Was it a pen ?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Stayingup
Posts: 5953
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 986 times
Has Liked: 2988 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Stayingup » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:43 pm

Fact is this referee is very poor and today was very pro Arsenal.
These 3 users liked this post: Silkyskills1 Rumpelstiltskin tim_noone

Pimlico_Claret
Posts: 1302
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 614 times
Has Liked: 680 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Pimlico_Claret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:54 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:I'm surprised that Mason didn't snatch the ball from Sanchez and take the Pen himself.
He would have had to take his turn behind the liner on the Longside today, deserved every bit of abuse that was hurled at him.

Steve1956
Posts: 17961
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6645 times
Has Liked: 3095 times
Location: Fife

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:00 pm

Think most in the cricket field stand would agree...Stonewall penalty.

claretspice
Posts: 6444
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3179 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by claretspice » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:03 pm

It could have been given, and it could have been turned down. That's the way Mason dealt with pushes in the back all afternoon - Monreal got away with plenty of two handed pushes on Barnes when the ball went forwards, Koscielney wierdly got away with very few. Same applied at the other end.

Having been so erratic, it seems bizarre he chose to go strict for the biggest call of the match, a call he knew would generally err on the side of the defending team. Mind you, this is the ref who chose to book the first Burnley player to complain about a decision for dissent when he didn'tt get within 10 yards of the linesman (and indeed, is entirely right that the decision was wrong), and then sees fit to summon five different Arsenal players for warnings about dissent in the second half without booking a single one. So perhaps we shouldn't be surprised. Both teams had gripes about the ref at different times today, but Mason generally gave the impression he was intimidated by Arsenal.
These 4 users liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70 Rumpelstiltskin Juan Tanamera Goodclaret

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Diesel » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:03 pm

I've just got in, the Dog went flying through the air.
This user liked this post: Bcap1959

Barry_Chuckle
Posts: 1797
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:24 pm
Been Liked: 599 times
Has Liked: 205 times
Location: Oldfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Barry_Chuckle » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:05 pm

Saxoman wrote:From my position, lying on my bed, listening ont wireless, a dead cert.. :D
Making tents again!

Did you pull the head off it when the penalty was scored? :lol:

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 4086
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1291 times
Has Liked: 2356 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:21 pm

Wrighty again on 606

" Ramseys done a bit,he's div........ well he's done a bit, he's made plenty of it"

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3301
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 746 times
Has Liked: 664 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by BabylonClaret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:21 pm

Newty wrote:I've only seen it from this angle https://streamable.com/ea733" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (as I couldn't tell what happened from the JHU) but to me it's clear Tarks has a hand on ramsey. Now having a hand on him alone isn't a foul, and he looks like he's thrown himself to the ground regardless, but if it's a shove from Tarks, then by the letter of the law it can be given as a foul.

But I'm still not 100% sure either way mind.
From that footage it's looks a dive. Tarkowski doesn't actually push him. From that angle if he's pushed Ramsay he'd have gone down not forward.

scouseclaret
Posts: 2701
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 275 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by scouseclaret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:21 pm

fidelcastro wrote:You make some good points, jlup, but if you listen to what Dyche says before mentioning Mason's performance, he does concede it was a penalty.
Are you serious? You think that “it was highly unlikely that anything other than a penalty was going to be given” is conceding it was a penalty????

Don’t have much of an ear for sarcasm do you?

Stacky_claret
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:23 pm
Been Liked: 80 times
Has Liked: 228 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Stacky_claret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:27 pm

The only thing that is certain is that it was a massive dive.
Contact does not equal a foul unless this is a new rule that's been brought in yet I'm sure that's what we'll here tonight on MOTD
This user liked this post: scouseclaret

scouseclaret
Posts: 2701
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 275 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by scouseclaret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:39 pm

There’s nothing that winds me up more in football these days than listening to old pros (Shearer is a he worst) saying “there was conract so he was right to go down.” Why?

There’s always going to be contact when the ball comes into the box. Since when did contact equal foul???

pushpinpussy
Posts: 2299
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 144 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by pushpinpussy » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:43 pm

yes defo move on

agreenwood
Posts: 4631
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2566 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by agreenwood » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:59 pm

It’s soft, but with Ramsey going face first and Tarkowski falling on top of him, it gives Mason a decision to make.

Mason wasn’t going to pass that opportunity up.

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8852
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 3021 times
Has Liked: 1868 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Wile E Coyote » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:59 pm

i mentioned to someone today with 10 mins remaining that they'ed win it with a last minute pen, that was based on how bad the ref was, and my suspicion that arsenal always seem to gain sneaky underhand advantages.
It looked very very innocuous to award a pen for that.
Had it have been the other way round, i would happily have accepted it though, just looked so much worse because of how **** the official was.

scouseclaret
Posts: 2701
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 275 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by scouseclaret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:05 pm

That's the real issue though isn't it? We all know it wouldn't have been given the other way round.
This user liked this post: tiger76

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 4086
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1291 times
Has Liked: 2356 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:05 pm

agreenwood wrote:It’s soft, but with Ramsey going face first and Tarkowski falling on top of him, it gives Mason a decision to make.

Mason wasn’t going to pass that opportunity up.
Nah it just gave Mason a hard on because it gave him the chance to become centre of attention once again

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 4086
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1291 times
Has Liked: 2356 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:08 pm

Radio 5 reports at 7.00pm

" Burnley manager Sean Dyche was left raging after his Burnley side went down to an Alexis Sanchez injury time penalty"

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:12 pm

Just watched it gain. Never in a million years on second vieiwing. Gutted.

hampsteadclaret
Posts: 3235
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:25 am
Been Liked: 1110 times
Has Liked: 802 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by hampsteadclaret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:16 pm

I couldn't tell live..who could?
The referee was dire all afternoon, he eventually started giving us more decisions ( free kicks) but why did he not book Arsenal players for dissent?
They were gobbling off and whinging all afternoon.
I think the ref favoured the Gooners all afternoon, especially on the big decisions.

The penalty.. I have seen it from one angle 20 times.
- not sure why Tarkowski touched him..? - at that point in the game..? - not needed.
- gives the ref the opportunity he wanted.
- 'contact' is not necessarily a foul.
- Ramsey conned the ref.

Was the Defours booking fair?
Was Brady's?

Very pi**** off because we played so well.. especially the first half.
We should have killed some of those chances in the first 45..

A pretty good game overall.

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Diesel » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:18 pm

Can we have one soon though?

Still got little bits of steam coming out of my ears!

****, ****, **** and more ******* **** ****!

Bertiebeehead
Posts: 1802
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:28 am
Been Liked: 574 times
Has Liked: 684 times
Location: Franks shed

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Bertiebeehead » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:25 pm

******* bald ****.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19796
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4203 times
Has Liked: 2247 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:40 pm

After watching it numerous times I'm convinced he only gives it because Tarky loses his footing and goes down, this after a hand on the back but no push.

Can we get Lee Mason banned from the Turf?

pureclaret
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
Been Liked: 537 times
Has Liked: 216 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by pureclaret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:48 pm

Barnes was not offside until he was flung like a rag doll to the floor in the penalty area or at least thats the way i saw it through my new claret glasses
This user liked this post: Bcap1959

boatshed bill
Posts: 17394
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3570 times
Has Liked: 7848 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:55 pm

I am sure it was enough to give a penalty, if you are that way inclined.
But I would ask: was the penalty given for the push or the dive?

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Diesel » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:02 pm

**** **** bitch slap head ****** **** **** rest slap head **** ****** slap head arsehole.

Steve1956
Posts: 17961
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6645 times
Has Liked: 3095 times
Location: Fife

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:02 pm

hampsteadclaret wrote:
A pretty good game overall.
I think it's the best game I've seen on the Turf this season,apart from the result

scouseclaret
Posts: 2701
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 275 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by scouseclaret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:04 pm

hampsteadclaret wrote:Was the Defours booking fair?
Was Brady's?

Very pi**** off because we played so well.. especially the first half.
We should have killed some of those chances in the first 45..

A pretty good game overall.
Brady's was a yellow all day long. Don't know about Defour's coz I've no idea what it was for.

I thought we were brilliant for 80 minutes today, but we did kind of invite it late on. We were so comfortable and in control on the ball for most of the game, it was frustrating that for the last 10 mins or so we dropped deep, and when we did win the ball - which was often - we just booted it up the pitch and gave it them straight back.

Habbits of old!

brigante
Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 12:54 pm
Been Liked: 240 times
Has Liked: 81 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by brigante » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:29 pm

Diesel wrote:I've just got in, the Dog went flying through the air.
Was there contact?
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller

Vintage Claret
Posts: 2338
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:03 pm
Been Liked: 977 times
Has Liked: 639 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Vintage Claret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:40 pm

It's the kind of clash you see every match between defender and attacker, technically probably a foul and therefore technically probably a penalty.

Would be interested to know how often these 'technically probably a foul' decisions are given in favour of the 'big 6' clubs as opposed to say , Burnley, Huddersfield, Brighton, etc over a season.

Honestly, hand on heart, for all those saying it was a clear penalty how many believe the same decision would have been given in identical circumstances at the other end of the pitch in the 92nd minute of the game?

Rick_Muller
Posts: 6876
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2894 times
Has Liked: 7084 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Rick_Muller » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:47 pm

I’d forgotten how masculine professional footballers needed their sport to become like school girl Netball and have no contact... oh, what’s that you say “it hasn’t...” could have fooled me. All this nonsense about “well, there was contact” really irates me because contact, strangely enough, is not banned from the sport - the day it is, is the day that I can say I refuse to watch it because it’s full of overpaid Jessie’s who fall over at the whiff of someone’s hand in their back.

BTW - “never a penalty, but we always get those decisions” - Arsenal supporting work colleague of mine.
Last edited by Rick_Muller on Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

lesxdp
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:11 am
Been Liked: 112 times
Has Liked: 1662 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by lesxdp » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:49 pm

Saxoman wrote:You are terrible losers! :roll:
Well perhaps we haven't had as much practice as you lot over recent seasons
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

boatshed bill
Posts: 17394
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3570 times
Has Liked: 7848 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:50 pm

Rick_Muller wrote:I’d forgotten how masculine professional footballers needed their sport to become like school girl Netball and have no contact... oh, what’s that you say “it hasn’t...” could have fooled me. All this nonsense about “well, there was contact” really irates me because contact, strangely enough, is not banned from the sport - the day it is, is the day that I can say I refuse to watch it because it’s full of overpaid Jessie’s who fall over at the whiff of someone’s hand in their back.
Bang on, Rick!

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9182
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3477 times
Has Liked: 5725 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Colburn_Claret » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:50 pm

The dive was completely improportionate, to the hand in the back.
In the JHU it was hard to see, but the body language looked dive.
It was obvious though that Mason was looking to give it, no matter the contact.
How Defour got booked for correctly arguing for a corner, and that little **** Sanchez was in his ear all match long and nothing.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5293
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2964 times
Has Liked: 837 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:54 pm

Blatant dive. Contact doesn't = foul.

It's clear it's not a push but mason was desperate to give anything he could for them, no matter how tenuous.

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 825 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:57 pm

Vintage Claret wrote:It's the kind of clash you see every match between defender and attacker, technically probably a foul and therefore technically probably a penalty.

Would be interested to know how often these 'technically probably a foul' decisions are given in favour of the 'big 6' clubs as opposed to say , Burnley, Huddersfield, Brighton, etc over a season.

Honestly, hand on heart, for all those saying it was a clear penalty how many believe the same decision would have been given in identical circumstances at the other end of the pitch in the 92nd minute of the game?
Good post.

Tarky has his hands on Ramsey and his right foot hits the back of Ramsey's leg (normal movement) which makes Tarky stumble and fall into Ramsey.

If the exact same event happens outside the box it's a free kick every single time.

If Tarky is guilty of anything it's letting Ramsey get in front of him and being a tad clumsy.

No pushing or shoving occurred there.
This user liked this post: Vintage Claret

dermotdermot
Posts: 3743
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 207 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by dermotdermot » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:58 pm

I thought initially that it was a penalty but, from that clip, it most clearly wasn’t. Most unfortunate. Pope deserves a mention for very nearly stopping the blighter. A vast improvement on his penalty shootout.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4386 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by tim_noone » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:58 pm

Mason to be fair had his claret and blue specs on,on another occasion .....awarding a dubious penalty
Last edited by tim_noone on Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17394
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3570 times
Has Liked: 7848 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:59 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:Good post.

Tarky has his hands on Ramsey and his right foot hits the back of Ramsey's leg (normal movement) which makes Tarky stumble and fall into Ramsey.

If the exact same event happens outside the box it's a free kick every single time.

If Tarky is guilty of anything it's letting Ramsey get in front of him and being a tad clumsy.

No pushing or shoving occurred there.
That's as good an analysis as we could hope for on MOTD 2

Tall Paul
Posts: 7446
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2652 times
Has Liked: 736 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Tall Paul » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:07 pm

quoonbeatz wrote:Blatant dive. Contact doesn't = foul.

It's clear it's not a push but mason was desperate to give anything he could for them, no matter how tenuous.
Why didn't he give them a penalty when Brady slid in on Bellerin in the box then?

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 825 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:11 pm

boatshed bill wrote:That's as good an analysis as we could hope for on MOTD 2
I don't watch it when we've lost. Bad loser and all that. :geek:

I'm sure I'll get to know what they thought about it on the programme.

I still don't want penalties given for that though, and not just because it's against us.

Claretitus
Posts: 1751
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
Been Liked: 460 times
Has Liked: 285 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Claretitus » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:16 pm

2 free kicks for us in first half, Mason clearly paced out 8 steps, and allowed Sanchez to stand only 4/5 yards away. Twice in second half, 10 paces stepped out. Why? Cos there's 2 sets of rules in this league, one to favour the big clubs, the other not. DISGRACEFUL

boatshed bill
Posts: 17394
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3570 times
Has Liked: 7848 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:16 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:I don't watch it when we've lost. Bad loser and all that. :geek:

I'm sure I'll get to know what they thought about it on the programme.

I still don't want penalties given for that though, and not just because it's against us.
Me neither, B.O.T, the game is as soft as shoite these days, and less and less attractive to anyone who remembers playing to the original rules (in my opinion,of course)

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5293
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2964 times
Has Liked: 837 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:17 pm

Tall Paul wrote:Why didn't he give them a penalty when Brady slid in on Bellerin in the box then?
He couldn't. Brady took the ball. Plus there was still time for arsenal to win it themselves. It was only when it was getting desperate that he had to take matters into his own hands.
These 2 users liked this post: Juan Tanamera tiger76

Tall Paul
Posts: 7446
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2652 times
Has Liked: 736 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Tall Paul » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:19 pm

quoonbeatz wrote:He couldn't. Brady took the ball. Plus there was still time for arsenal to win it themselves. It was only when it was getting desperate that he had to take matters into his own hands.
Of course he could.

If he actually wanted to give them a penalty it was an ideal opportunity.

He was incompetent, not bent.

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 825 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:21 pm

boatshed bill wrote:Me neither, B.O.T, the game is as soft as shoite these days, and less and less attractive to anyone who remembers playing to the original rules (in my opinion,of course)

I don't even know what constitutes as a penalty these days.

I mean some are saying that Brady's slide against that girly right back of theirs was a penalty.

He doesn't touch him and gets the ball. Sounds like a penalty. :roll:

Tall Paul
Posts: 7446
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2652 times
Has Liked: 736 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Tall Paul » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:23 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:I don't even know what constitutes as a penalty these days.

I mean some are saying that Brady's slide against that girly right back of theirs was a penalty.

He doesn't touch him and gets the ball. Sounds like a penalty. :roll:
He does touch him though, before he gets the ball.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5293
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2964 times
Has Liked: 837 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:23 pm

He is bent AF.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4386 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by tim_noone » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:24 pm

In begrudging fairness to Arsenal they knew there was only a minute of added time left and could have settled for a hard earned point but they continued to press as we did.. But they as always got the luck.

Rick_Muller
Posts: 6876
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2894 times
Has Liked: 7084 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Rick_Muller » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:24 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:I don't even know what constitutes as a penalty these days.

I mean some are saying that Brady's slide against that girly right back of theirs was a penalty.

He doesn't touch him and gets the ball. Sounds like a penalty. :roll:
BUT THERE WAS CONTACT YOU BUFFOON....!!!!

That’s the rule you’re missing ;)

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 825 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Was it a pen ?

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:27 pm

Rick_Muller wrote:BUT THERE WAS CONTACT YOU BUFFOON....!!!!

That’s the rule you’re missing ;)

Is that the same pushing contact as Tarky made ...YOU BUFFOON?

Post Reply