Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
If there's any truth in the £18m it should be just a flat no because he's clearly worth more than that in the current market.
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Not a common opinion I expect but I'd have a fully fit Tom Heaton over Pope any day. Don't get me wrong Nick has been absolutely fantastic - but if the right price comes in and Tom is Dyche fit, I wouldn't be surprised or disappointed if we were to sell. We need to remember we are still Burnley, this is what we do best. Build and grow. Buy well, sell well.
-
- Posts: 17372
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7835 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Always a slight concern to me when a story gets into the media whuch has the whiff of agent spin about it. But lets hope I'm wrong about that.[/quote]claretspice wrote:Plain wrong. The idea is top managers havent been interested in all the skills a player needs to use is a bit daft. Its like the old idea it doesnt matter if a centre half can pass a ball or not. Obviously, a keepers ability with his feet is less important thsn his shot stopping etc., but it doesnt mean it isnt one of the things that separates the very good from the outstanding.
And whether you think its important or not, Jurgen Klopp does. And hes the one who would be buying Pope, so his view on the importance of distribution to a keeper is quite important. Probably more important than your strident opinion.
No it doesnt. It means distribution isnt really captured in the stats but is still an important factor.
["quote="FactualFrank"] interesting to me is where and why this rumour is bleeding out, now" - really? Why does it actually matter? We have a club interested in one of our players.
Hang on a minute here.
Spice, you are saying that distribution by foot is vitally important to Kloppy, but most on here consider distribution to be Pope's weakness??
I don't really get it.
Or has klopp decided that stopping shots is a priority now??
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Does that differ to wrong?claretspice wrote:Plain wrong.
You're babbling. Several posters have stated that, with respect, you're typing absolute shite. You can't watch much football because you don't come across as knowing much about it.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:57 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Is he? Hes not worth that money if sat on the benchtaio wrote:If there's any truth in the £18m it should be just a flat no because he's clearly worth more than that in the current market.
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Yes he's worth more than £18m. And if he leaves this summer I believe it will be for more than that. I don't get your reference to him sitting on the bench.ColonelCool wrote:Is he? Hes not worth that money if sat on the bench
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:57 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
So you haven't yet realised that we have Tom Heaton? Who could quite possibly (and realistically) be our number 1 come next season?taio wrote:I don't get your reference to him sitting on the bench.
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
I'm well aware we have Heaton. But if Pope leaves it will be before the PL season starts so no time for his value to reduce with him spending a prolonged period on the bench. You haven't realised that or thought it through have you?ColonelCool wrote:So you haven't yet realised that we have Tom Heaton? Who could quite possibly (and realistically) be our number 1 come next season?
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:57 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Well, I've seen some excuses to not realising your own team, but it's an effort! Not knowing Burnley football club and who plays for them is a bit poor!taio wrote:I'm well aware we have Heaton. But if Pope leaves it will be before the PL season starts so no time for his value to reduce with him spending a prolonged period on the bench. You haven't realised that or thought it through have you?
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Tied yourself in knots trying to be a smart arse but instead made yourself look a fool. ColonelFool.ColonelCool wrote:Well, I've seen some excuses to not realising your own team, but it's an effort! Not knowing Burnley football club and who plays for them is a bit poor!
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Pope is a class goalkeeper. His shot stopping is excellent, he does not get flustered + he was consistently outstanding on crosses. Taking the pressure of our defenders. None of the nonsense punching we see from many keepers.
£18M valuation is way too low in the current market. Excuse the pun but he is a “keeper” if we are to continue to build the squad.
£18M valuation is way too low in the current market. Excuse the pun but he is a “keeper” if we are to continue to build the squad.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:57 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Erm... no. That makes no sense.taio wrote:Tied yourself in knots trying to be a smart arse but instead made yourself look a fool. ColonelFool.
Now if you are over the age of 25, there's something wrong. If you are over 25 - never post on the board again.
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Perhaps you can explain how Pope's valuation, if sold this summer, would be less with him being sat on the bench when the transfer window closes before the PL starts. Or are your saying his value will tumble if he's a sub in the Europa League qualification games? Either way that's stupid. But don't post again because you clearly won't be able to explain yourself.ColonelCool wrote:Erm... no. That makes no sense.
Now if you are over the age of 25, there's something wrong. If you are over 25 - never post on the board again.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:57 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Are you asking me about football or grammar?taio wrote:Perhaps you can explain how Pope's valuation, if sold this summer, would be less with him being sat on the bench when the transfer window closes before the PL starts. Or are your saying his value will tumble if he's a sub in the Europa League qualification games? Either way that's stupid. But don't post again because you clearly won't be able to explain yourself.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
For all Edersons **** farting about with the bal at which he is fantastically competent his two best highlights against us on’t Turf were the saves off Mee and Lennon. So let’s not kid ourselves, that’s why Pep signed him for Man City because first and foremost he’s a bloody good goalkeeper.
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Let me simplify it for you:ColonelCool wrote:Are you asking me about football or grammar?
- you said if Pope is sold it would be for less than his current value as he will be on the bench
- I said his value won't reduce for that reason because the PL starts after the transfer window closes
- you don't appear to have any ability to follow a simple and obvious point.
So there is no point continuing with this discussion.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:57 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
You are one hell of a strange poster. The question is.. are there enough hours to sort it all out?taio wrote:Let me simplify it for you:
- you said if Pope is sold it would be for less than his current value as he will be on the bench
- I said his value won't reduce for that reason because the PL starts after the transfer window closes
- you don't appear to have any ability to follow a simple and obvious point.
So there is no point continuing with this discussion.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4386 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
taio wrote:Let me simplify it for you:
- you said if Pope is sold it would be for less than his current value as he will be on the bench
- I said his value won't reduce for that reason because the PL starts after the transfer window closes
- you don't appear to have any ability to follow a simple and obvious point.
So there is no point continuing with this discussion.

-
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:26 pm
- Been Liked: 258 times
- Has Liked: 260 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
What does this mean Colonel? It's gibberish.ColonelCool wrote:Well, I've seen some excuses to not realising your own team, but it's an effort! Not knowing Burnley football club and who plays for them is a bit poor!
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:57 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Are you asking, or logging in as the other username? - yes - we know.paulus the woodgnome wrote:What does this mean Colonel? It's gibberish.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:57 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Entirely up to you if you want to get aggressive, but you come across as a bit of a wally. An angry wally at that.FactualFrank wrote:Does that differ to wrong?
You're babbling. Several posters have stated that, with respect, you're typing absolute shite. You can't watch much football because you don't come across as knowing much about it.
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Hang on a minute here.boatshed bill wrote:Always a slight concern to me when a story gets into the media whuch has the whiff of agent spin about it. But lets hope I'm wrong about that.
Spice, you are saying that distribution by foot is vitally important to Kloppy, but most on here consider distribution to be Pope's weakness??
I don't really get it.
Or has klopp decided that stopping shots is a priority now??[/quote]
I think every manager regards stopping shots as a priority - its the bare minimum. However, that doesn't mean that the top clubs aren't looking for keepers who have good distribution in addition. Like I said, distribution is one of those "added extras" which arguably separate the very good keepers from the world class. Liverpool want to go to the next level, so they want world class, and their manager is on record as saying that he regards distribution (which necessarily involves kicking, a lot) as a key attribute he wants his keeper to have.
I don't know if a majority of Burnley fans see distribution as Pope's weakness, but my personal opinion is that it is his Achilles heel at the minute. He's OK from dead balls, but from back passes when the ball is moving I think he's a bit shaky. And of course, in those teams that regard keeping possession as a priority, there are a lot of back passes, so that would be a bit of a problem.
Am I saying Pope can't improve his distribution? Of course not. Can he become good enough to play for a team like Liverpool? Possibly. His improvement over the last 3-4 years has been so dramatic it would be foolish to write anything off.
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
I think you are taking the sentiments too seriously!KRBFC wrote:He's been the best goalkeeper in the World for the past 3 years or so, week in week out, he makes 1 mistake and suddenly people forget the past 3 years.
The fact remains that Pope is worth far in excess of Liverpool's paltry, press release, sum.
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
I remember watching Pat Jennings as a young lad and he could hardly kick the ball at all. Went on to be the best.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
18m for a keeper who has less than one excellent season is reasonable. Another good season next season, with European experience and we can reasonably expect that value to double.
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
How many good seasons had Pickford had when Everton paid £30m for him?Imploding Turtle wrote:18m for a keeper who has less than one excellent season is reasonable. Another good season next season, with European experience and we can reasonably expect that value to double.
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Absolutely, Ian, and that's a great example of why its possible.IanMcL wrote:I remember watching Pat Jennings as a young lad and he could hardly kick the ball at all. Went on to be the best.
One thing I would say is that there's one key difference these days - in Jennings' day, keepers could pick up a back pass. They can't now. That's changed the level of skill with the ball at their feet a keeper needs, particularly in a team that intends to use the keeper as a means to keep the ball.
This user liked this post: IanMcL
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
Liverpool have previous for this. Van dyke last year is a great example. Leak you are interested. Let the player think about it and maybe even agitate for a move. Pick the player up for less than true market value or screw them up.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Why only £18m for best keeper in Prem?
You need to watch more football.claretspice wrote:Entirely up to you if you want to get aggressive, but you come across as a bit of a wally. An angry wally at that.