Yes I know I did - that does not mean I understand the point you are trying to make.
It very much sounds like that what you are saying is that because she did one thing then it’s fine that he kissed her on the lips - it’s all about context.
Yes I know I did - that does not mean I understand the point you are trying to make.
Would on the head have been OK?
Things aren't always so clear cut if the signals are right, it's not really the done thing to ask for permission that said if the signals aren't right to start with you don't kiss the woman, each individual case will be different but as a general rule you should know or at least be capable of judging the situation.RicardoMontalban wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 6:45 amNothing creepy or sexual about a woman being kissed on the lips without her consent?
Interesting viewpoint to put out there.
Age has nothing to do with it and I resent, as an over 60's male, being tarred with the same brush as those defending his actions (of whom could well be in your age bracket for all you know).
So when you said we shouldn't be calling people creeps, it was just because you agreed with the creeps?DCWat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:09 amWould on the head have been OK?
I’m not saying that in hindsight he shouldn’t have done it, but I do feel it’s being blown out of proportion.
In light of the article linked further up this thread, I do wonder if this is more due to a culmination of issues with this bloke than the incident itself.
It’s a leap and a half between someone not seeing this particular incident in as bad a light as you and them being a creep, sexist, arsehole, dick head, misogynist.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 10:47 amThis is such an awful take. It doesn't devalue a point to call creepy sexist arseholes creepy. There is no need to be nice to dickheads.
I don't read it that way, and have never said thatBig Vinny K wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:02 amYes I know I did - that does not mean I understand the point you are trying to make.
It very much sounds like that what you are saying is that because she did one thing then it’s fine that he kissed her on the lips - it’s all about context.
Not what I said at all, but crack on pigeonholing.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:15 amSo when you said we shouldn't be calling people creeps, it was just because you agreed with the creeps?
No, it's more due to the fact that a man felt he didn't need consent to kiss a woman on the mouth. Hard to believe that people can't see that.DCWat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:09 amWould on the head have been OK?
I’m not saying that in hindsight he shouldn’t have done it, but I do feel it’s being blown out of proportion.
In light of the article linked further up this thread, I do wonder if this is more due to a culmination of issues with this bloke than the incident itself.
.... and what if she'd kissed the horse on it's lips!Sheedyclaret wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:02 amThink he has to go due to his bizarre behaviour but I’ve just seen a female racehorse owner kiss a male jockey on the lips after winning a race wonder if this will attract the same media uproar?
He didn't kiss her on the head. He kissed her on the lips without her consent.DCWat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:09 amWould on the head have been OK?
I’m not saying that in hindsight he shouldn’t have done it, but I do feel it’s being blown out of proportion.
In light of the article linked further up this thread, I do wonder if this is more due to a culmination of issues with this bloke than the incident itself.
It's open and shut sexual assault by a boss on an employee. No amount of mealy-mouthed, equivocal bullshit about things being blown out of proportion changes that and to think it's anything other than a resignation issue is inherently creepy and misogynistic.
Creepy if done in private but hardly when it's in front of literally millions of viewers. Ill advised and over exhuburant maybe but that's about it. What sad world we live in these days with social media, influencers etc. Everything has to be a drama these days and peoples overreaction is unbelievable.SirBob wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:02 amYou can’t go around kissing women in the work place, sexual or non sexual it’s totally inappropriate. Those arguing that she was smiling before and after the kiss are delusional, she’s on television being broadcast around the world, do you expect her to start windmilling on live television?
We hit record sales in work last month I didn’t go around planting one on the lips of girls I worked with, I’d get the sack and rightly so.
He could have kissed her on the cheek? On the forehead? On the lips is creepy as fuk, he shouldn’t be working with women.
Bang on.NottsClaret wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:23 amThere’s some really weird men on this board, either pathetically terrified of women or tragically backward in their thinking.
He should be fired, never mind expected to resign. Just another creepy guy trying to make a talented woman’s achievements all about him while being a slimeball at the same time.
As I said in another post. Everything has to be a drama these days because they can't accept that someone else has a point of view that doesn't agree with their own. In fact calling another poster smelly and creepy is actually more offensive than what the post is actually about but it's far to easy to call someone names on a forum than in person.
It's not possible to think that calling someone smelly and creepy is worse than kissing someone against their will, lying about it, pressuring them to lie about it and then using a position of power to threaten legal action against them. Simply not possible.Firthy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:32 amAs I said in another post. Everything has to be a drama these days because they can't accept that someone else has a point of view that doesn't agree with their own. In fact calling another poster smelly and creepy is actually more offensive than what the post is actually about but it's far to easy to call someone names on a forum than in person.
Yes, she probably restrained herself from chinning him.
Calling someone smelly and creepy is more offensive than sexually assaulting someone?Firthy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:32 amAs I said in another post. Everything has to be a drama these days because they can't accept that someone else has a point of view that doesn't agree with their own. In fact calling another poster smelly and creepy is actually more offensive than what the post is actually about but it's far to easy to call someone names on a forum than in person.
There you go again.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:22 amIt's open and shut sexual assault by a boss on an employee. No amount of mealy-mouthed, equivocal bullshit about things being blown out of proportion changes that and to think it's anything other than a resignation issue is inherently creepy and misogynistic.
That's exactly what was said.Robbie_painter wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:36 amYou’ve heard nothing because it’s a quote you’ve just made up.That’s not what he said at all.
What’s this supposed to mean, then?Robbie_painter wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:36 amYou’ve heard nothing because it’s a quote you’ve just made up.That’s not what he said at all.
I'm not assuming anything, I don't think. You said it is being blown out of proportion and that it's wrong to call people defending it creeps. I just understand the implications of that.DCWat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:37 amThere you go again.
Assume what you like about me for having a different perspective, but rest assured, your pigeon holing is wrong.
I’ll look forward to you calling out similar things in the men’s game, a player being kissed in celebration, a manager patting a sub on the arse as he walks goes on to the pitch.
There’s this thing called “consent”. If you haven’t heard of it, I’d suggest you look it up before you interact with anyone again in real life.DCWat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:37 amThere you go again.
Assume what you like about me for having a different perspective, but rest assured, your pigeon holing is wrong.
I’ll look forward to you calling out similar things in the men’s game, a player being kissed in celebration, a manager patting a sub on the arse as he walks goes on to the pitch.
She has said she was offended by it though so not sure why you would not take that at face value.Nori1958 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:18 amI don't read it that way, and have never said that
My point was,and still is that the player in question didn't seem offended at the time, far from it.
Without reading back all my posts, I don't think I've ever said it was OK, but I can understand that in that specific moment everybody got carried away, and like I said did things they wouldn't normally do. Iam sure the player doesn't go round hugging and lifting her boss in the air on a daily basis, but having won the world Cup probably did it without even thinking about it.
Kissing someone on the lips without their consent is absolutely sexual assault, whether it’s done down a dark alley, or in full view of the world’s cameras, particularly when the victim of the assault is an employee of the perpetrator.
Are you a real person? Good grief.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:10 amThings aren't always so clear cut if the signals are right, it's not really the done thing to ask for permission that said if the signals aren't right to start with you don't kiss the woman, each individual case will be different but as a general rule you should know or at least be capable of judging the situation.
It's just terrifying isn't it.
Thank you for being so patronising, another string to the bow.
Completely agree, I have a 3 year old daughter and it’s worrying.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:58 amIt's just terrifying isn't it.
The thought of my daughter one day having to go out into a world knowing there are people like Firthy and others out there who don't think a boss kissing someone on the lips without consent is sexual assault genuinely makes me fear for her safety and well-being even more than I already do.
Your perspective now seems to be that it's ok he did it because she's a footballer. I hope you can understand why I might label you unkindly based on that.DCWat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 12:05 pmThank you for being so patronising, another string to the bow.
Perhaps I’m wrong in seeing a difference between, for example, business workplaces and those that are played out on a field in front of thousands at the event and millions at home.
There are a hundred and one things that go on, on the field of play or in celebration during and after, that of course would not be acceptable in a different working environment.
My perspective is not that I condone kissing someone on the lips, nor that I don’t understand consent, despite your assertion, it’s that the environment that they were in is entirely different, emotionally charged and celebratory. I just think that needs to be taken in to consideration when attempting to compare and contrast.
You’re more than entitled to disagree and suggest that there are no mitigating factors that should be applied. That’s fine, the labelling less so.
And yours and others complete overreaction to it makes me fear for the future of society. Firstly I never said I agreed with it and said it was ill advised.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 11:58 amIt's just terrifying isn't it.
The thought of my daughter one day having to go out into a world knowing there are people like Firthy and others out there who don't think a boss kissing someone on the lips without consent is sexual assault genuinely makes me fear for her safety and well-being even more than I already do.
I'm saying things happen naturally & you shouldn't necessarily permission to kiss a girl if the signals are right, you stated that you needed consent to kiss a woman which isn't entirely true if she's keen on you.
There are no mitigating factors which can justify sexually assaulting an employee. That you think there may be is deeply worrying.DCWat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 12:05 pmThank you for being so patronising, another string to the bow.
Perhaps I’m wrong in seeing a difference between, for example, business workplaces and those that are played out on a field in front of thousands at the event and millions at home.
There are a hundred and one things that go on, on the field of play or in celebration during and after, that of course would not be acceptable in a different working environment.
My perspective is not that I condone kissing someone on the lips, nor that I don’t understand consent, despite your assertion, it’s that the environment that they were in is entirely different, emotionally charged and celebratory. I just think that needs to be taken in to consideration when attempting to compare and contrast.
You’re more than entitled to disagree and suggest that there are no mitigating factors that should be applied. That’s fine, the labelling less so.