm

dermotdermot wrote:My god, you seem to be stalking me. Is it lunch time or something? You really must be part of a “plan”.
No. I'm just responding to your daft comment where you mentioned me.

Rowls - Get over it. It happens. How does a ref know that trying to get out of the way won't make matters worse? Standing his ground is about all he can do.

Rowls
Posts: 14750
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5693 times
Has Liked: 5920 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Rowls » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:16 pm

fidelcastro wrote:No. I'm just responding to your daft comment where you mentioned me.

Rowls - Get over it. It happens. How does a ref know that trying to get out of the way won't make matters worse? Standing his ground is about all he can do.
I don't see any of Madley's defenders applying the same argument to our player - get over it! What else can Westwood do? Long can't be expected to put in a better challenge!

Madley should have done better.

He was in the way.

You get over it.

4:20
Posts: 2455
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:23 am
Been Liked: 1138 times
Has Liked: 1320 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by 4:20 » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:17 pm

The only time I wished Clattenburg was back reffing in a Burnley match. He would've slithered out of the way like a snake no problem.

TopCat
Posts: 716
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 am
Been Liked: 213 times
Has Liked: 50 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by TopCat » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:18 pm

I am still livid at the **** poor tactics.
Wingers on wrong wings and no substitutions.
Kevin Long was never fouled.
Once again we have defended a cross badly in injury time and been punished.

As for subs, I am actually glad he didn't take Hendrick off, as it would certainly been the biggest cheer of the game, and wrecked what little confidence he retains.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9554
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2810 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:21 pm

Rowls wrote:I don't see any of Madley's defenders applying the same argument to our player - get over it! What else can Westwood do? Long can't be expected to put in a better challenge!

Madley should have done better.

He was in the way.

You get over it.
The ref is part of the field of play, so get over it!

As for Long, he needed to be stronger when the ball finally arrived in the area, several seconds after the 'collision' between the ref and Westwood.

Stop looking for excuses and accept that we didn't kill the game off when we had the chance.

Unless it's a different view entirely on your laptop? :roll:

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12966
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5501 times
Has Liked: 961 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Devils_Advocate » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:29 pm

Being reported that a large selection of the Premier League refs run a prediction competition between themselves worth a lot of money. Seems we were picked for bottom 3 by a lot of them and the report suggests its the reason why certain clubs like Burnley get refs doing their upmost to see that we lose.

Apparently Madley is up at the top and Burnley and Southampton are two of his picks that are doing the worst so looks like the body check may have been deliberate after all

Rowls
Posts: 14750
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5693 times
Has Liked: 5920 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Rowls » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:31 pm

Slow day Devils_Advocate?

fidelcastro
Posts: 9554
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2810 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:31 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Being reported that a large selection of the Premier League refs run a prediction competition between themselves worth a lot of money. Seems we were picked for bottom 3 by a lot of them and the report suggests its the reason why certain clubs like Burnley get refs doing their upmost to see that we lose.

Apparently Madley is up at the top and Burnley and Southampton are two of his picks that are doing the worst so looks like the body check may have been deliberate after all
Even for you that's pathetic.

:lol:

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12966
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5501 times
Has Liked: 961 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Devils_Advocate » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:33 pm

Rowls wrote:Slow day Devils_Advocate?
Seems its always a slow day in that head of yours Rowls
This user liked this post: Rowls

jlup1980
Posts: 2608
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 1029 times
Has Liked: 636 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by jlup1980 » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:33 pm

1. Westwood should have taken their player out as soon as they broke.
2. We should have defended the attack better.
3. It wasn't a foul on Long. Never been a foul. SD is wrong saying they get given every week. There was no contact, that's why it wasn't given.
4. Everyone is clutching at straws.
5. We were poor and didn't deserve to win the match.
6. These things happen. Move on.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12966
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5501 times
Has Liked: 961 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Devils_Advocate » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:35 pm

fidelcastro wrote:Even for you that's pathetic.

:lol:
To be fair to me though its not even close to being the most silliest far fetched post on this thread

fidelcastro
Posts: 9554
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2810 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:41 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:To be fair to me though its not even close to being the most silliest far fetched post on this thread
On balance, I reckon it is.

Where are these reports of a 'Ref's Club' where they try and influence League standings then?

:?: :?
This user liked this post: Rowls

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9825
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3231 times
Has Liked: 10727 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by evensteadiereddie » Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:01 pm

Barmy.

FCBurnley
Posts: 11619
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2291 times
Has Liked: 1379 times

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by FCBurnley » Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:15 pm

Keeper handled ball outside of penalty area FACT
Westwood was taken out by the Ref FACT
Longs defending for goal was awful FACT
Game was draw FACT
We did not deserve to win.

Ashingtonclaret46
Posts: 3913
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 1873 times
Has Liked: 2735 times
Location: Ashington, Northumberland

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Ashingtonclaret46 » Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:55 pm

FCBurnley wrote:Keeper handled ball outside of penalty area FACT
Westwood was taken out by the Ref FACT
Longs defending for goal was awful FACT
Game was draw FACT
We did not deserve to win.
Keeper handled ball outside of penalty area FACT --this can't be FACT because the referee saw no offence.

Rowls
Posts: 14750
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5693 times
Has Liked: 5920 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Post by Rowls » Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:11 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Seems its always a slow day in that head of yours Rowls
Some days slower than others but so far today I've done my shopping, fixed a sign for the pub, fixed and re-fitted a pair of wooden shutters and also fixed a faulty fire door.

All before actually starting my shift so I'm feeling productive today.

Still found time to post a remark in reply to your post above too. In truth, it was a poor effort on your behalf. You're normally more subtle than that.

Anyway, I'm back off to work in a minute or two - what a trooper I am. :)

Post Reply