Fact according to many well known journos on the WBA side and even Nixon said so.jtv wrote:Fact or..........................................fiction as usual?
ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Re: £25million bid for Dawson & Rodriguez
-
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 1219 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: £25million bid for Dawson & Rodriguez
Everything has a value - just because it is for sale at one price doesn't mean you have a buyer for it at that price. My son bought a second hand car last week in a private sale. It was offered at one price but he, and presumably the seller, both came away happy with a deal of £750 off the asking price.KRBFC wrote:They're pretty easy to deal with, pay the valuation and you can have the player. Last time we low balled and begged for Dawson for practically free instead of paying the small fee of £3.25 million to just get the deal done.
Football transfers exist in a world where there are multi millions of £ flying around - that does not mean there are unlimited amounts available and BFC have, rightly, been cautious about spending money above their valuation of a player's worth to the squad. I'm sure that even ManUre, PSG, Real Madrid and the other super rich clubs have their own valuations of each player's worth to the team which is why you often see negotiations break down.
Re: £25million bid for Dawson & Rodriguez
Yeah but haggling over £300,000 when we had received a fortune from promotion was pretty laughable. We should've paid the fee, shown the trust in Dyche and backed him by bringing in Dawson who was clearly one of his main targets. Same thing with Lansbury, Hendrick & Stephens what a mess we were back then, funny Lansbury went to Villa not long after for just £2.75M.bfcmik wrote:Everything has a value - just because it is for sale at one price doesn't mean you have a buyer for it at that price. My son bought a second hand car last week in a private sale. It was offered at one price but he, and presumably the seller, both came away happy with a deal of £750 off the asking price.
Football transfers exist in a world where there are multi millions of £ flying around - that does not mean there are unlimited amounts available and BFC have, rightly, been cautious about spending money above their valuation of a player's worth to the squad. I'm sure that even ManUre, PSG, Real Madrid and the other super rich clubs have their own valuations of each player's worth to the team which is why you often see negotiations break down.
-
- Posts: 11868
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4815 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Some actually believe the guff they type about transfers with no idea at all.
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Any substance to this ?claretcarrot93 wrote:Dawson fee has been agreed. Still negotiating on J-rod so I here
Re: £25million bid for Dawson & Rodriguez
Presumably if we hadn't been such a mess, we wouldn't have got stuck with the likes of Defour and Cork in midfield.KRBFC wrote:... what a mess we were back then ...

-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: £25million bid for Dawson & Rodriguez
I’m sort of on your side but not haggling got us Keane and Tarks.KRBFC wrote:Yeah but haggling over £300,000 when we had received a fortune from promotion was pretty laughable. We should've paid the fee, shown the trust in Dyche and backed him by bringing in Dawson who was clearly one of his main targets. Same thing with Lansbury, Hendrick & Stephens what a mess we were back then, funny Lansbury went to Villa not long after for just £2.75M.
Re: £25million bid for Dawson & Rodriguez
Did we not get Cork before the start of 17-18? your memory must be giving up on you.dsr wrote:Presumably if we hadn't been such a mess, we wouldn't have got stuck with the likes of Defour and Cork in midfield.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
It's the decisions of the past that have put us where we are now. It's futile to spend time banging on about how things went wrong when it's quite obvious they didn't go wrong.
We don't know what would have happened if we had signed Lansbury. But we know what did happen when we didn't sign Lansbury, and I have no complaints.
We don't know what would have happened if we had signed Lansbury. But we know what did happen when we didn't sign Lansbury, and I have no complaints.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
No it doesn`tClaretLoup wrote:We are in a new reality now. "Better than what we have got already" means signing Top Six players.
I could name you many players outside of the top 6 sides who would improve our first eleven - many out of our reach. Zaha would be one but there are many others.
Just because we finished 7th does not mean we are the 7th best team in the league.
Not sure what new reality world you live in but if you think that the only players who could improve our team are from the top 6 teams then you are on a different planet....and will be sadly disappointed by our signings !!
These 3 users liked this post: DCWat KRBFC ecc
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
I never said it went wrong, my point was actually we seem to have improved in the market since the relegation year hence the comment ''we were a mess back then'' (in terms of transfer policy with that Darnborough fella)dsr wrote:It's the decisions of the past that have put us where we are now. It's futile to spend time banging on about how things went wrong when it's quite obvious they didn't go wrong.
We don't know what would have happened if we had signed Lansbury. But we know what did happen when we didn't sign Lansbury, and I have no complaints.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
-
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:16 am
- Been Liked: 694 times
- Has Liked: 670 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Nixon reporting they want £35M for both
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
At last! Something interesting to read!ArmchairDetective wrote:Nixon reporting they want £35M for both
-
- Posts: 20656
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4542 times
- Has Liked: 2050 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
If that's true, offer em thirty, then walk away.ArmchairDetective wrote:Nixon reporting they want £35M for both
-
- Posts: 8762
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1883 times
- Has Liked: 2249 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Does Dixon moonlight on Talkshite radio.They specialise in nonsense too
-
- Posts: 7847
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 3108 times
- Has Liked: 4870 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Its "Nixon "
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
I think £25m is a lot TBH.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
In this market, I don’t think it’s excessive.ecc wrote:I think £25m is a lot TBH.
Two of their best players from last season, albeit a poor one and from some comments, a belief from WBA fans that Dawson is good enough for England (how good might he be under Dyche?) whilst we know what Rodriguez can bring.
It’s two positions we are certainly short in and bringing in two players at a decent age with plenty PL experience won’t come cheap.
-
- Posts: 8276
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4139 times
- Has Liked: 1144 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
£30-35m is the going rate i would say, for example Hendrick and Wood cost us a combined £25m with no Premier League experience, and that was a year and two years ago.
A perfectly reasonable amount and we haven’t dicked around with a lowball offer like is normal for us, £25m was a good opening offer but was never going to be enough.
I think we can get it done for £30m plus add ons, and I think we will too.
A perfectly reasonable amount and we haven’t dicked around with a lowball offer like is normal for us, £25m was a good opening offer but was never going to be enough.
I think we can get it done for £30m plus add ons, and I think we will too.
These 2 users liked this post: piston broke Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 381 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Puts it into perspective when you put it like that, to be fair.jedi_master wrote:£30-35m is the going rate i would say, for example Hendrick and Wood cost us a combined £25m with no Premier League experience, and that was a year and two years ago.
A perfectly reasonable amount and we haven’t dicked around with a lowball offer like is normal for us, £25m was a good opening offer but was never going to be enough.
I think we can get it done for £30m plus add ons, and I think we will too.
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Excellent point re:Hendrick and Woods’ price.jedi_master wrote:£30-35m is the going rate i would say, for example Hendrick and Wood cost us a combined £25m with no Premier League experience, and that was a year and two years ago.
A perfectly reasonable amount and we haven’t dicked around with a lowball offer like is normal for us, £25m was a good opening offer but was never going to be enough.
I think we can get it done for £30m plus add ons, and I think we will too.
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 519 times
- Has Liked: 266 times
- Location: Malaga Spain
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Both are 29 next on this site https://wtransfermarktww..co.uk/craig-dawson/profil/spieler/121477" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
it values Dawson at £7.20m maybe wide of the mark and if we offered that we would be accused of tabling a derisory offer and probably laughed out
10 million Dawson is limit and 18 for Jay and that should be it 28 mil package if not forget it
it values Dawson at £7.20m maybe wide of the mark and if we offered that we would be accused of tabling a derisory offer and probably laughed out
10 million Dawson is limit and 18 for Jay and that should be it 28 mil package if not forget it
-
- Posts: 17395
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3570 times
- Has Liked: 7849 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
I'm not sure about this "deal"
Where is the long-term planning? £28-£30m is a fair chunk of our likely transfer budget, unless SD knows a couple of our first team regulars wish to leave, which would change things dramatically.
Where is the long-term planning? £28-£30m is a fair chunk of our likely transfer budget, unless SD knows a couple of our first team regulars wish to leave, which would change things dramatically.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
I think we'd all like to see Jay back at Burnley. But look at his position, record since he was first injured and the risk of further injuries and £20m is a lot of money.
Dawson: whether Ben says or not (and I'm beginning to think it will end in tears) we need another CB. I'd say that he would be a priority over Jay.
Dawson: whether Ben says or not (and I'm beginning to think it will end in tears) we need another CB. I'd say that he would be a priority over Jay.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
If the tv deal is worth less surely transfer fees and wages should not be increasing at the same astronomical rate as before.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Is the TV deal worth less ?
The overseas rights are now more than the domestic rights and have been increasing significantly. The domestic rights have definitely slowed down but I thought the overall deal was still the highest one ever (I maybe wrong).
On this particular deal I think £30m should be the maximum. Jay`s value should not be that much more than what West Prom paid for him - he had an ok season but nothing to justify a current value of more than £18m / £19m. Dawson at about £11m / £12m feels about right for someone with his experience (and a big benefit of being able to cover 2 positions).
Getting rid of Wells, Walters and Bardsley would save us at least £60k a week...and we may recoup a 2 or 3 million in fees (if we were lucky). The increase in the wage bill by bringing in Jay and Dawson and getting rid of these 3 would probably be around £50k a week and the difference is we have 2 players who could both play in the first eleven.
I do get the point that both these players` values are only likely to depreciate in the future given their age. But if we end up getting a silly offer on Pope or Tarks the profit we make on either one of these players pays for both Dawson and JayRod. At the same time it is important that we keep on looking and buying the next Tarks, JBG, Pope, Keane etc.
For everyone out of the top 6 teams that is the model we all have to work with...we seem to be doing it pretty well at the moment but it does only take two or three £20m mistakes and a couple of baron years in finding and developing bargains and you are in a mess like Stoke, West Brom, Swansea etc.
The overseas rights are now more than the domestic rights and have been increasing significantly. The domestic rights have definitely slowed down but I thought the overall deal was still the highest one ever (I maybe wrong).
On this particular deal I think £30m should be the maximum. Jay`s value should not be that much more than what West Prom paid for him - he had an ok season but nothing to justify a current value of more than £18m / £19m. Dawson at about £11m / £12m feels about right for someone with his experience (and a big benefit of being able to cover 2 positions).
Getting rid of Wells, Walters and Bardsley would save us at least £60k a week...and we may recoup a 2 or 3 million in fees (if we were lucky). The increase in the wage bill by bringing in Jay and Dawson and getting rid of these 3 would probably be around £50k a week and the difference is we have 2 players who could both play in the first eleven.
I do get the point that both these players` values are only likely to depreciate in the future given their age. But if we end up getting a silly offer on Pope or Tarks the profit we make on either one of these players pays for both Dawson and JayRod. At the same time it is important that we keep on looking and buying the next Tarks, JBG, Pope, Keane etc.
For everyone out of the top 6 teams that is the model we all have to work with...we seem to be doing it pretty well at the moment but it does only take two or three £20m mistakes and a couple of baron years in finding and developing bargains and you are in a mess like Stoke, West Brom, Swansea etc.
-
- Posts: 3245
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
If this is the case why don't we move the Dawson signing forward? Does he have to hold hands with Jay and sign at exactly the same time?!claretcarrot93 wrote:Dawson fee has been agreed. Still negotiating on J-rod so I here
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley to raid the Baggies?
Jakubs Tash wrote:If this is the case why don't we move the Dawson signing forward? Does he have to hold hands with Jay and sign at exactly the same time?!
Because it's bo11ocks, and people want to try and pretend they have friends in high places and compete to try and break the news first to say " I told you so"
Agent_Claret says has inside info and we've signed a Newcastle player, but no one can confirm it yet for some strange reason...
What a load of tosh