Yes. And if P*** is offensive then Aussie must be, too.TheFamilyCat wrote:Is "Mussie" really that offensive?
If so, then "Proddy" must be too.
Yet nobody commented on this:
Facile argument.
Yes. And if P*** is offensive then Aussie must be, too.TheFamilyCat wrote:Is "Mussie" really that offensive?
If so, then "Proddy" must be too.
Yet nobody commented on this:
TheFamilyCat wrote:Is "Mussie" really that offensive?
If so, then "Proddy" must be too.
Yet nobody commented on this:
I don't think my example is comparable to the P***/ Aussie argument. It is common knowledge that P***, like n****r was used historically as an insult and as a result is considered offensive.Greenmile wrote:Yes. And if P*** is offensive then Aussie must be, too.
Facile argument.
I’m pretty sure it’s a popular term amongst the type of people who also use the p-word. Usually spelled with z’s though.TheFamilyCat wrote:I don't think my example is comparable to the P***/ Aussie argument. It is common knowledge that P***, like n****r was used historically as an insult and as a result is considered offensive.
As far as I'm aware "Mussie" does not have the same history, if that is the right word.
That's not to say that it may not be offensive depending on the context it's used in.
They get all confused between what race they are and what religion they follow.Bin Ont Turf wrote:I still haven't worked out why the sandal wearers fall over themselves in a rush to shout 'racist' when Muslims are spoken about in a negative manner.
They throw it about that much, willy nilly, that the word 'racist' has lost all of its meaning.
".. The only reasons for U.S. presidents to circumvent the 22-year-old law by issuing waivers was to pretend that the U.S. would be a neutral broker towards some peace between the (East-)European colonists and Palestinians. That was from start to end a deception. Congress and U.S. presidents are under control of the Zionist Lobby which can marshal enormous amounts of money to make or defeat candidates for legislative or executive offices. The Zionist billionaire Sheldon Adelson, who also sponsors the fascist Israel Prime Minister Netanyahoo, donated more than $100 million to the Trump campaign and tens of millions to Congress races. Today was time for Trump to settle some of that debt...
....With the increasing buildup of Zionist settlements in the Palestinian West Bank areas under Netanyahu, the two-state solution had long been killed. The Palestinian dictator Mahmoud Abbas, who let this happen without resistance, is just a kapo used by the Israelis to keep the Palestinians down. The Palestinians in Gaza which defied the Zionist occupation were bombed whenever an Israeli Premier needed some diversion from domestic political trouble....
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2017/12/tr ... teous.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;"Trump has no idea how his declaration will backfire. In violating Int’l law & legitimizing Israel’s apartheid rule in Jerusalem, Int’l law will no longer serve as a framework for securing Palestinian rights- “from river to sea Palestine will be free” will be normalized discourse
Those parties that have resisted and continue to resist U.S. hegemony and the Zionists, will win in the public opinion of the Middle East. Those who cooperate with and enable the U.S. and its Zionist pendant will lose...."
I'll be honest, I have never heard or seen it used before.Greenmile wrote:I’m pretty sure it’s a popular term amongst the type of people who also use the p-word. Usually spelled with z’s though.
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/muzzie" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;TheFamilyCat wrote:I'll be honest, I have never heard or seen it used before.
As I said, I can understand how it may be used as an insult but I don't personally consider "Muzzie" as derogatory or offensive.
You'll be ignoring the 'slang' bit and go straight for the 'offensive' bit no doubt.Greenmile wrote:https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/muzzie
If you’ve never heard or seen it before, how can you consider it to be anything?
Thing is Muslims often identify themselves first and foremost as muslim. They take criticism of their religion so personally that it's difficult to separate the ideology from the actions of the person.Greenmile wrote:Criticism of Islam is perfectly acceptable. Criticism of (all) Muslims is bigoted, and whilst not technically racist, it’s in the same ballpark.
“Slang” and “offensive” aren’t mutually exclusive. The p word is slang, too. The third descriptor on the link was “racial slur”. These aren’t options - all three apply.Bin Ont Turf wrote:You'll be ignoring the 'slang' bit and go straight for the 'offensive' bit no doubt.
Bluelab asked you a question by the way. Care to answer?
Not most of the Muslims I know.ClaretMoffitt wrote:Thing is Muslims often identify themselves first and foremost as muslim. They take criticism of their religion so personally that it's difficult to separate the ideology from the actions of the person.
I feel the same way about Muslims as I do about Christians or any other religion.Greenmile wrote:Criticism of Islam is perfectly acceptable. Criticism of (all) Muslims is bigoted, and whilst not technically racist, it’s in the same ballpark.
You ever tried criticising their religion in front of them? I assume not because it would be rude and unnecessary, but if you did, you'd likely be met with a more hostile and defensive response than if you did the same with your average Christian or Jew, just saying.Greenmile wrote:Not most of the Muslims I know.
Nothing wrong with any of that and I feel much the same, but I’m sure you don’t hate on all theists like some of the islamophobes on here do to all Muslims.Sidney1st wrote:I feel the same way about Muslims as I do about Christians or any other religion.
I just think they're all odd and need to get a grip of themselves.
I saw it used for the first time and didn't consider it as anything until it was challenged. From that, it was clear some people find it offensive, which I personally don't.Greenmile wrote:https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/muzzie
If you’ve never heard or seen it before, how can you consider it to be anything?
You don’t think that constant criticism from people like you might make them a little defensive?ClaretMoffitt wrote:You ever tried criticising their religion in front of them? I assume not because it would be rude and unnecessary, but if you did, you'd likely be met with a more hostile and defensive response than if you did the same with your average Christian or Jew, just saying.
I think Theists are bonkers too.Greenmile wrote:Nothing wrong with any of that and I feel much the same, but I’m sure you don’t hate on all theists like some of the islamophobes on here do to all Muslims.
Cringe for the 'hate on all' Yankism.Greenmile wrote: don’t hate on all theists
Fair criticism.Bin Ont Turf wrote:Cringe for the 'hate on all' Yankism.
Do you read the same websites the Turtle does?
Greenmile wrote:Fair criticism.
I originally just wrote “hate”, but that seemed a bit strong, so “hate on” seemed a simple way to soften it.
Post 152barba wrote:I've not read the whole thread but has anyone mentioned the Israel Embassy Act 1995 and the vote in both the US Congress and the Senate which both ratified the position that the US Embassy should be moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem?
They forgot to add that they were peaceful Stable nations."we will burn you with the flames of war which you started in Iraq, Yemen, Libya and Syria and Afghan"