RingoMcCartney wrote:To get the money to potentially spend on the NHS, we have to actually LEAVE and stop paying. We haven't left yet.
Hope that helps.
There are many benefits that we MIGHT enjoy post Brexit, and I'm with some people on this. But the economic argument doesn't add up. Never has. Never will. I think that even the majority of "leave" voters understand this. Their argument is that being economically less prosperous is a price worth paying for "independence". (You can agree or disagree with this stance).
It's difficult to see how the relatively low cost of EU membership, (in percentage terms of the economy, that is), can cover the costs of paying for all the alternative measures that will then have to be put in place, and that's even before we start to consider the hit to the overall economy in terms of trade, tax-take etc.
Going for the so-called "soft" option is now almost inevitable, because of pressure from business, backed by a large proportion of the population, but whilst the likes of JMG continue to raise the possibility of a "no deal" there remains an unhealthy air of uncertainty that is very bad for business in general. Many businesses are already making contingencies based on a "No deal" scenario, and once these plans are in place they are highly likely to stick with them. The clock is definitely ticking.
This user liked this post: Lancasterclaret