Retro Ban For Tarks?

[Steddyman]

All these people stating it was violent conduct and he deserves a ban, do you genuinely think Murray was so hurt he had to roll around on the floor in agony?

If he hadn't, if he had just shrugged it off, would it also have been violent conduct?

[Dark Cloud]

All these people stating it was violent conduct and he deserves a ban, do you genuinely think Murray was so hurt he had to roll around on he floor in agony?

If he hadn't, if he had just shrugged it off, would it also have been violent conduct?

Er, yes!

But I do take your point tbh and digressing slightly their player definitely got Arfield booked when the ref appeared to have decided it didn't warrant it. He kept rolling around for ages and eventually when the card finally came out he jumped up.

[tim_noone]

Er, yes!

But I do take your point tbh and digressing slightly their player definitely got Arfield booked when the ref appeared to have decided it didn't warrant it. He kept rolling around for ages and eventually when the card finally came out he jumped up.

I'm sure we will give them a nice warm welcome at turf moor.

[Tall Paul]

Er, yes!

But I do take your point tbh and digressing slightly their player definitely got Arfield booked when the ref appeared to have decided it didn't warrant it. He kept rolling around for ages and eventually when the card finally came out he jumped up.

Arfield didn't get booked.

[Dark Cloud]

Arfield didn't get booked.

I'd had few real ales in Brighton, but I'm sure he was carded. I'll check. Was it Taylor then? Barnes was booked for heading the goalkeeper into the back of the net which in the 60's was actually legal and positively encouraged!!!

[Bobzuruncle]

after the coverage I understand why Tarkowski has been charged but I am a little perplexed as to why Murray hasn’t for his deceiving of the ref - has this been explained elsewhere?