Women’s Euros 2022

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ALP
Posts: 1217
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:16 am
Been Liked: 1507 times
Has Liked: 400 times
Contact:

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by ALP » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:24 pm

yTib wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:21 pm
lots of twisted knickers on this thread but mostly from those who like watching crap football.
We've had plenty of that over the last few years too............. but we still watched it
This user liked this post: louieollie

yTib
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 701 times
Location: Château d'If

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by yTib » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:24 pm

ALP wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:24 pm
We've had plenty of that over the last few years too............. but we still watched it
apples and oranges lad.

ALP
Posts: 1217
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:16 am
Been Liked: 1507 times
Has Liked: 400 times
Contact:

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by ALP » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:26 pm

yTib wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:24 pm
apples and oranges lad.
Not keen on either thanks bud!! However it doesn't make it wrong that you may like em.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34427
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:27 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:20 pm
Except we've beaten City and gotten results against them
so have Norway v England

CoolClaret
Posts: 9813
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3104 times
Has Liked: 3100 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by CoolClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:33 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:27 pm
so have Norway v England
*Sigh*

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by aggi » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:33 pm

I'm definitely going to start going on the cricket threads and explain to everyone why I have no interest in cricket and why those who enjoy it need to accept that it's rubbish.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4230
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by dandeclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:34 pm

aggi wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:33 pm
I'm definitely going to start going on the cricket threads and explain to everyone why I have no interest in cricket and why those who enjoy it need to accept that it's rubbish.
Never realised you were a Yorkshire fan….

ALP
Posts: 1217
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:16 am
Been Liked: 1507 times
Has Liked: 400 times
Contact:

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by ALP » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:36 pm

aggi wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:33 pm
I'm definitely going to start going on the cricket threads and explain to everyone why I have no interest in cricket and why those who enjoy it need to accept that it's rubbish.
I may well just do the same, alongside Great British Bake Off and Coronation Street, I must also tell my Mrs to stop watching such shite as it's tainting her and degrading to her.

yTib
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 701 times
Location: Château d'If

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by yTib » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:37 pm

aggi wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:33 pm
I'm definitely going to start going on the cricket threads and explain to everyone why I have no interest in cricket and why those who enjoy it need to accept that it's rubbish.
who has told you that you need to accept anything?

try going onto the growing up thread and telling me why you can't handle someone with a contrary opinion to yours.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18550
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7611 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Rileybobs » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:40 pm

What is a bit odd though is you wouldn’t see the same disparaging comments on a thread about non-league football - which is generally regarded as a very low standard but good entertainment.
This user liked this post: louieollie

yTib
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 701 times
Location: Château d'If

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by yTib » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:42 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:40 pm
What is a bit odd though is you wouldn’t see the same disparaging comments on a thread about non-league football - which is generally regarded as a very low standard but good entertainment.
it's not on prime-time bbc1 though.

easily the point.
These 2 users liked this post: CoolClaret Jamesy

CoolClaret
Posts: 9813
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3104 times
Has Liked: 3100 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by CoolClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:43 pm

aggi wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:33 pm
I'm definitely going to start going on the cricket threads and explain to everyone why I have no interest in cricket and why those who enjoy it need to accept that it's rubbish.
You've totally missed the point of the argument.

You can totally go on to a cricket thread and say 'this game is being played at a poor standard' - case in point having criticism of why the Dutch were playing England in a O.D.I. would be fair game.

To come on and say 'this is rubbish' in regard to say, England's most recent Test against India then that would be objectively false.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18550
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7611 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Rileybobs » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:44 pm

yTib wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:42 pm
it's not on prime-time bbc1 though.

easily the point.
Non league football isn’t on prime-time BBC1 because the viewing figures would be appalling.

claret wizard
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 328 times
Has Liked: 132 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by claret wizard » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:44 pm

It must have been entertaining as I stuck with the whole game. Beth Mead was excellent. Lots of people getting focused on the “standard” on this thread. Of course it’s not mens football and a mens team from tier 8 would probably beat this England team. It’s not that relevant though. Let’s look at other sports where men and women compete separately. In tennis both sexes games are equally popular but the men would beat the women. In track athletics the women are obviously much slower than the men, but does that make the races any less exciting? Track cycling, men and women haves races mixed into the same schedule. I don’t think you’ll hear, we’ll skip the women’s races as they are so much slower than the men.

Was it a spectacle tonight, absolutely, and that’s all that really matters.
These 4 users liked this post: Bosscat martin_p cj_lotte Falcon

CoolClaret
Posts: 9813
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3104 times
Has Liked: 3100 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by CoolClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:45 pm

yTib wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:42 pm
it's not on prime-time bbc1 though.

easily the point.
Mind-boggling that folk can't quite grasp this very simple point

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by aggi » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:53 pm

yTib wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:37 pm
who has told you that you need to accept anything?

try going onto the growing up thread and telling me why you can't handle someone with a contrary opinion to yours.
Here you go. The first example I came across
https://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboa ... 0#p1856761

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by aggi » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:59 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:43 pm
You've totally missed the point of the argument.

You can totally go on to a cricket thread and say 'this game is being played at a poor standard' - case in point having criticism of why the Dutch were playing England in a O.D.I. would be fair game.

To come on and say 'this is rubbish' in regard to say, England's most recent Test against India then that would be objectively false.
That's because you've decided that the standard of women's football should be judged by the standard of men's football.

Obviously that isn't the case though, that's why they have different tournaments, leagues, etc.

It's like complaining that Dina Asher Smith won't best Usain Bolt.
These 2 users liked this post: wilks_bfc Falcon

CoolClaret
Posts: 9813
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3104 times
Has Liked: 3100 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by CoolClaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:03 am

aggi wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:59 pm
That's because you've decided that the standard of women's football should be judged by the standard of men's football.

Obviously that isn't the case though, that's why they have different tournaments, leagues, etc.

It's like complaining that Dina Asher Smith won't best Usain Bolt.
No it's more that there are severe blunders in literally every game - keepers getting lobbed for fun etc.. It's rank amateur

You don't get this in athletics/tennis/skiing/gymnastics for example

yTib
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 701 times
Location: Château d'If

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by yTib » Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:03 am

aggi wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:59 pm
That's because you've decided that the standard of women's football should be judged by the standard of men's football.

Obviously that isn't the case though, that's why they have different tournaments, leagues, etc.

It's like complaining that Dina Asher Smith won't best Usain Bolt.
a thread full of nonsense but that wins.

it's not about comparing men's sport with women's. it's about comparing one platform of entertainment with another.

that game tonight was like watching a bunch of blindfolded children. nothing to do with gender. just the standard.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34427
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:06 am

CoolClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:33 pm
*Sigh*
never mind lad, if that's the best you've got then I shouldn't have bothered

fidelcastro
Posts: 9266
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2748 times
Has Liked: 2740 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by fidelcastro » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:40 am

Vegas Claret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:06 am
never mind lad, if that's the best you've got then I shouldn't have bothered
UncoolClaret

Mattster
Posts: 1888
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:02 am
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 185 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Mattster » Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:45 am

yTib wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:03 am
a thread full of nonsense but that wins.

it's not about comparing men's sport with women's. it's about comparing one platform of entertainment with another.

that game tonight was like watching a bunch of blindfolded children. nothing to do with gender. just the standard.
For someone who can't understand why it's on prime time BBC you seem to be watching an awful lot of it.

I can't understand why anyone watches Love Island, byt you don't catch me watching every damn episode and then seeking out other people who do to complain about it though.
This user liked this post: tiger76

Bosscat
Posts: 28786
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9632 times
Has Liked: 20693 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Bosscat » Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:04 am

This thread should go the same way as the one with people arguing over the Badge and whether it was changed in 2015 🤭

For pities sake if you don't like Womens football DON'T BLOODY WATCH IT turn over and watch Netflix or summat else 🤣🤣🤣 but don't whine about it
This user liked this post: tiger76

dsr
Posts: 16197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:09 am

aggi wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:59 pm
That's because you've decided that the standard of women's football should be judged by the standard of men's football.

Obviously that isn't the case though, that's why they have different tournaments, leagues, etc.

It's like complaining that Dina Asher Smith won't best Usain Bolt.
To be fair, there were adverts all round the scrolling screens yesterday saying that women playing football should not be described as women's football, it's just football. Which means they want you to compare it with other sorts of football including men's; it's not a separate sport.

But as for various complaints (from other posters, not aggi) about it being on BBC1 - it gets high viewing figures. So why is there any objection? Not wanting to watch it is fine; complaining that other people shouldn't watch it even when they clearly want to - what's that about?

martin_p
Posts: 11083
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4060 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by martin_p » Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:27 am

Only just seen this thread, can never understand why people attempt to bring down something that others enjoy whether it be sport, tv, music or whatever. I found the match last night hugely entertaining, certainly more so than the average men’s England game, and surely that’s what it’s about. Everyone’s entitled to an opinion, but telling someone why something they enjoyed is rubbish is really just an attempt to suck the joy out of life. You’re entitled to be miserable but don’t try to bring everyone else down as well.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 Bosscat

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 937 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Hipper » Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:54 am

I like football. I've occasionally watched some women's football - Arsenal a few years ago before it all became professional. They were generally good but often their opponents were not, especially goalkeepers. It spoilt the whole game unfortunately.

I thought I'd have a peek at yesterday's England Norway game. It was 3-0 when I turned it on and it was 6-0 when I decided I'd had enough - about ten minutes or so. England players technically and in team play looked capable and tidy but they were so far above Norway the game wasn't enjoyable. If I supported England perhaps I'd enjoy it more.

I suppose I should check out a quarter final to see what's what. Germany-Spain doesn't appear to be on TV tonight?

martin_p
Posts: 11083
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4060 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by martin_p » Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:59 am

Hipper wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:54 am
I like football. I've occasionally watched some women's football - Arsenal a few years ago before it all became professional. They were generally good but often their opponents were not, especially goalkeepers. It spoilt the whole game unfortunately.

I thought I'd have a peek at yesterday's England Norway game. It was 3-0 when I turned it on and it was 6-0 when I decided I'd had enough - about ten minutes or so. England players technically and in team play looked capable and tidy but they were so far above Norway the game wasn't enjoyable. If I supported England perhaps I'd enjoy it more.

I suppose I should check out a quarter final to see what's what. Germany-Spain doesn't appear to be on TV tonight?
BBC2 7.30pm.
This user liked this post: Hipper

NottsClaret
Posts: 4235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2900 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by NottsClaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:03 am

Part of the problem is there's a lot of fat, lazy old men who only see sport as a TV show to entertain them. Never mind the millions of girls this inspires to actually go and play the sport and enjoy everything that brings.

That's what is really getting them wound up on here. The fact young and talented women are doing something they enjoy.. we can't have that, let's try and bring them down to our sad, tragic level.
This user liked this post: Bosscat

dsr
Posts: 16197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:10 am

NottsClaret wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:03 am
Part of the problem is there's a lot of fat, lazy old men who only see sport as a TV show to entertain them. Never mind the millions of girls this inspires to actually go and play the sport and enjoy everything that brings.

That's what is really getting them wound up on here. The fact young and talented women are doing something they enjoy.. we can't have that, let's try and bring them down to our sad, tragic level.
I'm sorry you're so bitter. People really aren't, by and large, as unpleasant as you seem to believe.

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by aggi » Tue Jul 12, 2022 11:30 am

yTib wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:03 am
a thread full of nonsense but that wins.

it's not about comparing men's sport with women's. it's about comparing one platform of entertainment with another.

that game tonight was like watching a bunch of blindfolded children. nothing to do with gender. just the standard.
Ah right, if we're comparing one platform of entertainment with another I can go back to saying cricket is boring and I don't understand why it's on tv so much when I want to watch Coronation street. As for F1, why do they keep showing that when I want to watch superbikes.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18550
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7611 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Rileybobs » Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:05 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:10 am
I'm sorry you're so bitter. People really aren't, by and large, as unpleasant as you seem to believe.
There’s a lot of misogyny on this forum. Surely you’ve seen it? On almost every single subject where women are discussed in fact.

Tribesmen
Posts: 5639
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1292 times
Has Liked: 691 times
Location: Tibet

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Tribesmen » Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:11 pm

From last night , now the pen was a shocker White went down like she had been shot and the ref fell for it .
I did think Norway looked ok until then but wow how they fell apart after that .
Lots of empty seats which i didn't think there would be , and one last thing i did notice that not one Black player was on the field for England .

Rowls
Posts: 14648
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5644 times
Has Liked: 5864 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Rowls » Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:14 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:09 am
To be fair, there were adverts all round the scrolling screens yesterday saying that women playing football should not be described as women's football, it's just football. Which means they want you to compare it with other sorts of football including men's; it's not a separate sport.
Yes, the adverts are silly. But women's football is not.

Longsidelenny1882
Posts: 910
Joined: Sun May 31, 2020 5:26 pm
Been Liked: 212 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Longsidelenny1882 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 12:37 pm

Not for me if they were playing int back yard I’d close the curtains roll on the proper stuff utc

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5233
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2943 times
Has Liked: 829 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by quoonbeatz » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:04 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:09 am
To be fair, there were adverts all round the scrolling screens yesterday saying that women playing football should not be described as women's football, it's just football. Which means they want you to compare it with other sorts of football including men's; it's not a separate sport.
That isn't what it means. It should be described as football beacuse it's the same sport, not because they want you to compare men's and women's teams, players or games.

dsr
Posts: 16197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:44 pm

quoonbeatz wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:04 pm
That isn't what it means. It should be described as football beacuse it's the same sport, not because they want you to compare men's and women's teams, players or games.
It might not be what they want it to mean, but it's what it does mean. I agree that women play football just as men play football and Billy's under 10's as mentioned above play football. And since they all play football they will be compared with each other.

There are arguments put forward that women's football shouldn't be compared with men's because it's a different game - women's football should be viewed as a sport in its own right. But if they want to make that argument, they can't simultaneously make the argument that it's the same game as the men.

Of course, it may be that different supporters of the women's game are putting forward different arguments. That way there is no inconsistency among anyone's viewpoint.

martin_p
Posts: 11083
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4060 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by martin_p » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:28 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:44 pm
It might not be what they want it to mean, but it's what it does mean. I agree that women play football just as men play football and Billy's under 10's as mentioned above play football. And since they all play football they will be compared with each other.

There are arguments put forward that women's football shouldn't be compared with men's because it's a different game - women's football should be viewed as a sport in its own right. But if they want to make that argument, they can't simultaneously make the argument that it's the same game as the men.

Of course, it may be that different supporters of the women's game are putting forward different arguments. That way there is no inconsistency among anyone's viewpoint.
Bet you’d go down a great at an under 10s match. ‘Great game Billy, you scored a hat-trick and your team won 3-2’. Dsr - ‘Great? I don’t think so, you were playing against 10 year olds Billy, you’d have been absolutely useless against the big Premier League defenders. Let’s face it Billy, in the grand scheme of world football you’re actually a bit rubbish!’

yTib
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 701 times
Location: Château d'If

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by yTib » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:30 pm

the further this thread goes, the more hysterical people are becoming.

Sproggy
Posts: 1607
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:41 pm
Been Liked: 713 times
Has Liked: 153 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Sproggy » Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:41 pm

quoonbeatz wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:04 pm
That isn't what it means. It should be described as football beacuse it's the same sport, not because they want you to compare men's and women's teams, players or games.

Last night the commentators pointed out that Ellen White is now second in the list of all time England goal scorers with only Wayne Rooney to catch.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5233
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2943 times
Has Liked: 829 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by quoonbeatz » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:03 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:44 pm
It might not be what they want it to mean, but it's what it does mean.
It means what it means, not what you want it to mean.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5233
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2943 times
Has Liked: 829 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by quoonbeatz » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:04 pm

Sproggy wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:41 pm
Last night the commentators pointed out that Ellen White is now second in the list of all time England goal scorers with only Wayne Rooney to catch.
I heard that. Thought it was ridiculous.

dsr
Posts: 16197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:06 pm

quoonbeatz wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:03 pm
It means what it means, not what you want it to mean.
Politicians through the ages have claimed that what they said was not what they meant. They don't get away with it.

dsr
Posts: 16197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by dsr » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:09 pm

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:28 pm
Bet you’d go down a great at an under 10s match. ‘Great game Billy, you scored a hat-trick and your team won 3-2’. Dsr - ‘Great? I don’t think so, you were playing against 10 year olds Billy, you’d have been absolutely useless against the big Premier League defenders. Let’s face it Billy, in the grand scheme of world football you’re actually a bit rubbish!’
I wouldn't be talking to a child I don't know anyway. But when deciding on which match to watch, I take into consideration which one is likely to give greater entertainment, and the men's is far more likely to produce good matches than the women's or the boys'.

I have actually seen a really good women's match. Greenland beat Aland 5-4, very entertaining. But I've seen a lot of dross as well.

CoolClaret
Posts: 9813
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3104 times
Has Liked: 3100 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by CoolClaret » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:16 pm

Sproggy wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:41 pm
Last night the commentators pointed out that Ellen White is now second in the list of all time England goal scorers with only Wayne Rooney to catch.
This is the disingenuous weird commentary/punditry I was alluding to.

I will make a disclaimer that it is getting better that what it has been - but I’d expect that when they’re literally training as professional footballers say to day.

I would howeve like to see the profit margin of the women’s game as a whole - there’s no doubt that mens football is heavily subsidising it…

I wonder how female athletes of other sports or lower league/grassroots clubs that are struggling for revenue (and are vital to the structure of the overall game) feel or would do with this level of subsidy?

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5233
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2943 times
Has Liked: 829 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by quoonbeatz » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:16 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:06 pm
Politicians through the ages have claimed that what they said was not what they meant. They don't get away with it.
Cool. Not seen any politicians commenting on this tbh.

martin_p
Posts: 11083
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4060 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by martin_p » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:16 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:09 pm
I wouldn't be talking to a child I don't know anyway. But when deciding on which match to watch, I take into consideration which one is likely to give greater entertainment, and the men's is far more likely to produce good matches than the women's or the boys'.

I have actually seen a really good women's match. Greenland beat Aland 5-4, very entertaining. But I've seen a lot of dross as well.
Sorry I thought you knew Billy, you referred to him in your post :lol:

So you can never apply any context to what your watching? Understand that entertainment isn’t primarily about the absolute skill of those involved but the ‘show’ itself? During my time as a Burnley supporter a lot of the most entertaining games were outside the top flight and therefore didn’t involve the very best players with the greatest skill and I’ve certainly seen lots of dross, both in the top flight and below. So how’s that different to women’s football?

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11591
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4726 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:20 pm

Sproggy wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 3:41 pm
Last night the commentators pointed out that Ellen White is now second in the list of all time England goal scorers with only Wayne Rooney to catch.
There was a highlight of a radio clip played where the woman reporter asked her if she was disappointed to have been subbed last night while being 1 goal behind Rooney as the highest all time scorer. Hard to think a dumber question that will be asked the whole tournament.

martin_p
Posts: 11083
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 4060 times
Has Liked: 745 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by martin_p » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:21 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:20 pm
There was a highlight of a radio clip played where the woman reporter asked her if she was disappointed to have been subbed last night while being 1 goal behind Rooney as the highest all time scorer. Hard to think a dumber question that will be asked the whole tournament.
Depends whether Garth Crooks is there.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11591
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4726 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:23 pm

martin_p wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:21 pm
Depends whether Garth Crooks is there.
:D :D

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3685
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1460 times
Has Liked: 358 times

Re: Women’s Euros 2022

Post by Big Vinny K » Tue Jul 12, 2022 4:28 pm

Some of the comments on this thread are embarrassing.
I’m a massive sports fan - football, cricket, golf and many others. I love playing them and I love watching many of them.
I prefer watching some to others and women’s football to be honest would not be near the top of my list - in a similar way that F1 or rugby league wouldn’t be either.
But I do appreciate that developing the womens game is extremely positive from all kinds of angles - not least of which is the impact it can have on physical and mental health for those increasing number of people who participate or just watch.

And I do regularly check for the Burnley FC Ladies scores and think their development in last couple of years is a good thing for the town. They won 9-0 I think I saw this week in a friendly.
This user liked this post: louieollie

Post Reply