Pretty much everything pollutes air quality all the big industrial factories pumping out toxic fumes would be a better starting point.Belial wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:10 amQuite right...not to mention the release of VOCs and other harmful substances. The rise in use of woodburners is directly impacting local air quality and will be one of the next focuses following the scrutiny over vehicles in the past 5-10 years
As far as using them being carbon neutral....the key word is "can"....doesn't mean that is, and it relies on planting elsewhere to make up for the ones cut down and burned. There's also a sh1t tonne of carbon in a tree!
But yeah...burning decking is a bit daft really
Wood burners
-
- Posts: 11016
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1349 times
- Has Liked: 896 times
Re: Wood burners
-
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: Wood burners
Those 'big industrial factories' are, in the most part, well regulated...the majority of pollutants have seen a huge reduction over the past 30 years or soJakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:24 amPretty much everything pollutes air quality all the big industrial factories pumping out toxic fumes would be a better starting point.
The main exception being... Particulate Matter and to an extent, NO2. Both an impact of woodburners. Ammonia emissions are also going against the trend
-
- Posts: 11016
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1349 times
- Has Liked: 896 times
Re: Wood burners
Health & safety don't give a monkeys easily fobbed off or bribed they are pigheaded because I don't think they are funded by the government anymore or in part so need to recoup but things easily quieten down when a piece of paper with a queens head on is produced. It's cheaper for the companies to go down that avenue than spending sh1tloads on extraction & other H&S directives.Belial wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:33 amThose 'big industrial factories' are, in the most part, well regulated...the majority of pollutants have seen a huge reduction over the past 30 years or so
The main exception being... Particulate Matter and to an extent, NO2. Both an impact of woodburners. Ammonia emissions are also going against the trend
-
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: Wood burners
What's health and safety got to do with anything?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:41 amHealth & safety don't give a monkeys easily fobbed off or bribed they are pigheaded because I don't think they are funded by the government anymore or in part so need to recoup but things easily quieten down when a piece of paper with a queens head on is produced. It's cheaper for the companies to go down that avenue than spending sh1tloads on extraction & other H&S directives.
-
- Posts: 11016
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1349 times
- Has Liked: 896 times
Re: Wood burners
I guess if you don't give a sh1t about employees not a lot

The discussion had moved from wood burners into industrial companies I think some of that could possibly fall into some sort of an health & safety arena.
-
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: Wood burners
Well...you mentioned in the context of pollution that industrial sites are an issue, and I responded to state they are mostly regulated and that the facts prove many substances have significantly reduced over time.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:56 amI guess if you don't give a sh1t about employees not a lot![]()
The discussion had moved from wood burners into industrial companies I think some of that could possibly fall into some sort of an health & safety arena.
Not really seeing where health and safety has come into any discussion?
-
- Posts: 11016
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1349 times
- Has Liked: 896 times
Re: Wood burners
The remit of health & safety encompasses the welfare of the employee it's a mutual duty by legislation for the employer & employee to adhere to. Health & safety is supposed to protect exposure.Belial wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 9:05 amWell...you mentioned in the context of pollution that industrial sites are an issue, and I responded to state they are mostly regulated and that the facts prove many substances have significantly reduced over time.
Not really seeing where health and safety has come into any discussion?
-
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: Wood burners
Ok so the whole thread is about environmental pollution but you are now discussing employee health and safety?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 9:09 amThe remit of health & safety encompasses the welfare of the employee it's a mutual duty by legislation for the employer & employee to adhere to. Health & safety is supposed to protect exposure.
-
- Posts: 11016
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1349 times
- Has Liked: 896 times
Re: Wood burners
Double damn right I am on the basis that pollution causes poor health whatever form of pollution it impacts health, there’s environmental pollution such as wood burners & also major industrial companies whether regulated or not cause pollution, I’m not sure when discussing pollution (whatever form of pollution) how you can separate the word health or even safety from the discussion, please explain how pollution & health are separate regardless of methods of exposure?
-
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: Wood burners
Workplace exposure is completely different to environmental pollution. It's regulated by an entirely separate regime for a start. This thread is about woodburners and impacts of them to local air quality. You mentioned factories... They too can impact local and global air quality however in the most part are regulated and that has been proven to significantly reduce emissions over the last few decades (aside from particulates, NO2 and ammonia - which if you look at the sources, are not mainly from 'factories').Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:07 amDouble damn right I am on the basis that pollution causes poor health whatever form of pollution it impacts health, there’s environmental pollution such as wood burners & also major industrial companies whether regulated or not cause pollution, I’m not sure when discussing pollution (whatever form of pollution) how you can separate the word health or even safety from the discussion, please explain how pollution & health are separate regardless of methods of exposure?
-
- Posts: 11016
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1349 times
- Has Liked: 896 times
Re: Wood burners
I’m taking my grandson out fishing so I’ll pick this up later, if you can present a convincing argument that poor health & any kind of pollution don’t go hand in hand fair enough case closed, no beating around the bush you seem to have a problem with wood burners I can understand their popularity with the energy prices & think if people need to keep warm leave them be, my axe is with major companies pumping out the plumes. Good day.Belial wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:39 amWorkplace exposure is completely different to environmental pollution. It's regulated by an entirely separate regime for a start. This thread is about woodburners and impacts of them to local air quality. You mentioned factories... They too can impact local and global air quality however in the most part are regulated and that has been proven to significantly reduce emissions over the last few decades (aside from particulates, NO2 and ammonia - which if you look at the sources, are not mainly from 'factories').
-
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: Wood burners
There's quite a few inaccuracies there...I haven't said I have a problem with woodburners, I've stated the facts about them. Neither have I stated anywhere that pollution doesn't cause health issues! You seem dismissive of the facts regarding emissions from industry however...Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:48 amI’m taking my grandson out fishing so I’ll pick this up later, if you can present a convincing argument that poor health & any kind of pollution don’t go hand in hand fair enough case closed, no beating around the bush you seem to have a problem with wood burners I can understand their popularity with the energy prices & think if people need to keep warm leave them be, my axe is with major companies pumping out the plumes. Good day.
-
- Posts: 8320
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2471 times
- Has Liked: 3530 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: Wood burners
Perhaps the old sphere of influence / sphere of concern kicked in there? Unless someone here has a hotline to industry and can ask them to add a filter to their chimneys?Belial wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 12:14 pmThere's quite a few inaccuracies there...I haven't said I have a problem with woodburners, I've stated the facts about them. Neither have I stated anywhere that pollution doesn't cause health issues! You seem dismissive of the facts regarding emissions from industry however...

This user liked this post: Belial
-
- Posts: 18751
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7700 times
- Has Liked: 1593 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wood burners
Jakub’s wafflings must be a significant contributor to global carbon emissions.
Re: Wood burners
That is quite an allegation!Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:41 amHealth & safety don't give a monkeys easily fobbed off or bribed they are pigheaded because I don't think they are funded by the government anymore or in part so need to recoup but things easily quieten down when a piece of paper with a queens head on is produced. It's cheaper for the companies to go down that avenue than spending sh1tloads on extraction & other H&S directives.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: Wood burners
This is a thread about domestic wood burners. What are the pros and cons of having a wood burning stove in a domestic setting?
What goes on in factories and other workplaces is important of course but it has no relevance to this thread. If anyone has issues on these matters it would be easy to start another thread. However the subject does not help a prospective buyer of a wood burner make their decision.
What goes on in factories and other workplaces is important of course but it has no relevance to this thread. If anyone has issues on these matters it would be easy to start another thread. However the subject does not help a prospective buyer of a wood burner make their decision.
-
- Posts: 1297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:19 pm
- Been Liked: 437 times
- Has Liked: 16 times
Re: Wood burners
So, can you recommend someone for me or not?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:48 amI’m taking my grandson out fishing so I’ll pick this up later, if you can present a convincing argument that poor health & any kind of pollution don’t go hand in hand fair enough case closed, no beating around the bush you seem to have a problem with wood burners I can understand their popularity with the energy prices & think if people need to keep warm leave them be, my axe is with major companies pumping out the plumes. Good day.

This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 11016
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1349 times
- Has Liked: 896 times
Re: Wood burners
For a thread that was started well over a month ago & along the way you've received good advice & now approaching spring if you haven't found somebody right by now I guess you never will

Re: Wood burners
You have to remember "A log burner is not just for Christmas"Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 4:32 pmFor a thread that was started well over a month ago & along the way you've received good advice & now approaching spring if you haven't found somebody right by now I guess you never will![]()
-
- Posts: 17372
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7835 times
Re: Wood burners
I know some posters really don't rate him but isn't burning him a bit extreme? 
