Agreed. Hopefully he stops now
CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
This user liked this post: chekhov
-
- Posts: 17686
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3980 times
- Has Liked: 4932 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
SalisburyClaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:39 pmIf Tuchel wasn’t a football manager, you’d look at him and think - Sex Criminal



Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Wish some of our players could run 3 metresbox_of_frogs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:38 pmThat was outrageous. He literally ran 3 meters, did a small fist pump and walked back.
I assume we’ll be taking them to the High Court.

-
- Posts: 5315
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1522 times
- Has Liked: 1503 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Now that is worth pulling upSalisburyClaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:39 pmIf Tuchel wasn’t a football manager, you’d look at him and think - Sex Criminal
-
- Posts: 5120
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
I'm thinking he looks more like a crack addict.SalisburyClaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:39 pmIf Tuchel wasn’t a football manager, you’d look at him and think - Sex Criminal
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Looks like a good manager happening to show a bit of passion
These 2 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie Elizabeth
-
- Posts: 19803
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 4350 times
- Has Liked: 8617 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
He might be both.
-
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 2012 times
- Has Liked: 2287 times
- Location: lismore co. waterford
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
No.
As a mate of mine said to the boss,”What will you do if I call you a c*#t”?
“I’ll have you on a fizzer”, was the reply.
“What will you do if I think you’re a c*#t”?
“Nothing”
“Well I think you’re a c*#t”
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 17686
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3980 times
- Has Liked: 4932 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Jesus Dwight
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Ross Barkley running the game.
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Cracked Wheat ?
Cream Crackers ?
-
- Posts: 5315
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1522 times
- Has Liked: 1503 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Glad you are no longer sucking your thumb in the naughty cornerminnieclaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:46 pmNo.
As a mate of mine said to the boss,”What will you do if I call you a c*#t”?
“I’ll have you on a fizzer”, was the reply.
“What will you do if I think you’re a c*#t”?
“Nothing”
“Well I think you’re a c*#t”
This user liked this post: minnieclaret
-
- Posts: 5083
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1108 times
- Has Liked: 1018 times
-
- Posts: 19803
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 4350 times
- Has Liked: 8617 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
He's having a very good game.
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Yep could be
Secondary Careers for Managers is a good game -
Klopp looks like an accountant
Bruce would own a burger van etc
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Some at the club think we dodged a bullet not signing him

-
- Posts: 5120
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
They are just too good for us . We're lucky a lot of their shots have been off target. 1-0 is an achievement at half time. Let's hope they keep their foot off the gas and we can somehow nick one.
James has to be the best English right back, arguably better than Trippier. He put it on a plate for Havertz.
James has to be the best English right back, arguably better than Trippier. He put it on a plate for Havertz.
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Just saw Popey take a touch from a back pass before kicking it up field ...
Someone reckoned last week Nick never did that
Someone reckoned last week Nick never did that
-
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 2012 times
- Has Liked: 2287 times
- Location: lismore co. waterford
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Not having a pop at Charlie but yet again the cross came from our LB position.
Narrow FBs is crap.
Narrow FBs is crap.
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Farke looks like he hasn't got a neckSalisburyClaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:48 pmYep could be
Secondary Careers for Managers is a good game -
Klopp looks like an accountant
Bruce would own a burger van etc
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been Liked: 413 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
I think your mate pinched that off jummy greaves and what he said to a referee once .
-
- Posts: 5641
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1213 times
- Has Liked: 3777 times
-
- Posts: 5743
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1300 times
- Has Liked: 3162 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
That goal wasn't the fault of Taylor. Havertz should never have a free header there against both our centre halves. Taylor has done okay against James, especially considering the form James is in. Taylor has been aware of the switching of the ball and done okay.minnieclaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:50 pmNot having a pop at Charlie but yet again the cross came from our LB position.
Narrow FBs is crap.
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been Liked: 413 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
We're still in this
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4645 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Chelsea have looked slick as you' expect, the good news is it's only 1-0, and if we can keep in the game then you never know we might get a chance of pinching one in the 2nd half.
Bad goal to concede though, and I doubt Sean will be happy with the defending that led up to their goal.
Bad goal to concede though, and I doubt Sean will be happy with the defending that led up to their goal.
-
- Posts: 5743
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1300 times
- Has Liked: 3162 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
It's only 1-0. This isn't over yet. We could easily nick something.
-
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1999 times
- Has Liked: 510 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Micah Richards and Souness just nearly had a punchup over a fullback not racing out to stop the cross.
We do similar, and midfielders are starting to pick spots just ahead of our CBs knowing they’ll be unmarked for the cross.
We do similar, and midfielders are starting to pick spots just ahead of our CBs knowing they’ll be unmarked for the cross.
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Agreed but it doesn't stop you pressuring the ball, we are sitting too far off giving too much respectbox_of_frogs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:48 pmTo be fair, unless we ring up City and ask to practice against them, we have no way of training against class like this!
-
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:18 am
- Been Liked: 661 times
- Has Liked: 286 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Half time sangria here in Gran Canaria…..and no queue so back on sun lounger before second half begins…,
A bit different from JM concourse!!!!!
A bit different from JM concourse!!!!!
-
- Posts: 5739
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1307 times
- Has Liked: 704 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Only one down but , this Chelsea side remind me of City in their pomp .
Need a brake a lucky goal in the 96th min for a draw would do it
Need a brake a lucky goal in the 96th min for a draw would do it
-
- Posts: 17686
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3980 times
- Has Liked: 4932 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Can someone explain this to me? I can’t recall us always being so narrow, so is this a tactical change? And if so, why?minnieclaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:50 pmNot having a pop at Charlie but yet again the cross came from our LB position.
Narrow FBs is crap.
It appears to be a crap one. Why can’t we let the FB take the crosser? If they close them down they stand a better chance of blocking the cross or pushing them out wide. We’re basically giving world class players time to pick men out in the box….
-
- Posts: 11620
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2291 times
- Has Liked: 1379 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Chelsea not top of league for nothing. Done well to keep it at one. Need wood to win some headers.
-
- Posts: 5315
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1522 times
- Has Liked: 1503 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Very few teams in the world could live with Chelsea and to be only 1-0 down with the chances they’ve created is down to Pope and bad finishing.burnleymik wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:54 pmIt's only 1-0. This isn't over yet. We could easily nick something.
Nicking a goal to get a result today would be daylight robbery but anything can happen no matter how big the gulf in class.
That’s as positive as I can be
-
- Posts: 6607
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2753 times
- Has Liked: 1612 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
What the hell was our two cbs doing for the goal leaving havertz totally unmarked like thatminnieclaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:50 pmNot having a pop at Charlie but yet again the cross came from our LB position.
Narrow FBs is crap.
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been Liked: 413 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Westwood and Brownhill need some help against Kante/Jorginiho /Barkley to complete in midfield.
This user liked this post: jojomk1
-
- Posts: 5120
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Not having a target man in games like this really makes it hard. He needs to win headers and bring others into play but he just doesn't. He's been working his socks off though. Almost nicked the ball off them in their half.
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Ball watchinggandhisflipflop wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 4:00 pmWhat the hell was our two cbs doing for the goal leaving havertz totally unmarked like that
Same as our midfield two
Nobody is actually looking at where the Chelsea players are positioned - we are marking space but its not the space the opposition are standing in
This user liked this post: gandhisflipflop
-
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 2012 times
- Has Liked: 2287 times
- Location: lismore co. waterford
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Agreed. That’s why I wasn’t having a pop at him. He’s playing to instructions. I just hate it.burnleymik wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:53 pmThat goal wasn't the fault of Taylor. Havertz should never have a free header there against both our centre halves. Taylor has done okay against James, especially considering the form James is in. Taylor has been aware of the switching of the ball and done okay.
This user liked this post: burnleymik
-
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:44 am
- Been Liked: 136 times
- Has Liked: 9 times
-
- Posts: 6217
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1277 times
- Has Liked: 8528 times
- Location: Greystones Ireland
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Actually I typed German because I didn’t know how to spell his name
He is however German
He is however German
This user liked this post: Buxtonclaret
-
- Posts: 8769
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2330 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: CHELSEA. V CLARETS
Barkley is playing because Chelsea have a number of injuries. Wasn't making the squad a few weeks ago