This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
Sidney1st
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Post
by Sidney1st » Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:52 am
Imploding Turtle wrote:But it's wrong. So i guess you're fine about that and accept it. Right?
It's neither here nor there to me if it's right or wrong.
I've stopped caring about that now.
Have fun fapping away.
-
UpTheBeehole
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Post
by UpTheBeehole » Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:57 am
Sidney1st wrote:
Anyway, have fun being a smug arse, you do seem to enjoy it.

-
IndigoLake
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 949 times
Post
by IndigoLake » Wed Apr 18, 2018 12:32 pm
How on earth did a thread about Gary Lineker get to be 253 (now 254) posts long? Sensational stuff.
-
KRBFC
- Posts: 19190
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
- Been Liked: 4003 times
- Has Liked: 1079 times
Post
by KRBFC » Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:44 pm
Is this still going on? impressive
-
Vino blanco
- Posts: 5714
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 2038 times
- Has Liked: 2068 times
Post
by Vino blanco » Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:52 pm
All I said in post 5 was that Lineker's contract should be cancelled in order to save the taxpayer his £2 1/2 million salary. I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition!
-
UpTheBeehole
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Post
by UpTheBeehole » Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:58 pm
Vino blanco wrote:All I said in post 5 was that Lineker's contract should be cancelled in order to save the taxpayer his £2 1/2 million salary. I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition!
It wouldn't save the taxpayer anything, he's not paid by central government.
-
Tall Paul
- Posts: 7440
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
- Been Liked: 2651 times
- Has Liked: 735 times
Post
by Tall Paul » Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:20 pm
Vino blanco wrote:All I said in post 5 was that Lineker's contract should be cancelled in order to save the taxpayer his £2 1/2 million salary. I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition!
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
-
john'sroseyspecs
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:14 pm
- Been Liked: 364 times
Post
by john'sroseyspecs » Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:36 pm
Apparently they had to write to you to tell you they were coming. Oh, and i think Lineker's ok!
-
Damo
- Posts: 4576
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1799 times
- Has Liked: 2777 times
Post
by Damo » Wed Apr 18, 2018 6:13 pm
To be honest, I thought he would of taken a voluntary pay cut in solidarity with women employees when all that kicked off a while ago
-
Stan Tastic
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
- Been Liked: 475 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Post
by Stan Tastic » Wed Apr 18, 2018 7:10 pm
Has Gary replied to Joey after this exchange on Twitter? It was six years ago.
The spat continued today after Lineker tweeted: "@joey7barton Still raging then? Still kicking out? And still, presumably, misunderstood? But only by yourself I suspect."
Barton appeared to threaten Lineker in response, posting: "@GaryLineker do u wanna go there publicly "Mr Squeaky Clean" ? Think u should have a look in that vast closet of skeltons (sic) before u respond.
"@GaryLineker I know a lot about THAT side to u the people don't and won't bat an eye lid at exposing u. So mind ur manners Squeaky...
"@GaryLineker now back under your stone you odious little toad..."
-
Imploding Turtle
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Post
by Imploding Turtle » Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:27 pm
Stan Tastic wrote:Has Gary replied to Joey after this exchange on Twitter? It was six years ago.
Do you know how easy it is to make insinuations like that even if they're untrue?
-
Imploding Turtle
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Post
by Imploding Turtle » Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:29 pm
Damo wrote:To be honest, I thought he would of taken a voluntary pay cut in solidarity with women employees when all that kicked off a while ago
So you think to protest his employers paying women less than men he should give some of his wage back to his employers?
-
Stan Tastic
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
- Been Liked: 475 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Post
by Stan Tastic » Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:20 pm
Imploding Turtle wrote:Do you know how easy it is to make insinuations like that even if they're untrue?
No, enlighten me.
It seemed odd to just leave it at that after lecturing him on his behaviour.
-
Damo
- Posts: 4576
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1799 times
- Has Liked: 2777 times
Post
by Damo » Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:23 pm
Imploding Turtle wrote:So you think to protest his employers paying women less than men he should give some of his wage back to his employers?
I didn't say I think he should. (I wouldn't if I was him)
I said I thought he may have done, given that he considers equality to be so important
-
Imploding Turtle
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Post
by Imploding Turtle » Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:26 pm
Damo wrote:I didn't say I think he should. (I wouldn't if I was him)
I said I thought he may have done, given that he considers equality to be so important
But that'd be a really dumb way to encourage equality; rewarding his employer for the inequality.
-
Damo
- Posts: 4576
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1799 times
- Has Liked: 2777 times
Post
by Damo » Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:50 pm
Imploding Turtle wrote:But that'd be a really dumb way to encourage equality; rewarding his employer for the inequality.
I think so too Charlie.
See we do have something in common.
Welcome to the dark side