‘Details’ lost us the game

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
warksclaret
Posts: 8518
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2261 times
Has Liked: 1242 times

Re: ‘Details’ lost us the game

Post by warksclaret » Mon Mar 14, 2022 11:51 am

It shows you how exposed we are when we are citing Mee's absence as a reason for the disastrous 3 results. Ben is a great servant, great pro, and great defender who sadly is ageing and a little slow. The fact he has scored more goals after 23 games than anyone else bar Cornet is even sadder

randomclaret2
Posts: 7745
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 3054 times
Has Liked: 4794 times

Re: ‘Details’ lost us the game

Post by randomclaret2 » Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:03 pm

taio wrote:
Sun Mar 13, 2022 9:41 pm
I would hope that the new owners don't consider things in such a blanket fashion. Each case should be judged on its own merits. For example, Mee should be offered a new contract whereas Bardsley probably not. We would need balance in that some are offered contract extensions and some aren't. There's no way we should be offering all ten players a contract and equally there's no way we should not be offering an extension to any of them.
I actually agree with you, but I do suspect the American owners may be less keen to offer contracts until our status next season is known than might previously have been the case. We'll find out in due couse...

Post Reply