SmudgetheClaret wrote:The Trump administration are innocent it's just BS..

I think you're not even joking. There really are some people who think it's all just a witch hunt.
SmudgetheClaret wrote:The Trump administration are innocent it's just BS..
SmudgetheClaret wrote:It is...
I think we can group you over there with BlueLab.SmudgetheClaret wrote:Witches pleaded guilty with a pitch fork hovering over their heads !! maybe it was the same 2 Russians we have seen on the tv this week they have been hiding out all this time in the US after fixing the voting machines then headed to the UK with 2 water pistols filled with Novichok...
hmm. fair enough. It was kinda funny but i didn't know you meant it to be.SmudgetheClaret wrote:Steady turtle the second bit was satire...
Damo wrote:I think this thread needs a new title
Spijed wrote:Kavanaugh accuser currently testifying.
You have more credibility that this guy who has lied under oath to get the job he's got today. That should say a lot about him.Uwe Noble wrote:It's over. What a complete and utter disgrace this hearing has been. Kauvanagh has destroyed them.
We decided to investigate this matter to see who could be behind this apparent hoax. First, we reached out to a phone number that this woman gave us. After calling the number, we promptly received what we viewed as a threatening text message back, which read, “You’re in over your head…. Drop this”. The message included the home addresses of two of our editors, including myself.
Then out of nowhere, we received a phone call from another number originating from the same area code, of a man who claimed to be Mike Wilcox of a company called ‘Surefire Intelligence’. He again threatened us, telling us to “stop communicating with” the woman who had contacted us previously. (Both phone numbers have since been disconnected).
Recommended for a log fire and not for reading:"Amid news the Mueller probe could extend through 2018, Guardian reporter Luke Harding and TRNN's Aaron Maté discuss Russiagate and Harding's new book "Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win""
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... Ikf1uZli4g" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Lol. No. I've watched enough videos of yours to know i'd be wasting my time, while giving support to crazy, conspiracist youtubers.bluelabrador16 wrote:Watch the video Imploding Turtle, and then pass a comment.
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/view ... =8&t=41315" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;"Aaron Maté, admirable son of an admirable father."
Comments:"The upcoming midterms are widely seen as a referendum on Donald Trump’s presidency, but its defining issue to date is notably MIA. “Campaign ads and debates are mostly avoiding the Russia investigation,” Politico reports, “in favor of other issues important to voters…like the economy, health care and taxes.” One study of political ads over a four-week period through mid-October found that 0.1 percent of ads aired in congressional races mentioned Russia; there were zero mentions of Russia in ads for Senate races.
On one level, it is unsurprising that the election has been focused on issues that impact voters’ lives, rather than the byzantine bureaucratic drama that has consumed Washington and elite media since Trump’s election. But after months of fearmongering about a sweeping Russian interference effort and a compromised, complicit president, perhaps we are also seeing the penny start to drop: Russiagate, for all its hype, has not gone as advertised.
Take the supposed Russian threat to the midterms. For months, intelligence officials and prominent media outlets have bombarded us with warnings about “a pervasive messaging campaign by Russia to try to weaken and divide the United States” (Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats), a threat so dire that we might as well dub the vote the “The Moscow Midterms” (FiveThirtyEight) and acknowledge that “we’re defenseless against Russian sabotage in the midterm elections,” (Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin). The New York Times informed readers in July that Coats had likened “the persistent danger of Russian cyberattacks today…to the warnings the United States had of stepped-up terror threats ahead of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.” “The warning lights are blinking red again,” he said.....
....Adviser John Bolton, who, as I warned in The Nation in April, sees the Russiagate moment as “a not-to-be-missed opportunity” to advance a hawkish neoconservative agenda, including the dismantling of arms-control treaties that he began under George W. Bush....
..Ever since the 2016 election, the figureheads of Trump’s political and media opposition have invested in a supposition that Trump is in cahoots with Russia and encouraged him to be confrontational as a means of disproving it. They have de-incentivized and disempowered themselves to stand up to Trump when he confronts Russia in one of the most reckless ways that he could. For all the dire warnings about Russian trolls and hackers over the past two years, it is those sounding the alarms who have fueled a much worse threat."
https://www.thenation.com/article/russi ... erference/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
JR...So good. So unlikely to make the difference. But so good. Depressing too, given the correct assessment of the consequences: escalated New Cold War, new nuclear arms race -- and he doesn't mention it, but total distraction from the actual reasons for the 2016 result, the disastrous domestic election manipulation and the brute force of money in politics.
Caleb...Two years wasted--two years during which Trump was able to broadcast his message with almost no meaningful resistance from the mainstream Democrats. This byzantine, remote and dubious tale of Russian interference had almost zero resonance with the voters, and rightly so....
Clark...All that time wasted, dumbing down the electorate with scare tactics; diverting precious energy from the many real issues that are real threats.
Robert...Thank you, Mr. Maté, for this sensible assessment of the situation. Corporate media still cannot admit it missed the anti-establishment writing on the wall, and $hillarists still cannot admit they fielded (by force) a wretched candidate. The "left" has lost valuable time seeking to blame Russia for Trump's election and continuing to fail to acknowledge the reasons it did lose in 2016.
I liked the bit where the alternative number on the answer phone turned out to be his mum.Imploding Turtle wrote: Read the rest of the article, including the updates. It's hilarious. They used a photo of Christoph Waltz as a profile pic of an "employee".
aggi wrote:I liked the bit where the alternative number on the answer phone turned out to be his mum.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... Ikf1uZli4g"Amid news the Mueller probe could extend through 2018, Guardian reporter Luke Harding and TRNN's Aaron Maté discuss Russiagate and Harding's new book "Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win""
Background"Amid news the Mueller probe could extend through 2018, Guardian reporter Luke Harding and TRNN's Aaron Maté discuss Russiagate and Harding's new book "Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win""
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... Ikf1uZli4g
"More proof of collusion with Netanyahu than Putin."Aaron Matéwas born and raised in Vancouver, Canada, Aaron comes to Democracy Now! after a two-year stint as an independent journalist and as a researcher for the author and journalist Naomi Klein. Through his work as a journalist and activist, he has had the opportunity to visit the Occupied Territories, Haiti, and South Africa. His writings have appeared in publications including the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail, and the Guardian of London. Aaron received his B.A. in Communication Studies from Concordia University in Montreal. He is a regular contributor to the Montreal/San Francisco-based magazine Warrior.
Aaron Maté is a host/producer for The Real News and a contributor to the Nation. He has previously reported and produced for Democracy Now!, Vice, and Al Jazeera, and written for the Toronto Star, the Intercept, and Le Monde Diplomatique.
That's the kinda thing he's been leading up to for two years. It's gonna happen sooner or later that someone will slaughter a mass of people and Trump will provide excuses for them. He's almost done it with this synagogue shooter. He hasn't directly excused him, but he has repeated the exact same argument that the shooter used as justification - that Soros is funding a migrant invasion.ontario claret wrote:Trump's latest utterance is that he wants U.S. troops to shoot to kill if the migrants coming through Mexico try to storm the border by throwing rocks. Visions of that famous scene in "Gandhi" come to mind. I wonder if the commander of the army units is already making considerations for handling the wounded. For his sake, I hope he has. Then again, maybe Trump watches a re-run of "The Longest Day" last night. Maybe he expects them to storm across the Rio Grande in landing craft.
SmudgetheClaret wrote:Turtles your house of cards is getting very unsteady..
https://www.infowars.com/watch-live-kav ... ills-kids/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Saturday night massacre? your eyes are bleeding in anticipation of people getting slaughtered is there no limit to what you lot will see as point scoring ..Imploding Turtle wrote:In actual Russia investigation news: In April a guy called Noel Francisco received a presidential waiver that allows him to not be subject to ethics rules (such as massive and obvious conflicts of interest). Francisco is the Solicitor General at the Justice Dept. and if Trump fires Rosenstein then Francisco is who becomes responsible for overseeing the Russia investigation.
Francisco is also a partner as a law firm called Jones Day, and that law firm is the firm that is defending Trump in all matters related to the Russia investigation
When Trump does his Saturday Night Massacre I can't wait to see how his fans defend this clear and obvious corruption of justice.
I've no doubt you actually thought it was a reference to violence.SmudgetheClaret wrote:Saturday night massacre? your eyes are bleeding in anticipation of people getting slaughtered is there no limit to what you lot will see as point scoring ..
Sorry I assumed you meant the up and coming clash at the border...Imploding Turtle wrote:I've no doubt you actually thought it was a reference to violence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Massacre" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;