Time to go

[Longside4evr]

Hendrick was poor for fans to boo him off the pitch was a disgrace.
It wasn't Hendrick at all the fans were booing it was aimed at Willian for the dive
Just read the Hendrick thread wasn't aware of the booing on his subbing absolute crazy

[Bin Ont Turf]

What?

I think it should be me asking that question...............

What an avalanche of shite.

But not as much shite as your comment.

What indeed.

[Leisure]

I think it should be me asking that question...............

What indeed.

Go on I'll humour you. Please explain your comment that the manager's comments/assessment were shite?

[Bin Ont Turf]

Go on I'll humour you. Please explain your comment that the manager's comments/assessment were shite?

I didn't and I have absolutely no idea where you have got that from.

This thread was started by someone who says that it is time for the manager to go and gave stupid reasons for it, hence the avalanche of shite.

[No Ney Never]

look at the geordies, loads of cash and Benitez in charge, who many regarded as some kind of footballing messiah, but they are ****

dyche is a brilliant manager, we are lucky to have him

Absolutely.
Benitez, the only manager in history to have won the UEFA Europa League, UEFA Super Cup, UEFA Champions League and the FIFA Club World Cup. Has won La Liga twice, won the Coppa Italia and Supercoppa Italiana twice, the FA cup and been named UEFA Manager of the Year twice. Currently at a club paying players £75K/week and is doing how much better than our Sean?

[Turfmoor321]

[quote="Bin Ont Turf"]I didn't and I have absolutely no idea where you have got that from.

This thread was started by someone who says that it is time for the manager to go and gave stupid reasons for it, hence the avalanche of shite

Hence you’re shite comment

[LoveCurryPies]

Dyche
The football on offer is woefull, no knee jerk reaction
This has been brewing since 2nd half of Leicester at home last season.
And some will have Dyche streets ahead of Eddie Howe because of our 7th place finish last season..
I know what football I’d prefer to watch!

Think you have rose tinted glasses re the Howe games. We leaked goals and lost many games.

Anyone calling for Dyche to go is an idiot in my book. It’s some of the players who need to improve and a couple of quality signings come the window.

[Paul Waine]

That doesn't make any sense. If Hart was at fault for goal after goal after goal then you'd have a point, but he's been EASILY our best player this season.

Hi fidel, I agree, I don't think Joe Hart has been "at fault" for many of the goals we have conceded this season. In fact there have been several that he couldn't do anything about. However, (1) something has upset the balance of the defence and (2) Joe Hart is the major change from the past two seasons. So, what is different about Joe Hart? He's making a lot more money than any other member of the squad - City paying out his contract being the major part. Joe Hart is described as "livid" at the end of today's game. Is his "lividness" effecting the defenders? Does his "lividness" imply blame on others failings - and is this unsettling them and making them fail more? Two seasons back, Tom was our captain and he organised the defence from his position as keeper. When Tom was injured, Nick stepped up - and Ben Mee took the lead as captain (in Tom's absence) in organising the defence. This season - the defence is not well organised and we are losing games and shipping too many goals.

So, it's the balance and the team togetherness which we seem to be missing and not a good goalkeeper. Of course, we will have three England keepers - when Nick is fit again - and only one of them can play at any one time.

This is just my speculation based on what we can see and read. As you say, it might not "make any sense."

[Tinribs]

Games against Chelsea and Man City wont affect our season they are bonus games.where if we are dead lucky and maybe they go down to ten or have an off day we get a point.
But let’s be honest do we really look anything like the side we saw last season?when was the last time we actually looked better than the opposition ? Don’t say Bournemouth because that was a freak I think they still looked a better side than us.
I wouldn’t want Dyche to leave I’d say the board need to back him with much more in the transfer market our dealings have been shambolic for the last half dozen windows and that’s our major problem We need to recruit someone who can actually get a deal over the line.
Today was boring apart from the first 8 minutes I don’t even look forward to going on the Turf anymore the football is absolutely dreadful we are the only side in the Prem who cannot string half a dozen passes together.Hope we are still in with a shout come January

[BigChaCha]

I wouldn’t want Dyche to leave I’d say the board need to back him with much more in the transfer market our dealings have been shambolic for the last half dozen windows and that’s our major problem

The problem is, that if we are near the relegation spots come January, we will not be able to attract the calibre of player needed even if the board decide to really back him!

[cricketfieldclarets]

Hi fidel, I agree, I don't think Joe Hart has been "at fault" for many of the goals we have conceded this season. In fact there have been several that he couldn't do anything about. However, (1) something has upset the balance of the defence and (2) Joe Hart is the major change from the past two seasons. So, what is different about Joe Hart? He's making a lot more money than any other member of the squad - City paying out his contract being the major part. Joe Hart is described as "livid" at the end of today's game. Is his "lividness" effecting the defenders? Does his "lividness" imply blame on others failings - and is this unsettling them and making them fail more? Two seasons back, Tom was our captain and he organised the defence from his position as keeper. When Tom was injured, Nick stepped up - and Ben Mee took the lead as captain (in Tom's absence) in organising the defence. This season - the defence is not well organised and we are losing games and shipping too many goals.

So, it's the balance and the team togetherness which we seem to be missing and not a good goalkeeper. Of course, we will have three England keepers - when Nick is fit again - and only one of them can play at any one time.

This is just my speculation based on what we can see and read. As you say, it might not "make any sense."

It doesnt make sense though.

Would we be worse off with the same midfield but Aguero or Icardi up top instead of the established, hard working and modestly paid vokes?

[burnleymik]

Regarding the defence being disorganised compared to last season... I know there were rumours about a bust-up between Tarks and Mee, could that have any bearing?

I mean I heard Hart screaming like crazy to keep the defence organised in the first half, so he seems to be on top of that aspect.

Something does seem amiss at the moment, maybe it's like others have said that the midfield are not giving the same levels of protection and with more pressure comes more mistakes?

I don't know, but I don't think sacking Dyche is going to fix whatever that problem with the defence is.

[Imploding Turtle]

We've lost 6 games, three of them to Man City, Man Utd, and Chelsea, which is to be expected. So really the OP wants Dyche gone because out of the other 7 games, we've lost 3 of them. ******* ridiculous.

[Leisure]

I didn't and I have absolutely no idea where you have got that from.

This thread was started by someone who says that it is time for the manager to go and gave stupid reasons for it, hence the avalanche of shite.

Your post 53, following the manager's comments in post 52. But maybe you weren't responding to that post.

[Bin Ont Turf]

Your post 53, following the manager's comments in post 52. But maybe you weren't responding to that post.

I haven't read post "52". I have only read the OP's post, the three after and your posts on this thread.

I thought that it was common practice to quote the posts that you were directly talking about, like I've done with your posts.

[Leisure]

I haven't read post "52". I have only read the OP's post, the three after and your posts on this thread.

I thought that it was common practice to quote the posts that you were directly talking about, like I've done with your posts.

And if you'd done that in your post 53 then there wouldn't have been the misunderstanding about your comment!