Afraid not, you’ll just have to keep relying on the 95% pony on the transfer rumours thread.
Wout is back
-
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
- Been Liked: 269 times
- Has Liked: 161 times
Re: Wout is back
Well we managed fine enough before a horse botherer infiltrated the Gawthorpe fences, im sure we’ll muddle through again.StayingDown4Ever wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 5:18 pmAfraid not, you’ll just have to keep relying on the 95% pony on the transfer rumours thread.
-
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1432 times
- Has Liked: 1585 times
Re: Wout is back
He's got the unlucky 13 squad number 
-
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1433 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Wout is back
I think it's a good number for a striker.
-
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 390 times
- Has Liked: 1317 times
Re: Wout is back
Welcome back, Wout.
Have a great season.
Have a great season.
-
- Posts: 6507
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1247 times
- Has Liked: 292 times
Re: Wout is back
Twine and Wout surely can be sing in the theme of twist and shout
These 3 users liked this post: k90bfc Jellybean spt_claret
-
- Posts: 9139
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2342 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Wout is back
I reckon he's asked for that deliberately.
Re: Wout is back
lucs86 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 4:41 pmOur CFs (Jay and Barnes) were constantly dropping deep, back to goal, holding off defenders for a flick or pass wide or into Tella running into the space they vacated. They did this all the time, all season.
Other parts of his game can be questioned but this is the exact role that WW excels at, that he always looks good doing, with us and what I saw at United. He is easily better than Jay and Barnes at it and would be absolutely suited to it in the PL.
I don't see us playing that way 100% of the time next season as defences will be higher, but I'd assume it'll still be the default tactic.
He's also massive and we're a pretty small side. When we play Brentford, Luton, Sheff Utd and other set piece teams he'll be very useful defensively.He’ll be good defensively,I’m 74 ,and I can jump higher than him,get shut.
He's paid for and in the door, he's rarely injured, good engine, and works very hard. Dyche's criticism was that he was trying to do too much. If he stays he'll be very good for us this season.
Weird thread this.
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: Wout is back
No. 13
Let's hope it turns out as well as it did for Joey Barton in 2015 / 16
Let's hope it turns out as well as it did for Joey Barton in 2015 / 16
Re: Wout is back
Jeff Hendrick wore 13 the season he scored that team goal at Everton.
Re: Wout is back
People mention him only scoring two goals for us in his last spell here…Jay only scored 2 league goals that season also & he had the whole season…
Could he have done better? Yes (but so could 95% of the side that season).
The club & team he left 12 months ago is completely different to the one he’s returned to now. VK ain’t stupid, he would’ve had numerous talks with WW & Alan Pace before welcoming him back to training. If he’s in the claret & blue shirt, then he should be getting the full backing of everyone. People potentially thinking about booing shouldn’t be anywhere near the Turf.
Could he have done better? Yes (but so could 95% of the side that season).
The club & team he left 12 months ago is completely different to the one he’s returned to now. VK ain’t stupid, he would’ve had numerous talks with WW & Alan Pace before welcoming him back to training. If he’s in the claret & blue shirt, then he should be getting the full backing of everyone. People potentially thinking about booing shouldn’t be anywhere near the Turf.
These 4 users liked this post: k90bfc Paul Waine longsidepies Cornwallclaret
Re: Wout is back
In fairness Jay was only ever given five minutes here or there that season. Dyche wanted a bettering ram up front. He wanted someone who could affect the "feel" in the box, whatever the hell that means.
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Wout is back
I'm not sure we have the choice to deny him access to his job without very good reason.BradTee93 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 6:56 pm
The club & team he left 12 months ago is completely different to the one he’s returned to now. VK ain’t stupid, he would’ve had numerous talks with WW & Alan Pace before welcoming him back to training. If he’s in the claret & blue shirt, then he should be getting the full backing of everyone. People potentially thinking about booing shouldn’t be anywhere near the Turf.
Re: Wout is back
Yeah having read that back I wasn’t clear was Iboatshed bill wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 7:05 pmI'm not sure we have the choice to deny him access to his job without very good reason.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
Re: Wout is back
If you consider how important Bash was for the way we played last season, surely there’s a chance that Weghorst could become a key player for us this coming season? He has similar qualities to Ash in terms of his work ethic, hold up play and both are underrated with the ball at their feet.
My only concern is if there is any bad blood between him and any other members of the squad, but I’m sure that can easily be sorted. As for us fans, if we are winning games and he’s scoring/assisting fairly regularly, we’ll be more than happy I reckon!
My only concern is if there is any bad blood between him and any other members of the squad, but I’m sure that can easily be sorted. As for us fans, if we are winning games and he’s scoring/assisting fairly regularly, we’ll be more than happy I reckon!
This user liked this post: k90bfc
Re: Wout is back
Course, all/most players will choose.
-
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
- Been Liked: 740 times
- Has Liked: 1923 times
Re: Wout is back
I do hope that you're proved right as none of our current options fill me with confidence; the problem is of course that unless a club has gazzilions to spend, proven goalscorers aren't that easy to find; if they were, then Wout wouldn't have got poached by United in January.
Re: Wout is back
Had an absolute storming game today. Can't wait to see him back at the turf
-
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
- Been Liked: 740 times
- Has Liked: 1923 times
Re: Wout is back




This user liked this post: Bosscat
Re: Wout is back
The latest lie made up by BFC fans to paint Wout in a negative light. The truth? He’s back when agreed, on time, the reason why later than others? Pretty simple, The FA Cup final was played on June 3rd, our last game was May 8th.Cirrus_Minor wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 5:51 pmHe seems to have rocked up for pre season a bit late, suggest that he might have been waiting for something away from Burnley.
-
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1433 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Wout is back
It is a bit of a shame for those of us that think he's just not good enough that a bunch of cranks, weirdos and body language understanders have come along for the ride.
-
- Posts: 12178
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5987 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Wout is back
Been in the Dutch squad as well, hasn't he?
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
- Been Liked: 722 times
- Has Liked: 2352 times
Re: Wout is back
Tony Philliskirk 2.0?AGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 5:51 pmHe's got the unlucky 13 squad number
Screenshot_20230714-174926_Chrome.jpg
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Wout is back
You are not wrong.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:27 pmIt is a bit of a shame for those of us that think he's just not good enough that a bunch of cranks, weirdos and body language understanders have come along for the ride.
I still think he'll be gone by the end of the window.
i've yet to see any proof that he is up to the weekly demands of the EPL
-
- Posts: 6625
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1238 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Wout is back
He has proved he is a league 1 player at best. So if he is our no1 striker. We get relegated. Even my daughter BF a Man Utd fan told his mates he would score 5 last season after watching him on the turf. He scored none. He will score none for us, hence we get relegated if we score no goals with our main striker.
-
- Posts: 6786
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2856 times
- Has Liked: 7024 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Wout is back
I’m glad he’s back. I like him and I think he’ll do well for us if he stays.
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Wout is back
Our system, as used last season, works despite getting few goals from our central striker (for want of a better title).Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:17 pmHe has proved he is a league 1 player at best. So if he is our no1 striker. We get relegated. Even my daughter BF a Man Utd fan told his mates he would score 5 last season after watching him on the turf. He scored none. He will score none for us, hence we get relegated if we score no goals with our main striker.
I'd have JR ahead of WW to start, Jay does have goals in his game.
Re: Wout is back
Madness. Just total and utter drivel.
-
- Posts: 9806
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3096 times
Re: Wout is back
Biggest load of ******** ever posted on UTC/Clarets MadLowbankclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:17 pmHe has proved he is a league 1 player at best. So if he is our no1 striker. We get relegated. Even my daughter BF a Man Utd fan told his mates he would score 5 last season after watching him on the turf. He scored none. He will score none for us, hence we get relegated if we score no goals with our main striker.
Absolutely 0 ‘league one strikers’ bag two in a World Cup quarter final against the eventual winners, or starts in a league cup final for Man United
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7609 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wout is back
Do you think any of our other centre forwards are good enough?daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 8:27 pmIt is a bit of a shame for those of us that think he's just not good enough that a bunch of cranks, weirdos and body language understanders have come along for the ride.
Re: Wout is back
A centre forward in a Kompany team is usually rather busy, and while you can't question Wout's workrate, I wonder how well he actually presses. (I don't actually wonder, that's a figure of speech.) You're an opposition defender with the ball at your feet looking for a pass and Wout is bearing down on you like a pensioner with a zimmer frame, you're thinking you've got all the time in the world.
-
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1433 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Wout is back
You get the sense that in Foster there's a lot of clay for the manager and coaches to work with, which can't truthfully be said as of Wout, in whom you know the limits of what you're getting. Jay is to a certain extent reliable; his form is rarely bad, he just gets injured more than anyone would like. Jay and Foster are good options enough for the other attackers to buzz around at least until January where we can assess where we're at, but in an ideal world we'd bring in a new first choice forward, especially with Obafemi (probably) missing the start of the season.
-
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1433 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Wout is back
I forgot about Obafemi, I feel the same on him as on Foster.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7609 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wout is back
I know the response is likely to be that you don’t know whether Foster will be good enough but you know that Weghorst won’t be - which is fair enough. But as things stand I’m pretty certain that Weghorst is the most capable and likely player to be lead the line. Whether he stays or goes I think we need to spend pretty big in that position, but with a lack of signings to date we’d be woefully short up top without him.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:26 pmFingers firmly crossed for Foster. Thought he looked generally decent.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7609 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wout is back
Will miss the start of the season though, and I presume it could be a number of weeks without him.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:35 pmI forgot about Obafemi, I feel the same on him as on Foster.
Re: Wout is back
With how confident and extroverted he is, and the fact he's almost at a hundred league games, you can easily forget how young Obefemi is. Just checked, he turned 23 a week ago.
-
- Posts: 3264
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1086 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: Wout is back
I know this board is about opinions. But if yours is anywhere near the idea that Wout is a L1 striker...your opinion is just wrong.
-
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1433 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Wout is back
I would add that Foster seems very likely to me to improve and Weghorst does notRileybobs wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:37 pmI know the response is likely to be that you don’t know whether Foster will be good enough but you know that Weghorst won’t be - which is fair enough. But as things stand I’m pretty certain that Weghorst is the most capable and likely player to be lead the line. Whether he stays or goes I think we need to spend pretty big in that position, but with a lack of signings to date we’d be woefully short up top without him.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Wout is back
Yeah, but Weghorst doesn't have to improve that much to be capable at this level, while Foster is still very young and has a long way to go (but like you, looked a lot more like it as the season went on, but its still a hell of leap to be effective at this level)daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:48 pmI would add that Foster seems very likely to me to improve and Weghorst does not
-
- Posts: 3876
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1136 times
- Has Liked: 1863 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: Wout is back
Weghorst was a regular starter for half a season in a team that finished 3rd in the premier leaguedaveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:48 pmI would add that Foster seems very likely to me to improve and Weghorst does not
Foster didn’t start hardly any games, if any in the championship
I would think that it’s more than likely if we don’t sign an alternative centre forward and WW stays that he will start almost every game until January in the Barnes role, not an out and out goal scoring striker but the focal point of attacks with others playing into him and off of him
I don’t know if I think Foster will start a premier league game up to January and that’s when dependant on success or failure we may have to sign a proper goal scoring centre forward and neither WW or Foster will start games
Re: Wout is back
Imagine claiming Wout is a bad player and bringing up his PL goal scoring record but completely ignoring Jays 2 Pl goals in his last 65 apps. Brilliant waffle as alwaysSpiral wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 9:34 pmYou get the sense that in Foster there's a lot of clay for the manager and coaches to work with, which can't truthfully be said as of Wout, in whom you know the limits of what you're getting. Jay is to a certain extent reliable; his form is rarely bad, he just gets injured more than anyone would like. Jay and Foster are good options enough for the other attackers to buzz around at least until January where we can assess where we're at, but in an ideal world we'd bring in a new first choice forward, especially with Obafemi (probably) missing the start of the season.
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Wout is back
Not necessarily using goals scored as a yardstick, who do you think is the better footballer?
Re: Wout is back
It's not hyperbolic but it is opinion. We spent a large part of last season with a centre forward who didn't score or assist many goals but was there to receive the ball and lay it off. Weghorst might work out in that role or he might not (and probably needs someone like Tella to play off him) but he's probably no worse an option than our other strikers.xxmunkyennuixx wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 3:23 pmIt is not hyperbolic to state he is too limited in terms of mobility and physicality to be of use. We have seen nothing in his spell with us or on loan at United to demonstrate how he will work inside the systems and tactics we employed last season. He has built a fairly decent sample size for himself - how many goals, how many chances created? Four assists and two goals in Premier League football. I think I have that right. Some of this on loan at United... an elite team and he still didn't score or provide chances.
Already covered United's predicament and international football. Players are sometimes signed as stop gaps eg. Falcao, Larsson, Ighalo. United have a history of it.
I will not be sat at the ground launching abuse at him. I would expect us to be struggling in the bottom three with him in the team. We can do better, I think we will sign better. I expect he will be sold making this thread redundant in many ways.
But all those posters saying that he's crap or championship or even league one standard, that's really getting carried away.
Re: Wout is back
I'm holding Wout to his flimsy goalscoring record because he doesn't do enough outside of the goalscoring part of being a forward to warrant the kind of forbearance afforded to Jay (and Barnes last season after his renaissance, though admittedly Barnes looked well past it at PL level under Dyche, but then so did everyone). Wout is just...there...he runs a lot without affecting play, pressing fairly ineffectively, with the odd "nice touch", the odd bit of chest control, which is nothing Jay can't also do, except Jay is a more aggressive player with a penchant for shooting from anywhere — low back lift, ball right under his feet, loads of power on it — and even if he doesn't score it can occasionally cause problems for defences in the next phase of play, either from a parried save or a block. And despite being shorter, Jay is far better header of the ball. Not for his quality but out of sheer desperation, ManU took a punt on Wout and played him in the exact role we will be using him, and for all the talent around him at UTD he did basically nothing. That's kinda worrying.
This user liked this post: xxmunkyennuixx
-
- Posts: 4874
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1245 times
- Has Liked: 1468 times
Re: Wout is back
Yeah, of course, he was raring to get back
Re: Wout is back
Weghorst by an absolute distance, it’s not really close in most areas.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:37 pmNot necessarily using goals scored as a yardstick, who do you think is the better footballer?
Re: Wout is back
Weghorst by an absolute distance, it’s not really close in most areas.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 10:37 pmNot necessarily using goals scored as a yardstick, who do you think is the better footballer?
Re: Wout is back
More long paragraphs of nothingness. Weghorst was excellent dropping deep and linking play, that assists for Rodriguez (Man Utd home) was pure quality. For a big slow guy he didn’t half wriggle out of tackles on the halfway line and spray it wide with quality. Ran his absolute arse off from the front too. His goal scoring record is questionable, the rest of his game isn’t.Spiral wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 11:20 pmI'm holding Wout to his flimsy goalscoring record because he doesn't do enough outside of the goalscoring part of being a forward to warrant the kind of forbearance afforded to Jay (and Barnes last season after his renaissance, though admittedly Barnes looked well past it at PL level under Dyche, but then so did everyone). Wout is just...there...he runs a lot without affecting play, pressing fairly ineffectively, with the odd "nice touch", the odd bit of chest control, which is nothing Jay can't also do, except Jay is a more aggressive player with a penchant for shooting from anywhere — low back lift, ball right under his feet, loads of power on it — and even if he doesn't score it can occasionally cause problems for defences in the next phase of play, either from a parried save or a block. And despite being shorter, Jay is far better header of the ball. Not for his quality but out of sheer desperation, ManU took a punt on Wout and played him in the exact role we will be using him, and for all the talent around him at UTD he did basically nothing. That's kinda worrying.
As for Jay, you’re clutching at straws mentioning his shooting ability when his goal record is worse than Wouts.
-
- Posts: 4874
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1245 times
- Has Liked: 1468 times
Re: Wout is back
I don't like them, never have, but I think that most people will agree that Manchester United are a better attacking side than we are or potentially will be next season. Weghorst scored 2 goals as a striker for Manchester United during his 38 match stint with that club so how many is he likely to score for us. Our survival next season will depend upon how many goals we score, maybe someone can explain how Wout will help in this regard.