Lineker: patronising freeloader
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Unreal, 100% clear that the tweet is aimed at Arsenal fans
And also 100% clear that whoever is 7th is always going to be a team that Arsenal fans would be confident of finishing above.
So there is absolutely nothing to see here at all, and it it didn't make you laugh, then you are perhaps taking things a bit too seriously.
And also 100% clear that whoever is 7th is always going to be a team that Arsenal fans would be confident of finishing above.
So there is absolutely nothing to see here at all, and it it didn't make you laugh, then you are perhaps taking things a bit too seriously.
This user liked this post: houseboy
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Not much to get upset about there. Think MOTD would benefit from a mix of presenters and not just ex footballers. Danny Murphy is good but I prefer the dynamic with a journalist ( Mark Pougatch) for example and an ex manager in addition to a footballer. Lineker is becoming tiresome.
-
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1293 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Natalie Sawyer has some free time now and could provide as much quality as Lineker does in stating a point then asking if the pundits agree. Probably be a damn site cheaper as well.
The only issue I have with Lineker is the size of his salary at the beeb, which I believe he is thoroughly undeserving of.
The only issue I have with Lineker is the size of his salary at the beeb, which I believe he is thoroughly undeserving of.
-
- Posts: 7367
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2368 times
- Has Liked: 1722 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
I'm not sure if anyone has ever been imprisoned for not paying their TV licence. I'm not even sure they CAN as I don't think it is a criminal offence. I could be wrong on the second bit but I have never ever personally heard of anyone being thrown inside for non-payment.RingoMcCartney wrote:I have a washing machine in my house. I'm not obliged to pay, through threat of prison, a tax to one particular washing powder manufacturer whether I use their product or not.
I have a microwave. I'm not obliged to pay, through threat of prison, a tax to one particular food manufacturer whether I use their product or not.
I have a television. Why should I be obliged to pay one particular broadcaster, through threat of prison, whether I watch their product or not?
In 2018, with subscription, pay to view and multi channel options, its its an indefensible, regressive poll tax, that punishes those least able to afford it.
It's not a "tv licence" it's the BBC tax.
-
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:06 am
- Been Liked: 107 times
- Has Liked: 46 times
- Location: Colne
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Yes he's taking the **** out of arsenal fans, BUT he's using Burnley to do so, so yes he is being patronising to us
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Courts Jail 107 People For Not Paying BBC TV Licence Fineshouseboy wrote:I'm not sure if anyone has ever been imprisoned for not paying their TV licence. I'm not even sure they CAN as I don't think it is a criminal offence. I could be wrong on the second bit but I have never ever personally heard of anyone being thrown inside for non-payment.
https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/10/ ... 63939.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Of the 184,595 people across the UK charged with non-payment of the TV Licence by Capita TV Licensing, 21,300 were found not guilty – and 90 people were jailed for failing to pay court-issued fines. The figure for charges includes out-of-court disposals.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/07/1 ... ons_women/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... rate-cases" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Scrap the unjustifiable BBC poll tax.
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
They weren't jailed for not paying the TV Licence. It even says that in your post.RingoMcCartney wrote:Courts Jail 107 People For Not Paying BBC TV Licence Fines
https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/10/ ... 63939.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Of the 184,595 people across the UK charged with non-payment of the TV Licence by Capita TV Licensing, 21,300 were found not guilty – and 90 people were jailed for failing to pay court-issued fines. The figure for charges includes out-of-court disposals.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/07/1 ... ons_women/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... rate-cases" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Scrap the unjustifiable BBC poll tax.
This user liked this post: UpTheBeehole
-
- Posts: 7367
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2368 times
- Has Liked: 1722 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
90 people were jailed for 'non-payment of fines' (a criminal offence) not non-payment of TV licence. You can be jailed for not paying a tenner if it's a court fine. So no-one has ever been jailed for not paying their TV licence then?
I would also be careful of using the Huff Post as a source, it's not the most reliable publication in the world.
I would also be careful of using the Huff Post as a source, it's not the most reliable publication in the world.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Javid said almost 200,000 people were prosecuted in 2012-13 for failing to buy a TV licence, which costs £145.50 a year. “More than 50 were sent to prison.Tall Paul wrote:They weren't jailed for not paying the TV Licence. It even says that in your post.
From the guardian.....
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Javid said almost 200,000 people were prosecuted in 2012-13 for failing to buy a TV licence, which costs £145.50 a year. “More than 50 were sent to prison.houseboy wrote:90 people were jailed for 'non-payment of fines' (a criminal offence) not non-payment of TV licence. You can be jailed for not paying a tenner if it's a court fine. So no-one has ever been jailed for not paying their TV licence then?
I would also be careful of using the Huff Post as a source, it's not the most reliable publication in the world.
From the guardian.....
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Courts jail 845 for not paying TV licence finesTall Paul wrote:They weren't jailed for not paying the TV Licence. It even says that in your post.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/cour ... 28836.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
From the independent.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
houseboy wrote:I'm not sure if anyone has ever been imprisoned for not paying their TV licence. I'm not even sure they CAN as I don't think it is a criminal offence. I could be wrong on the second bit but I have never ever personally heard of anyone being thrown inside for non-payment.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/cour ... 28836.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... rate-cases" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/07/1 ... ons_women/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/10/ ... 63939.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Woman pensioner jailed for not paying TV licence - ridiculous cost of jailing fine dodgers in Northern Ireland
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news ... 21028.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news ... 21028.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
She was jailed for refusing to pay a fine, not for not paying her licence. Learn to ******* read.RingoMcCartney wrote:Woman pensioner jailed for not paying TV licence - ridiculous cost of jailing fine dodgers in Northern Ireland
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news ... 21028.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This user liked this post: UpTheBeehole
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north- ... e-13055099" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
50 Welsh language campaigners could be jailed over TV licences
50 Welsh language campaigners could be jailed over TV licences
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Imploding Turtle wrote:She was jailed for refusing to pay a fine, not for not paying her licence. Learn to ******* read.




Desperate just simply desperate!


-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
RingoMcCartney wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Desperate just simply desperate!![]()
It literaly says so in the first sentence.
"A female pensioner was jailed for a month because she refused to pay a fine after being caught evading the TV licence."
Last edited by Imploding Turtle on Mon Apr 16, 2018 10:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: UpTheBeehole
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
The punishment for evading the licence fee is a fine of up to £1,000, but those who refuse to pay up can be hauled back before the courts and sent to jail.Imploding Turtle wrote:She was jailed for refusing to pay a fine, not for not paying her licence. Learn to ******* read.
Just how much of a super massive pedantic clown are You!??


-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Stop digging you tool!Imploding Turtle wrote:It literaly says so in the first sentence.
"A female pensioner was jailed for a month because she refused to pay a fine after being caught evading the TV licence."



Put the spade down!!!
And evacuate the hole!!


-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Refusing to pay a court mandated fine is a crime all by itself. It doesn't matter why you got the fine, refusal to pay it is a crime and anyone who refuses to pay a fine should be sent to prison.RingoMcCartney wrote:The punishment for evading the licence fee is a fine of up to £1,000, but those who refuse to pay up can be hauled back before the courts and sent to jail.
Just how much of a super massive pedantic clown are You!??![]()
If you illegally park your car and get fined, then tell the court you will not pay the fine you will go to prison. That doesn't mean you went to prison for illegally parking your car.
How are you this stupid? Seriously. Do you have learning difficulties or something? Cos if you do then say so so i can go easier on you.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
THE BBC and Home Office faced sustained criticism after the Prison Service revealed yesterday that 845 people were jailed last year for not having a television licence.Imploding Turtle wrote:Refusing to pay a court mandated fine is a crime all by itself. It doesn't matter why you got the fine, refusal to pay it is a crime and anyone who refuses to pay a fine should be sent to prison.
If you illegally park your car and get fined, then tell the court you will not pay the fine you will go to prison. That doesn't mean you went to prison for illegally parking your car.
How are you this stupid? Seriously. Do you have learning difficulties or something? Cos if you do then say so so i can go easier on you.
Taken from the Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/cour ... 28836.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
All together now.
845 845 in prison
845 845 I say.
845 845 in prison
For not paying the tv licence turtle says "no way"
You really are a ridiculous, argue that black is white chimp aren't you!



-
- Posts: 7367
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2368 times
- Has Liked: 1722 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
You go to court for an offence (not paying a TV licence), you get fined. You have to pay a court fine or you get sent to prison. No-one has been imprisoned for not paying the licence, you are ignoring your own proofs.RingoMcCartney wrote:The punishment for evading the licence fee is a fine of up to £1,000, but those who refuse to pay up can be hauled back before the courts and sent to jail.
Just how much of a super massive pedantic clown are You!??![]()
For what it's worth I actually agree with you about the licence fee, I think it's wrong, but no-one has been imprisoned for not paying it only for not paying the legally binding court fine.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
RingoMcCartney wrote:THE BBC and Home Office faced sustained criticism after the Prison Service revealed yesterday that 845 people were jailed last year for not having a television licence.
Taken from the Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/cour ... 28836.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
All together now.
845 845 in prison
845 845 I say.
845 845 in prison
For not paying the tv licence turtle says "no way"
You really are a ridiculous, argue that black is white chimp aren't you!![]()
![]()
It's just to ******* easy.
From that same article:
In 1991, the first year in which figures were collected, 394 people were jailed (136 of them women) for failing to pay the fine - a maximum of pounds 1,000 - imposed by magistrates for having television without an pounds 83 licence. Last year, 845 (including 292 women) were imprisoned. The typical sentence was 14 days.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Anyone refusing to pay a fine could be sent to prison and at least 70 people have received custodial sentences in recent years. With more than 180,000 people charged with not paying their licence fee each year, prosecutions currently account for around one in 10 of all criminal cases in England and Wales.
From the daily telegraph.
From the daily telegraph.
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
lol Ringo
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
If they can't afford the 147 for the BBC poll taxImploding Turtle wrote:It's just to ******* easy.
From that same article:
In 1991, the first year in which figures were collected, 394 people were jailed (136 of them women) for failing to pay the fine - a maximum of pounds 1,000 - imposed by magistrates for having television without an pounds 83 licence. Last year, 845 (including 292 women) were imprisoned. The typical sentence was 14 days.
How likely is it that they can afford to pay the 1000?
Have a little think you idiot.
Ask yourself this very simple (even for you) qustion
If you don't pay the BBC poll tax. Can you end up in jail with a criminal record?
I've got at least 845 reasons to know what the answer is !


-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Tall Paul wrote:lol Ringo
I'm the one laughing Paul!
At the usual gaggle of lefties, flying in the face of reality that if you don't pay your tv licence you wind up in jail!
Literally laughable!

Got my week off with a right giggle, watching you huff n puff and use pure desperate pedantry is you tie yourselves in knots!


Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
From the same Guardian article that you linked to prove your point:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... rate-cases" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... rate-cases" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You cannot go to prison for non-payment of your licence fee
These 2 users liked this post: UpTheBeehole Rileybobs
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
houseboy wrote:I'm not sure if anyone has ever been imprisoned for not paying their TV licence. I'm not even sure they CAN as I don't think it is a criminal offence.
last year 107,000 were given a criminal record for failing to pay money to the BBC......
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Tall Paul wrote:From the same Guardian article that you linked to prove your point:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... rate-cases" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If they can't afford the 147 for the BBC poll tax
How likely is it that they can afford to pay the 1000?
Put pedantry to one side for a moment.
Have a little think.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
RingoMcCartney wrote:If they can't afford the 147 for the BBC poll tax
How likely is it that they can afford to pay the 1000?
Have a little think you idiot.
Ask yourself this very simple (even for you) qustion
If you don't pay the BBC poll tax. Can you end up in jail with a criminal record?
I've got at least 845 reasons to know what the answer is !![]()
So you concede that they were jailed for not paying the fine, which is a seperate crime. Good.
As for your "point". Let me get this straight. These people you say couldn't afford a licence fee, therefore they in effect stole a product they couldn't afford. So what you're saying is that if you steal something because you can't afford to buy it you then shouldn't be fined as punishment, because you can't afford it.
So the obvious question that follow is "what punishment should they receive?" Community service? But then that inhibits their ability to find work in order to afford things. So, i guess it's prison then. So the logical conclusion from your train of "thought" is that you're implicitely advocating that people who break the law requiring them to purchase a licence if they want to watch TV either shouldn't be punished for it (surely you don't want crimes to be unpunished), or should be sent to prison for it.
So. To summarise, ringo thinks you should be sent to prison if you don't pay your TV licence. Also, Ringo wants us all to be outraged at people who are sent to prison for refusing to pay a fine received as punishmen for the crime of failing to purchase a TV licence.
-
- Posts: 7367
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2368 times
- Has Liked: 1722 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
I think you're getting a bit obsessed now Ringo mi old mate. You've lost this one ages ago, go have a lie down you'll feel much better afterwards.RingoMcCartney wrote:last year 107,000 were given a criminal record for failing to pay money to the BBC......
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
So despite me saying on many many occasion that the tv licence fee shpuld be scrapped. You're now desperately trying to claim I think people should be sent to prison.Imploding Turtle wrote:So you concede that they were jailed for not paying the fine, which is a seperate crime. Good.
As for your "point". Let me get this straight. These people you say couldn't afford a licence fee, therefore they in effect stole a product they couldn't afford. So what you're saying is that if you steal something because you can't afford to buy it you then shouldn't be fined as punishment, because you can't afford it.
So the obvious question that follow is "what punishment should they receive?" Community service? But then that inhibits their ability to find work in order to afford things. So, i guess it's prison then. So the logical conclusion from your train of "thought" is that you're implicitely advocating that people who break the law requiring them to purchase a licence if they want to watch TV either shouldn't be punished for it (surely you don't want crimes to be unpunished), or should be sent to prison for it.
So. To summarise, ringo thinks you should be sent to prison if you don't pay your TV licence. Also, Ringo wants us all to be outraged at people who are sent to prison for refusing to pay a fine received as punishmen for the crime of failing to purchase a TV licence.




Even by your monumental moronic standards, you've really cranked up the stupid levels to 11!!




Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
How likely is it that the fine is as much as £1,000?RingoMcCartney wrote:If they can't afford the 147 for the BBC poll tax
How likely is it that they can afford to pay the 1000?
Put pedantry to one side for a moment.
Have a little think.
How likely is it that the court won't allow them to pay the fine on the drip?
Have a little think yourself.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Not true. It's not a recordable offense.RingoMcCartney wrote:last year 107,000 were given a criminal record for failing to pay money to the BBC......
And stop passing off passages of The Register as your own words
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/07/1 ... ons_women/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
houseboy wrote:I think you're getting a bit obsessed now Ringo mi old mate. You've lost this one ages ago, go have a lie down you'll feel much better afterwards.
Haha really!?
Non payment of tv licence leads to a criminal record and jail.
Final score
Ringo McCartney 1. Houseboy 0
The match of the day summarisers said Ringo just had too much common sense and facts in his locker, for the opposition to cope with.
845 845 in prison
Come on you know the words!!!
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Imploding Turtle wrote:Not true. It's not a recordable offense.
And stop passing off passages of The Register as your own words
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/07/1 ... ons_women/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;




Put the spade down



Or get a job in a grave yard. Think about it. You'd get paid for digging holes!!!!



-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Can you be imprisoned if you don't pay the £1k fine for not having a licence?
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Of course you can. If a court instructs you to pay a fine and you refuse to pay it you can, and should, be imprisoned.Sidney1st wrote:Can you be imprisoned if you don't pay the £1k fine for not having a licence?
This user liked this post: Sidney1st
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Imploding Turtle wrote:Not true. It's not a recordable offense.
And stop passing off passages of The Register as your own words
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/07/1 ... ons_women/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
A week after the culture secretary, Sajid Javid, confirmed a review of the law that makes non-payment of your television licence a CRIMINAL OFFENCE ......
Is it finally sinking on implodingchimp?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... rate-cases" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Shelling peas.
It's just like shelling peas.



-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
RingoMcCartney wrote:A week after the culture secretary, Sajid Javid, confirmed a review of the law that makes non-payment of your television licence a criminal offence ......
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... rate-cases" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Shelling peas.
It's just like shelling peas.
![]()
![]()
Yes, it's a criminal offence. That doesn't mean you get a criminal record for it.
Let me help you. Google "Non-recordable crimanal offences"
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
I thought half term was over. Evidently not.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Here, Ringo. This destroys both your pathetic arguments.

Source? ******* parliament.
http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06860/SN06860.pdf

Source? ******* parliament.
http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06860/SN06860.pdf
This user liked this post: UpTheBeehole
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Imploding Turtle wrote:Yes, it's a criminal offence. That doesn't mean you get a criminal record for it.
Let me help you. Google "Non-recordable crimanal offences"




You're meeting yourself coming back now!!!!



So it is a CRIMINAL OFFENCE now is It!!!!!!!?



So not only have you brought the stupid levels up to 11. You've now hot your legal team out of the turtle bunker and going for a full on pedantry fest!!!!!



-
- Posts: 4307
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2929 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Ha. loving the TV licensing pedantry this morning.
Anyway, re. Lineker, I doubt there's many pundits had more good things to say about us to a larger audience than he has every week this season. We're really scraping around for things to take offence at here. I can only really think of Chris Sutton's latest rambling and nobody listens to that plank.
Anyway, re. Lineker, I doubt there's many pundits had more good things to say about us to a larger audience than he has every week this season. We're really scraping around for things to take offence at here. I can only really think of Chris Sutton's latest rambling and nobody listens to that plank.
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
You can always tell Ringo is losing an argument by how many smileys he uses.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Imploding Turtle wrote:Here, Ringo. This destroys both your pathetic arguments.
Source? ******* parliament.
http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06860/SN06860.pdf



Yes !! Yes !! It totally destroys what I said right at the beginning
Don't pay your tv licence you wind up in jail.
Well done the implodingchimps highly qualified pedantry squad!!!!


Job done. Back to the turtle bunker for you!!


-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
UpTheBeehole wrote:You can always tell Ringo is losing an argument by how many smileys he uses.



-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
No one listens to Sutton because he sounds so effing boring.NottsClaret wrote:Ha. loving the TV licensing pedantry this morning.
Anyway, re. Lineker, I doubt there's many pundits had more good things to say about us to a larger audience than he has every week this season. We're really scraping around for things to take offence at here. I can only really think of Chris Sutton's latest rambling and nobody listens to that plank.
Re: Lineker: patronising freeloader
Just accept that Ringo is terminally stupid, it makes ignoring his denial of stone cold facts a lot easier.
This user liked this post: UpTheBeehole