Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
-
- Posts: 11254
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3633 times
- Has Liked: 2241 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
The bit about Mr Robinson’s “admissions” makes great reading.
-
- Posts: 8320
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2471 times
- Has Liked: 3530 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Of course it does#FTH wrote:Free the Halstead

Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Clitheroe v Lowerhouse 9th JuneZizkovClaret wrote:When is Lowerhouse v Clitheroe next season? Might have to book a flight
This user liked this post: ZizkovClaret
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
You’re assuming I didn’t?arise_sir_charge wrote:So you where there then?
You should have given evidence.
-
- Posts: 8320
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2471 times
- Has Liked: 3530 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Wonder if there might be a precautionary paddy wagon presence? Or maybe it will be played at Accy at 10am midweek as a precaution?#FTH wrote:Clitheroe v Lowerhouse 9th June

#BubbleGame
This user liked this post: Foulthrow
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4200 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
A costly affair and that's before the witness protection bill comes haha.
Clitheroe's lawyer is taking credit for the verdict on twitter.
I was very surprised to see Gary Hunt giving evidence as his name crops up a lot when shamatuer deals are made, it won't be good for business.
Clitheroe's lawyer is taking credit for the verdict on twitter.
I was very surprised to see Gary Hunt giving evidence as his name crops up a lot when shamatuer deals are made, it won't be good for business.
-
- Posts: 2309
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 487 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
#PaidTheHalstead#FTH wrote:Free the Halstead
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4200 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
To be fair to Halstead if he is getting paid it could be argued he deserved it.
There's plenty getting paid that don't deserve it.
There's plenty getting paid that don't deserve it.
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
It reads like Padiham weren’t happy about their player wanting to leave. It’s a shame it doesn’t report the other side of the story/evidence that in fact it was the player himself who made the first contact expressing his desire to move to Clitheroe (and before you ask yes I was there whrn this happened. Could give you location, date and even approximate time) It also reads like he admitted to making a joke comment in 'banter' as I'm sure many other players have before.Bordeauxclaret wrote:The bit about Mr Robinson’s “admissions” makes great reading.
-
- Posts: 11254
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3633 times
- Has Liked: 2241 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
“It was just banter”
Is he related to Richard Keys?
Is he related to Richard Keys?
-
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:44 am
- Been Liked: 133 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
“The panel has had great concern about the governance of Clitheroe C C “ says it all really . UTH
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
So you’ve never admitted to something just to shut people up after they've been relentlessly badgering you?Bordeauxclaret wrote:“It was just banter”
Is he related to Richard Keys?
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
People in glass houses....Lord Rothbury wrote:“The panel has had great concern about the governance of Clitheroe C C “ says it all really . UTH
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4200 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Hahaha Clitheroe were chasing Kurt for about 5 years and our previous WKT keeper before that.#FTH wrote:It reads like Padiham weren’t happy about their player wanting to leave. It’s a shame it doesn’t report the other side of the story/evidence that in fact it was the player himself who made the first contact expressing his desire to move to Clitheroe (and before you ask yes I was there whrn this happened. Could give you location, date and even approximate time) It also reads like he admitted to making a joke comment in 'banter' as I'm sure many other players have before.
Padiham as a club have had nothing to do with the enquiry.
This user liked this post: Lord Rothbury
-
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:44 am
- Been Liked: 133 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Explain#FTH wrote:People in glass houses....
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Just don’t believe everything the ‘Lowerhouse Messiah’ tells you.Lord Rothbury wrote:Explain
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Not even to carify the matter of alleged unpaid debts to the club????Quickenthetempo wrote:Hahaha Clitheroe were chasing Kurt for about 5 years and our previous WKT keeper before that.
Padiham as a club have had nothing to do with the enquiry.
-
- Posts: 7588
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2301 times
- Has Liked: 4094 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
What's a great shame to me is that all this has blown up and has indeed caused huge rifts and divisions (not least on here!) just at a time when the Lancs League is going through a massive, dramatic and actually very exciting transformation. It was much needed and overdue and began last year with the 3 new clubs entering. This coming season it will morph even more with numerous additions. The numbers of people actively taking an interest in Lancs League cricket either playing, supporting or in some administrative capacity has over a number of years fallen, but the league IS still one of the most prestigious in the whole country and is still thriving. Loads of people still take great interest and have fierce allegiances and over the next couple of years it will move into a whole new era. This sorry episode is in danger of derailing some of that IF people don't simply accept things, like it or not, put the squabbling behind them and just move on ready for the new season and I say this as a VERY committed member and supporter of a Lancs League club (but not Clitheroe).
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
You seem pretty certain about this. The league have a complaints procedure. I suggest you lodge this immediately with the evidence to support your findings.#FTH wrote:Just don’t believe everything the ‘Lowerhouse Messiah’ tells you.
Meanwhile and as has been the norm for the last 10 years with many of our developed players Lowerhouse have just lost another promising youngster, this time to Bradford and Bingley in the Yorkshire Premier League. I wonder what one of his reasons was for leaving?
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
The panel have found that he didn't say it in banter and he didn't say it as a result of constant badgering......they have found that because he didn't.
They have actually found that he said it, they confirm this more than once, but that he is of such dubious character generally that they can't be sure that he was actually being truthful when he did say it.
Utterly bizarre, but it is what it is.
They have actually found that he said it, they confirm this more than once, but that he is of such dubious character generally that they can't be sure that he was actually being truthful when he did say it.
Utterly bizarre, but it is what it is.
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Also, there were unapaid debts to the club, he paid them in March 2017, when requested, to allow his move to Clitheroe. This was confirmed by Padiham.#FTH wrote:Not even to carify the matter of alleged unpaid debts to the club????
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4200 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
It's not been mentioned and wasn't in the released papers. That’s the trouble with it taking place in football season ha.#FTH wrote:Not even to carify the matter of alleged unpaid debts to the club????
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
100% agreed Dark Cloud.Dark Cloud wrote:What's a great shame to me is that all this has blown up and has indeed caused huge rifts and divisions (not least on here!) just at a time when the Lancs League is going through a massive, dramatic and actually very exciting transformation. It was much needed and overdue and began last year with the 3 new clubs entering. This coming season it will morph even more with numerous additions. The numbers of people actively taking an interest in Lancs League cricket either playing, supporting or in some administrative capacity has over a number of years fallen, but the league IS still one of the most prestigious in the whole country and is still thriving. Loads of people still take great interest and have fierce allegiances and over the next couple of years it will move into a whole new era. This sorry episode is in danger of derailing some of that IF people don't simply accept things, like it or not, put the squabbling behind them and just move on ready for the new season and I say this as a VERY committed member and supporter of a Lancs League club (but not Clitheroe).
This is what everyone involved at what ever level within this investigation, or within the league in general, wanted/wants.
I'm afraid that this hasn't been helped by Clitheroe's conduct during the process in taking it outside of the tried and trusted complaints process and employing solicitors and barristers. This grew legs way beyond anything that anybody expected or wanted. They decided they weren't happy for the clubs to decide as they do on all other matters of discipline, big or small.
The subsequent reaction to the verdict (which in itself, unfortunately pauses a number of valid questions) by Clitheroe with social media crowing, the #FTH hash tag and the subsequent statement which rather than be conciliatory again goes on the attack has done nothing to soften the mood within the league.
Clitheroe would be best advised to start building bridges with the member clubs, most of whom have been friends and colleagues for 125 years, as opposed to further mixing the pot.
Hopefully we can all move on better for the experience. I fear however it needs all sides to play a part in that and some are already showing signs that they aren't of that mind.
These 2 users liked this post: Dark Cloud Dressinggown
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Indeed. I was mearly pointing out Padiham had been involved. Nothing more.arise_sir_charge wrote:Also, there were unapaid debts to the club, he paid them in March 2017, when requested, to allow his move to Clitheroe. This was confirmed by Padiham.
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
No point complaining according to this thread.RocketLawnChair wrote:You seem pretty certain about this. The league have a complaints procedure. I suggest you lodge this immediately with the evidence to support your findings.
Meanwhile and as has been the norm for the last 10 years with many of our developed players Lowerhouse have just lost another promising youngster, this time to Bradford and Bingley in the Yorkshire Premier League. I wonder what one of his reasons was for leaving?

-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Based on the findings of this investigation but then the subsequent judgement you’re probably right !!#FTH wrote:No point complaining according to this thread.
Anyhow congratulations on winning the league title and I will bid you a farewell.
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 241 times
- Has Liked: 399 times
- Location: Ribble Valley
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Dele Alli didn't dive at the weekend either, cos the ref didn't book him. However...
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4200 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Apparently the roads are clear in Clitheroe, they can't even get the snow to stick.
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
To be fair I have never been interested in cricket but this whole saga has made me really want to go to the lowerhouse clitheroe match next seasonDark Cloud wrote:What's a great shame to me is that all this has blown up and has indeed caused huge rifts and divisions (not least on here!) just at a time when the Lancs League is going through a massive, dramatic and actually very exciting transformation. It was much needed and overdue and began last year with the 3 new clubs entering. This coming season it will morph even more with numerous additions. The numbers of people actively taking an interest in Lancs League cricket either playing, supporting or in some administrative capacity has over a number of years fallen, but the league IS still one of the most prestigious in the whole country and is still thriving. Loads of people still take great interest and have fierce allegiances and over the next couple of years it will move into a whole new era. This sorry episode is in danger of derailing some of that IF people don't simply accept things, like it or not, put the squabbling behind them and just move on ready for the new season and I say this as a VERY committed member and supporter of a Lancs League club (but not Clitheroe).
-
- Posts: 11619
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2291 times
- Has Liked: 1379 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
I know the reasons, just saying it is a shame. I guess our generation were very lucky to be able to see the worlds best players in our own backyard.ClaretTony wrote:No foreign players in county cricket then and very little international cricket compared to today.
-
- Posts: 7588
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2301 times
- Has Liked: 4094 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
You might have to catch a special bus from outside The Turf about 10.30 a.m. and be escorted to and from the ground by police cars. On the plus side you'll be able to enjoy some real ale!!Inchy wrote:To be fair I have never been interested in cricket but this whole saga has made me really want to go to the lowerhouse clitheroe match next season

-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Why would anyone with no interest in cricket want to go?
This user liked this post: #FTH
-
- Posts: 7588
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2301 times
- Has Liked: 4094 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
True, but I think it should also be remembered that in many instances those chaps weren't necessarily the best players in the world at the time, but were perhaps destined to become just that in the future and their Lancashire league experiences were a stepping stone along the way. Many famous names graced the league as young lads BEFORE they were actually household names. Yes, that wasn't always the case and some excellent top pros played in the league after they were world class and also "on the way down" so to speak.FCBurnley wrote:I know the reasons, just saying it is a shame. I guess our generation were very lucky to be able to see the worlds best players in our own backyard.
-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
The thing is, they were the best players in the world at the time. The Lancashire League were able to attract the top international players during the 1960s. All of Basil Butcher, Wes Hall, Charlie Griffith & Lance Gibbs from the West Indies, Eddie Barlow (South Africa) and Neil Hawke (Australia) were among those gracing the league. It all changed in 1968 with the relaxing of the rules in county cricket. For example, Burnley had signed Asif Iqbal for 1968 but then suddenly he signed for Kent. Other clubs were in the same boat. Prior to 1968 though we saw some absolute greats in the league along with the up and coming (such as Clive Lloyd) and some others who were perhaps on the way down.Dark Cloud wrote:True, but I think it should also be remembered that in many instances those chaps weren't necessarily the best players in the world at the time, but were perhaps destined to become just that in the future and their Lancashire league experiences were a stepping stone along the way. Many famous names graced the league as young lads BEFORE they were actually household names. Yes, that wasn't always the case and some excellent top pros played in the league after they were world class and also "on the way down" so to speak.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 11:18 am
- Been Liked: 32 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
I have followed this thread and various other related threads since the start of last season with great interest. I played cricket in the Northern League, and I have been intrigued to see how Darwen, Cltheroe and Great Harwood would compete after moving leagues. I think it is fair to say that Northern League players always felt that the Lancashire League seemed to hold themselves above the other Leagues within the County. So it was interesting to see that certainly Darwen and Clitheroe showed that the standard of cricket in the Northern League and Ribblesdale League was at least equal to that of the Lancashire League . I would readily accept that the standard of pro player in the LL prior to say 1990 was in general higher than the other Leagues. Furthermore, It always baffled me in the "heyday" of the LL, with the bumper attendances announced, and no doubt high sales of refreshments, etc, as to where all the cash went - there must have been some very wealthy clubs in the LL!
I know from my own position, that over a period of 5 years in the middle 80's, I was approached on 3 occasions as I recall, to move my allegiance to clubs in the LL. It would have incurred a fair bit of time and commitment, and expense to travel 100 miles or so perhaps 3 times a week for 24 weeks! Also a player from the area covered by the LL used to come up and play in our local 20/20 competition, he also played for various teams in the LL over a long career, I would suggest that he did not move clubs for the good of his health!.
At all sports and all levels within those sports, enticements to play have been offered, its been going on for years, and will continue to go on for years to come. Nobody likes being bottom of the league, and some clubs/people want desperately to be top of the league. it is what it is. I don't believe players think its to much of an issue, you just want to get out on the pitch and beat them. I took much more pleasure in giving a "paid player a "send off", than an unpaid player!!
I know from my own position, that over a period of 5 years in the middle 80's, I was approached on 3 occasions as I recall, to move my allegiance to clubs in the LL. It would have incurred a fair bit of time and commitment, and expense to travel 100 miles or so perhaps 3 times a week for 24 weeks! Also a player from the area covered by the LL used to come up and play in our local 20/20 competition, he also played for various teams in the LL over a long career, I would suggest that he did not move clubs for the good of his health!.
At all sports and all levels within those sports, enticements to play have been offered, its been going on for years, and will continue to go on for years to come. Nobody likes being bottom of the league, and some clubs/people want desperately to be top of the league. it is what it is. I don't believe players think its to much of an issue, you just want to get out on the pitch and beat them. I took much more pleasure in giving a "paid player a "send off", than an unpaid player!!
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
ClaretTony wrote:Why would anyone with no interest in cricket want to go?
For the same reason you watch coronation street. The drama
-
- Posts: 7717
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1934 times
- Has Liked: 4295 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
And not just the 60s Tony.ClaretTony wrote:The thing is, they were the best players in the world at the time. The Lancashire League were able to attract the top international players during the 1960s. All of Basil Butcher, Wes Hall, Charlie Griffith & Lance Gibbs from the West Indies, Eddie Barlow (South Africa) and Neil Hawke (Australia) were among those gracing the league. It all changed in 1968 with the relaxing of the rules in county cricket. For example, Burnley had signed Asif Iqbal for 1968 but then suddenly he signed for Kent. Other clubs were in the same boat. Prior to 1968 though we saw some absolute greats in the league along with the up and coming (such as Clive Lloyd) and some others who were perhaps on the way down.
It was a privilege to see those great stars in the 60s, and then the likes of Allan Donald, Viv Richards, Michael Holding, Andy Roberts, Kapil Dev, Mudassar, Steve Waugh, Roger Harper and many others right up to the end of the 90s.
-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Absolutely. I think Holding & Roberts were here at the same time too. I saw a tail ender hit Roberts for three successive boundaries up at Haslingden. No histrionics from him, no short deliveries, he just went down the wicket and shook the lad's hand.nil_desperandum wrote:And not just the 60s Tony.
It was a privilege to see those great stars in the 60s, and then the likes of Allan Donald, Viv Richards, Michael Holding, Andy Roberts, Kapil Dev, Mudassar, Steve Waugh, Roger Harper and many others right up to the end of the 90s.
Roger Harper really was a magnificent pro for both Bacup and Nelson too, in some ways probably the best of the lot given his longevity in the league. By then though the big names were getting fewer and fewer, but certainly some top, top players still around.
-
- Posts: 7588
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2301 times
- Has Liked: 4094 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Both Maharaj (Nelson) and Ryan Harris (Lowerhouse) have gone on to play test match cricket after recent stints in the LL. (I'm sure there are others)
-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
There's quite a few in recent years who have gone on to play international cricket but with the international calendar now there is little chance of getting current test players into league cricket.Dark Cloud wrote:Both Maharaj (Nelson) and Ryan Harris (Lowerhouse) have gone on to play test match cricket after recent stints in the LL. (I'm sure there are others)
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
So, the conclusion seems to be that Clitheroe were guilty of breaking the rules but the LL just couldn’t prove it? Or am I reading the league statement wrong?
Surely the LL knew what they were getting though when they allowed Clitheroe to join? I thought that it was a fairly open secret that they’d been rumoured to pay players for a long time.
Surely the LL knew what they were getting though when they allowed Clitheroe to join? I thought that it was a fairly open secret that they’d been rumoured to pay players for a long time.
This user liked this post: Stproc
-
- Posts: 7588
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2301 times
- Has Liked: 4094 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Very true. Most aren't even interested in playing county cricket. The real money to be made lies elsewhere these days.ClaretTony wrote:There's quite a few in recent years who have gone on to play international cricket but with the international calendar now there is little chance of getting current test players into league cricket.
Which perhaps inadvertently points to why many top foreign players, particularly West Indian players, found it so attractive and came here in the 50's and 60's. The money on offer, even in the LL was probably extremely lucrative in terms of the standard of living/wages in the Windies at the time. Now of course it's wholly different.
-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Interestingly, when I watched the recent BBC programme on the West Indians playing in the Lancashire League, it was reported that Constantine was unbelievably well paid by Nelson. Back then, the attendances were massive though and clubs could afford it. Even when I first started going to Burnley, you had to get there in good time to get a seat.Dark Cloud wrote:Very true. Most aren't even interested in playing county cricket. The real money to be made lies elsewhere these days.
Which perhaps inadvertently points to why many top foreign players, particularly West Indian players, found it so attractive and came here in the 50's and 60's. The money on offer, even in the LL was probably extremely lucrative in terms of the standard of living/wages in the Windies at the time. Now of course it's wholly different.
-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
That's how I've read it.Foulthrow wrote:So, the conclusion seems to be that Clitheroe were guilty of breaking the rules but the LL just couldn’t prove it? Or am I reading the league statement wrong?
This user liked this post: Foulthrow
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Du Plessis at TodDark Cloud wrote:Both Maharaj (Nelson) and Ryan Harris (Lowerhouse) have gone on to play test match cricket after recent stints in the LL. (I'm sure there are others)
-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
2007 at Tod and 2010 at Ramsbottom, also played for Lancs.Walton wrote:Du Plessis at Tod
But he didn't make an international debut until 2011.
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1776 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
The Race & Pace documentary said that Learie Constantine when at Nelson was the best paid sportsman in the UK. His salary was equivalent to about £45k in today's money.Dark Cloud wrote:Very true. Most aren't even interested in playing county cricket. The real money to be made lies elsewhere these days.
Which perhaps inadvertently points to why many top foreign players, particularly West Indian players, found it so attractive and came here in the 50's and 60's. The money on offer, even in the LL was probably extremely lucrative in terms of the standard of living/wages in the Windies at the time. Now of course it's wholly different.
In today's money, that's exceptional money for a league pro, low for a 1st class cricketer and very poor for a world class cricketer.
This user liked this post: Hopey
-
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:44 am
- Been Liked: 133 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
I would believe him before you FTH as you are probably involved in some way .I know the House have some fat buggers amongst their support but Clitheroe ran out of pies last year before 4 pm maybe you spend your spare cash in other ways .#FTH wrote:Just don’t believe everything the ‘Lowerhouse Messiah’ tells you.
This user liked this post: Stproc
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4200 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Running out of pies deserves court proceedings more than paying players any day of the week.Lord Rothbury wrote:I would believe him before you FTH as you are probably involved in some way .I know the House have some fat buggers amongst their support but Clitheroe ran out of pies last year before 4 pm maybe you spend your spare cash in other ways .
-
- Posts: 7588
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2301 times
- Has Liked: 4094 times
Re: Clitheroe CC Not Guilty
Running out of beer is far worse!! 
