Mr. Tarkowski
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
The yellow card he picked up on the sideline, he just left his man completely in the middle. No idea what he was doing, he was very lucky not to be sent off for a second yellow in a very similar scenario, completely leaving his man in the middle and doing god knows what at right back.
The top defenders in the top teams 1v1 are incredible, Tarkowski is levels away from that.
The top defenders in the top teams 1v1 are incredible, Tarkowski is levels away from that.
-
- Posts: 5310
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1520 times
- Has Liked: 1503 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
It’s all over as far as I’m concerned and my trust is that Dyche recognises this.
-
- Posts: 17376
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7837 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
The points I was trying to make were:
A. If I was the chairman I would have had reservations about throwing that sort of "investment" at the squad a second time
B. From our record one year spend we really haven't had value.
-
- Posts: 77768
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38055 times
- Has Liked: 5775 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Three of those six signings were in 2019boatshed bill wrote: ↑Sun Jan 02, 2022 6:20 pmApart from the thick end of £40m in 2018, which brought us :
Hart, nuff said
Gibson, Oops
Vydra, not a PL striker
Pieters,
Rodriguez, he's one of our own
Crouch.
There's the problem in a nutshell.
If you invest you expect something back.
-
- Posts: 17376
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7837 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
OK, but it was over those windows, and a hell of a lot of money by our standards.
Do you think we got value for money? I don't
Do you see any forward planning ( barGibson)? I don't
-
- Posts: 77768
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38055 times
- Has Liked: 5775 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
I read just the other day that Dyche wasn't happy with that summer 2018 window having got into Europe. A goalkeeper past his best and two Championship players, neither of whom have shown themselves really up to Premier League football.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 7:06 pmOK, but it was over those windows, and a hell of a lot of money by our standards.
Do you think we got value for money? I don't
Do you see any forward planning ( barGibson)? I don't
-
- Posts: 17376
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7837 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Who makes these decisions?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 7:12 pmI read just the other day that Dyche wasn't happy with that summer 2018 window having got into Europe. A goalkeeper past his best and two Championship players, neither of whom have shown themselves really up to Premier League football.
-
- Posts: 77768
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38055 times
- Has Liked: 5775 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
More, who was making those decisions I think.
-
- Posts: 17376
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7837 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Strange.
I know absolutely nothing about how the club is run but I find it odd that anyone other than the manager (of any club) can sanction the signing of players, since if that manager doesn't want them he will do his best not to play them
-
- Posts: 77768
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38055 times
- Has Liked: 5775 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Like Tuchel & Lukakuboatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 7:35 pmStrange.
I know absolutely nothing about how the club is run but I find it odd that anyone other than the manager (of any club) can sanction the signing of players, since if that manager doesn't want them he will do his best not to play them
-
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 409 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Seems we have backed ourselves into a corner then, shame really as £10m plus could go on his replacement whoever that may be.Lowbankclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 2:55 pmAs I pointed out earlier, even if we accepted a bid, he is unlikely to agree personal terms as he will get way more wages in the summer.
Id also sell Mee to Newcastle in the summer (after extending his contract with the year option we seem to have) if they'll take him, another high earner off the books if we go down.
-
- Posts: 17376
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7837 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
TBH I don't know how Chelsea go about their business.
In fact, does Lukaku play for Chelsea? I'm not being funny, I thought he left years ago

-
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 1:35 pm
- Been Liked: 111 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
He made an identical error at Southampton.
Sloppiness is how I would describe it.
However he still remains a very good player, and one I would keep until the end of the season or beyond if he decides to stay.
His mistake has been magnified out of proportion only because we are in such a poor position in the league.
Also for the life of me I cannot understand why Cornet did not start against Leeds with McNeil on the bench.
Sloppiness is how I would describe it.
However he still remains a very good player, and one I would keep until the end of the season or beyond if he decides to stay.
His mistake has been magnified out of proportion only because we are in such a poor position in the league.
Also for the life of me I cannot understand why Cornet did not start against Leeds with McNeil on the bench.
-
- Posts: 10666
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4656 times
- Has Liked: 7307 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
For me at this stage, Tarks goes on the bench for Collins.
Tarks is leaving. Whether that is this month or the end of the season. He is not the future for us, Collins is. Get him in the side, playing alongside Mee for the rest of the season.
Tarks is leaving. Whether that is this month or the end of the season. He is not the future for us, Collins is. Get him in the side, playing alongside Mee for the rest of the season.
This user liked this post: tiger76
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4645 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Why would Newcastle be interested in Ben Mee come the summer?, assuming they survive they'll be planning to sign much better players than Ben.Superjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 7:55 pmSeems we have backed ourselves into a corner then, shame really as £10m plus could go on his replacement whoever that may be.
Id also sell Mee to Newcastle in the summer (after extending his contract with the year option we seem to have) if they'll take him, another high earner off the books if we go down.
-
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 746 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Seeing as we very actively pursued a dual signing of Jayrod and Dawson I think its pretty obvious we got second (even third in Gibsons case) dibs. Given what we did fork out for Vydra and Gibson it wasn't a million miles away from the asking for the two we did want.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 7:35 pmStrange.
I know absolutely nothing about how the club is run but I find it odd that anyone other than the manager (of any club) can sanction the signing of players, since if that manager doesn't want them he will do his best not to play them
In hindsight I pretty much thi k that was the point Gaick pa icked and decided to jump ship
-
- Posts: 17376
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7837 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
I see, so Gibson and Vydra were kind of the best we could have got at the time?BabylonClaret wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:59 pmSeeing as we very actively pursued a dual signing of Jayrod and Dawson I think its pretty obvious we got second (even third in Gibsons case) dibs. Given what we did fork out for Vydra and Gibson it wasn't a million miles away from the asking for the two we did want.
In hindsight I pretty much thi k that was the point Gaick pa icked and decided to jump ship
But, apparently, SD didn't want either.
Quite honestly, I'm not sure why we wanted any of the four of them, though Gibson was highly rated.
-
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 746 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Well Jay was year younger and still had Prem experience and at the tine might have been been decent option for the European campaign. Dawson would have been a v good addition - he's still playing for a top 5 side.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 9:25 pmI see, so Gibson and Vydra were kind of the best we could have got at the time?
But, apparently, SD didn't want either.
Quite honestly, I'm not sure why we wanted any of the four of them, though Gibson was highly rated.
Gibson was highly rated at the time yes but our preferred option was Mawson who baled at the last minute.
I expect we always have a number of options to pursue but we spent most of the summer haggling with West Brom and ended up spending nearly as much on players lower down our list. That' was a disaster summer window. Expensive and very little return I think that's whT made Garlick start to look for a way out
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 296 times
- Has Liked: 621 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Dawson is a better cb than tarkowski anyway, baffles me why they want to sign him, just my opinion.BabylonClaret wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 9:34 pmWell Jay was year younger and still had Prem experience and at the tine might have been been decent option for the European campaign. Dawson would have been a v good addition - he's still playing for a top 5 side.
Gibson was highly rated at the time yes but our preferred option was Mawson who baled at the last minute.
I expect we always have a number of options to pursue but we spent most of the summer haggling with West Brom and ended up spending nearly as much on players lower down our list. That' was a disaster summer window. Expensive and very little return I think that's whT made Garlick start to look for a way out
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
What we are seeing with Tarks is the reality of modern day football, at one stage they are of value then suddenly they are gone for nothing. In my opinion whilst being a good defender he is not Van Dijk and there are players out there to replace him, but we have hung on instead of cashing in and along with Hendrick and Brady we have lost players of value for nothing.
We have always been a selling club and we should adopt the Brentford model of signing players improving them and then selling.
We have always been a selling club and we should adopt the Brentford model of signing players improving them and then selling.
-
- Posts: 9617
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2223 times
- Has Liked: 3120 times
Re: Mr. Tarkowski
Think it is very much back to the future, the vision of Pace for networking players into the academy from around the country a different levels was created by Burnley and ran at various levels up to the early 80’s, I seem to remember one of John Bond’s biggest sins as Burnley manager was dismantling that system, various managers have tried to revive/ re dismantle it, but by the time serious effort was made we were coming from a long way behind most clubs of our size and we are only now catching up.
-
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 409 times