Just for fun

john'sroseyspecs · Post by **john'sroseyspecs** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:08 pm

165. And i'm rubbish at maths

andyh · Post by **andyh** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:10 pm

spadesclaret wrote:38

2+3+(3x11)

Gotta be this. I think you have to notice that the time, number of bananas and vertices do matter.

golden · Post by **golden** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:12 pm

Fretters · Post by **Fretters** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:15 pm

That's numberwang.

john'sroseyspecs · Post by **john'sroseyspecs** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:18 pm

: 1366245754555544_animate.gif (589.22 KiB) Viewed 2683 times

I hate maths.

Cirrus_Minor · Post by **Cirrus_Minor** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:18 pm

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:24 pm

Second guess 35.

golden · Post by **golden** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:24 pm

golden · Post by **golden** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:25 pm

yorkyclaret · Post by **yorkyclaret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:30 pm

john'sroseyspecs · Post by **john'sroseyspecs** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:30 pm

88 goddammit !

timshorts · Post by **timshorts** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:32 pm

You can't tell as there is insufficient data.
However, I agree with bob. The answer ought to be 38
but, it : could be different assuming that the clock value changesif you move the hands but a bunch of bananas doesn't and is just worth 4 no matter how many bananas there are.
An alternate answer is Produced if you dont apply the vodkas rule in which case it becomes 88.

yorkyclaret · Post by **yorkyclaret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:33 pm

Dawlishclaret · Post by **Dawlishclaret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:33 pm

halfmanhalfbiscuit · Post by **halfmanhalfbiscuit** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:42 pm

Culmclaret · Post by **Culmclaret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:42 pm

Roosterbooster · Post by **Roosterbooster** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:46 pm

thatdberight · Post by **thatdberight** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:46 pm

51 or 50 but the clock bit is just deliberately confusing

conyoviejo · Post by **conyoviejo** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:49 pm

" THE ANSWER IS "

Clock = 2
Bananas = 3
The two shapes in total = 11 (lines)

No doubt there will be plenty of different views ,but this is the answer without using BODMAS .....(2 + 3 + 3 x 11) = 88

If you use BODMAS it becomes (2+ 3 + ( 3 x 11) ) = 38

Hope that kept you amused for a few minutes if nothing else..

Darnhill Claret · Post by **Darnhill Claret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:56 pm

The answer is 120.

conyoviejo · Post by **conyoviejo** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:58 pm

The answer to life is 42

Darnhill Claret · Post by **Darnhill Claret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:58 pm

Correction to 88

Belial · Post by **Belial** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:58 pm

Darnhill Claret · Post by **Darnhill Claret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:59 pm

Hadn't looked at the final shape closely enough.

Belial · Post by **Belial** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:00 pm

Me too! Good un Conyov

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:54 pm

23

playing footy the Sean Dyche way

Rick_Muller · Post by **Rick_Muller** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:58 pm

conyoviejo wrote:" THE ANSWER IS "

Clock = 2
Bananas = 3
The two shapes in total = 11 (lines)

No doubt there will be plenty of different views ,but this is the answer without using BODMAS .....(2 + 3 + 3 x 11) = 88

If you use BODMAS it becomes (2+ 3 + ( 3 x 11) ) = 38

Hope that kept you amused for a few minutes if nothing else..

There is no “without using BODMAS” as BODMAS is part of the rules of basic mathematics

Im_not_Robbie_Blake · Post by **Im_not_Robbie_Blake** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:21 pm

15+15+15 = 45
4+4+15 = 23
3+4+4 = 11

So....
3+4+(4x11) = 51

How can this be wrong?

spadesclaret · Post by **spadesclaret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:29 pm

Im_not_Robbie_Blake wrote:15+15+15 = 45
4+4+15 = 23
3+4+4 = 11

So....
3+4+(4x11) = 51

How can this be wrong?

The clock says 2 (not 3)
There are 3 bananas (not 4)

mdd2 · Post by **mdd2** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:35 pm

hampsteadclaret wrote:150..?

I agree

IanMcL · Post by **IanMcL** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:42 pm

88

Top shape had 15 sides= 15
Banana=1
Clock at 3pm=3
Clock at 2pm =2

2pm+3bananas+3bananas=8 x bottom shape has 11 sides =88

Only noticed bottom shape difference after another glance!

spadesclaret · Post by **spadesclaret** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:45 pm

IanMcL wrote:120

Top shape = 15
Banana=1
Clock at 3pm=3
Clock at 2pm =2

2pm+3bananas+3bananas=8 x top shape15 =120

The 'top shape' becomes 11 once the square is removed.

IanMcL · Post by **IanMcL** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:49 pm

spadesclaret wrote:The 'top shape' becomes 11 once the square is removed.

Just noticed that on 2nd look Spades. Then see you are on to me too. Nice spot.

chorleyhere · Post by **chorleyhere** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:50 pm

mdd2 · Post by **mdd2** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:51 pm

mdd2 wrote:I agree

No I don't.
Good as my late friend always said "check your work"
And as others have pointed out the figures number according to the sides which fall from 15 to 11, the clock goes from 3 to 2 o'clock (I got that) and the nanas number 4 then 3.
Enjoyed getting that wrong.
Think I will test my grandson and see how he does

atlantalad · Post by **atlantalad** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:16 pm

I make it 255. Then read again and saw bananas , so 88.

while we are here with maths:

Is there anyone out there with deep understanding of maths that can explain the relevance of “erf?” I know the value is related to Gaussian distribution and depends on the magnitude of the equality. But where does it come from/ how is it derived?

i.e C = erf { some expression] where erf depends on C.

Rick_Muller · Post by **Rick_Muller** » Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:06 pm

atlantalad wrote:I make it 255. Then read again and saw bananas , so 88.

while we are here with maths:

Is there anyone out there with deep understanding of maths that can explain the relevance of “erf?” I know the value is related to Gaussian distribution and depends on the magnitude of the equality. But where does it come from/ how is it derived?

i.e C = erf { some expression] where erf depends on C.

http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual ... tions.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

dsr · Post by **dsr** » Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:27 am

Rick_Muller wrote:There is no “without using BODMAS” as BODMAS is part of the rules of basic mathematics

Unfortunately, Rick, you're confusing pure science with puzzling. When you're applying for a Nobel Priza, then you need to use Bodmas at all times; but this doesn't mean that number puzzles that don't use Bodmas can't exist. Numerous such puzzles do exist, especially when they involve fitting missing numbers into a square.

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Mon Mar 12, 2018 7:14 am

I was under as I assumed the bananas were from Aldi.

deanothedino · Post by **deanothedino** » Mon Mar 12, 2018 7:26 am

atlantalad wrote:I make it 255. Then read again and saw bananas , so 88.

while we are here with maths:

Is there anyone out there with deep understanding of maths that can explain the relevance of “erf?” I know the value is related to Gaussian distribution and depends on the magnitude of the equality. But where does it come from/ how is it derived?

i.e C = erf { some expression] where erf depends on C.

It's the error function when integrating the normal distribution.

If you're ever struggling for sleep take a look at it's wiki page

aclaretinstevenage · Post by **aclaretinstevenage** » Mon Mar 12, 2018 7:27 am

atlantalad · Post by **atlantalad** » Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:37 pm

Deanothedino

It's the error function when integrating the normal distribution.
Image

If you're ever struggling for sleep take a look at it's wiki page

Thanks Deano,& Rick.
Understand now. First bit and Applications section on wiki are OK, rest got a bit too heavy so I'll leave it until there's a baking programme on TV the have another go

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:59 pm

Dougall · Post by **Dougall** » Tue Mar 13, 2018 10:07 am