ablueclaret wrote:When did I say they were key players.
I said the three E's deserved a CHANCE.
I reckoned KM could be a good Premier League player as yet he has not.
I reckoned Ings would be exceptional and was better than Blake, we probably will never know that.
I reckoned Mee should be played at centre half, he has been.
I reckoned Tarka should play as a holding midfielder, he has played there.
I reckoned Agyei was a talent and should be on the bench, that's what happened.
I reckoned Renny could be a good midfielder for us, he hadn't been but I like the fact he has gone abroad to test himself, good on him
What a load of balls. You didn't merely suggest the 3 E's deserved a chance. You continually banged the drum that all 3 should be playing as if they would be a key to our success. All 3 got a chance and all 3 were nowhere near the required standard. You were wrong.
You didn't suggest just 'trying' Tarka in midfield, again you suggested in your posts that he would excel in midfield and that is where he should be deployed. He was tried in that position and I think it put to bed any notion that he is a permanent solution in that position. As it stands, you were wrong.
I'm almost certain that you were calling for Agyei to start (if you can prove otherwise I'll hold my hands up, unlike you). He made a brief appearance from the bench and looked like bambi on ice. Maybe he'll make it, maybe he won't but he certainly shouldn't have been starting games for us last season. Again, you were wrong.
I think that was almost an admission of being wrong on the Smith point, the fact that he is playing abroad is entirely irrelevant.
KM is a decent talent, but has only just seemed to have found his way in the Championship, never mind the Premier League. So as it stands you were wrong.
Well done on predicting Ings would be a good player, although thats one out of a small number, and considering the fee we paid for him and the obvious talent that he had I think it was a calculated prediction.