Millwall Next Game-Strikers

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
BleedingClaret
Posts: 4007
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 1181 times
Has Liked: 1920 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Millwall Next Game-Strikers

Post by BleedingClaret » Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:29 pm

dougcollins wrote:
Mon Oct 28, 2024 6:43 pm
Just pretend Koleosho is Tella, play him more central and lob the ball over the top for him.

CJ could probably find him most times.
I’ve been saying the same

IanMcL
Posts: 34711
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6932 times
Has Liked: 10339 times

Re: Millwall Next Game-Strikers

Post by IanMcL » Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:07 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:04 pm
I bet you're proud of that.
No I wish he was!

AGENT_CLARET
Posts: 4175
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
Been Liked: 1432 times
Has Liked: 1585 times

Re: Millwall Next Game-Strikers

Post by AGENT_CLARET » Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:11 pm

I think Parker will go with v Millwall

--------------Trafford

Roberts---Egan-Riley---Esteve---Pires

---------Cullen-----Brownhill

Koleosho-----Laurent-----Anthony

-------------Rodriguez

RVclaret
Posts: 16411
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4523 times
Has Liked: 3045 times

Re: Millwall Next Game-Strikers

Post by RVclaret » Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:19 pm

Since when has Laurent ever played in that position? I’d be amazed if he plays as a number 10 given his profile. I could see the normal 4-3-3 shape with Laurent as an 8 alongside Cullen as the 6 and Brownhill the other 8 though.

Mattster
Posts: 1993
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:02 am
Been Liked: 498 times
Has Liked: 187 times

Re: Millwall Next Game-Strikers

Post by Mattster » Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:39 pm

AGENT_CLARET wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:11 pm
I think Parker will go with v Millwall

--------------Trafford

Roberts---Egan-Riley---Esteve---Pires

---------Cullen-----Brownhill

Koleosho-----Laurent-----Anthony

-------------Rodriguez
Think we'll see Humphreys at left back, Millwall are better going forwards than the other sides we've recently faced so I reckon Parker will opt for more caution.

summitclaret
Posts: 4549
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1020 times
Has Liked: 1606 times
Location: burnley

Re: Millwall Next Game-Strikers

Post by summitclaret » Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:39 pm

Mattster wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:39 pm
Think we'll see Humphreys at left back, Millwall are better going forwards than the other sides we've recently faced so I reckon Parker will opt for more caution.
Be madness not to include Basher. Have you seen the size of their centre half?

ChorltonCharlie
Posts: 924
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:57 am
Been Liked: 396 times
Has Liked: 85 times

Re: Millwall Next Game-Strikers

Post by ChorltonCharlie » Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:51 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:19 pm
Since when has Laurent ever played in that position? I’d be amazed if he plays as a number 10 given his profile. I could see the normal 4-3-3 shape with Laurent as an 8 alongside Cullen as the 6 and Brownhill the other 8 though.
I think some of our fans really struggle to understand that teams don't need to play with 2 strikers or 1 striker and an attacking midfielder just behind.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

AfloatinClaret
Posts: 2421
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
Been Liked: 748 times
Has Liked: 1950 times

Re: Millwall Next Game-Strikers

Post by AfloatinClaret » Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:21 pm

Why is Flemming ineligible? I thought we'd bought him rather than loaned him an my understanding was that you could refuse permission for one of your loanees not to take the field against you, but not someone whom you'd sold.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12670 times
Has Liked: 6311 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Millwall Next Game-Strikers

Post by Vegas Claret » Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:55 pm

AfloatinClaret wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:21 pm
Why is Flemming ineligible? I thought we'd bought him rather than loaned him an my understanding was that you could refuse permission for one of your loanees not to take the field against you, but not someone whom you'd sold.
He's on loan with an obligation to buy
This user liked this post: AfloatinClaret

Post Reply