This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
NL Claret
- Posts: 2763
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 338 times
Post
by NL Claret » Mon Mar 03, 2025 1:17 pm
CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:44 pm
Two things occur to me on this:
1. If games were reversed, and Hannibal had his incident in the cup, would he have been left out of a vital league match where combative players are needed for a derby on a cabbage patch? Not a chance.
2. If we had drawn Rovers, had they got through, would he have picked the same side? I think yes. That’s the reason I predicted straight after the draw that it could cost Parker his job in the medium term, drawing a local rival and knowing he would sack it off. My red danger alarm was flashing straight away. It may only haunt him in the summer of we fail. Had it been Rovers, the chants to resign would already have started. Naive and avoidable.
But it is now done. Two wins this week are now the minimum requirement. Then a sort of reset in relations can be declared.
Two things occur to me on this:
1. We are very well placed in the table and an FAC defeat will not cost Parker his job which will disappoint some UTC posters who have disliked Parker since day one. It was a sad prediction and sometimes you get the feeling that some want Parker to fail.
2. Two wins are not the minimum requirement at all however for some it will be. Even with 6 points the reset of relations (that some or maybe 1 UTC posters thinks) will not be reset.
-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Mon Mar 03, 2025 6:49 pm
dsr wrote: ↑Sun Mar 02, 2025 11:56 pm
I'm afraid you haven't understood what I said. I said that he as good as told the players that it didn't matter if we lost; you have understood that to mean that he actually wanted to lose. It's very different on two counts.
There have been plenty of people on here advocating wholesale team changes on the grounds that losing in the FA Cup doesn't matter. That's exactly what Parker did. If you don't believe that it was because Parker thinks the cup doesn't matter, then we can agree to differ.
Bore off
You're implying stuff which you know is garbage
He picked a team, gave a run out to some lads that would normally be good enough to win
He didn't pick a team to lose on purpose, or as good as told them that it didn't matter if they won or not
So many drama queen's on here these days spouting utter toss like you have
-
ksrclaret
- Posts: 7907
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
- Been Liked: 2987 times
- Has Liked: 855 times
Post
by ksrclaret » Mon Mar 03, 2025 6:58 pm
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 6:49 pm
Bore off
You're implying stuff which you know is garbage
He picked a team, gave a run out to some lads that would normally be good enough to win
He didn't pick a team to lose on purpose, or as good as told them that it didn't matter if they won or not
So many drama queen's on here these days spouting utter toss like you have
Go and cool off Sidney1st.
-
RMutt
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 pm
- Been Liked: 398 times
- Has Liked: 93 times
Post
by RMutt » Mon Mar 03, 2025 7:10 pm
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 6:49 pm
Bore off
You're implying stuff which you know is garbage
He picked a team, gave a run out to some lads that would normally be good enough to win
He didn't pick a team to lose on purpose, or as good as told them that it didn't matter if they won or not
So many drama queen's on here these days spouting utter toss like you have
No, it’s a bit more nuanced than losing on purpose or Parker actually telling them it doesn’t matter.
Players aren’t daft. They know whether the manager considers it to be a game that is a must win at all costs or not. And the team he picked gave them the message it wasn’t.
Two weeks earlier we’d managed a nil nil draw with more or less our strongest team
so to put out the team he did tells you ( and the players) all you need to know about the manager’s priorities.
The performance was pretty much what everyone expected once they’d seen the team.
-
jrgbfc
- Posts: 9708
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
- Been Liked: 2349 times
- Has Liked: 351 times
Post
by jrgbfc » Mon Mar 03, 2025 7:56 pm
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 6:49 pm
Bore off
You're implying stuff which you know is garbage
He picked a team, gave a run out to some lads that would normally be good enough to win
He didn't pick a team to lose on purpose, or as good as told them that it didn't matter if they won or not
So many drama queen's on here these days spouting utter toss like you have
Its really not that difficult to understand mate. Nobody is saying Parker stood up in the dressing room and told the lads to lose. If you can't see the message leaving out 7 or 8 of our regulars sends out then you're just being deliberately obtuse or determined to defend Parker at any cost.
-
dsr
- Posts: 16197
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 4855 times
- Has Liked: 2580 times
Post
by dsr » Tue Mar 04, 2025 12:08 am
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 6:49 pm
Bore off
You're implying stuff which you know is garbage
He picked a team, gave a run out to some lads that would normally be good enough to win
He didn't pick a team to lose on purpose, or as good as told them that it didn't matter if they won or not
So many drama queen's on here these days spouting utter toss like you have
Is that what passes for polite conversation in your world?