Southgate or Sir Alf?
-
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
- Been Liked: 544 times
- Has Liked: 1332 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Sir Alf, settled.
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Sir Alf every time
He would have dropped Kane after the second game realising he was past his best just like he didn’t pick Greaves when he was fit in 66
He would have dropped Kane after the second game realising he was past his best just like he didn’t pick Greaves when he was fit in 66
These 2 users liked this post: warksclaret SouthLondonexile
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
In 1966 & 1970 England were easily the best football team in the world and Sir Alf managed a win and a last 8 (B+). In the lats two Euro's England have ranked about 3rd or 4th best and we've come runners up twice (A-).
Saying Sir Alf is better than Southgate for winning the World cup is akin to saying Klopp is better than Dyche for taking Liverpool to 4th against Dyche taking Burnley to 7th in 17/18
Saying Sir Alf is better than Southgate for winning the World cup is akin to saying Klopp is better than Dyche for taking Liverpool to 4th against Dyche taking Burnley to 7th in 17/18
-
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1293 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Chucking the fishing rod in again, DA?Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 10:33 pmIn 1966 & 1970 England were easily the best football team in the world and Sir Alf managed a win and a last 8 (B+). In the lats two Euro's England have ranked about 3rd or 4th best and we've come runners up twice (A-).
Saying Sir Alf is better than Southgate for winning the World cup is akin to saying Klopp is better than Dyche for taking Liverpool to 4th against Dyche taking Burnley to 7th in 17/18
Bit too obvious, that bait.
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
-
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1293 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Sure you are, DA.
Never change
Never change
-
- Posts: 14750
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5693 times
- Has Liked: 5920 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
You've hit the nail on the head here.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 11:25 amWithout knowing much of Alf Ramsay's era, I presume he was thought to be the best manager in the league/country to get the England job?
I don't think international managers are the best in the country anymore?
It's correct to say that you can get lucky in small tournaments like world cups and euros.
But Sir Alf didn't get lucky winning the league and developing what became the template for most football teams for 30-40 years. He was the Pep Guardiola / Herbert Chapman of his day.
Southgate is just somebody who was working at the FA when the vacancy arose. If he gets another job as a club manager we'll see how he gets on and this debate can move on.
I'm just hoping and praying that his resignation comes soon.
These 2 users liked this post: CrosspoolClarets bobinho
-
- Posts: 8764
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2330 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Alf was a hell of a tactitioner, and an amazing analyst of the game. I have read his autobiography. The creator of the over lapping full back. He transformed Ball, Hurst, Peters into great players within a few rounds, and brought out the best of Jack Charlton and Nobby Stiles
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Sir Alf is without doubt a far better football manager than Southgate overall. The question is who is/was the best England (national football team) manager not who is the best English football manager.
As per my previous post I think most people without bias will agree Southgate is the best England (national football team) manager we have ever had.
Really hope he gives us another two years
As per my previous post I think most people without bias will agree Southgate is the best England (national football team) manager we have ever had.
Really hope he gives us another two years
-
- Posts: 14750
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5693 times
- Has Liked: 5920 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Ah, well it's easy then isn't it? It's the one who won the World Cup!Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 10:48 pmSir Alf is without doubt a far better football manager than Southgate overall. The question is who is/was the best England (national football team) manager not who is the best English football manager.
Sometimes, your online persona's "opinions" speak for themselves, "Devil's Advocate".
Like the real person behind your online character, I'm hoping Southgate resigns and tbh is love to see him rock up at Ewood Park. I'm relieved and grateful he wasn't in the running before we appointed Parker.
-
- Posts: 6866
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1999 times
- Has Liked: 510 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Has there been a manager to bring a side up and win the league in their next season? Probably, but I struggle to recall it.Rowls wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 10:42 pmYou've hit the nail on the head here.
It's correct to say that you can get lucky in small tournaments like world cups and euros.
But Sir Alf didn't get lucky winning the league and developing what became the template for most football teams for 30-40 years. He was the Pep Guardiola / Herbert Chapman of his day.
Southgate is just somebody who was working at the FA when the vacancy arose. If he gets another job as a club manager we'll see how he gets on and this debate can move on.
I'm just hoping and praying that his resignation comes soon.
Southgate has done a lot of good, let’s be clear, he has changed the mentality, but he isn’t Sir Alf, and we need a new name to change it further.
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
I'm suggesting just judge them only on their performance at international level. Im saying coming 1st and joint 5th with the best team on the planet is not as good as coming 2nd twice with the joint 3rd best team.Rowls wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 10:54 pmAh, well it's easy then isn't it? It's the one who won the World Cup!
Sometimes, your online persona's "opinions" speak for themselves, "Devil's Advocate".
Like the real person behind your online character, I'm hoping Southgate resigns and tbh is love to see him rock up at Ewood Park. I'm relieved and grateful he wasn't in the running before we appointed Parker.
If you're going to point out winning something makes all the difference then tell me to you think Pep winning the league with Man City is a better achievement than Dyche finishing 7th with Burnley?
-
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1293 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
I’ll assume you’re being serious then DA
A manager who drew with Uruguay, beats Mexico, France, Argentina, Portugal and eliminates West Germany to win a tournament vs a man who beat Serbia, drew with Slovenia, Denmark, Slovakia and Switzerland before beating the Netherlands and losing to Spain.
And were supposed to think the latter did a better job because he had the 3rd best team in the world and not the best?
A manager who drew with Uruguay, beats Mexico, France, Argentina, Portugal and eliminates West Germany to win a tournament vs a man who beat Serbia, drew with Slovenia, Denmark, Slovakia and Switzerland before beating the Netherlands and losing to Spain.
And were supposed to think the latter did a better job because he had the 3rd best team in the world and not the best?
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
I think relatively speaking Southgate has over achieved more and performed better as England manager in his 8 years than Ramsey did in his 10 years. The only real argument for Ramsey is he won the top prize but on that basis you would need to think that Pep winning the Premier League was a better achievement than Dyche taking Burnley to 7th and into Europe and if you think that then I think you are clueless.Darthlaw wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 11:22 pmI’ll assume you’re being serious then DA
A manager who drew with Uruguay, beats Mexico, France, Argentina, Portugal and eliminates West Germany to win a tournament vs a man who beat Serbia, drew with Slovenia, Denmark, Slovakia and Switzerland before beating the Netherlands and losing to Spain.
And were supposed to think the latter did a better job because he had the 3rd best team in the world and not the best?
-
- Posts: 14750
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5693 times
- Has Liked: 5920 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Brian Clough did it with his Forest side. Howard Wilkinson at Leeds in 1992?CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 10:56 pmHas there been a manager to bring a side up and win the league in their next season? Probably, but I struggle to recall it.
Southgate has done a lot of good, let’s be clear, he has changed the mentality, but he isn’t Sir Alf, and we need a new name to change it further.
Can't think of anybody since then.
-
- Posts: 14750
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5693 times
- Has Liked: 5920 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Lol.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 10:58 pmI'm suggesting just judge them only on their performance at international level. Im saying coming 1st and joint 5th with the best team on the planet is not as good as coming 2nd twice with the joint 3rd best team.
If you're going to point out winning something makes all the difference then tell me to you think Pep winning the league with Man City is a better achievement than Dyche finishing 7th with Burnley?
It'd be nice to know if you've got a real username so we can match up the genuine opinions with the DA stuff.
-
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 1:35 pm
- Been Liked: 111 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Here’s my second contribution:
The best England manager we ever had was Terry Venables. I’m only sorry his reign was cut short.
Here’s the thing the best manager we should have had was Brian Clough unquestionably.
The best England manager we ever had was Terry Venables. I’m only sorry his reign was cut short.
Here’s the thing the best manager we should have had was Brian Clough unquestionably.
-
- Posts: 2953
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 758 times
- Has Liked: 721 times
- Location: Château d'If
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
bloody daft question.
-
- Posts: 3055
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 531 times
- Has Liked: 2435 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
Pottsy better than both
-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
He was England’s first ever manager in that his predecessor Walter Winterbottom had teams chosen by selectors. When the FA decided to go with a full time manager they offered the job to Jimmy Adamson who was still a player at Burnley.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 11:25 amWithout knowing much of Alf Ramsay's era, I presume he was thought to be the best manager in the league/country to get the England job?
I don't think international managers are the best in the country anymore?
Adamson turned it down and they chose Ramsey who had taken Ipswich up to the first division and then won it a year later.
This user liked this post: Quickenthetempo
-
- Posts: 20610
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4542 times
- Has Liked: 2047 times
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
I just about remember the Adamson/England episode.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:29 pmHe was England’s first ever manager in that his predecessor Walter Winterbottom had teams chosen by selectors. When the FA decided to go with a full time manager they offered the job to Jimmy Adamson who was still a player at Burnley.
Adamson turned it down and they chose Ramsey who had taken Ipswich up to the first division and then won it a year later.
(My dad talked about it)
Is it known why JA turned down the job?
-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Southgate or Sir Alf?
I think he said he wanted to continue playing but Ramsey took the job in 1963 at a time when Adamson's playing career hadn't much time left.
This user liked this post: ElectroClaret