Rovers demise bad for the game.

Top Claret · Post by **Top Claret** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:56 pm

Blackburn Rovers are good for football, they are a shinning example to others of how not to run a football club.

I believe we made a profit of £30 million plus in the last financial year and a similar amount in the previous year, this is a fantastic achievement, and if we achieve our EPL status this season even better. We are building our club on solid foundations a club, that can stand a relegation knock and not fall apart, unlike Rovers.

Jack Walker built BRFC on sinking sand. Correct me if I am wrong but I don't recall BRFC ever making a profit, he just threw good money after bad, and finally the inevitable is now happening.

Walkers Trust could not wait to get rid of the club to the first set of mugs who came along and what a fine job they are doing.

Long live the Venkys and lets all raise a glass to the demise of B****RD ROVERS.

Guich · Post by **Guich** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:10 pm

ShabbaRanks wrote:A couple of throwaway comments and he's made a 40 comment thread.

You lot want a word with yourselves, he wouldn't keep coming back if you didn't bite harder than a saltwater crocodile.

Lemmings.

Oh come on Shabba! How can any Claret not find the Blackburn saga hilarious? Any chance to have another laugh is always welcome.
It's better than watching repeats of Blackadder

Sidney1st · Post by **Sidney1st** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:12 pm

Guich wrote:Oh come on Shabba! How can any Claret not find the Blackburn saga hilarious? Any chance to have another laugh is always welcome.
It's better than watching repeats of Blackadder

The Rovers saga is pretty much a laugh a week too.

'Tune in next week to see what happens....'

Saxoman · Post by **Saxoman** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:49 pm

HiroshimaClaret wrote:Never minded your posts, Saxoman and a few have entertained me BUT this one HAS to be THE most non-sensical one I have ever read on this forum. It is beyond comprehension.

As a Rovers fan and continuing on your favourite subject of names, maybe you should rename yourself PAXOMAN as Rovers are pretty well stuffed.

I'm sorry pal, it was early hours, I couldn't sleep and was feeling a bit mischievous. The whole thread is meant to be a joke, can't believe the responses!

evensteadiereddie · Post by **evensteadiereddie** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:51 pm

Why, what the hell did you expect ?

Saxoman · Post by **Saxoman** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:56 pm

evensteadiereddie wrote:Why, what the hell did you expect ?

To be seen right through.. Can't believe anyone would really believe I meant it!

Sorry again Hiroshima, I know its where you live of course..

claretdom · Post by **claretdom** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:10 pm

Looks like you outwitted everyone again saxo

Obviously nobody else is on your level.... thank f***

hoskinsgoalatswansea · Post by **hoskinsgoalatswansea** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:10 pm

Saxoman wrote:To be seen right through.. Can't believe anyone would really believe I meant it!

Sorry again Hiroshima, I know its where you live of course..

I smell bullshite on both accounts here. You weren't fishing, and you didn't know, or have the sense, to work out the reason for Hiroshima's username. Back tracking to save face if ever I've seen it.

Saxoman · Post by **Saxoman** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:11 pm

hoskinsgoalatswansea wrote:I smell bullshite on both accounts here. You weren't fishing, and you didn't know, or have the sense, to work out the reason for Hiroshima's username. Back tracking to save face if ever I've seen it.

I've never seen you post here before, hence I don't know you and you clearly don't know me if that's your opinion.

Look up the 9/11 thread..

Walton · Post by **Walton** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:14 pm

Saxoman wrote:I'm sorry pal, it was early hours, I couldn't sleep and was feeling a bit mischievous. The whole thread is meant to be a joke, can't believe the responses!

For a joke, it turned out to be utterly hilarious. I certainly laughed my head off when typing my contribution to this thread. Still laughing now to be honest. Hahaha, Rovers are f*cked.

Saxoman · Post by **Saxoman** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:16 pm

claretdom wrote:Looks like you outwitted everyone again saxo

Obviously nobody else is on your level.... thank f***

Its easy, just observe Burnley's fans worst perceptions of rovers fans and play on it..

hoskinsgoalatswansea · Post by **hoskinsgoalatswansea** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:18 pm

Saxoman wrote:I've never seen you post here before, hence I don't know you and you clearly don't know me if that's your opinion.

Look up the 9/11 thread..

You're right I don't post much, but I'm a regular viewer, and see enough of your posts. Don't have any real issues, or interest for that matter, with much of what you post. I'm fairly indifferent to your input. I was just pointing out that that was a clear case of backtracking to save face.

Saxoman · Post by **Saxoman** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:18 pm

Walton wrote:For a joke, it turned out to be utterly hilarious. I certainly laughed my head off when typing my contribution to this thread. Still laughing now to be honest. Hahaha, Rovers are f*cked.

Then why the angry tone?

Saxoman · Post by **Saxoman** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:19 pm

hoskinsgoalatswansea wrote:You're right I don't post much, but I'm a regular viewer, and see enough of your posts. Don't have any real issues, or interest for that matter, with much of what you post. I'm fairly indifferent to your input. I was just pointing out that that was a clear case of backtracking to save face.

Everyone's entitled to an opinion.

yorkyclaret · Post by **yorkyclaret** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:45 pm

Having known him longer than most on here, I knew straight away it was a fishing trip, however it could raise the question should a small club be allowed, in future, to be ruined by a sugar daddy?

HiroshimaClaret · Post by **HiroshimaClaret** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:05 pm

Saxoman wrote:To be seen right through.. Can't believe anyone would really believe I meant it!

Sorry again Hiroshima, I know its where you live of course..

No worries, mate. Have a good weekend barring events in Anglia today.

SabdenGrandpubah · Post by **SabdenGrandpubah** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:40 pm

Talking of demises, feast your eyes on what has to be the finest ever thread on the rovers' forum, where resident head-the-ball Abbey (a man who you can guarantee sits in front of an alchopop splattered screen, and a variety of digestive biscuit crumbs lodged in his t-shirt folds), finally self-combusts. Tremendous scenes!

http://www.brfcc.com/mb/index.php/topic ... als/page-3" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Lord Beamish · Post by **Lord Beamish** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:58 pm

Link not taking me to thread. What's the name of the thread?

claretdom · Post by **claretdom** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:03 pm

Link isn't working but it is also a safe bet the other complete goon tomphil features on the same thread

Sidney1st · Post by **Sidney1st** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:09 pm

I'm guessing an admin has deleted it to avoid anymore embarrassment

ElectroClaret · Post by **ElectroClaret** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:13 pm

They really are a bunch of herberts on that site.

Completely deluded.

SabdenGrandpubah · Post by **SabdenGrandpubah** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:14 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Link not taking me to thread. What's the name of the thread?

Link works for me, it's in
'Thread Removals' in 'Ask Admin' section

Try again...

http://www.brfcc.com/mb/index.php/topic ... als/page-3

claretdom · Post by **claretdom** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:17 pm

Looks like you need to join up to read it.

The thought of being registered to something with that lot is too much.

Sidney1st · Post by **Sidney1st** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:19 pm

Must be only for certain sections, the rest of the normal forum is open for laughs.

Sidney1st · Post by **Sidney1st** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:20 pm

At least one of them is looking at the positives of relegation, new grounds to visit.

http://www.brfcc.com/mb/index.php/topic ... son/page-1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Also good for a laugh.

http://www.brfcc.com/mb/index.php/topic ... ost/page-1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ElectroClaret · Post by **ElectroClaret** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:21 pm

Yes, says "you do not have permission.......Etc."

Better off putting "brfcc" into your search box to get round that.

Right_winger · Post by **Right_winger** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:23 pm

Who's up for setting up a crowd funding page to fly a plane over deadwood on their final home game of the season. A vote for the most hilarious message can be had on here.

ElectroClaret · Post by **ElectroClaret** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:26 pm

Yes, right winger, if they're definitely being relegated we've got to do summat like that.

The occasion must be marked.

claretdom · Post by **claretdom** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:26 pm

If it is capable of a drone strike I will kick it off with £100

Right_winger · Post by **Right_winger** » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:31 pm

Anything to ruffle a few feathers of that lot. Interestingly it's not as overly expensive as I was expecting £595 for an hour...

http://www.airads.co.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.