Joshua v povetkin
Joshua v povetkin
What a refreshing change the Russian is compared to some of the pumped up pricks currently in the heavyweight division
It's almost like rocky IV in reverse
It's almost like rocky IV in reverse
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4386 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
This post prompted me to check the triple G fight...I now know he lost but under what circumstances ?CBT wrote:What a refreshing change the Russian is compared to some of the pumped up pricks currently in the heavyweight division
It's almost like rocky IV in reverse
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Surely I can’t be alone in hoping Povetkin wipes out hearns golden goose?
This user liked this post: DomBFC1882
Re: Joshua v povetkin
I think AJ is over-rated, and Hearn is a slimy toad but I don't want him to lose. Certainly not to a drug cheatRight_winger wrote:Surely I can’t be alone in hoping Povetkin wipes out hearns golden goose?
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
One of the main reasons I want Joshua to lose is because of Hearn and the hype. AJ is overrated. I’m also of the belief that AJ is also on the PEDsDamo wrote:I think AJ is over-rated, and Hearn is a slimy toad but I don't want him to lose. Certainly not to a drug cheat
Re: Joshua v povetkin
What makes you believe that?Right_winger wrote:One of the main reasons I want Joshua to lose is because of Hearn and the hype. AJ is overrated. I’m also of the belief that AJ is also on the PEDs
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Believe that AJ is on the PEDs.. he has quite a lot of the physical tell tale signs... he has a protruding stomach commonly associated with HGH abuse, he has anabolic nipple, lots of superficial muscle mass, plenty of his fellow pros have spoken out against him aswell.Damo wrote:What makes you believe that?
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Did you read this nonsense on boxing scene?Right_winger wrote:Believe that AJ is on the PEDs.. he has quite a lot of the physical tell tale signs... he has a protruding stomach commonly associated with HGH abuse, he has anabolic nipple, lots of superficial muscle mass, plenty of his fellow pros have spoken out against him aswell.
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
No... it’s fairly obvious.. and the pros who’ve spoken out against him have done so on many platforms.Damo wrote:Did you read this nonsense on boxing scene?
It’s obvious looking at him he’s cycling the PEDs
-
- Posts: 8588
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2685 times
- Has Liked: 2375 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
He’s probably the most tested man in boxing, unfortunately for some people it’s hard to accept that some people are genetic freaks when it comes to muscle growth.Right_winger wrote:No... it’s fairly obvious.. and the pros who’ve spoken out against him have done so on many platforms.
It’s obvious looking at him he’s cycling the PEDs
I like him, he’s great for the sport.
These 2 users liked this post: BackoffDave Raggus
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Not of Fan of Joshua and his manufactured humble (yeah right) persona, however I don't want to see him beaten by a proven drug cheat.
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
You people do realise Joshua is also a convicted drug dealer?
Re: Joshua v povetkin
I do, hence my comments re his 'humble' persona. Can't speak for anyone else.Right_winger wrote:You people do realise Joshua is also a convicted drug dealer?
This user liked this post: Right_winger
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Anabolic nipple? Every day is a school day. I'm not googling that from work, mind.
These 2 users liked this post: bobinho Goobs
-
- Posts: 4614
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1553 times
- Has Liked: 1065 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Sproggy wrote:Anabolic nipple? Every day is a school day. I'm not googling that from work, mind.



Re: Joshua v povetkin
The only black boxer I can remember the British public taking to their hearts was Bruno which I pretty sad.
-
- Posts: 11831
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4804 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Yeah Lennox Lewis was disliked
Re: Joshua v povetkin
He wasn't liked either .... and he certainly wasn't loved and it was a marriage of convenience for both him and us. The amount of time he has spent in the UK since retirement shows how much he felt British!Yeah Lennox Lewis was disliked
Re: Joshua v povetkin
If you think Frank Bruno is the only black boxer that the British public have taken to then then you must have very little knowledge about boxing.
Nigel Benn, Lloyd Honygan, Herrol Graham, Jonny Nelson and even Chris Eubank towards the end of his career despite his brash personality just to name a few.
Mind you, Amir Khan seems to be really disliked by lots of people for no apparent reason so perhaps you do have a point
Nigel Benn, Lloyd Honygan, Herrol Graham, Jonny Nelson and even Chris Eubank towards the end of his career despite his brash personality just to name a few.
Mind you, Amir Khan seems to be really disliked by lots of people for no apparent reason so perhaps you do have a point
Re: Joshua v povetkin
No reason whatsoever, apart from the bit where mowed the guy down on a zebra, effectively killing him whilst on on the wrong side of the road doing one half times the speed limit, displayed the required remorse to get the charge reduced, then subsequently got caught doing 140 on the M62.Damo wrote: Mind you, Amir Khan seems to be really disliked by lots of people for no apparent reason so perhaps you do have a point
This user liked this post: LeadBelly
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
BigChaCha wrote:The only black boxer I can remember the British public taking to their hearts was Bruno which I pretty sad.
Oh dear someone couldn’t wait to play that card..
Shame as it’s of no use whatsoever now and has zero relevance to the reasons for disliking Joshua.
This user liked this post: LeadBelly
-
- Posts: 3444
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1129 times
- Has Liked: 322 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
It's weird that alot of actual boxing fans don't like Joshua. In a very short career he's done absolutely brilliantly. How many heavyweights have collected 3 of the belts in around 20 fights? He's got more names on his record than wilder, who's had double the amount of fights. After 20 fights, wilder was fighting total bums.
Yet boxing fans swoon over fury after one admittedly brilliant display against wlad. But that fight was also dull as dishwater compared to Joshua's fight with him.
Joshua isn't complete by any means, but he wouldn't be because he's still a relative novice!
Yet boxing fans swoon over fury after one admittedly brilliant display against wlad. But that fight was also dull as dishwater compared to Joshua's fight with him.
Joshua isn't complete by any means, but he wouldn't be because he's still a relative novice!
This user liked this post: BackoffDave
Re: Joshua v povetkin
I didn't realise the bloke had died or the circumstances behind the collision.Caballo wrote:No reason whatsoever, apart from the bit where mowed the guy down on a zebra, effectively killing him whilst on on the wrong side of the road doing one half times the speed limit, displayed the required remorse to get the charge reduced, then subsequently got caught doing 140 on the M62.
My bad
-
- Posts: 1682
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 2:21 pm
- Been Liked: 462 times
- Has Liked: 2398 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Povetkin by KO
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4201 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
It's sort of fashionable to be left field and and like Fury in the English boxing world over Joshua.
One fights absilute bums and talks a good game and the other as highlighted earlier in the thread, takes on the best.
Joshua has had a few different tests recently and come through them. No fighter can expect to go through his career without these tough spots.
One fights absilute bums and talks a good game and the other as highlighted earlier in the thread, takes on the best.
Joshua has had a few different tests recently and come through them. No fighter can expect to go through his career without these tough spots.
Re: Joshua v povetkin
It's not like that at all.Quickenthetempo wrote:It's sort of fashionable to be left field and and like Fury in the English boxing world over Joshua.
One fights absilute bums and talks a good game and the other as highlighted earlier in the thread, takes on the best.
Joshua has had a few different tests recently and come through them. No fighter can expect to go through his career without these tough spots.
Perhaps you just don't really understand boxing. From a purist point of view, Furys win against Klitschko was much better than AJ's. Fury' s win was a technical masterclass against a guy who was considered unbeatable. AJ's win was much more exciting, I was a nervous wreck by the end of the fight myself but by that point, Wlad had decided to call it a day and would of beaten AJ with his usual approach.
I don't personally feel anyone really dislikes AJ but a lot of boxing fans consider him to be over-rated. I'd say the current crop of heavyweights all are but it's been slim pickings in that division for far too long.
AJ is lauded as a all time great by the media already though due to his marketing team and that probably makes boxing fans more dismissive of him. He won't care though as he is making an absolute fortune and the reality is, it's good for boxing that the casuals are getting behind him. The more people who take an interest in the sport the better. Especially with the popularity of the UFC nonsense over the last 10 years
-
- Posts: 1466
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:41 pm
- Been Liked: 470 times
- Has Liked: 441 times
- Location: Sector 7G
Re: Joshua v povetkin
It always strikes me as strange that people expect elite boxers to be salt of the earth characters, when really it's a sport where it's almost a requirement to have a bit of an edge to your personality, given that often times your overriding goal is to knock somebody senseless. Then when we get a boxer like Anthony Joshua, who genuinely seems like a nice bloke, it's dismissed as fake. True, AJ got caught dealing weed in his early 20s but I'm sure his outlook and general maturity have changed a lot since then.
These 2 users liked this post: Damo IndigoLake
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4201 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Although I wanted Fury to win against Vlad, the fight was absolute dross. You had one fighter ducking and diving and the other who was so used to getting the result on points he didn't ever try and throw anything.Damo wrote:It's not like that at all.
Perhaps you just don't really understand boxing. From a purist point of view, Furys win against Klitschko was much better than AJ's. Fury' s win was a technical masterclass against a guy who was considered unbeatable. AJ's win was much more exciting, I was a nervous wreck by the end of the fight myself but by that point, Wlad had decided to call it a day and would of beaten AJ with his usual approach.
I don't personally feel anyone really dislikes AJ but a lot of boxing fans consider him to be over-rated. I'd say the current crop of heavyweights all are but it's been slim pickings in that division for far too long.
AJ is lauded as a all time great by the media already though due to his marketing team and that probably makes boxing fans more dismissive of him. He won't care though as he is making an absolute fortune and the reality is, it's good for boxing that the casuals are getting behind him. The more people who take an interest in the sport the better. Especially with the popularity of the UFC nonsense over the last 10 years
As you say the excitement of AJ has breathed new life into boxing which is much needed. Fury can't hide behind is press conferences and social media anymore to keep fans happy. He has to go and put in a performance in the ring.
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Fury is very under rated technically. People look at his early channel 5 career when he was very green and very unfit. He then matured into a much better boxer and not sure how anyone could say his fight against Klitschko was anything other than a masterclass- Fury v AJ would be very interesting. Personally I think Fury would win. What I am pretty convinced with is that AJ will get beat in the next couple of years.
AJ is decent - and actually I don’t mind him as a person. He speaks well and generally he is respectful to other boxers. I despise Hearn though and everything he does as a promoter.
I love boxing and have followed it for a lot of years. The current heavyweight division is poor - possibly the poorest in history. It’s been like this for at least the last 10 years. Americans do not want to box at this weight anymore - they prefer to go into more lucrative sports. Take a country like America out of the heavyweight division and it’s decimated. That is the only reason that the likes of AJ, Fury and even the Klitschko brothers have done so well....take these guys back 20 years and they would struggle to be in the top 10.
AJ is decent - and actually I don’t mind him as a person. He speaks well and generally he is respectful to other boxers. I despise Hearn though and everything he does as a promoter.
I love boxing and have followed it for a lot of years. The current heavyweight division is poor - possibly the poorest in history. It’s been like this for at least the last 10 years. Americans do not want to box at this weight anymore - they prefer to go into more lucrative sports. Take a country like America out of the heavyweight division and it’s decimated. That is the only reason that the likes of AJ, Fury and even the Klitschko brothers have done so well....take these guys back 20 years and they would struggle to be in the top 10.
These 2 users liked this post: Damo DomBFC1882
-
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:26 pm
- Been Liked: 258 times
- Has Liked: 260 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
I do not agree with that. Here are the Ring Magazine top 10 heavies from 1998:TVC15 wrote:....take these guys back 20 years and they would struggle to be in the top 10.
1. Evander Holyfield
2. Lennox Lewis
3. Michael Grant
4. Michael Moorer
5. Shannon Briggs
6. Chris Byrd
7. Ike Ibeabuchi
8. David Tua
9. Andrew Golota
10. Hasim Rahman
I'd say Joshua would comfortably be No 3 on that list.
Re: Joshua v povetkin
What time is the ringwalk?
Re: Joshua v povetkin
It will probably be around 10 -10.45pm..
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Joshua v povetkin
It'll be around 10-10.30pm I imagine.karatekid wrote:What time is the ringwalk?
-
- Posts: 20610
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4542 times
- Has Liked: 2047 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
9.50pm according to the Sun online.
Usually later than advertised though.
Usually later than advertised though.
Re: Joshua v povetkin
I dont see the issue with Joshua. I had a complete dislike to Lewis because of the way he covered Bruno's eye to take his belt, but also he's Canadian. I loved Tyson (yes American), Benn, Bruno, Calazahgi, and i have grown to like George groves. Joshua is the real deal, but as Brits always do, some will try taking shots at him no matter how low they want to go.
Last edited by ClaretAL on Sat Sep 22, 2018 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1466
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:41 pm
- Been Liked: 470 times
- Has Liked: 441 times
- Location: Sector 7G
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Anyone got a link to a decent stream?
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Get IPTV mate , £60 for 12 months , get all Premier League football, Sky BT , movies etcSammyBoy wrote:Anyone got a link to a decent stream?
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Sorry but disagree, Michael Grant is probably the most likening to Joshua on that list and he got found out.paulus the woodgnome wrote:I do not agree with that. Here are the Ring Magazine top 10 heavies from 1998:
1. Evander Holyfield
2. Lennox Lewis
3. Michael Grant
4. Michael Moorer
5. Shannon Briggs
6. Chris Byrd
7. Ike Ibeabuchi
8. David Tua
9. Andrew Golota
10. Hasim Rahman
I'd say Joshua would comfortably be No 3 on that list.
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Isn’t there a poster on here who can sort us out with the IPTV?joey13 wrote:Get IPTV mate , £60 for 12 months , get all Premier League football, Sky BT , movies etc
This user liked this post: theroyaldyche
-
- Posts: 20610
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4542 times
- Has Liked: 2047 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Think you might be on about Cutsy.MRG wrote:Isn’t there a poster on here who can sort us out with the IPTV?
I believe he got the elbow.

This user liked this post: theroyaldyche
Re: Joshua v povetkin
I don’t know , got it a few weeks ago and it’s been brilliantMRG wrote:Isn’t there a poster on here who can sort us out with the IPTV?
-
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 2122 times
- Has Liked: 991 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Not sure he posts anymore but I’ve got it and works a treat.MRG wrote:Isn’t there a poster on here who can sort us out with the IPTV?
This user liked this post: theroyaldyche
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:19 am
- Been Liked: 28 times
- Has Liked: 295 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Anyone got a stream for the fight?
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 55 times
- Has Liked: 48 times
- Contact:
Re: Joshua v povetkin
http://livehd-2017.blogspot.com/p/mobile-1.html?m=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This user liked this post: SammyBoy
-
- Posts: 13290
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3732 times
- Has Liked: 2149 times
- Contact:
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Well the last undercard of Campbell/Mendy has just gone the distance with Campbell unanimously winning on points
-
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:26 pm
- Been Liked: 258 times
- Has Liked: 260 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
That's why Joshua, at 3, would be above him in the list. Grant - 1 title fight and utterly blitzed by Lennox. Joshua a superior fighter.Right_winger wrote:Sorry but disagree, Michael Grant is probably the most likening to Joshua on that list and he got found out.
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Anyone have a genuine virus free link please?
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Just back home. Tuned in via Redbox. Super picture.
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Cutsy123@outlook.co.uk . If you need him. Its not me btwElectroClaret wrote:Think you might be on about Cutsy.
I believe he got the elbow.
This user liked this post: theroyaldyche
Re: Joshua v povetkin
Ripple is working very well
And as I typed this it froze
And as I typed this it froze
This user liked this post: FactualFrank