Subs cost us that game

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
claretspice
Posts: 6435
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3179 times
Has Liked: 151 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by claretspice » Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:48 am

123EasyasBFC wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:18 am
I can’t get behind the subs costing us the game, until the subs we were second best in the second half and Boro should have been 3-1 up. 3 then had 2 massive chances to play Anthony and brownhill in and didn’t both times, I think people are clutching for something to moan about Parker because we didn’t win
Parker absolutely had to change things. I was just a bit surprised with the options he took.

Sheedyclaret
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:44 am
Been Liked: 199 times
Has Liked: 48 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by Sheedyclaret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:52 am

MG70 wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2024 5:27 am
That’s the spirit :roll:
No that’s the reality

NL Claret
Posts: 2808
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 343 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by NL Claret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:13 am

I've just woke up and noticed the title of the thread, had to check the result on flash score.

blatherwickstattoos
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
Been Liked: 454 times
Has Liked: 641 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by blatherwickstattoos » Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:21 am

NL Claret wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:13 am
I've just woke up and noticed the title of the thread, had to check the result on flash score.
I meant cost is the Win lol. My hands and brain were defrosting . Not a bad point like I said more positives than negatives but the subs made no impact that’s all.

Blyclaret
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by Blyclaret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:24 am

Sheedyclaret wrote:
Fri Dec 06, 2024 11:03 pm
And then what get relegated again shudder at the thought of this team in the premier league
I have a very good solution for u. **** off and support someone else.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77613
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37985 times
Has Liked: 5767 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by ClaretTony » Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:37 am

blatherwickstattoos wrote:
Fri Dec 06, 2024 10:24 pm

Another 2 points dropped in my eyes but we keep moving forward .
Coming from behind in those conditions is very much a point won unless you are looking for something negative

Clovius Boofus
Posts: 2389
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1069 times
Has Liked: 328 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by Clovius Boofus » Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:42 am

Reality doesn't matter to those who perpetually search for negativity, even after an entertaining game that was played in utterly horrendous conditions against a decent team.

blatherwickstattoos
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
Been Liked: 454 times
Has Liked: 641 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by blatherwickstattoos » Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:42 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:37 am
Coming from behind in those conditions is very much a point won unless you are looking for something negative
As I’ve said more positives than negatives but the use of Hannibal out wide was the baffling one. Slowed down our attacking threat.

brexit
Posts: 1908
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
Been Liked: 279 times
Has Liked: 66 times
Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by brexit » Sat Dec 07, 2024 10:24 am

I think numerous things that we all knew were highlighted last night as we played the best team I have seen at home this season.
1. We only have two starting wingers
2. Saramento prefers to play as a number 10
3. Flemming is always on the shoulder of the last defender looking for a ball over the top, but never receives it.
4. Jay is not the striker he used to be but plays a role ala harry kane in picking up the ball deep.
5. Kolesho always wants to beat one more man and normally fails
6. We have too many similar midfielders laurent, cullen, brownhill and hannibal
7. No-one has nailed the left back position.
8. Trafford has improved and is a steady keeper.
9. Our free kicks and corners are terrible (we average 7 corners a match at home)

warksclaret
Posts: 8715
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2321 times
Has Liked: 1287 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by warksclaret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 10:46 am

I think its time Koleosho was rested and made the "impact sub", particularly now we have Redmond approaching fitness. Koleosho runs his socks off and comes back defensively on many occasions, however when deep he thinks he can dribble his way into an attacking position and often loses or gives away the ball. Foster is hopefully not far away allowing Sarmiento to go wide with Anthony, and possibly even allowing Fleming to be the genuine No 10, particularly against lower opposition

Anthony seems to get some stick on here but he is often the player to generate something with his forays and crosses, and yesterday I thought his corner delivery was the best since the McNeil/Westwood era

HurstGrangeClaret
Posts: 296
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:43 am
Been Liked: 137 times
Has Liked: 92 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by HurstGrangeClaret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 11:29 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:37 am
Coming from behind in those conditions is very much a point won unless you are looking for something negative
For me, it was definitely a point won.
Found it quite alarming how many decent chances they created in the second half.
You can argue all day about the subs but realistically, we have to be happy that our home record is still intact. Boro will be one of the better teams we play.

GDK
Posts: 80
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:50 pm
Been Liked: 35 times
Has Liked: 104 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by GDK » Sat Dec 07, 2024 11:51 am

Boro were by far the best team we have faced at home so far this season. A point is fine. All the substitutions seemed to make sense at the time, but it can't be easy coming into a game like that, in those conditions, and trying to immediately make an impact.

I agree, definitely a point gained rather than two lost.
These 2 users liked this post: nil_desperandum boatshed bill

Blyclaret
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by Blyclaret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 12:00 pm

blatherwickstattoos wrote:
Fri Dec 06, 2024 11:19 pm
Cost us the win * edit
Honestly .. do you think we are going to win or rather should win every game …

NL Claret
Posts: 2808
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 343 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by NL Claret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 12:00 pm

Said it before and I'll say it again.

I'm sure if it's arrogance, entitlement or unrealistic expectations or all 3.

Which club wins every game? We don't win and moaning starts.

blatherwickstattoos
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
Been Liked: 454 times
Has Liked: 641 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by blatherwickstattoos » Sat Dec 07, 2024 12:05 pm

Blyclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2024 12:00 pm
Honestly .. do you think we are going to win or rather should win every game …
I just thought we could have pushed them a bit more second half. They were there for the taking at points

123EasyasBFC
Posts: 6776
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 1282 times
Has Liked: 330 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by 123EasyasBFC » Sat Dec 07, 2024 12:27 pm

claretspice wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:48 am
Parker absolutely had to change things. I was just a bit surprised with the options he took.
Hannibal didn’t need to come on but the other subs were fine

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2770
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1451 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by daveisaclaret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 12:27 pm

It's hard to understand for me, but it's now seen as a bad thing by lots of posters on here if you think Burnley are good and should do well.
This user liked this post: blatherwickstattoos

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6810
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2125 times
Has Liked: 1061 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Dec 07, 2024 12:33 pm

Middlesbrough had the advantage of the weather last night. First half when they were kicking against the wind it was nowhere near as blustery as it was when we were kicking against the wind.

blatherwickstattoos
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
Been Liked: 454 times
Has Liked: 641 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by blatherwickstattoos » Sat Dec 07, 2024 12:35 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2024 12:27 pm
It's hard to understand for me, but it's now seen as a bad thing by lots of posters on here if you think Burnley are good and should do well.
Exactly this. It’s like you can’t have an opinion without super fans putting you down. I’m happy with a point in the end like I’ve said but I do feel the Hannibal sub and position maybe cost us the 3 points. You’d think I’ve had said something way out line with some of the replies

AfloatinClaret
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
Been Liked: 748 times
Has Liked: 1956 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by AfloatinClaret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 1:48 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Fri Dec 06, 2024 10:28 pm
The poor final balls from several players cost us the game, opting to shoot rather than pass to a teammate in a better position.
Conversely, there have been innumerable posts (perhaps one or more were your own?) on previous match reviews where the players have been getting berated for trying to put in an extra pass, rather than accepting responsibility and taking the shot; we can't have it both ways.

kentonclaret
Posts: 8014
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1204 times
Has Liked: 249 times

Re: Subs cost us that game

Post by kentonclaret » Sat Dec 07, 2024 2:30 pm

Scott Parker has worked miracles in his time at Burnley given the lack of any real attacking options from the bench. Yesterday Middlesbrough were able to bring on Latte Lath who had scored 6 goals in his last 8 games whilst Burnley brought on Flemming who probably won’t score 6 goals all season. Today Leeds freshened up their attack from the bench bringing on Gnonto and Mateo Joseph. Some smart recruitment needed in January if we are to maintain a promotion push.
This user liked this post: blatherwickstattoos

Post Reply