If only things were that simple!
Fracking
-
- Posts: 11024
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1349 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
Re: Fracking
Re: Fracking
It has been backed up by a first class engineer. Unfortunatley for me I didn't retain the report. If I had I would have given you the informatiin to access it. Logic??? What do you mean?Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Sun Oct 10, 2021 10:27 pmI live about a mile away from Woodplumpton, and can assure you there’s been no fracking or fracking protests. These took place at Little Plumpton, a totally separate place, as has been previously pointed out to you. As you’ve proved in the rest of this thread though, the apparent authority you claim to have on this issue has not been backed up by basic facts or logic.
Re: Fracking
Thats right. He wont have a clue about the improvements in the engineering of Fracking. But makes comments. There you go.RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑Sun Oct 10, 2021 10:40 pmIt's irrelevant.
Nobody's ever going to take top spot from you, Champ !
![]()
Re: Fracking
Typo but thanks. I ought to know better having been in the textile/ engineering industry all my working life.
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud
Re: Fracking
Well energy prices up 58%. Great Lets all get greener.
The real issue is a massive reduction of energy production in this country over decades. We were self-sufficient in gas and pretty much so in electricity until governments screwed it all up in their quest to go Green and in the process introduce energy poverty to much of their populations. Xi Jinping must be wetting himself at such ineptitude.
Well something HAS to be done. Fracking, Extracting our energy recourses from the ground on land or under the seas until renewables can provide the electricity required at a fair cost to the consumer.
USA has done it and is (for)now self sufficient. Its been a balls up for years here with privatisation placing the responsibility for energy (gas and electricity) provision in the hands of the gas and electricity supplier companies, who it seems have not understood or disregarded the importance of gas exploration in favour of profits.
The real issue is a massive reduction of energy production in this country over decades. We were self-sufficient in gas and pretty much so in electricity until governments screwed it all up in their quest to go Green and in the process introduce energy poverty to much of their populations. Xi Jinping must be wetting himself at such ineptitude.
Well something HAS to be done. Fracking, Extracting our energy recourses from the ground on land or under the seas until renewables can provide the electricity required at a fair cost to the consumer.
USA has done it and is (for)now self sufficient. Its been a balls up for years here with privatisation placing the responsibility for energy (gas and electricity) provision in the hands of the gas and electricity supplier companies, who it seems have not understood or disregarded the importance of gas exploration in favour of profits.
Re: Fracking
Now now. I was a fan of yours!!! I thought you were funnier than Danny Boyle but you've lost your lustre pal. Get c(F)racking on something useful.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Oct 10, 2021 9:48 pmIs Sunday considered to be the end of the week or the start of the week? Just trying to work out if Stayingup is making a last dash attempt to win clown of the week or if he's setting the early pace for the crown
-
- Posts: 11024
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1349 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
Re: Fracking
I partly reside near woodplumpton they might not have been any protests but if you look at some of the windows in the houses or in the garden you will see no fracking posters & signs on poles, all around that area people aren’t keen on fracking.Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Sun Oct 10, 2021 10:27 pmI live about a mile away from Woodplumpton, and can assure you there’s been no fracking or fracking protests. These took place at Little Plumpton, a totally separate place, as has been previously pointed out to you. As you’ve proved in the rest of this thread though, the apparent authority you claim to have on this issue has not been backed up by basic facts or logic.
Re: Fracking
I just wonder what the result would be of a referendum on starting extracting our resources from the ground. The population has never been consulted on climate change or on what our current and forseeable energy sources should be.
I doubt the firm that worked at Woodplumpton on fracking woukd return. Quadrilla. They were abused and had their equipment damaged. Shell has wallked away from exploration for gas in the North sea. So thanks to our lamentable politicians of all hues we are stuck high energy prices for a long time.
I doubt the firm that worked at Woodplumpton on fracking woukd return. Quadrilla. They were abused and had their equipment damaged. Shell has wallked away from exploration for gas in the North sea. So thanks to our lamentable politicians of all hues we are stuck high energy prices for a long time.
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Fracking
Yeah lets have another referendum so all the Tufton Street mob can con all the brainless idiots like you to vote against their own interests again just like they did with Brexit.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Fracking
The end of UK fracking.
Egan said: “At a time when the UK is spending billions of pounds annually importing gas from all corners of the globe, and gas prices for hard-pressed UK households are rocketing, the UK government has chosen this moment to ask us to plug and abandon the only two viable shale gas wells in Britain.”
https://bit.ly/3GJn6TQ
Egan said: “At a time when the UK is spending billions of pounds annually importing gas from all corners of the globe, and gas prices for hard-pressed UK households are rocketing, the UK government has chosen this moment to ask us to plug and abandon the only two viable shale gas wells in Britain.”
https://bit.ly/3GJn6TQ
This user liked this post: Stayingup
Re: Fracking
Just read that our UK, deficit on imports of natural gas is running at 2 billion / month on moth and rising at 800 million per month and has doubled since last year. ONS figures. This is madness when we have enough to be self sufficient and even to export to Europe. Our politicians present and past have made catastrophic decisions to arrive at this situation. They are usuless.
Re: Fracking
You really are an ignorant b@st@rd. When you mention my name in a post have the courtesy to address it me.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sat Feb 05, 2022 10:49 amYeah lets have another referendum so all the Tufton Street mob can con all the brainless idiots like you to vote against their own interests again just like they did with Brexit.
When you mention my name in a post address it to me not tge board in general ignorant ****.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Fracking
I wonder how green it is to ship LNG in massive tankers halfway round the world to UK ports, not to mention the astronomical financial costs in doing so.
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Fracking
Is this you talking about me without having the courtesy to address it to me?" You really are brainless as well as being an "ignorant b@st@rd" by your own standars
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Fracking
I've no problem with the net-zero ambition, but not without the infrastructure in place, and certainly not at the expense of condemning millions of people into making the stark choice between eating and heating for years on end. The fact that we are in this current situation, regarding energy security, only goes to show that successive governments have failed the UK, and the current Govt even more so.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 Stayingup
Re: Fracking
It isnt. If we had exploited our energy resources and exported the excess we would have a trade surplus by now. Our current poor trade situation is blamed on Brexit by tools on here and others but not exploiting our recourses has been outstandingly bad by our so called elites and along with their running down UK is mostly to blame for the current deficit.Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 4:45 pmI wonder how green it is to ship LNG in massive tankers halfway round the world to UK ports, not to mention the astronomical financial costs in doing so.
Re: Fracking
It isnt. If we had exploited our energy resources and exported the excess we would have a trade surplus by now. Our current poor trade situation is blamed on Brexit by tools on here and others but not exploiting our recourses has been outstandingly bad by our so called elites and along with their running down UK is mostly to blame for the current deficit.Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 4:45 pmI wonder how green it is to ship LNG in massive tankers halfway round the world to UK ports, not to mention the astronomical financial costs in doing so.
Re: Fracking
Addressed to you nobber. Now shut it.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 4:52 pmIs this you talking about me without having the courtesy to address it to me?" You really are brainless as well as being an "ignorant b@st@rd" by your own standars
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Fracking
Nope, below is the full post and there's no direct mention of me. Whereas I actually responded directly to your idiotic post within 10 mins you referred to a post I made 4 months earlier without mention me at all. All I can say is youre not very good at this but hopefully you might have learned something today
RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑Sun Oct 10, 2021 10:40 pm
It's irrelevant.
Nobody's ever going to take top spot from you, Champ !
Stayingup wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 7:30 pm
Thats right. He wont have a clue about the improvements in the engineering of Fracking. But makes comments. There you go.
Re: Fracking
Well I'm still waiting for a sensible constructive comment from you about the UK energy situation. Champ!!!Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 5:11 pmNope, below is the full post and there's no direct mention of me. Whereas I actually responded directly to your idiotic post within 10 mins you referred to a post I made 4 months earlier without mention me at all. All I can say is youre not very good at this but hopefully you might have learned something today
RingoMcCartney wrote: ↑Sun Oct 10, 2021 10:40 pm
It's irrelevant.
Nobody's ever going to take top spot from you, Champ !
Stayingup wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 7:30 pm
Thats right. He wont have a clue about the improvements in the engineering of Fracking. But makes comments. There you go.
All you ever do is make negative comments.
-
- Posts: 5641
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1213 times
- Has Liked: 3777 times
Re: Fracking
It's the fuk... conservatives' fault ...end of! ..or the Bell-ends who voted them in, take your pick.Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 4:55 pmI've no problem with the net-zero ambition, but not without the infrastructure in place, and certainly not at the expense of condemning millions of people into making the stark choice between eating and heating for years on end. The fact that we are in this current situation, regarding energy security, only goes to show that successive governments have failed the UK, and the current Govt even more so.
Privatizing something so essential was bound to end like this.

-
- Posts: 5641
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1213 times
- Has Liked: 3777 times
Re: Fracking
FRACKING IS A COMPLETE NONSENSE!
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Fracking
The figure you quoted is the Gov figure to play down the truth.Stayingup wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 8:15 pmWell energy prices up 58%. Great Lets all get greener.
The real issue is a massive reduction of energy production in this country over decades. We were self-sufficient in gas and pretty much so in electricity until governments screwed it all up in their quest to go Green and in the process introduce energy poverty to much of their populations. Xi Jinping must be wetting himself at such ineptitude.
Well something HAS to be done. Fracking, Extracting our energy recourses from the ground on land or under the seas until renewables can provide the electricity required at a fair cost to the consumer.
USA has done it and is (for)now self sufficient. Its been a balls up for years here with privatisation placing the responsibility for energy (gas and electricity) provision in the hands of the gas and electricity supplier companies, who it seems have not understood or disregarded the importance of gas exploration in favour of profits.
The truth is that bills will go up by at least 100%. I pay £160 a month and my fixed rate quote was £360 a month for the next year. Or stay on a variable rate which means my next months DD is £280.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Fracking
At this rate, millions won't be able to afford to cook food, never mind heat and light their homes in winter.
France has limited their gas price increases to 12.6%. Electricity is only going up by 4%. They get 70% of their electricity from nuclear power and most of it is state-owned.
Here, in the UK, we are in a mess because we allowed our energy security to be governed by political dogma and the whims of the stock markets. Sacrificed on the mantra of 'all privatisation is good', rather than a pragmatic mix-economy approach, both state-owned and private sector, like the French.
We are our own biggest enemy and now the chickens have finally come home to roost.
France has limited their gas price increases to 12.6%. Electricity is only going up by 4%. They get 70% of their electricity from nuclear power and most of it is state-owned.
Here, in the UK, we are in a mess because we allowed our energy security to be governed by political dogma and the whims of the stock markets. Sacrificed on the mantra of 'all privatisation is good', rather than a pragmatic mix-economy approach, both state-owned and private sector, like the French.
We are our own biggest enemy and now the chickens have finally come home to roost.
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Fracking
I don’t think nuclear is the answer, look at wind scale, three mile island, Chernobyl and Fukushima. But for single councillor the north west of England would be uninhabitable today.Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 8:39 pmAt this rate, millions won't be able to afford to cook food, never mind heat and light their homes in winter.
France has limited their gas price increases to 12.6%. Electricity is only going up by 4%. They get 70% of their electricity from nuclear power and most of it is state-owned.
Here, in the UK, we are in a mess because we allowed our energy security to be governed by political dogma and the whims of the stock markets. Sacrificed on the mantra of 'all privatisation is good', rather than a pragmatic mix-economy approach, both state-owned and private sector, like the French.
We are our own biggest enemy and now the chickens have finally come home to roost.
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Fracking
Fracking is not the answer, push the wind turbine companies to build more offshore wind farms faster.Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 8:39 pmAt this rate, millions won't be able to afford to cook food, never mind heat and light their homes in winter.
France has limited their gas price increases to 12.6%. Electricity is only going up by 4%. They get 70% of their electricity from nuclear power and most of it is state-owned.
Here, in the UK, we are in a mess because we allowed our energy security to be governed by political dogma and the whims of the stock markets. Sacrificed on the mantra of 'all privatisation is good', rather than a pragmatic mix-economy approach, both state-owned and private sector, like the French.
We are our own biggest enemy and now the chickens have finally come home to roost.
Way cheaper than nuclear and perfectly safe.
Re: Fracking
Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 8:54 pmFracking is not the answer, push the wind turbine companies to build more offshore wind farms faster.
Way cheaper than nuclear and perfectly safe.
[/quote
As it stands wiind farms on a good day supply 24% of the UK electricity requurement. On a good day that is. It will take years to erect and commission enough of these to fulfill the requirements of UK. And then whaf happens when the wind doesnt blow? In addition what will the cost be to build them and for electricity they produce. Thel point is we are in an energy crisis now and costs are about to go up 54% in April. So meantime till we have sustainable energy production what would you suggest?
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Fracking
Also wrong is your time scales on power.
The Gov restrict the amount of sea bed allowed to be used for wind farms.
Wind farms can be up and runnng in 12 months.
Nuclear is ten years.
And to be fair things can be done faster.
I worked in the aero industry, the fastest a company was approved to make RR products for use on engines was 18 months. I got Hycrome Burnley approved and making parts in just over 6 months. The only thing restricting progress is humans who don’t believe it can be done.
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Fracking
Just to add, the guys at Hycrome moved heaven and earth to get there, amazing people and typically Burnley folk. Any success is a team success.
This user liked this post: bfcjg
Re: Fracking
Wind farms can be up and running in 12 months !!! . Fact is it isn't being done and people in this country are going to feel the adverse cost effects badly and for a long time. And what happens when the wind doesnt blow? No we sensibly should exploit our resources until reliable and cost effective sustainable energy is avallable. If it ever will be. We are surrounded by sea and the tide is predictable maybe we should utilize that power.Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 9:32 pmAlso wrong is your time scales on power.
The Gov restrict the amount of sea bed allowed to be used for wind farms.
Wind farms can be up and runnng in 12 months.
Nuclear is ten years.
And to be fair things can be done faster.
I worked in the aero industry, the fastest a company was approved to make RR products for use on engines was 18 months. I got Hycrome Burnley approved and making parts in just over 6 months. The only thing restricting progress is humans who don’t believe it can be done.
Re: Fracking
No it didnt.Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 9:24 pmIncorrect, it did over 40% in the last two weeks. If your going to quote facts get them correct.
Re: Fracking
I think you might be struggling with the 12 months scenario.Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 9:32 pmAlso wrong is your time scales on power.
The Gov restrict the amount of sea bed allowed to be used for wind farms.
Wind farms can be up and runnng in 12 months.
Nuclear is ten years.
And to be fair things can be done faster.
I worked in the aero industry, the fastest a company was approved to make RR products for use on engines was 18 months. I got Hycrome Burnley approved and making parts in just over 6 months. The only thing restricting progress is humans who don’t believe it can be done.
The latest stats had 24% of the UK's power coming from wind farms (that was 2020, 2021 figures aren't out yet). Suppose we want to make that 34%. We would need an extra 5,000 or so turbines to make up the difference, many of them offshore. I dare say we could get the odd turbine up and running in less than 12 months, but could we get a significant number? What with planning permission, design, site surveys, and so on, followed by all the building of the turbines, we are talking about quite a long time to really get going. certainly more than 12 months, not less.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Fracking
Yes, but anything we do will be long termdsr wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:08 pmI think you might be struggling with the 12 months scenario.
The latest stats had 24% of the UK's power coming from wind farms (that was 2020, 2021 figures aren't out yet). Suppose we want to make that 34%. We would need an extra 5,000 or so turbines to make up the difference, many of them offshore. I dare say we could get the odd turbine up and running in less than 12 months, but could we get a significant number? What with planning permission, design, site surveys, and so on, followed by all the building of the turbines, we are talking about quite a long time to really get going. certainly more than 12 months, not less.
So if we are going to do it, and its going to take time and be a long term solution(and its not digging in the ground for more fossil fuels) then it might as well be sustainable energy, backed by nuclear stations
Course, with this lot in charge, we will be lucky if they have any plan at all!
Re: Fracking
Definitely long term. But when was the last time we had a government with a long term plan for power? Not Johnson, not Cameron, not Blair. Cameron's short term plan, probably still in force, is that in case of emergency they have a network of private companies' diesel generators that can be plugged into the grid. Last week it was suggested that they will drain power from any charging electric cars that are plugged in. (That'll go down well, I don't think!)Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:16 pmYes, but anything we do will be long term
So if we are going to do it, and its going to take time and be a long term solution(and its not digging in the ground for more fossil fuels) then it might as well be sustainable energy, backed by nuclear stations
Course, with this lot in charge, we will be lucky if they have any plan at all!
Is nuclear power suitable as backup? I thought nuclear had to be kept at a fairly steady level because of the reactors and couldn't be powered up and down anything like as readily as coal fired?
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Fracking
Well, its "back up" as a more general termdsr wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:25 pmDefinitely long term. But when was the last time we had a government with a long term plan for power? Not Johnson, not Cameron, not Blair. Cameron's short term plan, probably still in force, is that in case of emergency they have a network of private companies' diesel generators that can be plugged into the grid. Last week it was suggested that they will drain power from any charging electric cars that are plugged in. (That'll go down well, I don't think!)
Is nuclear power suitable as backup? I thought nuclear had to be kept at a fairly steady level because of the reactors and couldn't be powered up and down anything like as readily as coal fired?
Essentially the chances of the wind not blowing, tides not happening or the sun not shining are pretty unlikely
But its an expensive and long term plan that is required, and I'm pretty sure that we haven't got one
As you say, no one seems to have one, and the latest one on batteries is being shown up to be nowhere near ambitious enough sadly
Re: Fracking
Batteries sounds unworkable to me. Take February as perhaps the hardest month to cover - although this year it's blown several gales, it's pretty common to have a couple of weeks (sometimes more) of high pressure, no wind, freezing cold. We get weak sunshine and tides, but that won't be anywhere near enough. We need either very significant backup or else huge battery storage. We can't really rely on imports for a long cold snap because there's every chance Europe would be in the same boat.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:32 pmWell, its "back up" as a more general term
Essentially the chances of the wind not blowing, tides not happening or the sun not shining are pretty unlikely
But its an expensive and long term plan that is required, and I'm pretty sure that we haven't got one
As you say, no one seems to have one, and the latest one on batteries is being shown up to be nowhere near ambitious enough sadly
And of course the long term plan, such as it is, is to vastly increase electricity use by abolishing gas heating. We have a theoretical long term plan - net zero, electric cars, heat pumps and so on - but what we don't have is any details about how it will work. Yikes.
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Fracking
There was a CEO of a power gen company on Ian King live this week. He was saying they are building more offshore wind farms this year. They also won some of the bidding for sites off Scotland that were sold not long ago.dsr wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:08 pmI think you might be struggling with the 12 months scenario.
The latest stats had 24% of the UK's power coming from wind farms (that was 2020, 2021 figures aren't out yet). Suppose we want to make that 34%. We would need an extra 5,000 or so turbines to make up the difference, many of them offshore. I dare say we could get the odd turbine up and running in less than 12 months, but could we get a significant number? What with planning permission, design, site surveys, and so on, followed by all the building of the turbines, we are talking about quite a long time to really get going. certainly more than 12 months, not less.
We should be pushing these companies to build them faster, not restricting them by only selling plots as and when.
It was he who said that in the last few weeks wind had provided over 40% of the power we needed. But to be fair it was because it’s been so windy. The average over the year will probably be about the same as what you say.
That’s the issue with wind, it does not always blow, hence we need other alternatives, just that nuclear is not for me. To dangerous and the waste is contaminated for hundreds of years. Interestingly Japan plans to dump millions of gallons of contaminated water into the sea from their nuclear accident because they see no alternative.
This user liked this post: dsr
-
- Posts: 6623
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Fracking
There is an energy dashboard that shows what energy is being used to power our electric. It was shown live on COP 26 and it’s live on the net. So today it’s showing Wind as generating 39% of our electric.